Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

[Ray From Cleveland]

WTF do you think we have judges for? In your line of thinking, once a jury finds a subject guilty, they should just hit the enter button on their laptop to spit out the sentence instead of having a judge do it.

We have judges to weigh the circumstance of the crime. You don't give a public servant, who put their life on the line everyday to protect the public, the same sentence as you do with a drug dealer who killed somebody over a bad dope deal, that had a criminal history back to their juvenile days.

Accidents happen all the time. But an accident is not intentional. A judge understands that. The judge also understands that a police officer has a long list of enemies because of the nature of a police officers job. A badge only gives you so much protection against a bullet. That's why most police officers carry off duty.

She made a deadly mistake, and she's paying for it with ten years of her life, plus having to live with the guilt of killing an innocent man until she dies herself. That's why we have judges.

The OP says Murderers should be executed.

She was convicted of murder.

You should debate the OP when she lands on a position.

I think we all know what he means by that......well.....at least those of us on the right do.

Well...what does the OP mean? ‘ Murderers should be executed’ is what she said....

I think we all know he meant cold blooded murderers, not people that shot somebody by accident. Besides, her crime fits manslaughter more than murder. The charge was actually bogus to begin with. The judge realized that.

Shooting a man in his own home and not performing CPR. Pretty cold blooded.

And you want to call it manslaughter?

Manslaughter is a non-intentional homicide. If I get in a fight at a bar, and I accidentally killed the guy, that's manslaughter. I had no intent to kill him.

 

[candycorn]

I’m against the death penalty.

But I fail to see how one murder gets 10 years and another murder gets a death penalty.

Of course you’re against the death penalty. You validate the OP perfectly.

So amber Guyger should get the death penalty?

Are you going to wimp out and not answer?

Topic is not debating every case. Topic is the left being soft on murderers letting them murder again.

You’re okay with murderers getting 10 years only fuck face.

That you can’t support your OP is funny as hell.

Thanks for the batting practice

Your dumbass strawman shows how stupid you are.

It’s a real case fuck face.

Sorry that you’re for letting convicted murderers out of prison. But that is the truth.

Again thanks for the batting practice

 

[Weatherman2020]

Of course you’re against the death penalty. You validate the OP perfectly.

So amber Guyger should get the death penalty?

Are you going to wimp out and not answer?

Topic is not debating every case. Topic is the left being soft on murderers letting them murder again.

You’re okay with murderers getting 10 years only fuck face.

That you can’t support your OP is funny as hell.

Thanks for the batting practice

Your dumbass strawman shows how stupid you are.

It’s a real case fuck face.

Sorry that you’re for letting convicted murderers out of prison. But that is the truth.

Again thanks for the batting practice

Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

Read it. Read it a second time. A third.

 

[candycorn]

So amber Guyger should get the death penalty?

Are you going to wimp out and not answer?

Topic is not debating every case. Topic is the left being soft on murderers letting them murder again.

You’re okay with murderers getting 10 years only fuck face.

That you can’t support your OP is funny as hell.

Thanks for the batting practice

Your dumbass strawman shows how stupid you are.

It’s a real case fuck face.

Sorry that you’re for letting convicted murderers out of prison. But that is the truth.

Again thanks for the batting practice

Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

Read it. Read it a second time. A third.

“Start executing murderers then.”

Fact she was found guilty of murder.

So why don’t you want her executed?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Topic is not debating every case. Topic is the left being soft on murderers letting them murder again.

You’re okay with murderers getting 10 years only fuck face.

That you can’t support your OP is funny as hell.

Thanks for the batting practice

Your dumbass strawman shows how stupid you are.

It’s a real case fuck face.

Sorry that you’re for letting convicted murderers out of prison. But that is the truth.

Again thanks for the batting practice

Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

Read it. Read it a second time. A third.

“Start executing murderers then.”

Fact she was found guilty of murder.

So why don’t you want her executed?

Dumbass. I said read it and you didn’t. otherwise you’d now know there is murder and degrees of murder and there is manslaughter and various degrees of manslaughter.

Freaks like you want 1st degree murderers to live to murder again.

