Washington Post: Clinton Campaign paid for research that led to Trump-Russia dossier

trump ~ nothing is a crime

Hillary ~ everything is a crime, including breathing

THE key element you intentionally left out is 'EVIDENCE'.

After a year of multiple investigations and a stacked Special Counsel, libtards and snowflakes have not been able to produce the 1st shred of evidence a crime was even committed, let alone that Trump was involved.

On the flip-side of that coin, the existing evidence against Hillary, Comey, Mueller, Holder, Lynch, Koskinen, Clapper, Brennan, and even Obama is overwhelming.
 
So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.
Ummm...I never said anything about Assange. Link to Trump contacting Assange?

You said a campaign using a foreign source was breaking the law.
So Trump's campaign contacting Assange to get hacked Russian info would also be against the law.

Orv in your feeble demented poor excuse of a brain, it is only illegal if a Democrat does it?
 
So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.
Ummm...I never said anything about Assange. Link to Trump contacting Assange?

You said a campaign using a foreign source was breaking the law.
So Trump's campaign contacting Assange to get hacked Russian info would also be against the law.

Orv in your feeble demented poor excuse of a brain, it is only illegal if a Democrat does it?
so you admit that what hillary did was illegal?
 
You said a campaign using a foreign source was breaking the law.
So Trump's campaign contacting Assange to get hacked Russian info would also be against the law.
I asked you for a link proving this happened.

After a year of multiple investigations and a stacked corrupt Special Counsel producing not 1 shred of evidence to support snowflake claims, you think you would learn by now that just because a snowflake says something is true doesn't make it true.
 
This, coupled with the Russian/Clinton connection has completely blown up the entire Trump collusion lie!
Only withb the feeble minded Trumpettes.

Funding opposition research is typical.

The company the Democrats hired had been doing it for Republicans. OMG OMG OMG

They found bad stuff about Trump so you Trumpettes have to declare this illegal & fake news.
Mueller found it. who put him in charge?
 
So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.
Ummm...I never said anything about Assange. Link to Trump contacting Assange?

You said a campaign using a foreign source was breaking the law.
So Trump's campaign contacting Assange to get hacked Russian info would also be against the law.

Orv in your feeble demented poor excuse of a brain, it is only illegal if a Democrat does it?
so you admit that what hillary did was illegal?
he doesn't even understand what he did there. funny.
 
No Americans have done more to expedite that eventuality than the Trump team.
There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions. This false report PURCHASED / FUNDED by Hillary, Comey, Obama, and the DNC, furthermore, was illegally used in a US election versus a Presidential candidate.

In light of all of this, only a desperate, reality-denying leftist would cling to the claim that anything within the document was true, especially since it is - like every liberal / snowflake claim about Trump and his team so far - is not supported by any evidence.
There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions.

Not true in any way.

Read it. Don't bitch about the source, read it.
The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.

There are reports in the dossier that highlight the when, where and with who the meetings Trump people had which were continually denied but were later proven to be true. Not to mention the entire operation the Russians planned to influence the election.

You can continue to deny any of it is real, but you only make yourself look ignorant.

A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated
dude, your gaslighting tactics are over. you've been outed by your own fking party. time to get a new play.


It's all right there. You didn't see it?

Just because Dems paid for a portion of it, that doesn't make it invalid.
 
You need to show a quid pro quo.

EVIDENCE SHOWS:
Russians wanted uranium.
The Clintons spent years selling Influence.
The Obama administration hid Russia's Bribery/Influence-Purchasing Crimes.
Hillary took over $100 million from the Russian lead trying to buy Uranium
Hillary was on the committee
Bill Clinton was on the Ex-KGB Payroll
The Russians got the Uranium.

'Nuff said.

No.
Clinton had no unilateral authority over the deal. You would need to show that she exerted influence over all of the players in order to make the deal happen.
yeah they call that indictment and a grand jury to do that. ready?

Absolutely.
Are you ready for a let down? Will you spin it as yet another conspiracy to protect Clinton?
Of course you will.
 
RogerR20171026_low.jpg
 
No Americans have done more to expedite that eventuality than the Trump team.
There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions. This false report PURCHASED / FUNDED by Hillary, Comey, Obama, and the DNC, furthermore, was illegally used in a US election versus a Presidential candidate.

In light of all of this, only a desperate, reality-denying leftist would cling to the claim that anything within the document was true, especially since it is - like every liberal / snowflake claim about Trump and his team so far - is not supported by any evidence.
There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions.

Not true in any way.

Read it. Don't bitch about the source, read it.
The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.

There are reports in the dossier that highlight the when, where and with who the meetings Trump people had which were continually denied but were later proven to be true. Not to mention the entire operation the Russians planned to influence the election.

You can continue to deny any of it is real, but you only make yourself look ignorant.

A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated

Other than the dossier, what evidence is there that these meetings took place?

Read it, dope! My god, I've put it in front of you dopes a number of times.
 
trump ~ nothing is a crime

Hillary ~ everything is a crime, including breathing

THE key element you intentionally left out is 'EVIDENCE'.

