Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fools. The lot of them.You can't lower the taxes that much. That is the GOP's failed policy that fails again and again.Good question. I'm surprised you didn't do a Google search to find out what's going on. Here, let me do it for you since you clearly don't know how to use Google:Uh duh! Because those jobs are now automated. That means they won't be coming back. Wasn't that obvious?How exactly does automation refute the fact that jobs have fled overseas?
This must be liberal regressive logic...
Exactly where does it say the jobs that fled to low wage countries are all automated? And exactly how are those factories still not going to bring jobs, even if that was the case?
It is the famous liberal regressive (non)logic indeed...
jobs that left us now automated
Not only are there robots, but there have been great strides in 3d printers now that they also use everything from metals to organics. It might benefit you to go learn something. They say Trump's followers are mostly uneducated. Don't prove that to be true.
I think it would be far more effective for you to google an IQ test. Most likely you will be receiving spectacularly special results.
Damn these people are retards. No the jobs aren't automated. And no, no one is saying that the exactly same jobs are going to come back. It's a metaphor, if you don't understand it, you simply lack the intelligence to have a discussion with.
What is being said is this: by lowering taxes and general level of regressive parasitism, USA will become much more attractive business location. That's a fact...
To Republicans, they think that lowering taxes is the "quick fix" for the uneducated and untalented, which would be Republicans. Even funnier, they always like to say, "But America has the highest corporate tax" even though we ALL know the effective tax isn't high at all.
It's competition and innovation. Two words the GOP can't seem to figure out what they mean. What they know is "cut taxes" and "deregulate". Because if someone eats poison, the market will take care if it. You don't really need cars built with safety regulations or roads with speed limits. Deregulate.
Fools. The lot of them.You can't lower the taxes that much. That is the GOP's failed policy that fails again and again.Good question. I'm surprised you didn't do a Google search to find out what's going on. Here, let me do it for you since you clearly don't know how to use Google:Uh duh! Because those jobs are now automated. That means they won't be coming back. Wasn't that obvious?
Exactly where does it say the jobs that fled to low wage countries are all automated? And exactly how are those factories still not going to bring jobs, even if that was the case?
It is the famous liberal regressive (non)logic indeed...
jobs that left us now automated
Not only are there robots, but there have been great strides in 3d printers now that they also use everything from metals to organics. It might benefit you to go learn something. They say Trump's followers are mostly uneducated. Don't prove that to be true.
I think it would be far more effective for you to google an IQ test. Most likely you will be receiving spectacularly special results.
Damn these people are retards. No the jobs aren't automated. And no, no one is saying that the exactly same jobs are going to come back. It's a metaphor, if you don't understand it, you simply lack the intelligence to have a discussion with.
What is being said is this: by lowering taxes and general level of regressive parasitism, USA will become much more attractive business location. That's a fact...
To Republicans, they think that lowering taxes is the "quick fix" for the uneducated and untalented, which would be Republicans. Even funnier, they always like to say, "But America has the highest corporate tax" even though we ALL know the effective tax isn't high at all.
It's competition and innovation. Two words the GOP can't seem to figure out what they mean. What they know is "cut taxes" and "deregulate". Because if someone eats poison, the market will take care if it. You don't really need cars built with safety regulations or roads with speed limits. Deregulate.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
Fools. The lot of them.You can't lower the taxes that much. That is the GOP's failed policy that fails again and again.Good question. I'm surprised you didn't do a Google search to find out what's going on. Here, let me do it for you since you clearly don't know how to use Google:Exactly where does it say the jobs that fled to low wage countries are all automated? And exactly how are those factories still not going to bring jobs, even if that was the case?
It is the famous liberal regressive (non)logic indeed...
jobs that left us now automated
Not only are there robots, but there have been great strides in 3d printers now that they also use everything from metals to organics. It might benefit you to go learn something. They say Trump's followers are mostly uneducated. Don't prove that to be true.
