Missourian
Diamond Member
- Aug 30, 2008
- 34,988
- 25,788
Oh well...hopefully Satan's protection will one day falter, when you least expect it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your theory that the Democrat appointed justices on the court are not partisan couldn't be more absurd.health insurance companies can charge higher premiums for pre existing conditions. that would include hypertension, diabetes, cancer...
tick tick tick...
Ohhh look, the lying Nazi is spewing slander in hopes of creating fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
Show us where Kavanaugh has proposed such things, Herr Himmler?
Oh you can't? Well, that's because you're a fucking liar - it's the Nazi way.
Kavanaugh Dodges Question on Pre-Existing Condition Provision
The Future of Health Care Under Brett Kavanaugh: Part 2 - NWHN
lol...
So nothing then, Nazi?
Your source claims he "dodged," nothing supports the lie you told.
Such is your way, you are a notorious fucking liar.
why would he dodge if he was certain he wouldn't overturn that mandate? just like he dodged getting the FBI involved.
That is true. One of the big objections to Kavanaugh is that he was nominated by Trump. As the democrats said and have been saying they would not vote to confirm anyone nominated by the president.Let's see if we understand this. A person is unfit for the Supreme Court because he got angry at people who were blatantly trying to derail his confirmation in every way possible, even to the extent of presuming him guilty until proven innocent.
He's angry because he's got something to hide.
If this was all just something pulled out of Feinstein's ass, he would have calmly welcomed any questions and an FBI investigation into the allegations.
.
.
.
they trash his reputation, his name, his family, and you expect him to calmly welcome questions from his attackers?
the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
[
he had a lot of very interesting salacious questions posed to clinton- quite sexual in nature... brett is a sick dude.
Really Nazi?
Post them.
Because I think you are once again lying.
You're a notorious fucking liar, after all. You have zero integrity or ethics - which I guess serves you as a Nazi.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...-memo-from-Brett-Kavanaugh-to-Judge-Starr.pdf
i always back up what i say, mutt. & btw,
you suck at trolling.
That is true. One of the big objections to Kavanaugh is that he was nominated by Trump. As the democrats said and have been saying they would not vote to confirm anyone nominated by the president.He's angry because he's got something to hide.
If this was all just something pulled out of Feinstein's ass, he would have calmly welcomed any questions and an FBI investigation into the allegations.
.
.
.
they trash his reputation, his name, his family, and you expect him to calmly welcome questions from his attackers?
the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
You sound as ridiculous and as idiotic as KavanaughAfter the bullshit the Democrats pulled...you betcha. You reap what you sow bitches. Cry me a fucking river. Kavanaugh will hate you the same way I do...with good reason. Now fuck off.
I really hope that Kav is a partisan justice, just like the rest of them are. 5-4 in favor constitutionalism Gotta love it.Correct.He's proven himself to be too partisan to sit on the highest court anyway. After his conspiracy theory laced opening rant last week he shouldn't even be in consideration.
Conservative columnist: Kavanaugh is far too partisan, angry to be on Supreme Court
Flake and Coons Say Kavanaugh Was Too ‘Partisan’ in Testimony: ‘Belligerent, Aggressive, Angry’
Even with Jeff Flake's FBI investigation, Brett Kavanaugh Is unfit to serve
Analysis | Brett Kavanaugh just got remarkably angry — and political — for a Supreme Court nominee
Kavanaugh’s ridiculous lies about why Democratic senators appropriately oppose his appointment rendered him a partisan politician, not an impartial jurist.
Kavanaugh is qualified to be a Fox ‘news’ talking head, not a Supreme Court justice.
Let's see if we understand this. A person is unfit for the Supreme Court because he got angry at people who were blatantly trying to derail his confirmation in every way possible, even to the extent of presuming him guilty until proven innocent.
He's angry because he's got something to hide.
If this was all just something pulled out of Feinstein's ass, he would have calmly welcomed any questions and an FBI investigation into the allegations.
.
.
.
they trash his reputation, his name, his family, and you expect him to calmly welcome questions from his attackers?
the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
I really hope that Kav is a partisan justice, just like the rest of them are. 5-4 in favor constitutionalism Gotta love it.Correct.He's proven himself to be too partisan to sit on the highest court anyway. After his conspiracy theory laced opening rant last week he shouldn't even be in consideration.
Conservative columnist: Kavanaugh is far too partisan, angry to be on Supreme Court
Flake and Coons Say Kavanaugh Was Too ‘Partisan’ in Testimony: ‘Belligerent, Aggressive, Angry’
Even with Jeff Flake's FBI investigation, Brett Kavanaugh Is unfit to serve
Analysis | Brett Kavanaugh just got remarkably angry — and political — for a Supreme Court nominee
Kavanaugh’s ridiculous lies about why Democratic senators appropriately oppose his appointment rendered him a partisan politician, not an impartial jurist.
