What Are They, If Not A Mob?

[OldLady]

The Democrats have perfected a time machine. They've got their 1960s back.

A Paid protest is not a protest .

They're not PAID PROTESTS either.

 

[Tilly]

the majority are protesting -

Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

that majority shows up at the polls and Republicans are fucked.

they werent heard just before Kavanaugh was confirmed, the intend to be heard after ...

cya Repubs ..

Still put your trust in polls, huh?
Lol.

 

[Tilly]

The Democrats have perfected a time machine. They've got their 1960s back.

A Paid protest is not a protest .

They're not PAID PROTESTS either.

Prove they are not paid (after all, demanding proof of a negative is all the rage right now)

 

[kiwiman127]

Republicans can't stand women who are pragmatic and think for themselves. No for them it's, "back in the kitchen wench."

 

[Siete]

the majority are protesting -

Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

that majority shows up at the polls and Republicans are fucked.

they werent heard just before Kavanaugh was confirmed, the intend to be heard after ...

cya Repubs ..

Still put your trust in polls, huh?
Lol.

just Fox polls

 

[miketx]

the majority are protesting -

Fox News Poll: Record number of voters oppose Kavanaugh nomination

Hillary by a landslide.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Freedom to assemble and to seek redress are constitutionally guaranteed rights.

When such actions interfere with the rights of others, it ceases to be mere protest and loses constitutional protection.

Your rights end where mine begin.

Republicans stoke fear of Democratic 'angry mobs' ahead of midterms

Pretty simple trick, turning "protest" into "mob." Gives it a whole different spin, doesn't it? You want scary, listen to a Trump rally some time when they boo Clinton or the press or whatever beef of the day the President has. Loud mob is exactly what it is.

Yeah, calling people wailing while pounding on and prying at the doors of a government building a "mob" instead of a "protest" is just a trick of semantics and spin. Not reality. And if you REALLY want scary, never mind 70 people being arrested in a Senate hearing; gotta look at campaign rallies where no one was arrested, but someone said words the left didn't like. Oooooohhh!!! *shudder* Now THAT'S a mob. No spin involved in THAT analysis.

We all know what a mob really is, and the protesters aren't it.

Property damaged, people chased out of public places, arrests made. If "we all know what a mob really is, and that isn't it", then it'll fill the bill until the "real" thing comes along.

And why do I suspect the only thing that missing for it to be a "real" mob is for it not to be leftists?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Radicalized zombies. Most reasonable logical Americans look at the Pussy Hatter mobs, and are appalled. They know those folks ain't right. Hopefully that'll be expressed at the Ballot Box in the future. Stay tuned.

Seems to be what the polls are indicating now, although who knows how long the voters' memory spans are?

 

[Siete]

you could put up a $500 reward for RW's to go an entire day without bringing up Clinton on this board and they wouldnt last 15 seconds before your $$ was safe.

 

[OldLady]

The crew here insisted on taking it off topic so badly that I requested it be removed.
Actual news is no longer tolerated by a big bunch of folks; Trump supporters no longer believe any news critical of the President or anyone he supports, and they are steadily moving into vilifying and turning Democrats into the "other" and an "enemy." I sometimes wonder where this will end.

Nah. Nobody was interested in your bullshit is all that was. Where will it all end? When you wake the fuck up. If ever.

Nah, this was pretty professionally deflected into other issues by the folks who refuse to listen to actual facts.

 

[OldLady]

Freedom to assemble and to seek redress are constitutionally guaranteed rights.

When such actions interfere with the rights of others, it ceases to be mere protest and loses constitutional protection.

Your rights end where mine begin.

Republicans stoke fear of Democratic 'angry mobs' ahead of midterms

Pretty simple trick, turning "protest" into "mob." Gives it a whole different spin, doesn't it? You want scary, listen to a Trump rally some time when they boo Clinton or the press or whatever beef of the day the President has. Loud mob is exactly what it is.