I think it would be far more effective for you to google an IQ test. Most likely you will be receiving spectacularly special results.
Damn these people are retards. No the jobs aren't automated. And no, no one is saying that the exactly same jobs are going to come back. It's a metaphor, if you don't understand it, you simply lack the intelligence to have a discussion with.
What is being said is this: by lowering taxes and general level of regressive parasitism, USA will become much more attractive business location. That's a fact...
To Republicans, they think that lowering taxes is the "quick fix" for the uneducated and untalented, which would be Republicans. Even funnier, they always like to say, "But America has the highest corporate tax" even though we ALL know the effective tax isn't high at all.
It's competition and innovation. Two words the GOP can't seem to figure out what they mean. What they know is "cut taxes" and "deregulate". Because if someone eats poison, the market will take care if it. You don't really need cars built with safety regulations or roads with speed limits. Deregulate.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
You can lower the taxes a lot. Government takes about 40 % every dollar you earn. That is almost half... Corporate taxes are insanely high in USA.
Regulations costs absolutely humongous amounts too, glad you noticed.
The market seems to be handling the regluation absolutely fine, even better actually, in more free market countries. For example in Singapore, people actually save for their retirement. Can you imagine, they don't enslave their kids to pay for the retirement benefits? Unthinkable to a regressive.
Just looking at the regulatory code... and yup sure enough it defines Greek bonds as risk free. Yeh this is the sort of regulation we need.
It indeed is cooperation and innovation... not regressive coercion. And yes, the market will prevent someone eating poison (market regulation), and take care of it in the case someone does. Not that this is in any way signficant portion of the government budget. By far most of it goes to enrich parasites such as yourself.
Prove your numbers.Fools. The lot of them.You can't lower the taxes that much. That is the GOP's failed policy that fails again and again.Good question. I'm surprised you didn't do a Google search to find out what's going on. Here, let me do it for you since you clearly don't know how to use Google:Exactly where does it say the jobs that fled to low wage countries are all automated? And exactly how are those factories still not going to bring jobs, even if that was the case?
It is the famous liberal regressive (non)logic indeed...
jobs that left us now automated
Not only are there robots, but there have been great strides in 3d printers now that they also use everything from metals to organics. It might benefit you to go learn something. They say Trump's followers are mostly uneducated. Don't prove that to be true.
I think it would be far more effective for you to google an IQ test. Most likely you will be receiving spectacularly special results.
Damn these people are retards. No the jobs aren't automated. And no, no one is saying that the exactly same jobs are going to come back. It's a metaphor, if you don't understand it, you simply lack the intelligence to have a discussion with.
What is being said is this: by lowering taxes and general level of regressive parasitism, USA will become much more attractive business location. That's a fact...
To Republicans, they think that lowering taxes is the "quick fix" for the uneducated and untalented, which would be Republicans. Even funnier, they always like to say, "But America has the highest corporate tax" even though we ALL know the effective tax isn't high at all.
It's competition and innovation. Two words the GOP can't seem to figure out what they mean. What they know is "cut taxes" and "deregulate". Because if someone eats poison, the market will take care if it. You don't really need cars built with safety regulations or roads with speed limits. Deregulate.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
You can lower the taxes a lot. Government takes about 40 % every dollar you earn. That is almost half... Corporate taxes are insanely high in USA.
Regulations costs absolutely humongous amounts too, glad you noticed.
The market seems to be handling the regluation absolutely fine, even better actually, in more free market countries. For example in Singapore, people actually save for their retirement. Can you imagine, they don't enslave their kids to pay for the retirement benefits? Unthinkable to a regressive.
Just looking at the regulatory code... and yup sure enough it defines Greek bonds as risk free. Yeh this is the sort of regulation we need.
It indeed is cooperation and innovation... not regressive coercion. And yes, the market will prevent someone eating poison (market regulation), and take care of it in the case someone does. Not that this is in any way signficant portion of the government budget. By far most of it goes to enrich parasites such as yourself.