Kavanaugh is qualified to be a Fox ‘news’ talking head, not a Supreme Court justice.
[
he had a lot of very interesting salacious questions posed to clinton- quite sexual in nature... brett is a sick dude.
Really Nazi?
Post them.
Because I think you are once again lying.
You're a notorious fucking liar, after all. You have zero integrity or ethics - which I guess serves you as a Nazi.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...-memo-from-Brett-Kavanaugh-to-Judge-Starr.pdf
i always back up what i say, mutt. & btw,
you suck at trolling.
You spew all kinds of shit, Nazi.
So let's look at what was asked of Clinton.
View attachment 219460
Now is it pertinent to the case, Nazi?
If so, how is it "salacious?"
You know that Clinton is and was an adult taking advantage of a subordinate in the workplace. There is no application to Kavanaugh or his opinion.
Admit it, that's just the sour grapes talking, right?That is true. One of the big objections to Kavanaugh is that he was nominated by Trump. As the democrats said and have been saying they would not vote to confirm anyone nominated by the president.they trash his reputation, his name, his family, and you expect him to calmly welcome questions from his attackers?
the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
trump is an illegit prez.
He's angry because he's got something to hide.
If this was all just something pulled out of Feinstein's ass, he would have calmly welcomed any questions and an FBI investigation into the allegations.
.
.
.
they trash his reputation, his name, his family, and you expect him to calmly welcome questions from his attackers?
the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
Partially Hillary losing, partially Bills impeachment.
I can almost guarantee the Clintons have no love for Kavanaugh.
and Hillary losing MAY be one of the reasons the Committee is partisan, another is they fear the stacked court.
That is true. One of the big objections to Kavanaugh is that he was nominated by Trump. As the democrats said and have been saying they would not vote to confirm anyone nominated by the president.they trash his reputation, his name, his family, and you expect him to calmly welcome questions from his attackers?
the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
trump is an illegit prez.
Irrelevant if he can't remember it, right?[
he had a lot of very interesting salacious questions posed to clinton- quite sexual in nature... brett is a sick dude.
Really Nazi?
Post them.
Because I think you are once again lying.
You're a notorious fucking liar, after all. You have zero integrity or ethics - which I guess serves you as a Nazi.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...-memo-from-Brett-Kavanaugh-to-Judge-Starr.pdf
i always back up what i say, mutt. & btw,
you suck at trolling.
You spew all kinds of shit, Nazi.
So let's look at what was asked of Clinton.
View attachment 219460
Now is it pertinent to the case, Nazi?
If so, how is it "salacious?"
mark judge is pertinent.
mark judge is pertinent.
Admit it, that's just the sour grapes talking, right?That is true. One of the big objections to Kavanaugh is that he was nominated by Trump. As the democrats said and have been saying they would not vote to confirm anyone nominated by the president.the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
trump is an illegit prez.
He's proven himself to be too partisan to sit on the highest court anyway. After his conspiracy theory laced opening rant last week he shouldn't even be in consideration.
Conservative columnist: Kavanaugh is far too partisan, angry to be on Supreme Court
Flake and Coons Say Kavanaugh Was Too ‘Partisan’ in Testimony: ‘Belligerent, Aggressive, Angry’
Even with Jeff Flake's FBI investigation, Brett Kavanaugh Is unfit to serve
Analysis | Brett Kavanaugh just got remarkably angry — and political — for a Supreme Court nominee
Irrelevant if he can't remember it, right?[
he had a lot of very interesting salacious questions posed to clinton- quite sexual in nature... brett is a sick dude.
Really Nazi?
Post them.
Because I think you are once again lying.
You're a notorious fucking liar, after all. You have zero integrity or ethics - which I guess serves you as a Nazi.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/do...-memo-from-Brett-Kavanaugh-to-Judge-Starr.pdf
i always back up what i say, mutt. & btw,
you suck at trolling.
You spew all kinds of shit, Nazi.
So let's look at what was asked of Clinton.
View attachment 219460
Now is it pertinent to the case, Nazi?
If so, how is it "salacious?"
mark judge is pertinent.
That is true. One of the big objections to Kavanaugh is that he was nominated by Trump. As the democrats said and have been saying they would not vote to confirm anyone nominated by the president.the clintons? lol....
where did I mentions the Clintons?
I was referring to the Senators on the Left on that committee
sorry- i read your reply differantly. i was referring that brett mentioning the clintons was a reason why he was being attacked by the (D)s... he listed hillary losing as one reason...
trump is an illegit prez.
no