We need to stop birthright citizenship IMMEDIATELY!

[Norman]

This is an emergency, day by day America is being conquered. No wonder a literal invasion has gathered on our doorstep.

How is this crazy law still in the book? No serious nation could allow anything of the sort. Even the republicans haven't paid any attention to the issue fully endorsing the crazy. What a disappointment. Only the man with balls, that is Trump has finally put some attention to the issue after 4D chessing the supreme court for his support. Just tells how completely useless our politicians are.

We need more real men with balls, more people like the God Emperor. Can't go wrong with that message going into the election. Just imagine if we had more people with common sense making the shots. Take back our country!

it's not a law, it's in our Constitution and not so easily changed... 2/3's of the house, 2/3s of the senate and 3/4's of the state legislatures with 2/3rds voting yes on the change is needed to amend the 14th amendment... I believe?

It can be done though, just a tough road.

The 2nd amendment was not changed by 2/3rd of the states but these folks can not by a gun since 1968


It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—

(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

(2) is a fugitive from justice;

(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));

(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

(5) who, being an alien—

(A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or

(B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(26)));

(6) who [2] has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

(7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship;

(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—

(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and

(B)

(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or

(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or

(9) has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

I, for one, believe fugitives from justice and the mentally defective should be able to buy all the guns they want!

SOMEBODY has to shoot all these goddam ANCHOR BABIES, goddammit!

Someone does need to dispose of these cry babies for certain.

Citizenship is not like candy G5000. It's not given to children on demand. It should be given to Americans only, so for example your citizenship would need to be revoked. I have yet to detect one ounce of Americanism. Being a (cry)-baby simply is not enough.

Oh the irony of whining about whining in a topic you created to whine!

You have created an irony vortex which might suck this forum into another dimension!

There indeed is irony in that you call yourself an American.

The exact reason why we need to stop bringing in more Anti-Americans.

 

[The Original Tree]

Read this if you want to know what The DemNazi Party is trying to accomplish with Illegal Immigration.

The Blue Wave, Normandy Beach & Fundamentally Changing America

 

[g5000]

it's not a law, it's in our Constitution and not so easily changed... 2/3's of the house, 2/3s of the senate and 3/4's of the state legislatures with 2/3rds voting yes on the change is needed to amend the 14th amendment... I believe?

It can be done though, just a tough road.

The 2nd amendment was not changed by 2/3rd of the states but these folks can not by a gun since 1968


It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—

(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

(2) is a fugitive from justice;

(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));

(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

(5) who, being an alien—

(A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or

(B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(26)));

(6) who [2] has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

(7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship;

(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—

(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and

(B)

(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or

(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or

(9) has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

I, for one, believe fugitives from justice and the mentally defective should be able to buy all the guns they want!

SOMEBODY has to shoot all these goddam ANCHOR BABIES, goddammit!

Someone does need to dispose of these cry babies for certain.

Citizenship is not like candy G5000. It's not given to children on demand. It should be given to Americans only, so for example your citizenship would need to be revoked. I have yet to detect one ounce of Americanism. Being a (cry)-baby simply is not enough.

Oh the irony of whining about whining in a topic you created to whine!

You have created an irony vortex which might suck this forum into another dimension!

There indeed is irony in that you call yourself an American.

The exact reason why we need to stop bringing in more Anti-Americans.

Yeah, bigotry is All-American. It sure is.

Same bullshit, different century.

INVASION!!!

 

[oreo]

This is an emergency, day by day America is being conquered. No wonder a literal invasion has gathered on our doorstep.

How is this crazy law still in the book? No serious nation could allow anything of the sort. Even the republicans haven't paid any attention to the issue fully endorsing the crazy. What a disappointment. Only the man with balls, that is Trump has finally put some attention to the issue after 4D chessing the supreme court for his support. Just tells how completely useless our politicians are.

We need more real men with balls, more people like the God Emperor. Can't go wrong with that message going into the election. Just imagine if we had more people with common sense making the shots. Take back our country!

There is such a thing called the 5th amendment to the Constitution.