Taxes:Prove your numbers.Fools. The lot of them.You can't lower the taxes that much. That is the GOP's failed policy that fails again and again.Good question. I'm surprised you didn't do a Google search to find out what's going on. Here, let me do it for you since you clearly don't know how to use Google:
jobs that left us now automated
Not only are there robots, but there have been great strides in 3d printers now that they also use everything from metals to organics. It might benefit you to go learn something. They say Trump's followers are mostly uneducated. Don't prove that to be true.
I think it would be far more effective for you to google an IQ test. Most likely you will be receiving spectacularly special results.
Damn these people are retards. No the jobs aren't automated. And no, no one is saying that the exactly same jobs are going to come back. It's a metaphor, if you don't understand it, you simply lack the intelligence to have a discussion with.
What is being said is this: by lowering taxes and general level of regressive parasitism, USA will become much more attractive business location. That's a fact...
To Republicans, they think that lowering taxes is the "quick fix" for the uneducated and untalented, which would be Republicans. Even funnier, they always like to say, "But America has the highest corporate tax" even though we ALL know the effective tax isn't high at all.
It's competition and innovation. Two words the GOP can't seem to figure out what they mean. What they know is "cut taxes" and "deregulate". Because if someone eats poison, the market will take care if it. You don't really need cars built with safety regulations or roads with speed limits. Deregulate.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
You can lower the taxes a lot. Government takes about 40 % every dollar you earn. That is almost half... Corporate taxes are insanely high in USA.
Regulations costs absolutely humongous amounts too, glad you noticed.
The market seems to be handling the regluation absolutely fine, even better actually, in more free market countries. For example in Singapore, people actually save for their retirement. Can you imagine, they don't enslave their kids to pay for the retirement benefits? Unthinkable to a regressive.
Just looking at the regulatory code... and yup sure enough it defines Greek bonds as risk free. Yeh this is the sort of regulation we need.
It indeed is cooperation and innovation... not regressive coercion. And yes, the market will prevent someone eating poison (market regulation), and take care of it in the case someone does. Not that this is in any way signficant portion of the government budget. By far most of it goes to enrich parasites such as yourself.
OK, you posted something about small business. You posted something about GDP. You posted some nonsense about everyone making $330,000 a year. Imagine that minimum wage.Taxes:Prove your numbers.Fools. The lot of them.You can't lower the taxes that much. That is the GOP's failed policy that fails again and again.I think it would be far more effective for you to google an IQ test. Most likely you will be receiving spectacularly special results.
Damn these people are retards. No the jobs aren't automated. And no, no one is saying that the exactly same jobs are going to come back. It's a metaphor, if you don't understand it, you simply lack the intelligence to have a discussion with.
What is being said is this: by lowering taxes and general level of regressive parasitism, USA will become much more attractive business location. That's a fact...
To Republicans, they think that lowering taxes is the "quick fix" for the uneducated and untalented, which would be Republicans. Even funnier, they always like to say, "But America has the highest corporate tax" even though we ALL know the effective tax isn't high at all.
It's competition and innovation. Two words the GOP can't seem to figure out what they mean. What they know is "cut taxes" and "deregulate". Because if someone eats poison, the market will take care if it. You don't really need cars built with safety regulations or roads with speed limits. Deregulate.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
You can lower the taxes a lot. Government takes about 40 % every dollar you earn. That is almost half... Corporate taxes are insanely high in USA.
Regulations costs absolutely humongous amounts too, glad you noticed.
The market seems to be handling the regluation absolutely fine, even better actually, in more free market countries. For example in Singapore, people actually save for their retirement. Can you imagine, they don't enslave their kids to pay for the retirement benefits? Unthinkable to a regressive.