 

[candycorn]

You’re okay with murderers getting 10 years only fuck face.

That you can’t support your OP is funny as hell.

Thanks for the batting practice

Your dumbass strawman shows how stupid you are.

It’s a real case fuck face.

Sorry that you’re for letting convicted murderers out of prison. But that is the truth.

Again thanks for the batting practice

Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

Read it. Read it a second time. A third.

“Start executing murderers then.”

Fact she was found guilty of murder.

So why don’t you want her executed?

Dumbass. I said read it and you didn’t. otherwise you’d now know there is murder and degrees of murder and there is manslaughter and various degrees of manslaughter.

Freaks like you want 1st degree murderers to live to murder again.

She was convicted of murder.
She was not convicted of manslaughter.

So either you want murderers executed or you don’t. Apparently you’re soft on crime because you don’t want this convicted murderer executed and are okay with her getting the light slap on the wrist she got.

For the record, the stance I have is this: if you’re convicted of murder...life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

Takes murderers off the street. You want them to get out in 10 years.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Your dumbass strawman shows how stupid you are.

It’s a real case fuck face.

Sorry that you’re for letting convicted murderers out of prison. But that is the truth.

Again thanks for the batting practice

Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

Read it. Read it a second time. A third.

“Start executing murderers then.”

Fact she was found guilty of murder.

So why don’t you want her executed?

Dumbass. I said read it and you didn’t. otherwise you’d now know there is murder and degrees of murder and there is manslaughter and various degrees of manslaughter.

Freaks like you want 1st degree murderers to live to murder again.

She was convicted of murder.
She was not convicted of manslaughter.

So either you want murderers executed or you don’t. Apparently you’re soft on crime because you don’t want this convicted murderer executed and are okay with her getting the light slap on the wrist she got.

For the record, the stance I have is this: if you’re convicted of murder...life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

Takes murderers off the street. You want them to get out in 10 years.

So let me get this straight: you want a woman who accidentally shot somebody thinking she was in her own apartment, to get the same life sentence as some guy, who tortured, raped, and then set two teenage girls on fire to their death?

Is that what you really want to see?

 

[candycorn]

It’s a real case fuck face.

Sorry that you’re for letting convicted murderers out of prison. But that is the truth.

Again thanks for the batting practice

Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

Read it. Read it a second time. A third.

“Start executing murderers then.”

Fact she was found guilty of murder.

So why don’t you want her executed?

Dumbass. I said read it and you didn’t. otherwise you’d now know there is murder and degrees of murder and there is manslaughter and various degrees of manslaughter.

Freaks like you want 1st degree murderers to live to murder again.

She was convicted of murder.
She was not convicted of manslaughter.

So either you want murderers executed or you don’t. Apparently you’re soft on crime because you don’t want this convicted murderer executed and are okay with her getting the light slap on the wrist she got.

For the record, the stance I have is this: if you’re convicted of murder...life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

Takes murderers off the street. You want them to get out in 10 years.

So let me get this straight: you want a woman who accidentally shot somebody thinking she was in her own apartment, to get the same life sentence as some guy, who tortured, raped, and then set two teenage girls on fire to their death?

Is that what you really want to see?

Yes.

the victims are equally dead so the punishment should be equal in the eyes of the law.

people make mistakes...and people pay for them.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Want to Cut Murders by 22.5%?

Read it. Read it a second time. A third.

“Start executing murderers then.”

Fact she was found guilty of murder.

So why don’t you want her executed?

Dumbass. I said read it and you didn’t. otherwise you’d now know there is murder and degrees of murder and there is manslaughter and various degrees of manslaughter.

Freaks like you want 1st degree murderers to live to murder again.

She was convicted of murder.
She was not convicted of manslaughter.

So either you want murderers executed or you don’t. Apparently you’re soft on crime because you don’t want this convicted murderer executed and are okay with her getting the light slap on the wrist she got.

For the record, the stance I have is this: if you’re convicted of murder...life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

Takes murderers off the street. You want them to get out in 10 years.

