What has happened to us?

Status
Not open for further replies.
And white trash who are wrong and fundies who are wrong...you gotta reach out from the left too.


That's a start.


But until you give up on calling people "racist", it is small potatoes.

Along with homophobe and bigot.
And babykiller, libtard, and commie.


NOne of those have the same impact as "racist" in our culture, AND, conservatives don't use those to attack the person INSTEAD of discussing the issue.


Hell, they CAN'T even if they wanted to, because calling someone a liberal does not marginalize them the way calling someone a racist does.


YOu can be a liberal, or a commie, and your argument will still be listened to.
I agree with you on the use of racist, but I think slurs in general end discussion. For instance a liberal can’t critisize Trump with out being labeled TDS or “sore loser”.


I've often agreed with liberals on their criticism of Trump, specifically on the Wall, and Syria and Russia.


Not nearly as often as I've disagreed, but, it depends on the criticism being made.


I've often used slurs in such discussions, such as warmonger, trying to make a point. But it did not end the discussion. It was an attempt to make a point.


I'm not seeing slurs in general ending discussion. Republicans just don't have that ability. Libtard, does not have the cultural poison that Racist does.
 
Actually this is a great example of how things get deliberately distorted to serve partisan agendas.

From your link.

When a picture of the memorial recently surfaced on social media sites, it quickly went viral, and prompted anger among many Republicans, who called the dedication not only inaccurate but also a prime example of revisionist history. But the university stands by the inscription.

The plaque, located on a historic building that’s part of Northeastern Illinois University in Chicago and installed in 1905, states: “This building is dedicated to public service honoring the memory of Abraham Lincoln Democrat.”



“ According to building archives, the word democrat was used because Lincoln was an advocate for democracy—the political or social equality of all people,” campus officials stated in a press release. “The word was not chosen to reflect a political affiliation. … Northeastern Illinois University recognizes the context that this plaque was created and intends to uphold its integrity.”
Which means....Dems AGAIN made a common word that is supposedly good for the USA into something bad due to their actions.

Any MSM report about the #walkaway gathering today? A buttload showed up, yet..silence. Funny, that. So my question is...why are so many dems walking away? Is it because they don't like what the "democrats" have/are done/doing and what they represent has no bearing on what the term DEMOCRACY means or rather..USED to mean?
I don’t know how many are really walking away and how much is rightwing media hype. I do think a number of people have left both parties and gone independent.
Check it out for yourself. Its all over twitter and it is NOT right wing media "hype". This is the problem, people. If something doesn't look good to the opposing views and happenings, it's "bullshit". No. Its not.
Ever hear of Blexit? Check that out too, which is also all over twitter. With vids. And pics. And statements. And witnesses.

Honestly I don’t trust social media or twitter for anything these days, there has been too much manipulation.

Twitter could close up shop tomorrow and I'd never notice until someone mentioned it
Lol...I don’t even have it.
 
That's a start.


But until you give up on calling people "racist", it is small potatoes.

Along with homophobe and bigot.
And babykiller, libtard, and commie.


NOne of those have the same impact as "racist" in our culture, AND, conservatives don't use those to attack the person INSTEAD of discussing the issue.


Hell, they CAN'T even if they wanted to, because calling someone a liberal does not marginalize them the way calling someone a racist does.


YOu can be a liberal, or a commie, and your argument will still be listened to.
I agree with you on the use of racist, but I think slurs in general end discussion. For instance a liberal can’t critisize Trump with out being labeled TDS or “sore loser”.


I've often agreed with liberals on their criticism of Trump, specifically on the Wall, and Syria and Russia.


Not nearly as often as I've disagreed, but, it depends on the criticism being made.


I've often used slurs in such discussions, such as warmonger, trying to make a point. But it did not end the discussion. It was an attempt to make a point.


I'm not seeing slurs in general ending discussion. Republicans just don't have that ability. Libtard, does not have the cultural poison that Racist does.
I think it depends on the slur and how it is used. For example in trying to discuss abortion, I am constantly labeled babykiller.

