Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now you're lying (more).Since they all approved the sale, you're saying there were no national security concerns. What do you think would happen if any of them didn't approve the deal?
how you figure that gaslighter?hey gaslighter, where is your evidence? why are you afraid to post something. merely constantly ranting opinion hate chat, why don't you enlighten us all on your material. please feel free here gaslighter. let's see it. what you got?and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.
One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
And the donations to the foundation were bribes? The Clintons are gangsters for charity?
It's you that need to post evidence, dope.
what link have you provided?There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions. This false report PURCHASED / FUNDED by Hillary, Comey, Obama, and the DNC, furthermore, was illegally used in a US election versus a Presidential candidate.
In light of all of this, only a desperate, reality-denying leftist would cling to the claim that anything within the document was true, especially since it is - like every liberal / snowflake claim about Trump and his team so far - is not supported by any evidence.There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions.
Not true in any way.
Read it. Don't bitch about the source, read it.
The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.
There are reports in the dossier that highlight the when, where and with who the meetings Trump people had which were continually denied but were later proven to be true. Not to mention the entire operation the Russians planned to influence the election.
You can continue to deny any of it is real, but you only make yourself look ignorant.
A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated
Other than the dossier, what evidence is there that these meetings took place?
Read it, dope! My god, I've put it in front of you dopes a number of times.
Don't tell me to do your homework. It's your claim. You support it. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
I provided the link in the post you responded to, dope.
Read It!
no it isn't. stop with the manipulation you fking gaslighter. post what you have. or go away. your game is up.I have no idea what the hell you're referring to. what's all there? post it. why are you afraid of it? gaslighter.dude, your gaslighting tactics are over. you've been outed by your own fking party. time to get a new play.There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions. This false report PURCHASED / FUNDED by Hillary, Comey, Obama, and the DNC, furthermore, was illegally used in a US election versus a Presidential candidate.
In light of all of this, only a desperate, reality-denying leftist would cling to the claim that anything within the document was true, especially since it is - like every liberal / snowflake claim about Trump and his team so far - is not supported by any evidence.There is no 'Intelligence' in the Intel reported within the dossier. It has been exposed that the report is filled with Russia-generated propaganda, obtained from a foreign agent through a Russia-associated/Paid company that has taken the 5th when called to testify before Congress to answer questions.
Not true in any way.
Read it. Don't bitch about the source, read it.
The source can't lie about facts we all know to be true.
There are reports in the dossier that highlight the when, where and with who the meetings Trump people had which were continually denied but were later proven to be true. Not to mention the entire operation the Russians planned to influence the election.
You can continue to deny any of it is real, but you only make yourself look ignorant.
A Lot of the Steele Report Has Since Been Corroborated
It's all right there. You didn't see it?
Just because Dems paid for a portion of it, that doesn't make it invalid.
It's in the post you responded to but apparently didn't read, dope.
and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.I miss the good old days when every RWnut on this forum was pissing himself with joy that HACKED emails might sink Hillary.
Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.
One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
And the donations to the foundation were bribes? The Clintons are gangsters for charity?
The foundation was just a slush fund and money laudering operation.
Now you're lying (more).Since they all approved the sale, you're saying there were no national security concerns. What do you think would happen if any of them didn't approve the deal?
Just because the sale was approved by the committee does not mean there were no national security concerns.
There were obvious national security concerns, which is why Mueller, Holder, and Obama hid all the evidence of Russian Bribery, Extortion, Intimidation, and Influence-Purchasing until AFTER the sale was completed.
I miss the good old days when every RWnut on this forum was pissing himself with joy that HACKED emails might sink Hillary.
Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.
One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal, than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it. Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.
If they did know, than they're all in it together, corruption goes much deeper and they're all accountable for it.
If they did not know, than Hillary cannot use them as cover and excuse for her wrongdoing.If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal
Of course that's the basis because it is true.
It's actually 14 and the SoS has no authority on the council.