Yeah, calling people wailing while pounding on and prying at the doors of a government building a "mob" instead of a "protest" is just a trick of semantics and spin. Not reality. And if you REALLY want scary, never mind 70 people being arrested in a Senate hearing; gotta look at campaign rallies where no one was arrested, but someone said words the left didn't like. Oooooohhh!!! *shudder* Now THAT'S a mob. No spin involved in THAT analysis.

We all know what a mob really is, and the protesters aren't it.

Property damaged, people chased out of public places, arrests made. If "we all know what a mob really is, and that isn't it", then it'll fill the bill until the "real" thing comes along.

And why do I suspect the only thing that missing for it to be a "real" mob is for it not to be leftists?

I didn't see that article. When I think mob, I think a large group of people who cannot be controlled and who yes are violent, bent on destruction, etc. When this thread opened, the first reference to a "mob" was the protesters in front of the Supreme Court this weekend, and those in the Senate last week. The ones arrested were for the most part just refusing to leave. NO ONE was violent. No one hurt anyone. That was not a mob. Some people are saying even the Women's March was a "mob." They are calling every protest a "mob." That is not accurate.

 

[Siete]

NEWS FLASH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MOBS VOTE AGAINST THOSE THEY ARE PROTESTING

aint that a bitch.

 

[Siete]

Freedom to assemble and to seek redress are constitutionally guaranteed rights.

When such actions interfere with the rights of others, it ceases to be mere protest and loses constitutional protection.

Your rights end where mine begin.

Republicans stoke fear of Democratic 'angry mobs' ahead of midterms

Pretty simple trick, turning "protest" into "mob." Gives it a whole different spin, doesn't it? You want scary, listen to a Trump rally some time when they boo Clinton or the press or whatever beef of the day the President has. Loud mob is exactly what it is.

Yeah, calling people wailing while pounding on and prying at the doors of a government building a "mob" instead of a "protest" is just a trick of semantics and spin. Not reality. And if you REALLY want scary, never mind 70 people being arrested in a Senate hearing; gotta look at campaign rallies where no one was arrested, but someone said words the left didn't like. Oooooohhh!!! *shudder* Now THAT'S a mob. No spin involved in THAT analysis.

We all know what a mob really is, and the protesters aren't it.

Property damaged, people chased out of public places, arrests made. If "we all know what a mob really is, and that isn't it", then it'll fill the bill until the "real" thing comes along.

And why do I suspect the only thing that missing for it to be a "real" mob is for it not to be leftists?

I didn't see that article. When I think mob, I think a large group of people who cannot be controlled and who yes are violent, bent on destruction, etc. When this thread opened, the first reference to a "mob" was the protesters in front of the Supreme Court this weekend, and those in the Senate last week. The ones arrested were for the most part just refusing to leave. NO ONE was violent. No one hurt anyone. That was not a mob. Some people are saying even the Women's March was a "mob." They are calling every protest a "mob." That is not accurate.

there will be a mob at the polls sending RW's back to Mickey D's

 

[Cecilie1200]

Freedom to assemble and to seek redress are constitutionally guaranteed rights.

When such actions interfere with the rights of others, it ceases to be mere protest and loses constitutional protection.

Your rights end where mine begin.

Republicans stoke fear of Democratic 'angry mobs' ahead of midterms

Pretty simple trick, turning "protest" into "mob." Gives it a whole different spin, doesn't it? You want scary, listen to a Trump rally some time when they boo Clinton or the press or whatever beef of the day the President has. Loud mob is exactly what it is.

Yeah, calling people wailing while pounding on and prying at the doors of a government building a "mob" instead of a "protest" is just a trick of semantics and spin. Not reality. And if you REALLY want scary, never mind 70 people being arrested in a Senate hearing; gotta look at campaign rallies where no one was arrested, but someone said words the left didn't like. Oooooohhh!!! *shudder* Now THAT'S a mob. No spin involved in THAT analysis.

We all know what a mob really is, and the protesters aren't it.

Exactly.
The Nazis who showed up in Charlottesville were a mob.
The women in D.C. didn't lift a finger except for when they politely allowed the police to arrest them.
.
.

