Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But that's the thing, we are not. He is working on it NOW. And they are objecting. Its not going to go anywhere BECAUSE of the very base that elected him.Not your as in yours but your as in democrats. Supporting the bill or not by me does not even enter the picture of fairness. Its one minority group trying to DENY another equal rights.How can it? Even with the make up BEFORE the off year it would have been dead. Your largest base is against it.They'll be serving Sno-Cones in Hell before the bill the White House is pushing passes with the current Congressional makeup.
My largest base? I am a Libertarian.
If the bill would be in danger of floundering as a result of opposition to adding it to The Civil Rights Act than a separate bill should be drafted.
I don't believe you would support the bill either way though.
I see. Cool.
To say they are denying them equal rights is a bit unfair b/c I am pretty sure they would still support a bill whether it was apart of The Civil Rights Act or a stand alone. I am sure a few would be opposed on the basis of their religious beliefs but admittedly I have zero idea how high or low the number. Either way, it is tough to judge b/c at this point we are discussing a hypothetical.
Protected and suspect classes of persons exist as a consequence of bigotry and racism being codified into law, where such measures are enacted predicated solely to disadvantage a given class of persons.There should be NO protected classes in a free society.
While I agree, the only reason protected classes were required is that the free society wasn't so free for some people. That being said, I would love to see all these protected classifications vanish into a puff of smoke.
So do you add it in to the existing bill and piss one group off or write another and piss off the other group?Protected and suspect classes of persons exist as a consequence of bigotry and racism being codified into law, where such measures are enacted predicated solely to disadvantage a given class of persons.There should be NO protected classes in a free society.
While I agree, the only reason protected classes were required is that the free society wasn't so free for some people. That being said, I would love to see all these protected classifications vanish into a puff of smoke.
When bigotry and racism are eliminated, the need for protected and suspect classes of persons will likewise end.
One shouldn't hold his breath.
So do you add it in to the existing bill and piss one group off or write another and piss off the other group?Protected and suspect classes of persons exist as a consequence of bigotry and racism being codified into law, where such measures are enacted predicated solely to disadvantage a given class of persons.There should be NO protected classes in a free society.
While I agree, the only reason protected classes were required is that the free society wasn't so free for some people. That being said, I would love to see all these protected classifications vanish into a puff of smoke.
When bigotry and racism are eliminated, the need for protected and suspect classes of persons will likewise end.
One shouldn't hold his breath.
But that's the thing, we are not. He is working on it NOW. And they are objecting. Its not going to go anywhere BECAUSE of the very base that elected him.Not your as in yours but your as in democrats. Supporting the bill or not by me does not even enter the picture of fairness. Its one minority group trying to DENY another equal rights.How can it? Even with the make up BEFORE the off year it would have been dead. Your largest base is against it.They'll be serving Sno-Cones in Hell before the bill the White House is pushing passes with the current Congressional makeup.
My largest base? I am a Libertarian.
If the bill would be in danger of floundering as a result of opposition to adding it to The Civil Rights Act than a separate bill should be drafted.
I don't believe you would support the bill either way though.
I see. Cool.
To say they are denying them equal rights is a bit unfair b/c I am pretty sure they would still support a bill whether it was apart of The Civil Rights Act or a stand alone. I am sure a few would be opposed on the basis of their religious beliefs but admittedly I have zero idea how high or low the number. Either way, it is tough to judge b/c at this point we are discussing a hypothetical.
So now you have two long standing roots of your base pitted AGAINST each other by your own party INSIDE the party. THAT is a problem.
Protected and suspect classes of persons exist as a consequence of bigotry and racism being codified into law, where such measures are enacted predicated solely to disadvantage a given class of persons.There should be NO protected classes in a free society.
While I agree, the only reason protected classes were required is that the free society wasn't so free for some people. That being said, I would love to see all these protected classifications vanish into a puff of smoke.
When bigotry and racism are eliminated, the need for protected and suspect classes of persons will likewise end.
One shouldn't hold his breath.
Dark fury. I have no idea where you live. My comments about Arpsio are based on where I used to live as well as his being kkk and very openly opposed to equality
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Protected and suspect classes of persons exist as a consequence of bigotry and racism being codified into law, where such measures are enacted predicated solely to disadvantage a given class of persons.There should be NO protected classes in a free society.