So let me get this straight: you want a woman who accidentally shot somebody thinking she was in her own apartment, to get the same life sentence as some guy, who tortured, raped, and then set two teenage girls on fire to their death?

Is that what you really want to see?

Yes.

the victims are equally dead so the punishment should be equal in the eyes of the law.

people make mistakes...and people pay for them.

Okay, so walk me through this:

One of these 13 year old girls was your daughter. This maniac raped her, tortured her, set her afire, and all you can imagine is your helpless daughter screaming in pain nobody can imagine, and kept screaming until her final breath. And the murderer gets life in prison, where your tax money feeds him, takes care of his medical necessities, provides him cable television and a workout room. You're satisfied with that?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Start executing murderers then.
This study shows 22.5% of murderers murder again.
Yet this is never discussed concerning violence.
If was was just 1% it would be worthy of addressing.
Fits right into why the Left like releasing criminals - they want a higher murder high to grab guns.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ed_Murderers_Who_Murder_Again_While_on_Parole

Thought you were going to say ban guns.
Easy. Like every other civilized country.
Not here, a violent nation based on convicts and religious nuts

Those idiots in other countries never had a Constitutional right to bear arms. The first thing Authoritarians and Socialist controlled governments do is ban private firearms ownership. The Government should be afraid of its citizens not the other way around.

 

[candycorn]

“Start executing murderers then.”

Fact she was found guilty of murder.

So why don’t you want her executed?

Dumbass. I said read it and you didn’t. otherwise you’d now know there is murder and degrees of murder and there is manslaughter and various degrees of manslaughter.

Freaks like you want 1st degree murderers to live to murder again.

She was convicted of murder.
She was not convicted of manslaughter.

So either you want murderers executed or you don’t. Apparently you’re soft on crime because you don’t want this convicted murderer executed and are okay with her getting the light slap on the wrist she got.

For the record, the stance I have is this: if you’re convicted of murder...life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

Takes murderers off the street. You want them to get out in 10 years.

So let me get this straight: you want a woman who accidentally shot somebody thinking she was in her own apartment, to get the same life sentence as some guy, who tortured, raped, and then set two teenage girls on fire to their death?

Is that what you really want to see?

Yes.

the victims are equally dead so the punishment should be equal in the eyes of the law.

people make mistakes...and people pay for them.

Okay, so walk me through this:

One of these 13 year old girls was your daughter. This maniac raped her, tortured her, set her afire, and all you can imagine is your helpless daughter screaming in pain nobody can imagine, and kept screaming until her final breath. And the murderer gets life in prison, where your tax money feeds him, takes care of his medical necessities, provides him cable television and a workout room. You're satisfied with that?

Strawman alert!

In the eyes of the law, murder should be murder with the same sentence. Regardless of perpetrator, regardless of victim.

This is why juries are screened to make sure they aren’t family members and are impartial.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Dumbass. I said read it and you didn’t. otherwise you’d now know there is murder and degrees of murder and there is manslaughter and various degrees of manslaughter.

Freaks like you want 1st degree murderers to live to murder again.

She was convicted of murder.
She was not convicted of manslaughter.

So either you want murderers executed or you don’t. Apparently you’re soft on crime because you don’t want this convicted murderer executed and are okay with her getting the light slap on the wrist she got.

For the record, the stance I have is this: if you’re convicted of murder...life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

Takes murderers off the street. You want them to get out in 10 years.

So let me get this straight: you want a woman who accidentally shot somebody thinking she was in her own apartment, to get the same life sentence as some guy, who tortured, raped, and then set two teenage girls on fire to their death?

Is that what you really want to see?

Yes.

the victims are equally dead so the punishment should be equal in the eyes of the law.

people make mistakes...and people pay for them.

Okay, so walk me through this:

One of these 13 year old girls was your daughter. This maniac raped her, tortured her, set her afire, and all you can imagine is your helpless daughter screaming in pain nobody can imagine, and kept screaming until her final breath. And the murderer gets life in prison, where your tax money feeds him, takes care of his medical necessities, provides him cable television and a workout room. You're satisfied with that?

Strawman alert!

