Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They don't allow you to step away from your subjective dogma long enough to objectively process a hypothetical event? This is why I never retain lefty attorneys. I like attorneys who can demonstrate an understanding of both sides of an argument, including how my opponent will try to win. I am sorry you are not allowed to objectively process hypothetical scenarios.See 1-4 aboveok...when have we had a tyrannical govt?....when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
See 1-4 above
it works
Why we haven’t had a tyrannical govt. Why we don’t need a second amendment
They don't allow you to step away from your subjective dogma long enough to objectively process a hypothetical event? This is why I never retain lefty attorneys. I like attorneys who can demonstrate an understanding of both sides of an argument, including how my opponent will try to win. I am sorry you are not allowed to objectively process hypothetical scenarios.See 1-4 aboveok...when have we had a tyrannical govt?....when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
See 1-4 above
it works
Why we haven’t had a tyrannical govt. Why we don’t need a second amendment
The opening post specified a hypothetical event, but you have already seen me post this reminder a dozen times. You really do know that it is about a hypothetical event, but you are evading it and being deceptive like commies do.The opening post specifies a hypothetical event. What arms do you think we would need for the hypothetical event? Remember, the opening post also specifies temporarily stepping away from subjective ideology long enough to provide an objective answer..ok...when have we had a tyrannical govt?....when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
See 1-4 above
it works
if your O.P. is serious, no amount of guns in private hands will defeat the strongest military in the history of mankind
The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
And to have all those rights we need:
- Right to bear arms.
when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
See 1-4 above
it works
Since the government can’t use the military to attack us we would need a few of the reserves to join us, and then we would form a few other militias, and battle homos and feminists, but they all disarmed them selves, so they will be Throwing dildos at us and using black gangstas as there secret weapon lol"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
Do you know why I specified stepping away from your subjective ideology for long enough to objectively process this hypothetical event? Do you know why I did it right there in the opening post? I already knew that commies operate in the hiding and in the dark, and I knew they absolutely WILL evade and be dishonest. Your evasion and dishonesty is like clockwork.They don't allow you to step away from your subjective dogma long enough to objectively process a hypothetical event? This is why I never retain lefty attorneys. I like attorneys who can demonstrate an understanding of both sides of an argument, including how my opponent will try to win. I am sorry you are not allowed to objectively process hypothetical scenarios.See 1-4 aboveok...when have we had a tyrannical govt?....when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...
See 1-4 above
it works
Why we haven’t had a tyrannical govt. Why we don’t need a second amendment
Like I said, your Red Dawn fantasies are just that
You take the government back in the freaking voting booth.From the permanent bureaucratic oligarchs.....But those parasites will always be with us, as long as The State is there to attract them."Take the government back" from whom?
The South tried....once.The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
And to have all those rights we need:
- Right to bear arms.
We have never needed arms to protect our freedoms and our vote
EVER
Obama Prosecuted More Journalists THAN ALL PRESIDENTS COMBINEDwhen have we had a tyrannical govt ?...The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
See 1-4 above
it works
Yea, commies are very predictable.when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
See 1-4 above
it works
Rightwinger wants a left wing tyrannical government and he honestly tells us what works to get to his goal.
All the tyrant dictators got rid of guns as their first move. With guns there is no tyranny.
You mean democratsThe South tried....once.The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
And to have all those rights we need:
- Right to bear arms.
We have never needed arms to protect our freedoms and our vote
EVER
You take the government back in the freaking voting booth.From the permanent bureaucratic oligarchs.....But those parasites will always be with us, as long as The State is there to attract them."Take the government back" from whom?
You would see 70% of the military special forces join the republican side, all the gun manufacturing is operated by republicans. Just sheer intimidation factor of republicans coming for the beta democrats with be enough arms for them to fold like paper chair
Evasion of the opening post as usual, no surprise here. Refusing to deviate from subjective agenda as usual. Classic commie. Yawn....The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
And to have all those rights we need:
- Right to bear arms.
We have never needed arms to protect our freedoms and our vote
EVER
Yep, exactly.when have we had a tyrannical govt ?...The arms private citizens need to overpower a tyrannical government"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
We don't all agree that the second amendment defines our right to keep and bear arms, we don't all agree that a "well regulated militia" isn't a militia encumbered by regulation, and we don't all agree that "shall not be infringed" really means just that. This thread is not meant to debate the intent of the second amendment, but rather to debate which arms are needed if we are to over power and take back a tyrannical government.
Regardless of your beliefs, ideology, or opinions of what the second ammendment are, please list what arms you think we would need as private citizens if we were to assemble militias to overpower and take back a tyrannical federal government if this hypothetical event were to occur. Would we need more than millions of ar15 owners? Do we need baseball bats and metal garbage can lids? What do you think we would need?
1. The vote
2. A Free Press
3. The right of assembly
4. Freedom of Speech
It has worked for 230 years
See 1-4 above
it works
Rightwinger wants a left wing tyrannical government and he honestly tells us what works to get to his goal.
All the tyrant dictators got rid of guns as their first move. With guns there is no tyranny.
