Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obviously I'm as anti-Regressive Left as anyone. I just think there are more intelligent ways to go about opposing them.I said nothing about the pay gap.Okay. I realize there are people who agree with him and his approach.McInnes was telling other people, particularly women, what they think, what they should think, and how to live their lives. For their own good. I think we have more than enough authoritarians running around.
He made a correct point about how and why women, generally make certain choices (is family over career), and gave his opinion on what that means. He did not give his advice to that specific woman, until she literally asked for it.
It would have been Authoritarian, if he wanted government policy to force that. Which he does not.
It is feminists who want to use government power to force equality of outcome that most women do not want.
We have decided that attacks, hyperbole and violence are the only way to achieve our goals (and I'm still not sure what those are). I don't how that can be intelligently defended. If we're giving up on using our minds, let's at least admit it.
.
He made an intelligent point, and argued it intelligently. The woman is the one that flipped out and started attacking him.
.
Ok, so I take it you do believe that women are seriously discriminated against in the work place, causing the "pay gap".
Have you at least heard the arguments for his position, and realize that they are not unreasonable?
I'm really having a problem with you dismissing him as " simplistic, ignorant ".
YOu can't have "compromise" or "cooperation" if you just dismiss people.
Especially if you are doing it, because you are accepting without question that the liberal position is so right that no one can reasonable disagree.
What I saw and heard, in my opinion, was a guy of below-average intelligence blurting out a string of simplistic generalizations so shallow that (a) even Hannity laughed and (b) I wasn't even sure if he was goofing around, maybe playing the role of stereotypical Archie Bunker neanderthal.
There. You asked. I'm not trying to anger or insult you. I was just leaving this alone. That was just my impression. And it is supported by the other videos I posted.
Maybe your guys will beat up enough people and cause enough damage that minds will change.
I have no idea what's going on at this point. I'm just the kid in the cafeteria, trying to eat his lunch during a food fight.
.
1. The Pay Gap is a generalization. Any point relevant to it, will be a generalization.
2. There is nothing unintelligent about pointing out the different choices women make, in the context of the Pay Gap debate.
3. Hannity did laugh. Because in our current political climate, hearing someone loudly and unabashedly stating the obvious truth, is shocking. I'm sure people gasped and laughed when the child pointed out that the Emperor was not wearing clothes.
4. I'm trying to help you understand. ANd the rise of the Proud Boys is a good thing. This is Middle America refusing to be marginalized by the Regressive Left.
I see many similarities between the two ends of the spectrum. They are, in no particular order:Well yes, obviously.I'm sure glad these guys didn't say what today's parties are saying.
.
Can you honestly Mac, look at what the left is doing and saying today, and say it's both parties that are the problem?
Is this a trick question?
.
No, it's not a trick question and your answer is quite a disappointment. I'm trying to decide if it's worth trying to reason with you on it.
Gawd, I love this place.I don't get why the left insists on being so black and white about everything
.
Okie doke!Gawd, I love this place.I don't get why the left insists on being so black and white about everything
.
You think I'm black and white? That's just your bias.
Even in this exact point i'm in the middle, bright guy. I said he is saying hyperbole but there is no doubt there is some truth. Try reading ... and thinking ...
McInnes was telling other people, particularly women, what they think, what they should think, and how to live their lives. For their own good. I think we have more than enough authoritarians running around.There's more than one way to do that. But if this group thinks that violence and hyperbole are the way to do it, there's nothing I can do about it. As I said, I think this is the best people can do at this point. We've just devolved to this.We are seeing a new generation of people who are refusing to be intimidated by the Regressive Left.
It is a good thing.
.
1. I not trying to derail your thread, but you are aware of the validity of the point McInnes raised, right? I think that is important to know. If you are dismissing him as ignorant, for no reason. That is wrong.
2. There is not more than one way to do that. Every other way has failed. People have been talking, for a long time in different ways, and the Left's monopoly on force and the threat of force has not budged until now. Antifa has taken a serious hit.
3 This is not devolution. This is an healthy response to an threat to a society.
We have decided that attacks, hyperbole and violence are the only way to achieve our goals (and I'm still not sure what those are). I don't how that can be intelligently defended. If we're giving up on using our minds, let's at least admit it.
.
I would put Gavin's intelligence as superior to yours.I said nothing about the pay gap.Okay. I realize there are people who agree with him and his approach.McInnes was telling other people, particularly women, what they think, what they should think, and how to live their lives. For their own good. I think we have more than enough authoritarians running around.1. I not trying to derail your thread, but you are aware of the validity of the point McInnes raised, right? I think that is important to know. If you are dismissing him as ignorant, for no reason. That is wrong.
2. There is not more than one way to do that. Every other way has failed. People have been talking, for a long time in different ways, and the Left's monopoly on force and the threat of force has not budged until now. Antifa has taken a serious hit.
3 This is not devolution. This is an healthy response to an threat to a society.
He made a correct point about how and why women, generally make certain choices (is family over career), and gave his opinion on what that means. He did not give his advice to that specific woman, until she literally asked for it.