Just looking at the regulatory code... and yup sure enough it defines Greek bonds as risk free. Yeh this is the sort of regulation we need.
It indeed is cooperation and innovation... not regressive coercion. And yes, the market will prevent someone eating poison (market regulation), and take care of it in the case someone does. Not that this is in any way signficant portion of the government budget. By far most of it goes to enrich parasites such as yourself.
Doesn't include all taxes.
Regulation:
New study finds federal regulation costs over $2 trillion per year and disproportionately affects small businesses | Regulatory Studies Center | The George Washington University
The growth of federal regulations over the past six decades has cut U.S. economic growth by an average of 2 percentage points per year, according to a new study in the Journal of Economic Growth. As a result, the average American household receives about $277,000 less annually than it would have gotten in the absence of six decades of accumulated regulations—a median household income of $330,000 instead of the $53,000 we get now.
(Now that study is really overestimating it, but the point still stands).
Report: Cost of Federal Regulation Reached $1.88 Trillion in 2014
OK, you posted something about small business. You posted something about GDP. You posted some nonsense about everyone making $330,000 a year. Imagine that minimum wage.Taxes:Prove your numbers.Fools. The lot of them.You can't lower the taxes that much. That is the GOP's failed policy that fails again and again.
To Republicans, they think that lowering taxes is the "quick fix" for the uneducated and untalented, which would be Republicans. Even funnier, they always like to say, "But America has the highest corporate tax" even though we ALL know the effective tax isn't high at all.
It's competition and innovation. Two words the GOP can't seem to figure out what they mean. What they know is "cut taxes" and "deregulate". Because if someone eats poison, the market will take care if it. You don't really need cars built with safety regulations or roads with speed limits. Deregulate.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
You can lower the taxes a lot. Government takes about 40 % every dollar you earn. That is almost half... Corporate taxes are insanely high in USA.
Regulations costs absolutely humongous amounts too, glad you noticed.
The market seems to be handling the regluation absolutely fine, even better actually, in more free market countries. For example in Singapore, people actually save for their retirement. Can you imagine, they don't enslave their kids to pay for the retirement benefits? Unthinkable to a regressive.
Just looking at the regulatory code... and yup sure enough it defines Greek bonds as risk free. Yeh this is the sort of regulation we need.
It indeed is cooperation and innovation... not regressive coercion. And yes, the market will prevent someone eating poison (market regulation), and take care of it in the case someone does. Not that this is in any way signficant portion of the government budget. By far most of it goes to enrich parasites such as yourself.
Doesn't include all taxes.
Regulation:
New study finds federal regulation costs over $2 trillion per year and disproportionately affects small businesses | Regulatory Studies Center | The George Washington University
The growth of federal regulations over the past six decades has cut U.S. economic growth by an average of 2 percentage points per year, according to a new study in the Journal of Economic Growth. As a result, the average American household receives about $277,000 less annually than it would have gotten in the absence of six decades of accumulated regulations—a median household income of $330,000 instead of the $53,000 we get now.
(Now that study is really overestimating it, but the point still stands).
Report: Cost of Federal Regulation Reached $1.88 Trillion in 2014
But nothing about everyone paying 40% in taxes.
I think you need to try again.
There is a different between the government receiving 40% of it's revenue from taxes and people paying 40% in taxes. Try to figure out the difference.OK, you posted something about small business. You posted something about GDP. You posted some nonsense about everyone making $330,000 a year. Imagine that minimum wage.Taxes:Prove your numbers.Fools. The lot of them.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
You can lower the taxes a lot. Government takes about 40 % every dollar you earn. That is almost half... Corporate taxes are insanely high in USA.
Regulations costs absolutely humongous amounts too, glad you noticed.
The market seems to be handling the regluation absolutely fine, even better actually, in more free market countries. For example in Singapore, people actually save for their retirement. Can you imagine, they don't enslave their kids to pay for the retirement benefits? Unthinkable to a regressive.