While I agree, the only reason protected classes were required is that the free society wasn't so free for some people. That being said, I would love to see all these protected classifications vanish into a puff of smoke.
When bigotry and racism are eliminated, the need for protected and suspect classes of persons will likewise end.
One shouldn't hold his breath.
Bigotry and racism are never going to be eliminated though. Besides, the protected classifications cover almost every American.
An in house base fight one year before elections? Their timing is well, just outright stupid. They could wind up pitting BLM against LGBT. And someone HAS to lose.Protected and suspect classes of persons exist as a consequence of bigotry and racism being codified into law, where such measures are enacted predicated solely to disadvantage a given class of persons.There should be NO protected classes in a free society.
While I agree, the only reason protected classes were required is that the free society wasn't so free for some people. That being said, I would love to see all these protected classifications vanish into a puff of smoke.
When bigotry and racism are eliminated, the need for protected and suspect classes of persons will likewise end.
One shouldn't hold his breath.
Bigotry and racism are never going to be eliminated though. Besides, the protected classifications cover almost every American.
I wonder if the self righteous far left ever considered that there is acrimony towards some people simply because the law somehow 'protects' them and not us.
Protected and suspect classes of persons exist as a consequence of bigotry and racism being codified into law, where such measures are enacted predicated solely to disadvantage a given class of persons.There should be NO protected classes in a free society.
While I agree, the only reason protected classes were required is that the free society wasn't so free for some people. That being said, I would love to see all these protected classifications vanish into a puff of smoke.
When bigotry and racism are eliminated, the need for protected and suspect classes of persons will likewise end.
One shouldn't hold his breath.
Weird how "some civil rights groups" turns into all Black people. Youre one of the bigger violators of basic reading comprehension on the board but this one takes the cake.Just writing this to CDZ specs might be hard but the topic is VERY interesting.
Okay you have the civil rights bill passed many years ago okay? And Obama and the democrats were looking to add the "LGBT" community to the bill when a little issue came up.
Okay here is where it gets touchy. Seems the Negro's OBJECT to any change in the civil rights bill because they view it as THEIR bill.
"The bill’s proposed route to ending bias against the LGBT community has attracted some controversy from some civil rights groups. The bill,introduced by congressional Democrats in July, would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include LGBT people. Civil rights organizations such as the NAACP and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights have expressed hesitance to support altering the historic civil rights legislation."
So now you have one minority seeking to quash another minorities rights. This is going to be a problem.
"Civil rights leaders like Henderson have expressed concern that amending the Civil Rights Act could open the door to amendments that aren’t in line with the original intent of the bill, according to LGBT news outlet The Washington Blade. The Obama administration seems well aware of these concerns: As recently as early October, Earnest told reporters that the bill was still being “carefully reviewed” by the White House."
That bill is the path to equal rights in housing and protection and jobs to the LGBT group. And YOU are a democrat running for office and your largest minority group does NOT want the smaller minority group included with them under equality laws and protections.
If you write ANOTHER law just for them that makes a separate but equal law that does NOT fit your platform. So you tell me how do you solve this without upsetting your base and NOT making a separate but equal law?
Same-Sex Marriage Was Just the Start: White House Champions Equality Bill
It just happens to be the Negro group that is sniveling. Read the link and see for yourself boy.Weird how "some civil rights groups" turns into all Black people. Youre one of the bigger dumbfucks on the board but this one takes the cake.Just writing this to CDZ specs might be hard but the topic is VERY interesting.
Okay you have the civil rights bill passed many years ago okay? And Obama and the democrats were looking to add the "LGBT" community to the bill when a little issue came up.
Okay here is where it gets touchy. Seems the Negro's OBJECT to any change in the civil rights bill because they view it as THEIR bill.
"The bill’s proposed route to ending bias against the LGBT community has attracted some controversy from some civil rights groups. The bill,introduced by congressional Democrats in July, would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include LGBT people. Civil rights organizations such as the NAACP and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights have expressed hesitance to support altering the historic civil rights legislation."
So now you have one minority seeking to quash another minorities rights. This is going to be a problem.