Composition of CFIUS
The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairperson of CFIUS, and notices to CFIUS are received, processed, and coordinated at the staff level by the Staff Chairperson of CFIUS, who is the Director of the Office of Investment Security in the Department of the Treasury.
The members of CFIUS include the heads of the following departments and offices:
The following offices also observe and, as appropriate, participate in CFIUS’s activities:
- Department of the Treasury (chair)
- Department of Justice
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of State
- Department of Energy
- Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
- Office of Science & Technology Policy
The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Labor are non-voting, ex-officio members of CFIUS with roles as defined by statute and regulation.
- Office of Management & Budget
- Council of Economic Advisors
- National Security Council
- National Economic Council
- Homeland Security Council
than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it
Why would any of them know about an investigation that potentially involves them?
Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.
Simply not true. Your conjecture. Each department is reviewing the deal for potential national security concerns within their purview.
If there is investigation going, and how you said, potential national security concerns involved, it's their job to know everything about it.
Since they all approved the sale, you're saying there were no national security concerns. What do you think would happen if any of them didn't approve the deal?
No, that's just snowflakes bleating after their champion was caught.Has anyone considered that maybe both sides are as guilty as sin and we should lock them all up?
and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.
One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
And the donations to the foundation were bribes? The Clintons are gangsters for charity?
The foundation was just a slush fund and money laudering operation.
Hmm....interesting. How did that work?
I assume you have something explaining how that's possible. Maybe something like the Clinton's personal taxes or the foundation's financials that corroborate your claim? Anything?
Don't count your chickens. Currently, Hillary Clinton is running all around the world desperately trying to divert attention from the Trump/Russia investigation has been turned on its head and is now investigating the Clinton/Uranium One corruption along with the Trump Dossier.
One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal, than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it. Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.
If they did know, than they're all in it together, corruption goes much deeper and they're all accountable for it.
If they did not know, than Hillary cannot use them as cover and excuse for her wrongdoing.If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal
Of course that's the basis because it is true.
It's actually 14 and the SoS has no authority on the council.
Composition of CFIUS
The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairperson of CFIUS, and notices to CFIUS are received, processed, and coordinated at the staff level by the Staff Chairperson of CFIUS, who is the Director of the Office of Investment Security in the Department of the Treasury.
The members of CFIUS include the heads of the following departments and offices:
The following offices also observe and, as appropriate, participate in CFIUS’s activities:
- Department of the Treasury (chair)
- Department of Justice
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of State
- Department of Energy
- Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
- Office of Science & Technology Policy
The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Labor are non-voting, ex-officio members of CFIUS with roles as defined by statute and regulation.
- Office of Management & Budget
- Council of Economic Advisors
- National Security Council
- National Economic Council
- Homeland Security Council
than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it
Why would any of them know about an investigation that potentially involves them?
Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.
Simply not true. Your conjecture. Each department is reviewing the deal for potential national security concerns within their purview.
If there is investigation going, and how you said, potential national security concerns involved, it's their job to know everything about it.
Since they all approved the sale, you're saying there were no national security concerns. What do you think would happen if any of them didn't approve the deal?
I can't speak to hypotheticals.
Can you say what would have happened if any of them didn't approve the deal?
I tend to prefer the age-old practice of relying on what used to be called 'Evidence'.Has anyone considered that maybe both sides are as guilty as sin and we should lock them all up?
Explain how the donations were bribes. What's your evidence?how you figure that gaslighter?hey gaslighter, where is your evidence? why are you afraid to post something. merely constantly ranting opinion hate chat, why don't you enlighten us all on your material. please feel free here gaslighter. let's see it. what you got?and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
And the donations to the foundation were bribes? The Clintons are gangsters for charity?
It's you that need to post evidence, dope.
One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal, than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it. Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.
If they did know, than they're all in it together, corruption goes much deeper and they're all accountable for it.