"Changing the actual words of the Constitution does take an amendment, as does actually deleting, repealing, or adding an amendment. In simple odds, the chance of any constitutional amendment being repealed would be roughly the same as a person living to 80 years old being struck by lightning during their lifetime. The Constitution’s Article V requires that an amendment be proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. It is up to the states to approve a new amendment, with three-quarters of the states voting to ratifying it."
What does it take to repeal a constitutional amendment? - National Constitution Center

So if Trump were actually able to use an executive order to change the U.S. Constitution, then Democrats could use an executive order to do away with the 2nd amendment, and Republicans could use an executive order to do away with Roe v Wade and Gay marriage.
Paul Ryan disagrees with Trump's call to end birthright citizenship, says it would be unconstitutional

IOW--Get over it, it's never going to happen.

When are you people going to stop letting Trump make fools out of you?

 

[Norman]

The 2nd amendment was not changed by 2/3rd of the states but these folks can not by a gun since 1968


It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—

(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

(2) is a fugitive from justice;

(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));

(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

(5) who, being an alien—

(A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or

(B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(26)));

(6) who [2] has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

(7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship;

(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—

(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and

(B)

(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or

(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or

(9) has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

I, for one, believe fugitives from justice and the mentally defective should be able to buy all the guns they want!

SOMEBODY has to shoot all these goddam ANCHOR BABIES, goddammit!

Someone does need to dispose of these cry babies for certain.

Citizenship is not like candy G5000. It's not given to children on demand. It should be given to Americans only, so for example your citizenship would need to be revoked. I have yet to detect one ounce of Americanism. Being a (cry)-baby simply is not enough.

Oh the irony of whining about whining in a topic you created to whine!

You have created an irony vortex which might suck this forum into another dimension!

You might want to post that clip into all the whiners in this topic shitting their pants over "anchor babies".

They are crying more than the "anchor babies"!

Sucking their thumbs, too.

"The anchor babies are bringing crime, they're rapists. Some anchor babies, I assume, are good...so I'll grab their pussies."

How many anti-Americans like this we have brought in needlessly as anchor babies?

It needs to stop.

 

[Taz]

Mine the border and put up Messikin pictograms. Problem solved.

 

[iceberg]

This is an emergency, day by day America is being conquered. No wonder a literal invasion has gathered on our doorstep.

How is this crazy law still in the book? No serious nation could allow anything of the sort. Even the republicans haven't paid any attention to the issue fully endorsing the crazy. What a disappointment. Only the man with balls, that is Trump has finally put some attention to the issue after 4D chessing the supreme court for his support. Just tells how completely useless our politicians are.

We need more real men with balls, more people like the God Emperor. Can't go wrong with that message going into the election. Just imagine if we had more people with common sense making the shots. Take back our country!

There is such a thing called the 5th amendment to the Constitution.

"Changing the actual words of the Constitution does take an amendment, as does actually deleting, repealing, or adding an amendment. In simple odds, the chance of any constitutional amendment being repealed would be roughly the same as a person living to 80 years old being struck by lightning during their lifetime. The Constitution’s Article V requires that an amendment be proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. It is up to the states to approve a new amendment, with three-quarters of the states voting to ratifying it."
What does it take to repeal a constitutional amendment? - National Constitution Center

So if Trump were actually able to use an executive order to change the U.S. Constitution, then Democrats could use an executive order to do away with the 2nd amendment, and Republicans could use an executive order to do away with Roe v Wade and Gay marriage.
Paul Ryan disagrees with Trump's call to end birthright citizenship, says it would be unconstitutional

IOW--Get over it, it's never going to happen.

When are you people going to stop letting Trump make fools out of you?

you should charge trump rent for living in your head.

 

[Care4all]

Yeah, it scares us when an a first born infant has been anointed a United States Citizen. Right away that infant is planning his or her first rape or murder. Just ask Donald Trump. He's prepared to use lethal force if that child dares to throw a rattle at him.

Just by being born on American soil does not make one American. The Chinese are flying their people in just to have babies in America, because for some reason, we have a retarded policy. These babies are supposedly every bit as American as actual American citizens.

You definitely are not an American. You WANT the invasion to cross over the border. Why any Americans should listen to such anti-American nonsense is beyond me.

yes they are citizens just like any person who is born on our soil and under our jurisdiction, unless they are Diplomats and have Diplomatic Immunity, where they do not answer to our jurisdiction/laws. Giving babies born here citizenship, was the way our founders got non-citizens to come and live here... it was an incentive for non citizens from Europe to come and populate our nation.... before the 14th Amendment gave that birthright to Slaves.

no.