"Civil rights leaders like Henderson have expressed concern that amending the Civil Rights Act could open the door to amendments that aren’t in line with the original intent of the bill, according to LGBT news outlet The Washington Blade. The Obama administration seems well aware of these concerns: As recently as early October, Earnest told reporters that the bill was still being “carefully reviewed” by the White House."
That bill is the path to equal rights in housing and protection and jobs to the LGBT group. And YOU are a democrat running for office and your largest minority group does NOT want the smaller minority group included with them under equality laws and protections.
If you write ANOTHER law just for them that makes a separate but equal law that does NOT fit your platform. So you tell me how do you solve this without upsetting your base and NOT making a separate but equal law?
Same-Sex Marriage Was Just the Start: White House Champions Equality Bill
No boy. It says "some". You even quoted it in your OP. How stupid are you?It just happens to be the Negro group that is sniveling. Read the link and see for yourself boy.Weird how "some civil rights groups" turns into all Black people. Youre one of the bigger dumbfucks on the board but this one takes the cake.Just writing this to CDZ specs might be hard but the topic is VERY interesting.
Okay you have the civil rights bill passed many years ago okay? And Obama and the democrats were looking to add the "LGBT" community to the bill when a little issue came up.
Okay here is where it gets touchy. Seems the Negro's OBJECT to any change in the civil rights bill because they view it as THEIR bill.
"The bill’s proposed route to ending bias against the LGBT community has attracted some controversy from some civil rights groups. The bill,introduced by congressional Democrats in July, would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include LGBT people. Civil rights organizations such as the NAACP and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights have expressed hesitance to support altering the historic civil rights legislation."
So now you have one minority seeking to quash another minorities rights. This is going to be a problem.
"Civil rights leaders like Henderson have expressed concern that amending the Civil Rights Act could open the door to amendments that aren’t in line with the original intent of the bill, according to LGBT news outlet The Washington Blade. The Obama administration seems well aware of these concerns: As recently as early October, Earnest told reporters that the bill was still being “carefully reviewed” by the White House."
That bill is the path to equal rights in housing and protection and jobs to the LGBT group. And YOU are a democrat running for office and your largest minority group does NOT want the smaller minority group included with them under equality laws and protections.
If you write ANOTHER law just for them that makes a separate but equal law that does NOT fit your platform. So you tell me how do you solve this without upsetting your base and NOT making a separate but equal law?
Same-Sex Marriage Was Just the Start: White House Champions Equality Bill
You must be really split on this one. On one hand you are a Negro and the other you are a homo. How do you resolve that?No boy. It says "some". You even quoted it in your OP. How stupid are you?It just happens to be the Negro group that is sniveling. Read the link and see for yourself boy.Weird how "some civil rights groups" turns into all Black people. Youre one of the bigger dumbfucks on the board but this one takes the cake.Just writing this to CDZ specs might be hard but the topic is VERY interesting.
Okay you have the civil rights bill passed many years ago okay? And Obama and the democrats were looking to add the "LGBT" community to the bill when a little issue came up.
Okay here is where it gets touchy. Seems the Negro's OBJECT to any change in the civil rights bill because they view it as THEIR bill.
"The bill’s proposed route to ending bias against the LGBT community has attracted some controversy from some civil rights groups. The bill,introduced by congressional Democrats in July, would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include LGBT people. Civil rights organizations such as the NAACP and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights have expressed hesitance to support altering the historic civil rights legislation."
So now you have one minority seeking to quash another minorities rights. This is going to be a problem.
"Civil rights leaders like Henderson have expressed concern that amending the Civil Rights Act could open the door to amendments that aren’t in line with the original intent of the bill, according to LGBT news outlet The Washington Blade. The Obama administration seems well aware of these concerns: As recently as early October, Earnest told reporters that the bill was still being “carefully reviewed” by the White House."
That bill is the path to equal rights in housing and protection and jobs to the LGBT group. And YOU are a democrat running for office and your largest minority group does NOT want the smaller minority group included with them under equality laws and protections.
If you write ANOTHER law just for them that makes a separate but equal law that does NOT fit your platform. So you tell me how do you solve this without upsetting your base and NOT making a separate but equal law?
Same-Sex Marriage Was Just the Start: White House Champions Equality Bill
It's sad in this day and age to need a Law to recognize HUMAN Rights.
