🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

"we Elected A Man As President Who Had No Experience At Anything"....

You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.

Yeah, just like Obama handled Harvard Law Review, right?

What's your point? Obama was not only on the HLR he was the editor. If you know anything about any law school anywhere in this country, the editor of law review insures a job with any top law firm in the country. Obama would be wealthier than Croesus right now if he had taken that path. He more than handled it, he owned it.
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.
If you read something you have no experience with, it behooves you to have people at your elbow to fill in the blanks. OBABBLE done got a shitload of blanks.

It's not the 80s anymore. People don't have to be "at your elbow" to fill in the blanks. Obama communicates with his national security apparatus every day - the fact that he doesn't require someone to come in and read his briefings to him isn't the scandal that you're hoping for.
OBABBLE doesn't know his ass from his elbow. They don't read to him...they explain what the words mean.

Right. What you have to realize, DuhTex, is that Obama and Clinton had to dumb their speeches down so that uni-brows like yourself could follow them. With Dubya, they had to ramp his speeches up to at least 3rd grade level, correct his grammar and even then he still said the stupidest shit I've ever heard come out of a politician's mouth...until Louie Gohmert came along. He's a good ol' Texas boy like you, too.
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.
If you read something you have no experience with, it behooves you to have people at your elbow to fill in the blanks. OBABBLE done got a shitload of blanks.

It's not the 80s anymore. People don't have to be "at your elbow" to fill in the blanks. Obama communicates with his national security apparatus every day - the fact that he doesn't require someone to come in and read his briefings to him isn't the scandal that you're hoping for.
OBABBLE doesn't know his ass from his elbow. They don't read to him...they explain what the words mean.

Right. What you have to realize, DuhTex, is that Obama and Clinton had to dumb their speeches down so that uni-brows like yourself could follow them. With Dubya, they had to ramp his speeches up to at least 3rd grade level, correct his grammar and even then he still said the stupidest shit I've ever heard come out of a politician's mouth...until Louie Gohmert came along. He's a good ol' Texas boy like you, too.
Oh
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.
He gets his security briefings in a report because he wanted to avoid any insider from making a claim that he received a verbal security briefing and didn't act on it. This way leaves a paper trail.

That's not implying he reads the reports. Not by a long shot.
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.
He gets his security briefings in a report because he wanted to avoid any insider from making a claim that he received a verbal security briefing and didn't act on it. This way leaves a paper trail.

That's not implying he reads the reports. Not by a long shot.

Your conspiracy fantasies aside, only 3 Presidents in US history have demanded that their daily reports be read to them. (Bush, Bush, and Carter)

Obama takes many more in-person Nat. Sec. briefings than most Presidents ever did. Reagan almost never had in-person briefings - using the metrics of this thread, he "missed" 99% of them.
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.
He gets his security briefings in a report because he wanted to avoid any insider from making a claim that he received a verbal security briefing and didn't act on it. This way leaves a paper trail.

That's not implying he reads the reports. Not by a long shot.

Your conspiracy fantasies aside, only 3 Presidents in US history have demanded that their daily reports be read to them. (Bush, Bush, and Carter)

Obama takes many more in-person Nat. Sec. briefings than most Presidents ever did. Reagan almost never had in-person briefings - using the metrics of this thread, he "missed" 99% of them.
proof please about Reagan if you can.
I provided proof re Obama don't you think intellectually honesty demands the same from your statement?
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.
He gets his security briefings in a report because he wanted to avoid any insider from making a claim that he received a verbal security briefing and didn't act on it. This way leaves a paper trail.

That's not implying he reads the reports. Not by a long shot.

Your conspiracy fantasies aside, only 3 Presidents in US history have demanded that their daily reports be read to them. (Bush, Bush, and Carter)

Obama takes many more in-person Nat. Sec. briefings than most Presidents ever did. Reagan almost never had in-person briefings - using the metrics of this thread, he "missed" 99% of them.
proof please about Reagan if you can.
I provided proof re Obama don't you think intellectually honesty demands the same from your statement?

