Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Typical lefty. They set out to find as much dirt as possible to attempt to destroy his chances due to their politics and you say it's their right. No one said they had no right, learn to read.One might suppose that it is when someone who is a Republican does something meriting 'destruction' (whatever that means in this context). Additionally, if the newspaper has a position antithetical to 'Republicans', which under free speech it would have every right to have, that could indeed be its 'job'.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Turning the question around, when did it become the job or obligation of a newspaper not to have a position?
I haven't seen many articles from Charles Krauthammer, Jennifer Rubin, Kathleen Parker, George Will, Republican politicians or donors with those themes.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Seems to be the only time they make any effort at all at being 'Journalists.' Clearly, not as much effort is going into 'researching' the corrupt witch and her rapist husband.
As usual, it'll be all about the Republican Candidate 'Hating women, Being a Racist, Being a Homophobe, Hating poor people, Being rich', etc etc...
Nothing ever changes. Every Election is just another Re-run TV Show. We've seen it many many times before.
So where were the 20 reporters in 2007 investigating Obama's hidden past?
Where are the 20 reporters investigating Hillary's fundraising for the Clinton Foundation from foreign countries while she was Secretary of State? Or all of Bill's bimbos while he was in office and Hillary was ignoring them? Or all of the lies that belong to Hillary?
Typical dualist, instantly falsely labeling anything or anyone that does not toe his/her line of faith as 'left'.Typical lefty. They set out to find as much dirt as possible to attempt to destroy his chances due to their politics and you say it's their right. No one said they had no right, learn to read.One might suppose that it is when someone who is a Republican does something meriting 'destruction' (whatever that means in this context). Additionally, if the newspaper has a position antithetical to 'Republicans', which under free speech it would have every right to have, that could indeed be its 'job'.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Turning the question around, when did it become the job or obligation of a newspaper not to have a position?
The fact is they are not an unbiased news source so calling them out on it is my right too.
Typical lefty. They set out to find as much dirt as possible to attempt to destroy his chances due to their politics and you say it's their right. No one said they had no right, learn to read.
So where were the 20 reporters in 2007 investigating Obama's hidden past?
I know right. I wonder how many were assigned to Samuel J. Tilden? If only they had dug up more dirt the Compromise of 1877 could have been avoided...In an age of sex, drugs and rock and roll most people would have to admit that Bill Clinton would have been the most interesting presidential candidate in modern history. How many Washington Post reporters were assigned to dig up juicy tidbits of his background? There were rumors that Barry Hussein Sotoro Obama wasn't even born in this Country and that he used an alien status to get a break in his college tuition. His father was an alcoholic anti-American African nationalist and he had brothers living in huts. How many Washington Post reporters were assigned to dig up Obama's history? Left wing media sources that have become propaganda arms of the democrat party don't even try to hide it anymore.
This isn't the first post of yours I've read, there was nothing instant about it. The tactic is typical of leftists. You simply continue to move the goal posts. The point was they have the right to be uneven and people have the right to call them on it and point out they are journalists with an agenda, not reporters.Typical dualist, instantly falsely labeling anything or anyone that does not toe his/her line of faith as 'left'.Typical lefty. They set out to find as much dirt as possible to attempt to destroy his chances due to their politics and you say it's their right. No one said they had no right, learn to read.One might suppose that it is when someone who is a Republican does something meriting 'destruction' (whatever that means in this context). Additionally, if the newspaper has a position antithetical to 'Republicans', which under free speech it would have every right to have, that could indeed be its 'job'.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Turning the question around, when did it become the job or obligation of a newspaper not to have a position?
The fact is they are not an unbiased news source so calling them out on it is my right too.
Nuance exists for the rest of us.
