We Must Do Something About The Media

heres a clue you complete fool.

They are owned by people who have a right to run their business as they see fit.


Want things to be MORE fair and them to have to report the truth?


Lets reinstate the fairness doctrine

lol, this coming from the people who were whining when a business cut their hours due to ObamaCare

dear insane person,


we are not all one person
 
The media we hasave in this country is corporate owned.

THAT is a fact.

Now you are fine with it when Fox lies to you but hate it when the other stations tell you the truth which confuses you and makes it harder for you to believe the fox lies.


Why do you hate capitalism?
 
Now would one on you brain dead cons like to show us how the Media you dont like is NOT corporate?
 
Oh my you cant find any proof that the media is anything but corporate?


Gee imagine my surprize
 
another view
links in article at site


SNIP:
Michael Friedman


Why not just label the media Democrats? A crucial election is coming and it is time for conservatives to play smash mouth with the Democratic media machine. The self-proclaimed objective media need to be called out and repositioned as Democrats. The New York Times Democrat (NYTD), the Washington Post Democrat (WaPoD), the Associated Press Democrat (APD), CBSD, ABCD, 60 Democratic Minutes, George Stepanoplous Democrat, David Gregory Democrat,... The Democrats enormous media advantage needs to be minimized.

The premise of every interview or report in the Democrat media is of a fair and objective "reporter" interviewing a public official or reporting on a topic.

The reality is when a Republican is interviewed or a Republican position is reported, it is actually a Democrat interviewing or reporting on the issue. By contrast, when a Democrat is being interviewed or an issue is being reported, the premise is that a fair and objective reporter is interviewing or reporting, the reality is a Democrat is interviewing or reporting on the issue.

This opportunity for Democratic reporters to slant their coverage without explicitly revealing their prejudice is enormous. Common tricks that reporters use to slant a story are the selection of facts, which "experts" are called upon for quotes, adjectives describing people or events, and many more.

An explicit label or repositioning of the reporter and media outlet would be a constant reminder to a busy public that the information being supplied is actually from a partisan Democrat parading as fair and objective reporter. The public will be able assign their own context and weight to the story based on the bias of the reporting source. Over time the Democratic media's power and influence will greatly diminish.

SNIP:
According to Rasmussen in a June 2008 survey, 21% of Americans perceived the press as conservative while 54% perceived the press at liberals.

all of it here
Blog: Truth in Labeling: Why Not Just Call The Media Democrats?
 
Last edited:
where in that is the evidence that the media you are complaining about is NOT corporate?
 
This man says it explicitly.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nO48JaVASXA]Reporter Admits that Media Swoons & Loses Their Minds In Obama's Presence - YouTube[/ame]

If you had any doubts or questions.
 
yet you think your jokes will make it all go away..
I think you aren't reading people very well. They aren't making jokes to make something go away, they are making jokes because they question the very existence of what you're ranting about.

I think 2nd poster nailed it, sounds like you are ready to embrace the media outlets that you agree with and declare all the rest as being some evil entity that must be stopped. You throw these ridiculous ideas out then have no interest in actually engaging in debate to back up your assertions or offer solutions. As others said, whats the point?

We need to do background checks on the media and limit the amount of information they can disseminate at any one time.
That sounds like a great way to prevent the media from being controlled by those in power! Limit what they can say and let the ones in power decide who gets to qualify as media.

why offer anything..the lamestream media has been in the pocket of the DNC since Clinton..they are just not hiding it anymore.............as for your lecture, save it

You are a true believer, unable to think for herself.
 
I think you aren't reading people very well. They aren't making jokes to make something go away, they are making jokes because they question the very existence of what you're ranting about.

I think 2nd poster nailed it, sounds like you are ready to embrace the media outlets that you agree with and declare all the rest as being some evil entity that must be stopped. You throw these ridiculous ideas out then have no interest in actually engaging in debate to back up your assertions or offer solutions. As others said, whats the point?


That sounds like a great way to prevent the media from being controlled by those in power! Limit what they can say and let the ones in power decide who gets to qualify as media.

why offer anything..the lamestream media has been in the pocket of the DNC since Clinton..they are just not hiding it anymore.............as for your lecture, save it

You are a true believer, unable to think for herself.

you know what, fuck off
 

Forum List

Back
Top