In the eyes of the law, murder should be murder with the same sentence. Regardless of perpetrator, regardless of victim.

This is why juries are screened to make sure they aren’t family members and are impartial.

You didn't answer the question.

 

[candycorn]

She was convicted of murder.
She was not convicted of manslaughter.

So either you want murderers executed or you don’t. Apparently you’re soft on crime because you don’t want this convicted murderer executed and are okay with her getting the light slap on the wrist she got.

For the record, the stance I have is this: if you’re convicted of murder...life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

Takes murderers off the street. You want them to get out in 10 years.

So let me get this straight: you want a woman who accidentally shot somebody thinking she was in her own apartment, to get the same life sentence as some guy, who tortured, raped, and then set two teenage girls on fire to their death?

Is that what you really want to see?

Yes.

the victims are equally dead so the punishment should be equal in the eyes of the law.

people make mistakes...and people pay for them.

Okay, so walk me through this:

One of these 13 year old girls was your daughter. This maniac raped her, tortured her, set her afire, and all you can imagine is your helpless daughter screaming in pain nobody can imagine, and kept screaming until her final breath. And the murderer gets life in prison, where your tax money feeds him, takes care of his medical necessities, provides him cable television and a workout room. You're satisfied with that?

Strawman alert!

In the eyes of the law, murder should be murder with the same sentence. Regardless of perpetrator, regardless of victim.

This is why juries are screened to make sure they aren’t family members and are impartial.

You didn't answer the question.

The answer for the hopelessly dense is “yes”.


Your turn.

The op prescribed this as the way to reduce the murder rate...

““Start executing murderers then.”


Amber Guyger was convicted of murder. Should she be executed? If not, then isn’t the OP full of shit?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Start executing murderers then.
This study shows 22.5% of murderers murder again.
Yet this is never discussed concerning violence.
If was was just 1% it would be worthy of addressing.
Fits right into why the Left like releasing criminals - they want a higher murder high to grab guns.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ed_Murderers_Who_Murder_Again_While_on_Parole

You are consumed with the opposite of TDS: You've got RRDS: Radical right derangement syndrome.
You're talking about 1/2 of this country when you open your pie hole and let the flies out with such stupid logic.

Why didn't you just say, "I have no response" ?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

A Dallas cop got 10 years for murdering a man in his own apartment.

Blaming liberals is disingenuous to the core, just like the blob and his supporters

So you think the cop went home, went into the wrong apartment, and shot a man, because that was their intent all along?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So let me get this straight: you want a woman who accidentally shot somebody thinking she was in her own apartment, to get the same life sentence as some guy, who tortured, raped, and then set two teenage girls on fire to their death?

Is that what you really want to see?

Yes.

the victims are equally dead so the punishment should be equal in the eyes of the law.

people make mistakes...and people pay for them.

Okay, so walk me through this:

One of these 13 year old girls was your daughter. This maniac raped her, tortured her, set her afire, and all you can imagine is your helpless daughter screaming in pain nobody can imagine, and kept screaming until her final breath. And the murderer gets life in prison, where your tax money feeds him, takes care of his medical necessities, provides him cable television and a workout room. You're satisfied with that?

Strawman alert!

In the eyes of the law, murder should be murder with the same sentence. Regardless of perpetrator, regardless of victim.

This is why juries are screened to make sure they aren’t family members and are impartial.

You didn't answer the question.

The answer for the hopelessly dense is “yes”.


Your turn.

The op prescribed this as the way to reduce the murder rate...

““Start executing murderers then.”


Amber Guyger was convicted of murder. Should she be executed? If not, then isn’t the OP full of shit?

Well it's a shame you answered yes. What that tells me is you have no loved ones in your life, or people in your life you really care much about. Because you see......if somebody did that to my young daughter, the only partial satisfaction I could get is seeing them die in shame; the way my innocent daughter did. And that aside, any immediate family member of mine.

On the other side of the coin, if we had the death penalty for any murder regardless of circumstance, then the jury of that officer would have to weigh whether they want to put somebody to death for a mistake. More than likely, they would have voted not guilty, and she wouldn't have spent one day in prison yet alone death.