A. Graham, "The Original Congressional Debate on Birthright Citizenship" | Counter-Currents Publishing

"The minutes of the 1866 congressional debate over the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment make for interesting reading. The clause is proposed by Senator Jacob Howard, who adds that “persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers” are excluded from it as dictated by the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”[1]"

the way you are saying is completely wrong as per the people who wrote the amendment. you can argue with them if you'd like but if you're going to use the constitution as proof, use it as intended, not as you may wish for it to be.

the SC ruled on it back in the day - so the liberals need to stop changing it cause they want votes, or for whatever reason they feel the need to today.

"The Supreme Court stated in the Slaughterhouse Cases of 1873 that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excluded “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within the United States.” This was dismissed as an obiter dictum in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), but it was the prevailing interpretation up to that point. This was again confirmed in Elk v. Wilkins (1884), in which the Court decided that an Indian who had severed his tribal ties was nonetheless not a citizen due to the fact that he owed allegiance to his tribe at the time of his birth."

nope, you are reading it wrong.... completely wrong..... alien, foreign, children and family of diplomats and diplomats is one specific group of people.

if the 14th amendment was meant in any other way, then all the white European Scottish and Irish and Italian and German etc.children born here of parents not citizens, would not be citizens and subjected to deportation and that IS NOT what they wanted.

give it up, i ain't buying your bullshit. this was debated and decided upon by the supreme court to NOT apply to the anchor baby situation. your not liking it and or inability to comprehend it doesn't change it.

if you are not a citizen of this country then you are an alien. ergo - your babies are as well. i found you a very specific example, several of them actually, that spells this out under no uncertain terms. you're now trying to interpret what they wanted and or didn't want *after* they told you. you want cred for this then do as i did and offer views from the people who wrote, debated and judged on this AT THE TIME to address your views. you incessant NO NO NO ITS MY WAY is not proof that you are right. just that you WANT to be.

check and mate.

no, it was not decided in the mannr you are making up....

I AM QUOTING what the Supreme Court SAID on it in their decision/opinion on it in US vs Ark.... silly one!

CHECK MATE!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This is an emergency, day by day America is being conquered. No wonder a literal invasion has gathered on our doorstep.

How is this crazy law still in the book? No serious nation could allow anything of the sort. Even the republicans haven't paid any attention to the issue fully endorsing the crazy. What a disappointment. Only the man with balls, that is Trump has finally put some attention to the issue after 4D chessing the supreme court for his support. Just tells how completely useless our politicians are.

We need more real men with balls, more people like the God Emperor. Can't go wrong with that message going into the election. Just imagine if we had more people with common sense making the shots. Take back our country!

There is such a thing called the 5th amendment to the Constitution.

"Changing the actual words of the Constitution does take an amendment, as does actually deleting, repealing, or adding an amendment. In simple odds, the chance of any constitutional amendment being repealed would be roughly the same as a person living to 80 years old being struck by lightning during their lifetime. The Constitution’s Article V requires that an amendment be proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. It is up to the states to approve a new amendment, with three-quarters of the states voting to ratifying it."
What does it take to repeal a constitutional amendment? - National Constitution Center

So if Trump were actually able to use an executive order to change the U.S. Constitution, then Democrats could use an executive order to do away with the 2nd amendment, and Republicans could use an executive order to do away with Roe v Wade and Gay marriage.
Paul Ryan disagrees with Trump's call to end birthright citizenship, says it would be unconstitutional

IOW--Get over it, it's never going to happen.

When are you people going to stop letting Trump make fools out of you?

Yes. Highly unlikely.

 

[Wry Catcher]

This is an emergency, day by day America is being conquered. No wonder a literal invasion has gathered on our doorstep.

How is this crazy law still in the book? No serious nation could allow anything of the sort. Even the republicans haven't paid any attention to the issue fully endorsing the crazy. What a disappointment. Only the man with balls, that is Trump has finally put some attention to the issue after 4D chessing the supreme court for his support. Just tells how completely useless our politicians are.

We need more real men with balls, more people like the God Emperor. Can't go wrong with that message going into the election. Just imagine if we had more people with common sense making the shots. Take back our country!

And you need to stop talking - you are making a fool of yourself.