You didn't provide "proof" of anything - you just linked to an op-ed. But here's some of the things a quick Google search would provide you:

Thinking back over the eight years of the two Reagan administrations, the Agency's briefing officer remembered only one or two occasions when the National Security Adviser took him into the Oval Office to brief the President directly. Unlike Carter, Reagan almost never wrote comments or questions on the PDB. On a day-to-day basis, therefore, the Agency's knowledge of the President's intelligence needs was limited. Such knowledge came only indirectly when Reagan's interests were passed on by the National Security Adviser or conveyed by the President directly to the CIA Director.

The fact that Reagan did not receive daily oral briefings from CIA officers did not mean that he did not receive intelligence information. Indeed, throughout the first few years of his administration, Reagan talked often with CIA Director Casey as well as with his other key national security aides. The President valued receiving information directly from individuals he knew personally and with whom he was comfortable; he preferred informal sessions to the more formal NSC system, which was used only infrequently.

From the CIA's Center for the Study of Intelligence: Chapter 6 -- Reagan and Bush A Study in Contrasts
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.
He gets his security briefings in a report because he wanted to avoid any insider from making a claim that he received a verbal security briefing and didn't act on it. This way leaves a paper trail.

That's not implying he reads the reports. Not by a long shot.

Your conspiracy fantasies aside, only 3 Presidents in US history have demanded that their daily reports be read to them. (Bush, Bush, and Carter)

Obama takes many more in-person Nat. Sec. briefings than most Presidents ever did. Reagan almost never had in-person briefings - using the metrics of this thread, he "missed" 99% of them.
proof please about Reagan if you can.
I provided proof re Obama don't you think intellectually honesty demands the same from your statement?

You didn't provide "proof" of anything - you just linked to an op-ed. But here's some of the things a quick Google search would provide you:

Thinking back over the eight years of the two Reagan administrations, the Agency's briefing officer remembered only one or two occasions when the National Security Adviser took him into the Oval Office to brief the President directly. Unlike Carter, Reagan almost never wrote comments or questions on the PDB. On a day-to-day basis, therefore, the Agency's knowledge of the President's intelligence needs was limited. Such knowledge came only indirectly when Reagan's interests were passed on by the National Security Adviser or conveyed by the President directly to the CIA Director.

The fact that Reagan did not receive daily oral briefings from CIA officers did not mean that he did not receive intelligence information. Indeed, throughout the first few years of his administration, Reagan talked often with CIA Director Casey as well as with his other key national security aides. The President valued receiving information directly from individuals he knew personally and with whom he was comfortable; he preferred informal sessions to the more formal NSC system, which was used only infrequently.

From the CIA's Center for the Study of Intelligence: Chapter 6 -- Reagan and Bush A Study in Contrasts
Thanks appreciate it!
 
Or doesnt, which seems to be the issue here.
People laiughed at Reagan because he got his in a TV news format. Seemed to work just fine though.

Well, no. That's not what "seems to be the issue here", that's just your imagination.
Youre right. The issue is that Obama is totally removed from reality. He misjudged, mischaracterized, and mis-spoke on every foreign policy issue. When that became obvious he threw his own team under the bus, claiming he got bad intel.
He is the most incompetent piece of shit ever to occupy the office and his continued presence there is a disgrace and an offense to every American.

In other words, you've created a narrative in your head to explain everything in the world based on your pure unadulterated hatred for Obama, and you won't let any facts get in the way of it.

In other words, you've created an ad hominem argument pretending to be an intelligent observation.

I don't think you understand what an "ad hominem" is. It's ok, though. Most people who use the term don't know what it means.

Abusive ad hominem usually involves attacking the traits of an opponent as a means to invalidate their arguments. (Wikipedia)

In your case, you assigned a personal trait ("pure unadulterated hatred") in an attempt to invalidate an argument.
 