I do agree though that in today’s culture, racist is right up in the top tier.
 
Along with homophobe and bigot.
And babykiller, libtard, and commie.


NOne of those have the same impact as "racist" in our culture, AND, conservatives don't use those to attack the person INSTEAD of discussing the issue.


Hell, they CAN'T even if they wanted to, because calling someone a liberal does not marginalize them the way calling someone a racist does.


YOu can be a liberal, or a commie, and your argument will still be listened to.
I agree with you on the use of racist, but I think slurs in general end discussion. For instance a liberal can’t critisize Trump with out being labeled TDS or “sore loser”.

Here's the problem, I've been called a racist so many times I can't count, I was even called a racist towards Asians and we have an adopted Chinese daughter for cripes sake. It's used towards people that are in no way racist

Some use sore loser towards the left, it's pretty clear they are sore losers so it's deserved

Besides being called a sore loser isn't anyway near as bad as labeling someone a racist when they are not

Constantly being labeled sore loser when you are not ends debate. They are not sore losers, they genuinely dislike Trump’s policies. You are doing just what those who shout racist are doing. It isn’t deserved.

I said some are clearly sore losers...not all. Trump deserves some criticism, I've criticized him. As for TDS? Good lord read this forum, some people wake up and evidently spend all day going on and on and on and on about Trump this and Trump that. It's not healthy and there is obviously something going on there
 
And babykiller, libtard, and commie.


NOne of those have the same impact as "racist" in our culture, AND, conservatives don't use those to attack the person INSTEAD of discussing the issue.


Hell, they CAN'T even if they wanted to, because calling someone a liberal does not marginalize them the way calling someone a racist does.


YOu can be a liberal, or a commie, and your argument will still be listened to.
I agree with you on the use of racist, but I think slurs in general end discussion. For instance a liberal can’t critisize Trump with out being labeled TDS or “sore loser”.

Here's the problem, I've been called a racist so many times I can't count, I was even called a racist towards Asians and we have an adopted Chinese daughter for cripes sake. It's used towards people that are in no way racist

Some use sore loser towards the left, it's pretty clear they are sore losers so it's deserved

Besides being called a sore loser isn't anyway near as bad as labeling someone a racist when they are not

Constantly being labeled sore loser when you are not ends debate. They are not sore losers, they genuinely dislike Trump’s policies. You are doing just what those who shout racist are doing. It isn’t deserved.

I said some are clearly sore losers...not all. Trump deserves some criticism, I've criticized him. As for TDS? Good lord read this forum, some people wake up and evidently spend all day going on and on and on and on about Trump this and Trump that. It's not healthy and there is obviously something going on there
You missed the Obama years :lol:
 
NOne of those have the same impact as "racist" in our culture, AND, conservatives don't use those to attack the person INSTEAD of discussing the issue.


Hell, they CAN'T even if they wanted to, because calling someone a liberal does not marginalize them the way calling someone a racist does.


YOu can be a liberal, or a commie, and your argument will still be listened to.
I agree with you on the use of racist, but I think slurs in general end discussion. For instance a liberal can’t critisize Trump with out being labeled TDS or “sore loser”.

Here's the problem, I've been called a racist so many times I can't count, I was even called a racist towards Asians and we have an adopted Chinese daughter for cripes sake. It's used towards people that are in no way racist

Some use sore loser towards the left, it's pretty clear they are sore losers so it's deserved

Besides being called a sore loser isn't anyway near as bad as labeling someone a racist when they are not

Constantly being labeled sore loser when you are not ends debate. They are not sore losers, they genuinely dislike Trump’s policies. You are doing just what those who shout racist are doing. It isn’t deserved.

