Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The full house will vote, when and if they go in to Impeachment Proceedings... which takes a vote in the Judicial Committee first... then on to the floor of the house, is my understanding of it...Because she can have the Intelligence Comm investigate without putting her members who are in districts Trump carried in 16 in the bad spot of having to vote.That's correct, but always before the House held a floor vote to begin an impeachment inquiry, so why is Pelosi violating precedent this time?Where does the const say the House cannot ok the speaker assigning an impeachment investigation to the intelligence community? It doesn't. It says the House has the power of impeachment, and both the Senate and House write their own rules by maj vote.Pelosi must first allow another vote to impeach him and this time succeed and no, only pinheads "know" what you do.Let's put Trump under oath. He won't be able to last 30 seconds without committing perjury. And everyone knows it.
It's not only that our leftared "friends" are monumentally ignorant but rather that so much of what they know just isn't so (with apologies to R. Reagan).
Like I said I don't see impeachment in the cards, but nearly 60% agree that the Ukraine urged to investigate Biden for aid needed investigating. I really don't think anything else blatantly offensive to the const is out there
Nation's intelligence officers are resigned to serving a president who doesn't trust them
"It is possible that additional whistleblowers will come forward to pile on evidence that Trump is committing crimes, making the original Ukraine whistleblower the impetus for a watershed moment that will topple Trump’s presidency."
What would be a boon for the gop is that probably the dems eventually will have to vote on whether to impeach. I mean Pelosi could just not bring it up, but imagine AOC or Omar. And I don't all dems will vote to impeach, and AOC will declare war on them …. leaving Trump to savor his Big Macs and fries. LOL
I want to see an impeachment that goes through a senate vote. What's this shit about having the intelligency committee doing the investigation so her members won't have to vote? Is that something like "super delegates" who have their vote counted before the election? Biggest thing I've seen today is recorded voice mails having Brennan saying Obama personally told him to do all this illegal spying and other stuff.
Woo ... it's been a long time since someone on the left attempted a rational thought. Thank you.What would be a boon for the gop is that probably the dems eventually will have to vote on whether to impeach... And I don't all dems will vote to impeach, and AOC will declare war on them … leaving Trump to savor his Big Macs and fries.That's correct, but always before the House held a floor vote to begin an impeachment inquiry, so why is Pelosi violating precedent this time?
July 17, 2019 - House kills lone Democrat’s Trump impeachment push in move that could further fracture the partyThe full house will vote, when and if they go in to Impeachment Proceedings... which takes a vote in the Judicial Committee first... then on to the floor of the house, is my understanding of it...Because she can have the Intelligence Comm investigate without putting her members who are in districts Trump carried in 16 in the bad spot of having to vote.That's correct, but always before the House held a floor vote to begin an impeachment inquiry, so why is Pelosi violating precedent this time?Where does the const say the House cannot ok the speaker assigning an impeachment investigation to the intelligence community? It doesn't. It says the House has the power of impeachment, and both the Senate and House write their own rules by maj vote.Pelosi must first allow another vote to impeach him and this time succeed and no, only pinheads "know" what you do.
It's not only that our leftared "friends" are monumentally ignorant but rather that so much of what they know just isn't so (with apologies to R. Reagan).
Like I said I don't see impeachment in the cards, but nearly 60% agree that the Ukraine urged to investigate Biden for aid needed investigating. I really don't think anything else blatantly offensive to the const is out there
Nation's intelligence officers are resigned to serving a president who doesn't trust them
"It is possible that additional whistleblowers will come forward to pile on evidence that Trump is committing crimes, making the original Ukraine whistleblower the impetus for a watershed moment that will topple Trump’s presidency."
What would be a boon for the gop is that probably the dems eventually will have to vote on whether to impeach. I mean Pelosi could just not bring it up, but imagine AOC or Omar. And I don't all dems will vote to impeach, and AOC will declare war on them …. leaving Trump to savor his Big Macs and fries. LOL
I want to see an impeachment that goes through a senate vote. What's this shit about having the intelligency committee doing the investigation so her members won't have to vote? Is that something like "super delegates" who have their vote counted before the election? Biggest thing I've seen today is recorded voice mails having Brennan saying Obama personally told him to do all this illegal spying and other stuff.
they vote on articles of impeachment drawn up, yea or nay and the yeas won go on to the Senate, for a trial.
Always before, the whole House voted to open an impeachment inquiry, so why has Pelosi violated precedent by refusing to allow the House hold a floor vote to open this inquiry?The full house will vote, when and if they go in to Impeachment Proceedings... which takes a vote in the Judicial Committee first... then on to the floor of the house, is my understanding of it...Because she can have the Intelligence Comm investigate without putting her members who are in districts Trump carried in 16 in the bad spot of having to vote.That's correct, but always before the House held a floor vote to begin an impeachment inquiry, so why is Pelosi violating precedent this time?Where does the const say the House cannot ok the speaker assigning an impeachment investigation to the intelligence community? It doesn't. It says the House has the power of impeachment, and both the Senate and House write their own rules by maj vote.Pelosi must first allow another vote to impeach him and this time succeed and no, only pinheads "know" what you do.