If they did not know, than Hillary cannot use them as cover and excuse for her wrongdoing.If you base your question on Hillary saying that her State Dept was one of nine agencies that need to approve the deal
Of course that's the basis because it is true.
It's actually 14 and the SoS has no authority on the council.
Composition of CFIUS
The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairperson of CFIUS, and notices to CFIUS are received, processed, and coordinated at the staff level by the Staff Chairperson of CFIUS, who is the Director of the Office of Investment Security in the Department of the Treasury.
The members of CFIUS include the heads of the following departments and offices:
The following offices also observe and, as appropriate, participate in CFIUS’s activities:
- Department of the Treasury (chair)
- Department of Justice
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of State
- Department of Energy
- Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
- Office of Science & Technology Policy
The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Labor are non-voting, ex-officio members of CFIUS with roles as defined by statute and regulation.
- Office of Management & Budget
- Council of Economic Advisors
- National Security Council
- National Economic Council
- Homeland Security Council
than you have to ask yourself first, did any of the other eight agencies knew about ongoing FBI investigation on U1 when they approved it
Why would any of them know about an investigation that potentially involves them?
Keep in mind that all those agencies were Barry's appointees, and they'll normally support each other opinion.
Simply not true. Your conjecture. Each department is reviewing the deal for potential national security concerns within their purview.
If there is investigation going, and how you said, potential national security concerns involved, it's their job to know everything about it.
Since they all approved the sale, you're saying there were no national security concerns. What do you think would happen if any of them didn't approve the deal?
I can't speak to hypotheticals.
Can you say what would have happened if any of them didn't approve the deal?
Oh... you can't sp...
Considering that you were speaking hypothetical since last November, I thought that wouldn't be a problem for you.
My deepest apologies. I was wrong and have no problem admitting it. (Just skimmed over it.)Now you're lying (more).Since they all approved the sale, you're saying there were no national security concerns. What do you think would happen if any of them didn't approve the deal?
Just because the sale was approved by the committee does not mean there were no national security concerns.
There were obvious national security concerns, which is why Mueller, Holder, and Obama hid all the evidence of Russian Bribery, Extortion, Intimidation, and Influence-Purchasing until AFTER the sale was completed.
I would expect this from leftist...
I suggest that, before you accuse me of anything, you first read my whole post (that basically agree with what you said), and also quote my whole post (that was meant for Hutch).
what *evidence* do we have on trump?Explain how the donations were bribes. What's your evidence?how you figure that gaslighter?hey gaslighter, where is your evidence? why are you afraid to post something. merely constantly ranting opinion hate chat, why don't you enlighten us all on your material. please feel free here gaslighter. let's see it. what you got?and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.
And the donations to the foundation were bribes? The Clintons are gangsters for charity?
It's you that need to post evidence, dope.
Explain how the donations were bribes. What's your evidence?
You know that's not true.and the donations to the Clinton foundation were made years prior to the uranium deal. There was no connection.One question on the uranium one "corruption".
Logically, how does an alleged bribe to Clinton somehow guarantee the approval of a deal that Clinton had no authority to unilaterally decide?
How did that work?
And the donations to the foundation were bribes? The Clintons are gangsters for charity?
The foundation was just a slush fund and money laudering operation.
Hmm....interesting. How did that work?
I assume you have something explaining how that's possible. Maybe something like the Clinton's personal taxes or the foundation's financials that corroborate your claim? Anything?
The foundation spent 90% of its proceeds on "expenses," which means on the Clintons. It was used to reward all their friends with lush high payig no-show jobs. It paid for Chelsea's wedding.
what *evidence* do we have on trump?Explain how the donations were bribes. What's your evidence?how you figure that gaslighter?hey gaslighter, where is your evidence? why are you afraid to post something. merely constantly ranting opinion hate chat, why don't you enlighten us all on your material. please feel free here gaslighter. let's see it. what you got?And the donations to the foundation were bribes? The Clintons are gangsters for charity?
It's you that need to post evidence, dope.