No experience at anything was still preferred to the best Republicans had to offer by a 2:1 margin
 
No experience at anything was still preferred to the best Republicans had to offer by a 2:1 margin
NO... People like you simply voted because he was black and YOU didn't have the intellectually honesty to do ANY research to find out that Obama wasn't qualified for ANY executive position. Since people like you couldn't find ANYTHING to vote for regarding him you voted so you wouldn't be called racist!
 
On the other hand, Wynn continues to disparage the White House: "I am stunned at the immaturity of this administration. ... We elected a man as president who had no experience at anything."
Casino executive Steve Wynn more scared about US than about China

Yet many of you Obamatrons support this totally inept inexperience "Executive" ONLY because he was black!
How totally stupid you people are that voted for a black man so you wouldn't feel guilty!
Not one minute of any executive experience that would have trained Obama for the minimum requirements of being an executive i.e. KNOWING he should be attending 100% of the security briefings instead..
As reported by the Government Accountability Institute, Obama has skipped nearly 60% of his presidential security briefings in his second term in office!
And then as the immature person he is.. HE lays the blame for any such underestimates at the feet of Jim Clapper, his director of intelligence. Isn't Clapper in the administration?
Obama Misses 60 of Security Briefings 8230 and Blames Intelligence Community The Loft -- GOPUSA

Why, you silly little ass, he obviously has some real experiance, then and now. After all, before he became President, he beat Republicans for the offices he held. And twice beat the GOP in becoming a two term President.
 
No experience at anything was still preferred to the best Republicans had to offer by a 2:1 margin
NO... People like you simply voted because he was black and YOU didn't have the intellectually honesty to do ANY research to find out that Obama wasn't qualified for ANY executive position. Since people like you couldn't find ANYTHING to vote for regarding him you voted so you wouldn't be called racist!
No people voted for Obama because they blamed Republicans for two wars and an economic collapse

They still do
 
On the other hand, Wynn continues to disparage the White House: "I am stunned at the immaturity of this administration. ... We elected a man as president who had no experience at anything."
Casino executive Steve Wynn more scared about US than about China

Yet many of you Obamatrons support this totally inept inexperience "Executive" ONLY because he was black!
How totally stupid you people are that voted for a black man so you wouldn't feel guilty!
Not one minute of any executive experience that would have trained Obama for the minimum requirements of being an executive i.e. KNOWING he should be attending 100% of the security briefings instead..
As reported by the Government Accountability Institute, Obama has skipped nearly 60% of his presidential security briefings in his second term in office!
And then as the immature person he is.. HE lays the blame for any such underestimates at the feet of Jim Clapper, his director of intelligence. Isn't Clapper in the administration?
Obama Misses 60 of Security Briefings 8230 and Blames Intelligence Community The Loft -- GOPUSA

Why, you silly little ass, he obviously has some real experiance, then and now. After all, before he became President, he beat Republicans for the offices he held. And twice beat the GOP in becoming a two term President.


What real experience as an executive? Obviously YOU've never managed people i.e. been in an executive position.
You have to know as Bush did with his Masters in Business Administration from Harvard which along with Bush's governor executive experience had him hire/fire people that he as an "executive" was required to do.
What "executive" experiences did Obama have? NONE.
Unless you've managed people for a living as I've done hiring, managing, setting expectations,meeting goals,etc. Obama had never done any of that!
The ONLY thing he did was use his RACE in an affirmative action program for President!

Of course he beat republicans. He was black and idiots like you voted for him just because he was black! Never qualified.
You also being ignorant of his curriculum Vitae that shows "community organizer" has his major qualification!

People like you are just too dumb to realize Obama was never qualified to be president and the only value was his half black parent.
Proof how dumb you people are of Obama... you've heard him countless times exhort us to be "our brother's keeper"!
Well tell me as I am my brother's keeper literally WHY this millionaire President can't even seem to help his brother who lives in this $12/year hut?
Obama-brother-Hut.jpg
 
You do know that before GWB, most Presidents didn't require people to come in and read their reports to them every day.

Obama gets his security briefing like previous, more literate Presidents did - in a daily report that he reads.

"Reads?"

Based on the results, I wouldn't be so optimistic.
 

Forum List

Back
Top