Show of hands, everyone who's going to accept sanctimonious moralizing from a dirtbag who wants to pitch a hissy about "Nazis" (who actually number maybe a few thousand people in the whole country, no matter how hard lying ass hats try to pretend everyone on the right is included), totally ignore the vastly more numerous AND more violent leftists who showed up to "oppose" them, and then wave away everything else as "not really a mob" because he approves of them?

Anyone?

Didn't think so.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Freedom to assemble and to seek redress are constitutionally guaranteed rights.

When such actions interfere with the rights of others, it ceases to be mere protest and loses constitutional protection.

Your rights end where mine begin.

Republicans stoke fear of Democratic 'angry mobs' ahead of midterms

Pretty simple trick, turning "protest" into "mob." Gives it a whole different spin, doesn't it? You want scary, listen to a Trump rally some time when they boo Clinton or the press or whatever beef of the day the President has. Loud mob is exactly what it is.

With Little Trumpsters, if Trump called female protesters "mobs", it must be true!
Despite: Analysis | President Trump has made more than 5,000 false or misleading claims
All of the lies/misleading statements are verified and have not been debunked by Trump, Trump's aids or supporters, ever.

"Never mind what you said. TRRRRRUUUUUUMMMMPPPP!!!"

Here's a hint: when your only response is "Well, YOU support Trump!" you've lost.

 

[jc456]

Well I'm a woman and I don't feel marginalized at all.

he just told us you did and he knows exactly how you feel. he is lying?

 

[DOTR]

While I tend to agree that the Dems were redundantly unhinged during the Kavanaugh hearings, I also remember the House recent "investigations" and how blatantly unhinged Republicans behaved.
That said, neither the Dems or Repugs, own the patent of extreme "mob" actions/reactions.

When is the last time an angry mob of conservatives clawed at the doors of the supreme court or ganged up to threaten congressmen and their families?

Liberalism is barbarism attacking civilization. Perfectly epitomized by physical attacks on the Supreme Court building itself which we saw.

 

[DOTR]

Very good article on the insanity. A witness in the Senate gallery says he only ever heard these sounds in insane asylums as a young reporter. Probably it’s actually demonic. Years of self hatred and abortion obsession drive them to this state.

Kavanaugh Foes Fill Senate Gallery With Sounds of the Insane

 

[Tilly]

Very good article on the insanity. A witness in the Senate gallery says he only ever heard these sounds in insane asylums as a young reporter. Probably it’s actually demonic. Years of self hatred and abortion obsession drive them to this state.

Kavanaugh Foes Fill Senate Gallery With Sounds of the Insane

“Mob rule is necessary,” one shrieking woman shouted before security personnel could settle her down.

Surprise, surprise!

 

[Cecilie1200]

I don't agree with needing a permit to exercise your right to assemble.

Considering that it inevitably involves interfering with the rights of others to peacefully go about their own daily business, and often requires security on-scene to keep everything orderly, seems like a perfectly reasonable compromise to allow everyone to exercise their freedoms and co-exist. And one of the rare legitimate uses of government.

Yeah, but I don't think everyone will try it all at once. It's like having to have a permit to carry a gun, sort of. But then you get on the other side and think, "well, some people are too stupid to carry a gun", and you just say, whatever, I guess.

No, it's not the same. Carrying a gun is just about you; the simple act of carrying does not, in itself, affect anyone else. Assembling in a large group in a public place, by definition, automatically affects everyone in that area. Even if it's completely peaceful and orderly, just the numbers of people means noise, crowding, traffic problems . . .

You'll notice that most municipalities only require permits if you expect a certain number of people or more to show up, or if you intend to be making noise that might be disruptive to other people (playing music or chanting, for example). If me and ten of my fellow parishioners from church wanted to have a lunch-time Bible study on the square at the courthouse, however, no permit is required. If me and three of my friends want to stand on the sidewalk across from the courthouse with signs, there's also no permit required for that. Both of those activities don't cause any more disruption to the people around us than normal daily activity would.