What are the effects of the Roe Overturn today?

Hardly, they recognized the precedent existed, they did not proclaim it was the right precedent nor etched in stone for eternity. Either way, done is done. We will be moving on. You folks can cry to your heart's content.
Horseshit

Recognizing precedent means you will follow that precedent

Idiot
 
No it doesn't. Get over it, whining won't change anything.
Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts.


You're an idiot
 
Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts.


You're an idiot
So yesterday didn't happen? At least you can stop crying now.
 
Following precedent or recognizing it means to use it to inform subsequent rulings

So who said they didn't use it? If they ruled that felons could possess firearms after they got out of prison, and the murder rate skyrocketed because of felons having guns, does that mean we can no longer stop felons from obtaining firearms?
 
Here, let me quote Rothbard for you, and then you go sit in the corner with your dunce hat on after which you remove "libertarian" from your avatar. Dumbass.

Twitter LinkedIn Email



By Martin van Staden
19 June 2015

3 2548 4

Email Address
Subscribe for Article Updates
RS-Banner-FB.png

“Most discussion of the issue bogs down in minutiae about when human life begins, when or if the fetus can be considered to be alive, etc. All this is really irrelevant to the issue of the legality (again, not necessarily the morality) of abortion. The Catholic antiabortionist, for example, declares that all that he wants for the fetus is the rights of any human being—i.e., the right not to be murdered. But there is more involved here, and this is the crucial consideration. If we are to treat the fetus as having the same rights as humans, then let us ask: What human has the right to remain, unbidden, as an unwanted parasite within some other human being’s body? This is the nub of the issue: the absolute right of every person and hence every woman, to the ownership of her own body. What the mother is doing in an abortion is causing an unwanted entity within her body to be ejected from it: If the fetus dies, this does not rebut the point that no being has a right to live, unbidden, as a parasite within or upon some person’s body.
The common retort that the mother either originally wanted or at least was responsible for placing the fetus within her body is, again, beside the point. Even in the stronger case where the mother originally wanted the child, the mother, as the property owner in her own body, has the right to change her mind and to eject it.”


Retard Nazi thinks that there can be no dissent.

You are quite the stupid fuck. :lmao:
 
And you still could not be forced get one, even under the state of a pandemic emergency....you could resist and not be jailed.....it was not a criminal offense to resist, ..... though if a doctor or nurse etc, you could lose your job.... :eek:

Correct, there are options to almost everything, such as if you don't like this ruling, then have protected sex. See how simple that was?
 
Overturning Roe was never about ‘abortion’ – it was about destroying the 14th Amendment caselaw that stood in the way of conservatives establishing the tyranny of Republican minority rule.
No it is about the Constitution that says 0 about abortion that is why control was returned to the states. You have no respect for the rule of law along with the assholes you support.
 

Forum List

Back
Top