We do not want a transcript of the call, we want the Whistleblower's

Penelope

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2014
60,265
15,791
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
are they still a whistleblower if they got the info 2nd hand and never heard it for themselves??
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Your fellow turd burglar never heard the call nor saw transcripts of it. So it is immaterial what he said because all he did was report hearsay and 3rd person information, and then ran to the media about it. He does not even qualify for protection under whistle blower rules. Maybe he thinks whistle blowing is a protected act when he loves hairy man butt?

Sorry to disappoint you two.
 
So we move from Mueller to The Phone Call.
Trump will be gone by Labor Day 2019
 
we want HRC's 10,000 deleted emails, not redacted.

we want Obama's college transcripts
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.

Be honest. . .

What you really want is an indictment and impeachment of Trump.

You really don't give a shit at this point for what, or how you get it.

If it is real? Fine. If it has to be fabricated, that will do too.
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.

how does it feel to 'want'?
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Does this whistle blower actually work for Trump? Because this story is boomeranging on the dems in record time.
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Nothing to report ALL HEARSAY JUST LIKE THE DOSSIER...you scum are so easy to show just how truly stupid you are...AMERICA is watching you!
 
we want HRC's 10,000 deleted emails, not redacted.

we want Obama's college transcripts
Why not ask for the whole 30,000?

Most of them were found on Weiner's laptop. But it's super double secret and nobody wants to see them, right?

But Trump's Tax Returns? Why that's a matter of National Security!
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
We want to see the accuser-that's our justice system.
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.
Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Still desperate for a way to remove Trump from office, eh?

Did you finally figure out that if Trump is impeached and removed, Hillary does not take over?
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.
Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Still desperate for a way to remove Trump from office, eh?

Did you finally figure out that if Trump is impeached and removed, Hillary does not take over?
No she won the popular vote so she would then be President
Lib 101
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.


You didn't hear the rest of the story....? The "Whistleblower" never heard the call didn't know any details and only heard second hand information about it.......so, they aren't even a real "Whistleblower," they are just another deep state hack breaking the law.
 
Stupid Democrats think this is the Second Coming of Watergate. :laughing0301:
 

Forum List

Back
Top