I said some are clearly sore losers...not all. Trump deserves some criticism, I've criticized him. As for TDS? Good lord read this forum, some people wake up and evidently spend all day going on and on and on and on about Trump this and Trump that. It's not healthy and there is obviously something going on there
You missed the Obama years :lol:

Sadly I didn't....thank God that ended
 
Along with homophobe and bigot.
And babykiller, libtard, and commie.


NOne of those have the same impact as "racist" in our culture, AND, conservatives don't use those to attack the person INSTEAD of discussing the issue.


Hell, they CAN'T even if they wanted to, because calling someone a liberal does not marginalize them the way calling someone a racist does.


YOu can be a liberal, or a commie, and your argument will still be listened to.
I agree with you on the use of racist, but I think slurs in general end discussion. For instance a liberal can’t critisize Trump with out being labeled TDS or “sore loser”.

Here's the problem, I've been called a racist so many times I can't count, I was even called a racist towards Asians and we have an adopted Chinese daughter for cripes sake. It's used towards people that are in no way racist

Some use sore loser towards the left, it's pretty clear they are sore losers so it's deserved

Besides being called a sore loser isn't anyway near as bad as labeling someone a racist when they are not

Constantly being labeled sore loser when you are not ends debate. They are not sore losers, they genuinely dislike Trump’s policies. You are doing just what those who shout racist are doing. It isn’t deserved.



I don't generally recall seeing that slur used in response to policy points.


But I will keep your point in mind, as I observe it over the next few days.


I personally rarely use that, and generally, only in extremis
 
EVERY TIME, I disagree with a democrat, I am called a vile hateful name of some sort, such as racist or nazis.


That makes me very mad and makes me look at them as the enemy.


You want to stop the hate and division, stop believing that anyone that disagrees with you, has to be Evil.
Correll, you know Coyote doesn't believe that.


EVERY TIME. Not one liberal on this site does not play that game.
Well, if you are one of those White Nationalists, the shoe fits. I don't try to keep you folks straight, so I wouldn't dare to guess.

I don't think it's about Nationalism, anti- Semitism, or Authoritarianism.

I just think Anglo- Saxon tribes are nuts.

I made a thead below proving its not the beliefs or government it is the people & their bad genes.

Non-Violent Authoritarian/Anti-Semite regime.

As. I pointed out Poland had the same policies as Nazi's in the 1930s & killed basically none Because Poles are Humans & Germans are something else.

th


Considering that the United States is about 50% Anglo-Saxon in origin (German) since well before World War I.

I would say that you're wrong.

*****SMILE*****



:)


Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like the U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

Mass shootings in the United States - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria
 
Last edited:
Correll, you know Coyote doesn't believe that.


EVERY TIME. Not one liberal on this site does not play that game.
Well, if you are one of those White Nationalists, the shoe fits. I don't try to keep you folks straight, so I wouldn't dare to guess.

I don't think it's about Nationalism, anti- Semitism, or Authoritarianism.

I just think Anglo- Saxon tribes are nuts.

I made a thead below proving its not the beliefs or government it is the people & their bad genes.

Non-Violent Authoritarian/Anti-Semite regime.

As. I pointed out Poland had the same policies as Nazi's in the 1930s & killed basically none Because Poles are Humans & Germans are something else.

th


Considering that the United States is about 50% Anglo-Saxon in origin (German) since well before World War I.

I would say that you're wrong.

*****SMILE*****



:)


Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like th U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria


upload_2018-10-28_20-25-2.jpeg


So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.

*****SMILE*****



:)

Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?
 
Last edited:
How about putting forth ideas to advance our nation forward? Not, women are bad unless they are subjugated to someone's sexual whims, people with darker skin are evil, People who practice religions other than fundamentalist Christianity are evil, LGBTs are evil. Dump this shit and get back into society.
 
View attachment 225282

Last week....

A Florida man was arrested after sending mail bombs to prominent Democrats and Trump critics. His online activity was full of hateful rhetoric targeting Democrats and minorities.

A man with a history of violence shot and killed two African-Americans in a Kentucky Kroger store following a failed attempt to barge into a black church.