Big deal, apparently the Federal Bureau of Investigation has assigned nearly 150 agents to "research" Clinton, How many agents does the FBI have investigating Trump? one suspects that Clinton is far more worried about what the busy bees at FBI are up to than Trump is about the goings on at WaPo.Washington Post assigns 20 reporters to research Donald Trump
There is nothing to stop your projection onto others and it certainly doesn't concern nor bother me. Pointing it out to others may help them to understand.This isn't the first post of yours I've read, there was nothing instant about it. The tactic is typical of leftists. You simply continue to move the goal posts. The point was they have the right to be uneven and people have the right to call them on it and point out they are journalists with an agenda, not reporters.Typical dualist, instantly falsely labeling anything or anyone that does not toe his/her line of faith as 'left'.Typical lefty. They set out to find as much dirt as possible to attempt to destroy his chances due to their politics and you say it's their right. No one said they had no right, learn to read.One might suppose that it is when someone who is a Republican does something meriting 'destruction' (whatever that means in this context). Additionally, if the newspaper has a position antithetical to 'Republicans', which under free speech it would have every right to have, that could indeed be its 'job'.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Turning the question around, when did it become the job or obligation of a newspaper not to have a position?
The fact is they are not an unbiased news source so calling them out on it is my right too.
Nuance exists for the rest of us.
So where were the 20 reporters in 2007 investigating Obama's hidden past?
Where are the 20 reporters investigating Hillary's fundraising for the Clinton Foundation from foreign countries while she was Secretary of State? Or all of Bill's bimbos while he was in office and Hillary was ignoring them? Or all of the lies that belong to Hillary?
I haven't seen many articles from Charles Krauthammer, Jennifer Rubin, Kathleen Parker, George Will, Republican politicians or donors with those themes.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Seems to be the only time they make any effort at all at being 'Journalists.' Clearly, not as much effort is going into 'researching' the corrupt witch and her rapist husband.
As usual, it'll be all about the Republican Candidate 'Hating women, Being a Racist, Being a Homophobe, Hating poor people, Being rich', etc etc...
Nothing ever changes. Every Election is just another Re-run TV Show. We've seen it many many times before.
Meanwhile there was Obama's mentor the Rev???? Wright saying "God Damn America!"34 years ...almost a family member ..........Trump comfortable with this sick fuck of a butler...oh yeah ..Yep.....because Trump ordered him to say that, .
The WaPo has a good mix of right, left, and center. That is why I prefer them over any other media outlets that come to mind.I haven't seen many articles from Charles Krauthammer, Jennifer Rubin, Kathleen Parker, George Will, Republican politicians or donors with those themes.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Seems to be the only time they make any effort at all at being 'Journalists.' Clearly, not as much effort is going into 'researching' the corrupt witch and her rapist husband.
As usual, it'll be all about the Republican Candidate 'Hating women, Being a Racist, Being a Homophobe, Hating poor people, Being rich', etc etc...
Nothing ever changes. Every Election is just another Re-run TV Show. We've seen it many many times before.
The Left-dominated MSM only plays 'Journalist' when attacking Republicans. It's been that way as long as i can remember. This Election will have the same theme as all the others. Trump the Republican, will be cast as the 'Evil Rich Racist Homophobe Woman-Hating' villain. Will America buy it this time around? Maybe? We'll see.
The WaPo has a good mix of right, left, and center. That is why I prefer them over any other media outlets that come to mind.I haven't seen many articles from Charles Krauthammer, Jennifer Rubin, Kathleen Parker, George Will, Republican politicians or donors with those themes.When did their job become destroying Republicans if they can?Complain when media don't do their job, complain when they do.
Seems to be the only time they make any effort at all at being 'Journalists.' Clearly, not as much effort is going into 'researching' the corrupt witch and her rapist husband.
As usual, it'll be all about the Republican Candidate 'Hating women, Being a Racist, Being a Homophobe, Hating poor people, Being rich', etc etc...
Nothing ever changes. Every Election is just another Re-run TV Show. We've seen it many many times before.
The Left-dominated MSM only plays 'Journalist' when attacking Republicans. It's been that way as long as i can remember. This Election will have the same theme as all the others. Trump the Republican, will be cast as the 'Evil Rich Racist Homophobe Woman-Hating' villain. Will America buy it this time around? Maybe? We'll see.
I like the WaPo too, the paper they use turns pretty colors in the fireplace.The WaPo has a good mix of right, left, and center. That is why I prefer them over any other media outlets that come to mind.
whining becomes you.
Obama was pressured to produce his fucking birth certificate just because he has Black skin.......
..Hillary Clinton has been under "shrill Partisan attack and Investigations" for 25 years