You Trumpbots are SOOOO predictable. Virtually no one was talking about this - except every now and then - until Trump brought it up.

Now you people are FREAKING out about it.

You Trumpbots are acting like brainless minions....who do and think ANYTHING that Trump asks you to think.

And this is proof positive of that.


You people are SO pathetic.

He's totally unhinged. In other words, your classic trump bootlicker.

This is why I am not as worried about America as many (especially the media) have been since Trump came to power. Because almost all of the recent increase in xenophobic drivel has come/been instigated by Trump and his minions (blindly following his instructions).
He has NEVER been over 50% in the respected polls...and he clearly (barring a war), probably never will be.
His power will obviously be diminished after the midterms. And he will almost certainly (again, barring a war he starts to save his political butt) be gone by late January 2021.
And when he is gone - his Trumpbots (who are mostly old and uneducated anyway) will no longer be listened to/humoured. And the intense xenophobic rhetoric will surely diminish back to 'normal'.

In other words - THIS SAD TIME IN AMERICAN HISTORY WILL PASS.

I hope so. Trumpism, aka neo fascism, takes place:

• when a free press has been attacked and The BIG LIE has eviscerated its essential purpose, a check on power;
• when democracy has been mocked by its leader and biddable people believe elections are rigged;
• when democracy itself has been attacked by a foreign power and the majority party fails to defend our nation.

 

[iceberg]

The 2nd amendment was not changed by 2/3rd of the states but these folks can not by a gun since 1968


It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—

(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

(2) is a fugitive from justice;

(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));

(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

(5) who, being an alien—

(A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or

(B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(26)));

(6) who [2] has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

(7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship;

(8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that—

(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and

(B)

(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or

(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or

(9) has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

I, for one, believe fugitives from justice and the mentally defective should be able to buy all the guns they want!

SOMEBODY has to shoot all these goddam ANCHOR BABIES, goddammit!

Someone does need to dispose of these cry babies for certain.

Citizenship is not like candy G5000. It's not given to children on demand. It should be given to Americans only, so for example your citizenship would need to be revoked. I have yet to detect one ounce of Americanism. Being a (cry)-baby simply is not enough.

Oh the irony of whining about whining in a topic you created to whine!

You have created an irony vortex which might suck this forum into another dimension!

There indeed is irony in that you call yourself an American.

The exact reason why we need to stop bringing in more Anti-Americans.

Yeah, bigotry is All-American. It sure is.

Same bullshit, different century.

INVASION!!!

oh bigotry my hairy pimple damaged ass.

i welcome them with open arms and will do all i can to help them IF THEY follow the processes we have in place to get here. if those need to be changed, then lets get congress off their ass and get it changed to help work visas at least and/or deal with the issue.

but calling people "men old white men" cause they want the law followed carries no weight anymore and just makes you look like a pissed off asswhipe cause you've got no argument, so demean people and stomp your size 6 foot around.

 

[iceberg]

Just by being born on American soil does not make one American. The Chinese are flying their people in just to have babies in America, because for some reason, we have a retarded policy. These babies are supposedly every bit as American as actual American citizens.

You definitely are not an American. You WANT the invasion to cross over the border. Why any Americans should listen to such anti-American nonsense is beyond me.

yes they are citizens just like any person who is born on our soil and under our jurisdiction, unless they are Diplomats and have Diplomatic Immunity, where they do not answer to our jurisdiction/laws. Giving babies born here citizenship, was the way our founders got non-citizens to come and live here... it was an incentive for non citizens from Europe to come and populate our nation.... before the 14th Amendment gave that birthright to Slaves.

no.

A. Graham, "The Original Congressional Debate on Birthright Citizenship" | Counter-Currents Publishing

"The minutes of the 1866 congressional debate over the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment make for interesting reading. The clause is proposed by Senator Jacob Howard, who adds that “persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers” are excluded from it as dictated by the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”[1]"

the way you are saying is completely wrong as per the people who wrote the amendment. you can argue with them if you'd like but if you're going to use the constitution as proof, use it as intended, not as you may wish for it to be.

the SC ruled on it back in the day - so the liberals need to stop changing it cause they want votes, or for whatever reason they feel the need to today.