It would have been Authoritarian, if he wanted government policy to force that. Which he does not.
It is feminists who want to use government power to force equality of outcome that most women do not want.
We have decided that attacks, hyperbole and violence are the only way to achieve our goals (and I'm still not sure what those are). I don't how that can be intelligently defended. If we're giving up on using our minds, let's at least admit it.
.
He made an intelligent point, and argued it intelligently. The woman is the one that flipped out and started attacking him.
.
Ok, so I take it you do believe that women are seriously discriminated against in the work place, causing the "pay gap".
Have you at least heard the arguments for his position, and realize that they are not unreasonable?
I'm really having a problem with you dismissing him as " simplistic, ignorant ".
YOu can't have "compromise" or "cooperation" if you just dismiss people.
Especially if you are doing it, because you are accepting without question that the liberal position is so right that no one can reasonable disagree.
What I saw and heard, in my opinion, was a guy of below-average intelligence blurting out a string of simplistic generalizations so shallow that (a) even Hannity laughed and (b) I wasn't even sure if he was goofing around, maybe playing the role of stereotypical Archie Bunker neanderthal.
There. You asked. I'm not trying to anger or insult you. I was just leaving this alone. That was just my impression. And it is supported by the other videos I posted.
Maybe your guys will beat up enough people and cause enough damage that minds will change.
I have no idea what's going on at this point. I'm just the kid in the cafeteria, trying to eat his lunch during a food fight.
.
Okie doke!Gawd, I love this place.I don't get why the left insists on being so black and white about everything
.
You think I'm black and white? That's just your bias.
Even in this exact point i'm in the middle, bright guy. I said he is saying hyperbole but there is no doubt there is some truth. Try reading ... and thinking ...
.
Could be!I would put Gavin's intelligence as superior to yours.I said nothing about the pay gap.Okay. I realize there are people who agree with him and his approach.McInnes was telling other people, particularly women, what they think, what they should think, and how to live their lives. For their own good. I think we have more than enough authoritarians running around.
He made a correct point about how and why women, generally make certain choices (is family over career), and gave his opinion on what that means. He did not give his advice to that specific woman, until she literally asked for it.
It would have been Authoritarian, if he wanted government policy to force that. Which he does not.
It is feminists who want to use government power to force equality of outcome that most women do not want.
We have decided that attacks, hyperbole and violence are the only way to achieve our goals (and I'm still not sure what those are). I don't how that can be intelligently defended. If we're giving up on using our minds, let's at least admit it.
.
He made an intelligent point, and argued it intelligently. The woman is the one that flipped out and started attacking him.
.
Ok, so I take it you do believe that women are seriously discriminated against in the work place, causing the "pay gap".
Have you at least heard the arguments for his position, and realize that they are not unreasonable?
I'm really having a problem with you dismissing him as " simplistic, ignorant ".
YOu can't have "compromise" or "cooperation" if you just dismiss people.
Especially if you are doing it, because you are accepting without question that the liberal position is so right that no one can reasonable disagree.
What I saw and heard, in my opinion, was a guy of below-average intelligence blurting out a string of simplistic generalizations so shallow that (a) even Hannity laughed and (b) I wasn't even sure if he was goofing around, maybe playing the role of stereotypical Archie Bunker neanderthal.
There. You asked. I'm not trying to anger or insult you. I was just leaving this alone. That was just my impression. And it is supported by the other videos I posted.
Maybe your guys will beat up enough people and cause enough damage that minds will change.
I have no idea what's going on at this point. I'm just the kid in the cafeteria, trying to eat his lunch during a food fight.
.
I know, and you have all the answers.Okie doke!Gawd, I love this place.I don't get why the left insists on being so black and white about everything
.
You think I'm black and white? That's just your bias.
Even in this exact point i'm in the middle, bright guy. I said he is saying hyperbole but there is no doubt there is some truth. Try reading ... and thinking ...
.
You want to be ignorant
Obviously I'm as anti-Regressive Left as anyone. I just think there are more intelligent ways to go about opposing them.I said nothing about the pay gap.Okay. I realize there are people who agree with him and his approach.He made a correct point about how and why women, generally make certain choices (is family over career), and gave his opinion on what that means. He did not give his advice to that specific woman, until she literally asked for it.
It would have been Authoritarian, if he wanted government policy to force that. Which he does not.
It is feminists who want to use government power to force equality of outcome that most women do not want.
He made an intelligent point, and argued it intelligently. The woman is the one that flipped out and started attacking him.
.
Ok, so I take it you do believe that women are seriously discriminated against in the work place, causing the "pay gap".
Have you at least heard the arguments for his position, and realize that they are not unreasonable?
I'm really having a problem with you dismissing him as " simplistic, ignorant ".
YOu can't have "compromise" or "cooperation" if you just dismiss people.
Especially if you are doing it, because you are accepting without question that the liberal position is so right that no one can reasonable disagree.
What I saw and heard, in my opinion, was a guy of below-average intelligence blurting out a string of simplistic generalizations so shallow that (a) even Hannity laughed and (b) I wasn't even sure if he was goofing around, maybe playing the role of stereotypical Archie Bunker neanderthal.