And Saturday morning, a man shouting anti-Semitic slurs opened fire at a Pittsburgh synagogue, killing 11 people attending Jewish services.

What is happening to us?
Dimms refuse to give up on the socialist meme of freeshit for everyone. Until they modify their view, there will be conflict...not cooperation. Who wants to cooperate in the death of their country?
So...that meme has been around for ages right along with the Republican meme of let the poor die in the streets. Yet until now we have always been able to compromise and each side coming away with something. Why the new zero sum attitude?
There's no zero sum between independence/hard work/ self reliance and free shit/ dependence/government supremacy.
 
EVERY TIME. Not one liberal on this site does not play that game.
Well, if you are one of those White Nationalists, the shoe fits. I don't try to keep you folks straight, so I wouldn't dare to guess.

I don't think it's about Nationalism, anti- Semitism, or Authoritarianism.

I just think Anglo- Saxon tribes are nuts.

I made a thead below proving its not the beliefs or government it is the people & their bad genes.

Non-Violent Authoritarian/Anti-Semite regime.

As. I pointed out Poland had the same policies as Nazi's in the 1930s & killed basically none Because Poles are Humans & Germans are something else.

th


Considering that the United States is about 50% Anglo-Saxon in origin (German) since well before World War I.

I would say that you're wrong.

*****SMILE*****



:)


Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like th U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria


View attachment 225437

So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.

*****SMILE*****



:)

Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?


So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.

The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.

Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.
 
How about putting forth ideas to advance our nation forward? Not, women are bad unless they are subjugated to someone's sexual whims, people with darker skin are evil, People who practice religions other than fundamentalist Christianity are evil, LGBTs are evil. Dump this shit and get back into society.

How do you FIX a society, if you don't acknowledge the problems???????????

Call me Mr-Fix-It, and I believe Eugenics is the solution, I mean if people like Robert Bowers weren't born, how could they cause problems?
 
Well, if you are one of those White Nationalists, the shoe fits. I don't try to keep you folks straight, so I wouldn't dare to guess.

I don't think it's about Nationalism, anti- Semitism, or Authoritarianism.

I just think Anglo- Saxon tribes are nuts.

I made a thead below proving its not the beliefs or government it is the people & their bad genes.

Non-Violent Authoritarian/Anti-Semite regime.

As. I pointed out Poland had the same policies as Nazi's in the 1930s & killed basically none Because Poles are Humans & Germans are something else.

th


Considering that the United States is about 50% Anglo-Saxon in origin (German) since well before World War I.

I would say that you're wrong.

*****SMILE*****



:)


Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like th U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria


View attachment 225437

So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.

*****SMILE*****



:)

Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?


So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.

The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.

Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.


th


So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?

How statistically honest of you...

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)
 
I don't think it's about Nationalism, anti- Semitism, or Authoritarianism.

I just think Anglo- Saxon tribes are nuts.

I made a thead below proving its not the beliefs or government it is the people & their bad genes.

Non-Violent Authoritarian/Anti-Semite regime.

As. I pointed out Poland had the same policies as Nazi's in the 1930s & killed basically none Because Poles are Humans & Germans are something else.

th


Considering that the United States is about 50% Anglo-Saxon in origin (German) since well before World War I.

I would say that you're wrong.

*****SMILE*****



:)


Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like th U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria


View attachment 225437

So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.

*****SMILE*****



:)

Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?


So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.

The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.

Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.


th


So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?

How statistically honest of you...

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)


MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.

I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.

You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.

Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.

The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.

Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.

Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.

I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.
 
th


Considering that the United States is about 50% Anglo-Saxon in origin (German) since well before World War I.

I would say that you're wrong.

*****SMILE*****



:)


Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like th U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria


View attachment 225437

So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.

*****SMILE*****



:)

Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?


So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.

The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.

Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.


th


So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?

How statistically honest of you...

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)


MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.

I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.

You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.

Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.

The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.

Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.

Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.

