[
Not everyone should have a gun. NOt everyone needs a gun, and there ought to be sensible criteria as to who can own one.
There is. Try buying one dip stick.
Again, Lanza, Cho, Loughner and Holmes...
Whatever you think is too tough is obviously not tough enough.
Somebody ignorant of the law and the circumstances would think that.
You have to look at each case individually, and then look at current laws. These guys would never be able to buy them now, not if the system wasn't rigged to set these scenarios up in the first place. Then you have to figure if they wanted them bad enough they could still get them, or simply build a pressure-cooker bomb. You can't stop this from happening just by creating gun-free zones or going after responsible owners. You folks don't want to discriminate or use profiling. There lies the flaw in your argument. Treat everyone like criminals regardless of the constitution.