There. You asked. I'm not trying to anger or insult you. I was just leaving this alone. That was just my impression. And it is supported by the other videos I posted.
Maybe your guys will beat up enough people and cause enough damage that minds will change.
I have no idea what's going on at this point. I'm just the kid in the cafeteria, trying to eat his lunch during a food fight.
.
1. The Pay Gap is a generalization. Any point relevant to it, will be a generalization.
2. There is nothing unintelligent about pointing out the different choices women make, in the context of the Pay Gap debate.
3. Hannity did laugh. Because in our current political climate, hearing someone loudly and unabashedly stating the obvious truth, is shocking. I'm sure people gasped and laughed when the child pointed out that the Emperor was not wearing clothes.
4. I'm trying to help you understand. ANd the rise of the Proud Boys is a good thing. This is Middle America refusing to be marginalized by the Regressive Left.
I think the net result of behavior like this is negative, because it confirms and reinforces stereotypes and divides us evenmore. I don't think attacks and violence are the answer.
.
I see many similarities between the two ends of the spectrum. They are, in no particular order:Well yes, obviously.I'm sure glad these guys didn't say what today's parties are saying.
.
Can you honestly Mac, look at what the left is doing and saying today, and say it's both parties that are the problem?
Is this a trick question?
.
No, it's not a trick question and your answer is quite a disappointment. I'm trying to decide if it's worth trying to reason with you on it.
If you're going to claim that the Right doesn't engage in the above, I don't know what to tell you. That would just be alternate universe stuff to me. If you're going admit that the Right engages in the above, but say that the Left is "even worse", I'm going to respectfully suggest that you clean your own house first.
- Myopia
- Binary thinking
- Tribal groupthink
- Personal insults
- Name-calling
- Hyperbole
- Deflection
- Distortion
- Violence
- Straw Man arguments
- Outright lies
.
That isnt remotely what i said, dickI know, and you have all the answers.Okie doke!Gawd, I love this place.I don't get why the left insists on being so black and white about everything
.
You think I'm black and white? That's just your bias.
Even in this exact point i'm in the middle, bright guy. I said he is saying hyperbole but there is no doubt there is some truth. Try reading ... and thinking ...
.
You want to be ignorant
We agree! You're the Man!
.
I see many similarities between the two ends of the spectrum. They are, in no particular order:Well yes, obviously.I'm sure glad these guys didn't say what today's parties are saying.
.
Can you honestly Mac, look at what the left is doing and saying today, and say it's both parties that are the problem?
Is this a trick question?
.
No, it's not a trick question and your answer is quite a disappointment. I'm trying to decide if it's worth trying to reason with you on it.
If you're going to claim that the Right doesn't engage in the above, I don't know what to tell you. That would just be alternate universe stuff to me. If you're going admit that the Right engages in the above, but say that the Left is "even worse", I'm going to respectfully suggest that you clean your own house first.
- Myopia
- Binary thinking
- Tribal groupthink
- Personal insults
- Name-calling
- Hyperbole
- Deflection
- Distortion
- Violence
- Straw Man arguments
- Outright lies
.
The first and second lines of my sigs are for comments like that.You cannot seriously argue that the right does anything in the least comparable to what the left does. Sitting on the fence, trying to appear above it all may make you feel superior, but it's pretty much worthless actually.
I see many similarities between the two ends of the spectrum. They are, in no particular order:Well yes, obviously.I'm sure glad these guys didn't say what today's parties are saying.
.
Can you honestly Mac, look at what the left is doing and saying today, and say it's both parties that are the problem?
Is this a trick question?
.
No, it's not a trick question and your answer is quite a disappointment. I'm trying to decide if it's worth trying to reason with you on it.
If you're going to claim that the Right doesn't engage in the above, I don't know what to tell you. That would just be alternate universe stuff to me. If you're going admit that the Right engages in the above, but say that the Left is "even worse", I'm going to respectfully suggest that you clean your own house first.
- Myopia
- Binary thinking
- Tribal groupthink
- Personal insults
- Name-calling
- Hyperbole
- Deflection
- Distortion
- Violence
- Straw Man arguments
- Outright lies
.
So Planned Parenthood is "tricking" people into getting abortions. The ACLU is tricking people into committing crimes. Got it.
You made up 43, it's not within 10 times that. Most of those are suicides not shooting a family member and they ignore where a gun provides defense without killing anyone.
Also, you're deflecting from your moonbat conspiracy theory that there's a national conspiracy of criminals trying to trick people into shooting each other and criminals are going to just take their guns. And remember your ridiculous claim you were in the military? Now you want to not be allowed to have a gun because you're going to shoot people like Yosemite Sam and criminals are going to take your gun from you.
And again, this is your standard, right? So abortions should be illegal for everyone because there are some stupid people out there who will abuse them, so we should all be prohibited from using them? That's what you just said.
how do you compromise with people who think partial birth abortion is not murder or that there are dozens of different sexes ?
Of course, the National Rampage Association wants crooks and crazies to have guns. That way the rest of you tiny dicked fools will be scared and want them, too.
