You're a fucking retarded dumb ass marxist POS.See page 40 ratio of benefits to taxes:
http://www.hks.harvard.edu/jeffreyliebman/distcurrfinalv2.pdf
If your income is less than 50 percent of the poverty line you receive 89.64 times more in SS benefits than you put in.
If your income is between 50 to 100 percent of the poverty line you receive 7.49 times more in SS than you put in.
If your income is between 100 to 200 percent of the poverty line you receive 2.28 times more in SS than you put in.
If your income is between 200 to 300 percent of the poverty line you receive 0.82% percent of what you put in.
If your income is greater than three times the poverty line you receive 26% of what you put in.
So, NO you didn't read the link I provided
Social Security Does Not Redistribute Income
"Social Security does not redistribute from people who are rich over their lifetime to those who are poor. In fact, it may even be slightly regressive."
In The Progressivity of Social Security (NBER Working Paper No. 7520), the authors concentrate on redistribution within, rather than across, generations. The Social Security benefit formula explicitly transfers money from people who earned more during their working years to those who earned less. This is why it is commonly seen as a progressive program. And, most economic studies have confirmed that Social Security is redistributive.
But the common perception and these previous studies fail to include a range of relevant individual characteristics that determine whether people really are lifetime rich or lifetime poor, the authors argue. When people are properly classified, no redistribution is found.
R/W NBER
Social Security Does Not Redistribute Income