ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ok-meme-blames-great-society-large-rise-afri/
You know where this is going but stick with it so you can see the extent to which they lie in order to make the picture appear worse than what it is...
Of course its exaggerated thats how demonization works silly
snip
snip
But it was welfare for white people so that makes it ok. Continuing on
Snip
Imagine that? Another Right wing email chain that turns out full of bunk. At least they are consistent. Where's Alan Keys when you need a black dude to defend white dudes?
The meme features a photograph of President Lyndon B. Johnson, whose "war on poverty" agenda in the mid 1960s was known as the Great Society.
Superimposed on Johnsons image is the following text: "Black children born without a father in the home rate pre-LBJ's 'Great Society' welfare system in 1964: 7 percent. Black children born without a father in the home rate post-LBJ's 'Great Society' 2014 = 73 percent. Hey, liberals, how's your 'Great Society' working out for the black family?"
We wanted to know if the memes numbers were right: Did the percentage of black children born without a father in the home rise from 7 percent before the Great Society to 73 percent today, and was it due to Johnson and the Great Society?
As we researched this claim, we noticed a problem: There is no federal data on "black children born without a father in the home."Instead, we found two types of data that are similar -- but not a perfect fit.
One is unmarried black births as a percentage of all black births. The other is the percentage of black children living without a father in the home.
The first option addresses births, a key focus of the Facebook claim. But this figure ignores cases in which a couple isnt married, but where the father is living in the home.
The second option, by contrast, does address living arrangements, but it includes all children up to age 18, not those who were "born" that year.
So to be as complete as possible, well analyze both statistics here.
You know where this is going but stick with it so you can see the extent to which they lie in order to make the picture appear worse than what it is...
Unmarried black births as a percentage of all black births
In 1964, according to federal health statistics, 24.6 percent of births to non-whites were considered "illegitimate," the term used for out-of-wedlock births at the time.
In 2012, the percentage of black births that were made to unmarried black mothers was 72 percent.
This is a large increase, and the more recent figure is more or less on target. However, the starting point in 1964 is higher than the Facebook post suggests. So the overall increase is more limited than the meme says. (Note: The 1964 figure was based on the "non-white" population, a category that includes Hispanics and Asian-Americans, while the 2012 figure was for African Americans only.)
So if you use this measurement, the memes numbers are off.
Of course its exaggerated thats how demonization works silly
The percentage of black children living without a father in the home
These figures offer even less support for the Facebook claim.
According to Census Bureau data, about 20 percent of black children in 1960 were living with just a mother. The comparable figure for 2013 is 50 percent of black children living with a mother only. (The only pre-Great Society year for which data is available is 1960.)
So this measurement, too, shows an increase. But the increase is two-and-a-half times bigger, not 10 times bigger, as the meme says, and its up by 25 to 30 percentage points, rather than the 66 points cited in the meme.
When we checked with experts, we found additional problems of context and logic with the claim. Here are a few of them:
Black families werent the only group to see an increase in single motherhood over the same time period
snip
We dont really know how common black single parenthood was prior to the Great Society
snip
"Welfare" -- the implicit target of the meme -- existed well before the Great Society
The welfare rules of the 1960s may have imposed a "marriage penalty" on recipients -- benefits that could be earned as a single person would disappear once a recipient got married. But such a pattern should have become evident well before the Great Society.
" Welfare was part of the New Deal in the 1930s," said Timothy M. Smeeding, director of the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin. "It was designed for widows with kids who didnt qualify for Social Security, but it soon became a single-parent program for divorcees and later unmarried mothers."
But it was welfare for white people so that makes it ok. Continuing on
Correlation does not equal causation
Snip
Our ruling
A meme circulating on social media said the percentage of black children born without a father in the home has risen from 7 percent in 1964 to 73 percent today, due to changes from President Lyndon Johnsons Great Society.
Theres no federal data to back up the memes specific claim, but the most applicable statistics show an increase in black fatherlessness that is more limited, and the rise might have been even more modest still if the early-1960s data had been more reliable.
In addition, the focus on Johnson and the Great Society is likely a red herring, since broader, societal factors are believed to have played a major role in rising rates of single-parenthood -- not just among blacks, but also among whites.
The exaggerated statistics, combined with an ignorance of important context, leads us to rate the claim False.
Imagine that? Another Right wing email chain that turns out full of bunk. At least they are consistent. Where's Alan Keys when you need a black dude to defend white dudes?