It's not only that our leftared "friends" are monumentally ignorant but rather that so much of what they know just isn't so (with apologies to R. Reagan).
Like I said I don't see impeachment in the cards, but nearly 60% agree that the Ukraine urged to investigate Biden for aid needed investigating. I really don't think anything else blatantly offensive to the const is out there
Nation's intelligence officers are resigned to serving a president who doesn't trust them
"It is possible that additional whistleblowers will come forward to pile on evidence that Trump is committing crimes, making the original Ukraine whistleblower the impetus for a watershed moment that will topple Trump’s presidency."
What would be a boon for the gop is that probably the dems eventually will have to vote on whether to impeach. I mean Pelosi could just not bring it up, but imagine AOC or Omar. And I don't all dems will vote to impeach, and AOC will declare war on them …. leaving Trump to savor his Big Macs and fries. LOL
I want to see an impeachment that goes through a senate vote. What's this shit about having the intelligency committee doing the investigation so her members won't have to vote? Is that something like "super delegates" who have their vote counted before the election? Biggest thing I've seen today is recorded voice mails having Brennan saying Obama personally told him to do all this illegal spying and other stuff.
they vote on articles of impeachment drawn up, yea or nay and the yeas won go on to the Senate, for a trial.
Speaking of shock, this will surely come as one to you but those who have not convicted Trump - who has yet to be charged with high crimes or for that matter, any crimes - employ an American tradition known as presumption of innocence. You OTOH clearly believe in presumption of guiltyes. ACTUALLY DOING what they are accusing everyone else of. now there's a shock (yawn)And you or others, have already exonerated him, right?...
I do not know Pelosi' s game plan, but I do trust her... to know what she is doing... And believe she does does love America.they can participate, and are.... they just can't subpoena... which is fine with me... who needs one of their dog and pony show/ obfuscation theatrics, at this stage of the process.... that would only make it in to one big tent circus with a bunch of side shows?If the house were so fucking concerned about our national whatever, they'd take a formal vote instead of having Adam Schitt refuse to let members of the GOP participate in inquiries.
And you don't think the house should vote on this so that the American People can see what a bunch of upstanding patriots are at the helm ?
You know good fucking well why they won't take a vote on it. It's not clear Pelosi would get what she needs when they have to hang their asses out in the sun to be seen for who they are.
My limited understanding, is that there will be a. Full vote, when the time is right... if they do decide to move forward, to impeach.... right now it is simply the grand jury phase, so to speak and the President or target in a criminal case, has no say so.
They can do such, when that happens, is my understanding.... but where in the rules is that? What is the rule number? If someone has posted this already, I missed it...they can participate, and are.... they just can't subpoena... which is fine with me... who needs one of their dog and pony show/ obfuscation theatrics, at this stage of the process.... that would only make it in to one big tent circus with a bunch of side shows?If the house were so fucking concerned about our national whatever, they'd take a formal vote instead of having Adam Schitt refuse to let members of the GOP participate in inquiries.
The minority party can't subpoena before the whole House votes on impeachment, Once the whole House votes the minority can subpoena. It's in the House rules. Look it up or show us where they can't.
So you've never heard of due process nor presumption of innocence, eh?
Me neither, at least we agree in principle on that point, however using shoddy, bullshit articles like the one you linked in your OP as a basis for your premise doesn't lend any credibility to your declaration of indifference.I frankly don't give a damn if Trump is impeached or not.OIC, thanks for taking the time and effort to elaborate on your mode of operation.I subscribe to the "Karma's a BITCH!" philosophy."Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up!"
Look at them whining now!
Are you one of those that subscribe to the "two wrongs make a right" philosophy?
They are reaping what they have sown.
"Stupid is as stupid does" -- Forrest Gump
Whatever floats your boat I suppose, enjoy.I am just enjoying the whining of Trump and the pseudocons as karma kicks them in the nuts for a while. Their whining is pleasing to my ears.
Says someone who posts on an internet forum."They are not only idle who do nothing, but they are idle also who might be better employed." -- Socrates
Says someone who posts on an internet forum."They are not only idle who do nothing, but they are idle also who might be better employed." -- Socrates
I was just wondering how you stand the stench of your own hypocrisy. Sorry.Says someone who posts on an internet forum."They are not only idle who do nothing, but they are idle also who might be better employed." -- Socrates
ROFLMAO! apparently good ole Socrates struck a nerve, huh? As usual your buttons are way too easy to press.
Mission Accomplished, it's Miller Time.