Just looking at the regulatory code... and yup sure enough it defines Greek bonds as risk free. Yeh this is the sort of regulation we need.
It indeed is cooperation and innovation... not regressive coercion. And yes, the market will prevent someone eating poison (market regulation), and take care of it in the case someone does. Not that this is in any way signficant portion of the government budget. By far most of it goes to enrich parasites such as yourself.
Doesn't include all taxes.
Regulation:
New study finds federal regulation costs over $2 trillion per year and disproportionately affects small businesses | Regulatory Studies Center | The George Washington University
The growth of federal regulations over the past six decades has cut U.S. economic growth by an average of 2 percentage points per year, according to a new study in the Journal of Economic Growth. As a result, the average American household receives about $277,000 less annually than it would have gotten in the absence of six decades of accumulated regulations—a median household income of $330,000 instead of the $53,000 we get now.
(Now that study is really overestimating it, but the point still stands).
Report: Cost of Federal Regulation Reached $1.88 Trillion in 2014
But nothing about everyone paying 40% in taxes.
I think you need to try again.
Do you understand what "revenue" means?
And this is why, it is said that regressives can't understand even the most basic of economics!
There is a different between the government receiving 40% of it's revenue from taxes and people paying 40% in taxes. Try to figure out the difference.OK, you posted something about small business. You posted something about GDP. You posted some nonsense about everyone making $330,000 a year. Imagine that minimum wage.Taxes:Prove your numbers.You can lower the taxes a lot. Government takes about 40 % every dollar you earn. That is almost half... Corporate taxes are insanely high in USA.
Regulations costs absolutely humongous amounts too, glad you noticed.
The market seems to be handling the regluation absolutely fine, even better actually, in more free market countries. For example in Singapore, people actually save for their retirement. Can you imagine, they don't enslave their kids to pay for the retirement benefits? Unthinkable to a regressive.
Just looking at the regulatory code... and yup sure enough it defines Greek bonds as risk free. Yeh this is the sort of regulation we need.
It indeed is cooperation and innovation... not regressive coercion. And yes, the market will prevent someone eating poison (market regulation), and take care of it in the case someone does. Not that this is in any way signficant portion of the government budget. By far most of it goes to enrich parasites such as yourself.
Doesn't include all taxes.
Regulation:
New study finds federal regulation costs over $2 trillion per year and disproportionately affects small businesses | Regulatory Studies Center | The George Washington University
The growth of federal regulations over the past six decades has cut U.S. economic growth by an average of 2 percentage points per year, according to a new study in the Journal of Economic Growth. As a result, the average American household receives about $277,000 less annually than it would have gotten in the absence of six decades of accumulated regulations—a median household income of $330,000 instead of the $53,000 we get now.
(Now that study is really overestimating it, but the point still stands).
Report: Cost of Federal Regulation Reached $1.88 Trillion in 2014
But nothing about everyone paying 40% in taxes.
I think you need to try again.
Do you understand what "revenue" means?
And this is why, it is said that regressives can't understand even the most basic of economics!
China’s factories are building a robot nation
The robots recently replaced 14 workers on the plant’s assembly line for remote controls. And soon, according to Midea’s home-air-conditioner division deputy general manager Wu Shoubao, more robots will arrive to replace the quality-control supervisors.
Robot revolution sweeps China's factory floors
Robot revolution sweeps China's factory floors
For decades, manufacturers employed waves of young migrant workers from China's countryside to work at countless factories in coastal provinces, churning out cheap toys, clothing and electronics that helped power the country's economic ascent.
Now, factories are rapidly replacing those workers with automation, a pivot that's encouraged by rising wages and new official directives aimed at helping the country move away from low-cost manufacturing as the supply of young, pliant workers shrinks.
So what happens? During the general election, the news will be coming out. Already Trump has provided lots of ignorant sound bites. Is this something he can take back. But then what does he have to run on?