After a year of multiple investigations and a stacked Special Counsel, libtards and snowflakes have not been able to produce the 1st shred of evidence a crime was even committed, let alone that Trump was involved.

On the flip-side of that coin, the existing evidence against Hillary, Comey, Mueller, Holder, Lynch, Koskinen, Clapper, Brennan, and even Obama is overwhelming.
hahaha-ah-haha-hahahahahaha
 
You lefties are positively mental... you've been whining for nearly a year about foreign sources meddling in our election, and now cheer foreign sources meddling in our election. Seek psychiatric help, and soon.

You were cheering foreign meddling on Trump's behalf, now you want it prosecuted against Clinton.

lol, oops.
 
trump ~ nothing is a crime

Hillary ~ everything is a crime, including breathing

THE key element you intentionally left out is 'EVIDENCE'.

After a year of multiple investigations and a stacked Special Counsel, libtards and snowflakes have not been able to produce the 1st shred of evidence a crime was even committed, let alone that Trump was involved.

On the flip-side of that coin, the existing evidence against Hillary, Comey, Mueller, Holder, Lynch, Koskinen, Clapper, Brennan, and even Obama is overwhelming.


So Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner et al MEETING with actual Russians is not evidence?

Jeff Sessions lying in his confirmation hear about meeting with Russians is not evidence?

But hearsay on anything Democratic is true...


Yeah I get it.
 
The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.
'The Source Can't Lie'? Bwuhahahaha....

Do you even hear yourself or think about what you write before you actually post it?

1. NONE of it has been proven. NO EVIDENCE. Only OPIION and unsubstantiated claims - like yours.

2. The information is from a foreign agent through a Russia-Associated/Paid company that just took the 5th when called to testify before Congress.

3. The use of this information in a US election was / is a CRIME. Hillary, Comey, Obama - they just got exposed for committing a crime...and you continue to argue how this Russian-generated propaganda is true ... because the accusation against Trump is more important to you than the actual CRIMES committed by Hillary, Comey, and Obama.

Bwuhahahaha.... You're freakin' HILARIOUS!

We know Trump and his people lied about meetings that we now know actually happened. We also know what the dossier says. That is called verification.

The source in the article can't lie about either. But, of course, you have no problem with it.
 
The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.
'The Source Can't Lie'? Bwuhahahaha....

Do you even hear yourself or think about what you write before you actually post it?

1. NONE of it has been proven. NO EVIDENCE. Only OPIION and unsubstantiated claims - like yours.

2. The information is from a foreign agent through a Russia-Associated/Paid company that just took the 5th when called to testify before Congress.

3. The use of this information in a US election was / is a CRIME. Hillary, Comey, Obama - they just got exposed for committing a crime...and you continue to argue how this Russian-generated propaganda is true ... because the accusation against Trump is more important to you than the actual CRIMES committed by Hillary, Comey, and Obama.

Bwuhahahaha.... You're freakin' HILARIOUS!
So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.
The Trump campaign did no such thing, moron.
 
So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.
Ummm...I never said anything about Assange. Link to Trump contacting Assange?

You said a campaign using a foreign source was breaking the law.
So Trump's campaign contacting Assange to get hacked Russian info would also be against the law.

Orv in your feeble demented poor excuse of a brain, it is only illegal if a Democrat does it?
so you admit that what hillary did was illegal?


No,dipstick. Try tio keeopnup.

Clintion hired a US company. That happens to be legal.

Trump's campaign contacting a known US criminal to get info from Russia.
 
So you just admitted the Trump campaign contacting Assange for the Russian obtained hacked e-mails was illegal.
Ummm...I never said anything about Assange. Link to Trump contacting Assange?

You said a campaign using a foreign source was breaking the law.
So Trump's campaign contacting Assange to get hacked Russian info would also be against the law.

Orv in your feeble demented poor excuse of a brain, it is only illegal if a Democrat does it?
gaslighter post. funny.
 
trump ~ nothing is a crime

Hillary ~ everything is a crime, including breathing

THE key element you intentionally left out is 'EVIDENCE'.

After a year of multiple investigations and a stacked Special Counsel, libtards and snowflakes have not been able to produce the 1st shred of evidence a crime was even committed, let alone that Trump was involved.

On the flip-side of that coin, the existing evidence against Hillary, Comey, Mueller, Holder, Lynch, Koskinen, Clapper, Brennan, and even Obama is overwhelming.


So Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner et al MEETING with actual Russians is not evidence?

Jeff Sessions lying in his confirmation hear about meeting with Russians is not evidence?

But hearsay on anything Democratic is true...


Yeah I get it.
what the FUCK kind of "evidence" do you have on them simply "meeting"?

we have paperwork, papertrails, money paid, media eating it up, you too, deflection to the other side and so much more on clinton and you call that hearsay.

yet a meeting in which you have zero idea what happened is evidence.

simply put - fuck that. no one is playing that game anymore, son.
 

Forum List

Back
Top