I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.


upload_2018-10-28_21-13-36.jpeg


You're the one doing shoddy math. There's a couple billion Caucasians in the world and if you're single out one ethnic group of them to demonize then you should do the same thing with the Asians and Africans.

The Japanese should be singled out for atrocities. Just as the Hutu's should be singled out for their atrocities. The list goes on....

I'm sure if we go far enough back in history we'd find some atrocities committed by your favored Polish group.

*****SMILE*****



:)

BTW... I've seen figures that the Russians mass murdered as many as 75 million and Mao's China was up to 125 million last century... Makes Hitler's Germany look like a drive by shooting.
 
There is blame to be spread all over the place....the trouble is the "sides" point, shout, scream and shout it's not us it's them!!!
We need to get it together. No reason for all this hate. There are plenty I disagree with on this board, but I wish them no harm. I just don't get it.
 
th


Considering that the United States is about 50% Anglo-Saxon in origin (German) since well before World War I.

I would say that you're wrong.

*****SMILE*****



:)


Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like th U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria


View attachment 225437

So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.

*****SMILE*****



:)

Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?


So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.

The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.

Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.


th


So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?

How statistically honest of you...

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)


MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.

I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.

You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.

Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.

The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.

Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.

Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.

I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.

You are aware that Danes and Swedes were Vikings? Your theory has so many holes....
 
Oh yeah?????

Well, a part from many of these mass-shooters / mass-murderers having Anglo-Saxon surnames such as Robert BOWERS, Stephen PADDOCK, Terry NICHOLS, Dylan ROOF, James Alex FIELDS, George HENNARD, James HUBERTY, Charles WHITMAN, Eric HARRIS & Dylan KLEBOLD.

Anglo-Saxon tribes could properly include more than Germans, also English, Lowland Scots, and Ulster Irish.


The Serial killers are heavily clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S.A, Australia, Canada, Germany & the UK.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of serial killers in the United States - Wikipedia

The mass shooters are mostly clustered in Anglo-Saxon countries like th U.S.A & Ulster Ireland.

List of serial killers by country - Wikipedia

List of massacres in Ireland - Wikipedia

The war murders & genocides of Germany.

Thirty Years' War - Wikipedia

World War I - Wikipedia

The Holocaust - Wikipedia

Operation Barbarossa - Wikipedia

The genocides of England.

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

The war murders of the U.S.A.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

EXCLUSIVE: US has killed over 20 million in 37 countries since end of World War II - Prof. Galtung - Daily Post Nigeria

View attachment 225437

So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.

*****SMILE*****



:)

Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?


So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.

The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.

Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.


th


So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?

How statistically honest of you...

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)


MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.

I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.

You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.

Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.

The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.

Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.

Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.

I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.



I'm sure if we go far enough back in history we'd find some atrocities committed by your favored Polish group.

*****SMILE*****



:)


I'll fess up to Polish mass-murders, basically the ones that Germans & Jews always shriek about. (As if they're less violent than Poles, which is a LAUGH-RIOT)

Bromberg Massacre: Approx 300, or so Germans were massacred by Poles because local Germans collaborated with Nazis to oppress Poland.

Jedwabne Massacre: Approx 300, or so Jews were massacred by Poles because local Jews collaborated with Soviets to oppress Poland.


Now, look at Anglo - Saxons.

They caused WW1, & WW2, that's like 60 - 100 million dead, and includes the Holocaust.

They caused the British Empire atrocities in India, where 30 - 60 million starved to death by Famine, a figure which rivals the amount starved to death by Mao the Communist, except this was by a crude Capitalist like British Empire.

They caused 13 - 30 million dead by the U.S.A since WW2.


Here we are, where Anglo-Saxons like Bowers, Paddock, Fields, and Roof are striking over, and over again.



The blood is on the Anglo-Saxon hands.
Now tell me when is the CARNAGE going to end??????????

Anglo-Saxons tried Capitalism, Fascism, and Communism and each system has lead to the BODIES strewn all over the place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top