It's also a shame you don't understand the point of the OP. What we do understand is liberals need to be spoken to like children. We need to spell out every single detail. In fact, if our founders could have foreseen liberals in our future, the US Constitution would be over 100 pages long, mostly to include color pictures so even liberals could understand it.

 

[candycorn]

Life in prison, no parole. Every murder, every time.

A Dallas cop got 10 years for murdering a man in his own apartment.

Blaming liberals is disingenuous to the core, just like the blob and his supporters

So you think the cop went home, went into the wrong apartment, and shot a man, because that was their intent all along?

Don’t know. I do know the jury who heard the evidence convicted her of murder. So she is a murderer.

 

[candycorn]

Yes.

the victims are equally dead so the punishment should be equal in the eyes of the law.

people make mistakes...and people pay for them.

Okay, so walk me through this:

One of these 13 year old girls was your daughter. This maniac raped her, tortured her, set her afire, and all you can imagine is your helpless daughter screaming in pain nobody can imagine, and kept screaming until her final breath. And the murderer gets life in prison, where your tax money feeds him, takes care of his medical necessities, provides him cable television and a workout room. You're satisfied with that?

Strawman alert!

In the eyes of the law, murder should be murder with the same sentence. Regardless of perpetrator, regardless of victim.

This is why juries are screened to make sure they aren’t family members and are impartial.

You didn't answer the question.

The answer for the hopelessly dense is “yes”.


Your turn.

The op prescribed this as the way to reduce the murder rate...

““Start executing murderers then.”


Amber Guyger was convicted of murder. Should she be executed? If not, then isn’t the OP full of shit?

Well it's a shame you answered yes. What that tells me is you have no loved ones in your life, or people in your life you really care much about. Because you see......if somebody did that to my young daughter, the only partial satisfaction I could get is seeing them die in shame; the way my innocent daughter did. And that aside, any immediate family member of mine.

On the other side of the coin, if we had the death penalty for any murder regardless of circumstance, then the jury of that officer would have to weigh whether they want to put somebody to death for a mistake. More than likely, they would have voted not guilty, and she wouldn't have spent one day in prison yet alone death.

It's also a shame you don't understand the point of the OP. What we do understand is liberals need to be spoken to like children. We need to spell out every single detail. In fact, if our founders could have foreseen liberals in our future, the US Constitution would be over 100 pages long, mostly to include color pictures so even liberals could understand it.

It’s a shame that you want to see murderers get out of prison after serving less time than someone who breaks into a house.

You girls are so emotional and want to treat murderers with kid gloves. Perhaps you should grow up.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That was not first degree murder.

So now you are for a 10 year sentence and release of convicted murderers?

Stop putting words in my mouth.

If you’re too stupid to not know the categories of crimes, it explains why you’re so ignorant on the topic.

So what do you think should happen to the murderer Amber Guyger? Earlier it was the death penalty. What is your story now?

The death penalty would be fine with me. If you carry a gun and are irresponsible enough to walk into the wrong apartment and kill the innocent person in their own apartment then you should face the ultimate penalty. I believe all non criminal Americans should be able to carry without a permit but should be responsible gun owners and users. Responsible people know what apartment is theirs.

I’m against the death penalty.

But I fail to see how one murder gets 10 years and another murder gets a death penalty.

That's because you are an idiot.

 

[candycorn]

So now you are for a 10 year sentence and release of convicted murderers?

Stop putting words in my mouth.

If you’re too stupid to not know the categories of crimes, it explains why you’re so ignorant on the topic.

So what do you think should happen to the murderer Amber Guyger? Earlier it was the death penalty. What is your story now?

The death penalty would be fine with me. If you carry a gun and are irresponsible enough to walk into the wrong apartment and kill the innocent person in their own apartment then you should face the ultimate penalty. I believe all non criminal Americans should be able to carry without a permit but should be responsible gun owners and users. Responsible people know what apartment is theirs.

I’m against the death penalty.

But I fail to see how one murder gets 10 years and another murder gets a death penalty.

That's because you are an idiot.

takes one to know one I suppose.