"The Supreme Court stated in the Slaughterhouse Cases of 1873 that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excluded “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within the United States.” This was dismissed as an obiter dictum in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), but it was the prevailing interpretation up to that point. This was again confirmed in Elk v. Wilkins (1884), in which the Court decided that an Indian who had severed his tribal ties was nonetheless not a citizen due to the fact that he owed allegiance to his tribe at the time of his birth."

nope, you are reading it wrong.... completely wrong..... alien, foreign, children and family of diplomats and diplomats is one specific group of people.

if the 14th amendment was meant in any other way, then all the white European Scottish and Irish and Italian and German etc.children born here of parents not citizens, would not be citizens and subjected to deportation and that IS NOT what they wanted.

give it up, i ain't buying your bullshit. this was debated and decided upon by the supreme court to NOT apply to the anchor baby situation. your not liking it and or inability to comprehend it doesn't change it.

if you are not a citizen of this country then you are an alien. ergo - your babies are as well. i found you a very specific example, several of them actually, that spells this out under no uncertain terms. you're now trying to interpret what they wanted and or didn't want *after* they told you. you want cred for this then do as i did and offer views from the people who wrote, debated and judged on this AT THE TIME to address your views. you incessant NO NO NO ITS MY WAY is not proof that you are right. just that you WANT to be.

check and mate.

no, it was not decided in the mannr you are making up....

I AM QUOTING what the Supreme Court SAID on it in their decision/opinion on it in US vs Ark.... silly one!

CHECK MATE!

link it. show me how the SC addressed anchor babies and allows it.

looks like our kings are still alive at this point.

 

[Norman]

This is an emergency, day by day America is being conquered. No wonder a literal invasion has gathered on our doorstep.

How is this crazy law still in the book? No serious nation could allow anything of the sort. Even the republicans haven't paid any attention to the issue fully endorsing the crazy. What a disappointment. Only the man with balls, that is Trump has finally put some attention to the issue after 4D chessing the supreme court for his support. Just tells how completely useless our politicians are.

We need more real men with balls, more people like the God Emperor. Can't go wrong with that message going into the election. Just imagine if we had more people with common sense making the shots. Take back our country!

There is such a thing called the 5th amendment to the Constitution.

"Changing the actual words of the Constitution does take an amendment, as does actually deleting, repealing, or adding an amendment. In simple odds, the chance of any constitutional amendment being repealed would be roughly the same as a person living to 80 years old being struck by lightning during their lifetime. The Constitution’s Article V requires that an amendment be proposed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. It is up to the states to approve a new amendment, with three-quarters of the states voting to ratifying it."
What does it take to repeal a constitutional amendment? - National Constitution Center

So if Trump were actually able to use an executive order to change the U.S. Constitution, then Democrats could use an executive order to do away with the 2nd amendment, and Republicans could use an executive order to do away with Roe v Wade and Gay marriage.
Paul Ryan disagrees with Trump's call to end birthright citizenship, says it would be unconstitutional

IOW--Get over it, it's never going to happen.

When are you people going to stop letting Trump make fools out of you?

It won't happen... sure... sure. Just like Trump presidency.

There is a reason why Trump went after the issue only after getting his supreme court picks. This is how chess is played in 4D.

Too bad if you are an enemy of America.

 

[g5000]

The racists know they can't get a majority of Americans to buy into their fear, much less the required super-majority, and so they have deluded themselves into believing a simple pen-and-ink change by the President is totally okay.

It's amazing how Trump has succeeded in getting the pseuedocons to prove themselves hypocrites on literally EVERYTHING for which they attacked Obama.

It's almost as if Trump was a New York Democrat playing a long running hoax on them.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I'm going to show you a photo of a creature which absolutely terrifies pseudocons. It causes them to curl up in a ball, shit their pants, and whimper.

It is a creature more terrifying than a Muslim suicide bomber, more horrifying than a transsexual, more disgusting than a negro on food stamps. It is a creature so unbelievably frightening, the pseudocon propagandists had to invent a new term for it.

Brace yourself.














Ready?













Watch out for the ANCHOR BABIES!!!! AAAAAAGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

OH GOD PLEASE NOT THE ANCHOR BABIES....

