Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have never slimed our troops. I ahve never demanded that they surrender to anyone. and I CERTAINLY have NEVER suggested that they were loafing in the field and not trying as hard as they could to win..... LIKE YOU DID.
You have smiled them by defending those in your party who have insulted them
You want them to surrender and come home beaten
All Dems care about is their political power and the troops are a stepping stone to that goal
That is your opinion of my position...I disagree.
YOUR position on the efforts put forth by our troops is certainly a position I disagree with. I certainly do not think they are dogging it and slacking off. I certainly do not wish they would get off their lazy asses and start fighting harder...LIKE YOU DO
YOUR position on the efforts put forth by our troops is certainly a position I disagree with. I certainly do not think they are dogging it and slacking off. I certainly do not wish they would get off their lazy asses and start fighting harder...LIKE YOU DO
Libs are always ready to smear the troops - it makes their kook base very happy
No wonder you have been in good mood lately
You don't see "Republicans" ANYWHERE in that statement. I said non-partisan, objective people. If they can put aside their partisanship and make an objective analysis, I could really care less WHERE they come from.
I wasn't suggesting anyone to bring back a politically-biased analysis. I want a TRUTHFUL one.
So wanting the US to win this war is now blood lust?
IMO, they're just trying to be a Western-style Democracy in the spitting image of the US Congress.
However, considering the state of affairs, in all seriousness I would say they have more pressing matters to attend.
You don't need to lay the "how many Americans will die" appeal to emotionalism on me. I've faced off with Iraqi's before, and would gladly do so again.
Those Americans are not draftees. Each and every one is a volunteer. NONE can be on their first enlistment having elisted before we were at war. They knew the deal before they walked into it.
They've got a job to do and they're doing it. I can totally relate.
Now, are we going to compare the progress and speed of the Iraq government to the US government when it comes to doing their job? If so, I've been waiting upwards of two decades and counting for ours to do something -- ANYTHING.
Every WESTPAC deployment I was on after the First Gulf War up until I retired in 2000 went to the ME, and we manned the Kuwait-Iraq border for a month or so.
Other than the fact they were shots, I didn't care about getting them. I'd rather be stabbed with a KaBar than get a shot.
intelligence reports 93% of saddam's aresenol destroyed by end of gulf war 1, and another 5% were accounted for in proceeding inspections and bombings.... i can try to find the link for this info, if you would like...
i read this BEFORE we went to war in iraq, this is one reason why i was against the war, saddam was not a major threat, we destroyed his arsenel and destroyed his army and military capabilities.... a true mission accomplished.
care
WOW, Stripey - what a devastatingly brilliant, incisive takedown of my post! I should probably count myself lucky that you've displayed the forebearance not to obliterate me completely, with an expertly-placed, "Oh, yeah?", or - horror of horrors - a pithy "Sez you!"
If you have nothing of substance to say, why the hell even reply at all?
He is on a roll - ins't he?
heh heh heh heh heh...
I am a DOVE, and going to war should ONLY occur when we are in an imminent threat, Our soldiers should NOT have to die for us Americans in an unnecessary war of choice...
that is immoral, under any rules!
Care
being a dove will do nothing to stop the terrorists and funny how many of the troops are speaking out how they want to stay and finish the job
They are there fighting the war - the Surrendercrats are not
The US deaths were going down - much to the dismay of the anti war left
The surge is continuing to show signs of progress - also much to the dismay of the anti war left
When troops speak out - the anti war left either ignores them or tries to dimmiss their comments
You are doing both from what I can see
and you are so giddy over those numbers aren't you?
no it was a press release - a british press release - and it was inaccurate.... we have never seen a 60% decrease in casualties because of the success of the surge. Do I really need to post the monthly figures for you again to show you that? Do I really need to show you how American casualties have been steadily rising? How the past eight months have seen 53% MORE Americans die?