What g5000 doesnt tell you is those precious little silver tooth money trees will turn into disgusting, taxpayer dependent, baby making, criminal filth...many will end up making LA’s Most Wanted list.
Non English speaking, indecent, immoral thirdworld filth has no place in our first world society, they simply can’t make it here standing on their own two feet, it’s been proven over and over again. We have plenty of pet humans here now and everybody sane and operating on their own checkbook knows it.
All Most Wanted - Los Angeles Police Department

Wow. You've been seriously brainwashed, haven't you, you little racist fuck.

“Brainwashed”?
Don’t need to be...I thought all sane people pay attention to statistics...no?
Look at every wetback infested shithole in America....look at every disgusting, fucked up Brown nation in the world. Look it up pussy...I make nothing up. Don’t be scared Gustavo...You’re filth, just admit it.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Fast forward 100 years.....

Whites are only 10% of the US population.
Hispanics are 80% of the population
GDP is barely 1 trillion annually
The US military can barely feed it's ranks (of 37,000)....AirForce now uses turbo prop single seaters as it's "advanced" fighters
Mexico has re-annexed California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, most of Arizona and Colorado, and parts of Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyoming
Welfare no longer available, blacks have fled to Mexico and S America looking for work
China has long since acquired Intel, Microsoft, Google, Apple, Amazon etc etc etc...and moved them all to China
Venezuela, now a RightWing stronghold and oil producer has emerged as the Western Hemisphere's fastest growing industrial nation. Whites flock there.

Back in the USA, "victorious" Democrats step over syringes and feces in the streets, crumbling infrastructure dominates as far as the eye can see...crime is so bad that millions have fled for safety in Canada, Europe and south of the border (except, canada is about as bad)...... those Democrats look up and go "Damn!....this place sucks! What happened ?????

 

[rightwinger]

We have had birthright citizenship for 150 years

Why the sudden urgency to stop it?

 

[iceberg]

The racists know they can't get a majority of Americans to buy into their fear, much less the required super-majority, and so they have deluded themselves into believing a simple pen-and-ink change by the President is totally okay.

It's amazing how Trump has succeeded in getting the pseuedocons to prove themselves hypocrites on literally EVERYTHING for which they attacked Obama.

It's almost as if Trump was a New York Democrat playing a long running hoax on them.

hey - now that i used "bigot" i'll lob out "racist" and show how superior morally i am cause i called them nasty names to show how i feel about their actions!!

maybe one day i'll have a point of merit and not just insult my way into a discussion...

 

[g5000]

I'm going to show you a photo of a creature which absolutely terrifies pseudocons. It causes them to curl up in a ball, shit their pants, and whimper.

It is a creature more terrifying than a Muslim suicide bomber, more horrifying than a transsexual, more disgusting than a negro on food stamps. It is a creature so unbelievably frightening, the pseudocon propagandists had to invent a new term for it.

Brace yourself.














Ready?













Watch out for the ANCHOR BABIES!!!! AAAAAAGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

OH GOD PLEASE NOT THE ANCHOR BABIES....

What g5000 doesnt tell you is those precious little silver tooth money trees will turn into disgusting, taxpayer dependent, baby making, criminal filth...many will end up making LA’s Most Wanted list.
Non English speaking, indecent, immoral thirdworld filth has no place in our first world society, they simply can’t make it here standing on their own two feet, it’s been proven over and over again. We have plenty of pet humans here now and everybody sane and operating on their own checkbook knows it.
All Most Wanted - Los Angeles Police Department

Wow. You've been seriously brainwashed, haven't you, you little racist fuck.

“Brainwashed”?
Don’t need to be...I thought all sane people pay attention to statistics...no?
Look at every wetback infested shithole in America....look at every disgusting, fucked up Brown nation in the world. Look it up pussy...I make nothing up. Don’t be scared Gustavo...You’re filth, just admit it.

"...look at every disgusting, fucked up Brown nation in the world."

Yesterday, I pointed out that the pseudocons on this board either place Winner tags on the posts of the white supremacists in their midst, or avert their eyes. I have never once seen a pseudocon call one of you out for your white supremacist shit.

And in many cases, they come to your aid and defense.


TA-DAAAAAAA!

 

[iceberg]

We have had birthright citizenship for 150 years

Why the sudden urgency to stop it?

um...this was debated and SC decided upon when it was written. it was not to allow citizenship to anyone born here.

saying it a million times won't change it. back it up with a counter from valid sources. your emo-state of mind doesn't count.