Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
science says different,,Since you asked, your lie was children are subject to abortion. Your opinion that there is only one reason for an abortion is only your opinion and is not shared by the majority of the country.
In English-speaking countries, the legal definition of child generally refers to a minor, in this case as a person younger than the local age of majority. Such individuals are not at risk of abortion.
If you consider a fertilized egg to be a person you are in the extreme minority. Even in the anti-abortion side. Alabama passed a law saying a fertilized egg was a person and then quickly said 'oops, just kidding' when the IVF crowd started screaming.science says different,,
it says its a human being at conception and has a mother and a father,, and that makes it the child of that mother and father,,
and as usual you changed my wording out of context,,
I said there is only one GOOD reason,,
all the other reasons are whats used by pro abortion people to justify killing an innocent child still in the womb,,
science says its a human being at conception not me,,If you consider a fertilized egg to be a person you are in the extreme minority. Even in the anti-abortion side. Alabama passed a law saying a fertilized egg was a person and then quickly said 'oops, just kidding' when the IVF crowd started screaming.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I'd love to argue your point about every fossil is a transitional fossil but I doubt long periods of stasis would convince you.I knew what I was talking about, not my fault I didn't know what you were talking about. I don't recall you mentioning 'transitional fossils'. If you had, I'd have said that every fossil is a transitional fossil.
Persons aren't specific human beings? Because a fertilized human egg is literally a specific human being in the earliest stage of its human life cycle.If you consider a fertilized egg to be a person you are in the extreme minority. Even in the anti-abortion side. Alabama passed a law saying a fertilized egg was a person and then quickly said 'oops, just kidding' when the IVF crowd started screaming.
How does that affect the science of when human life begins?then quickly said 'oops, just kidding' when the IVF crowd started screaming
Science doesn't say it is a person at conception either.science says its a human being at conception not me,,
by definition yes it does,,,Science doesn't say it is a person at conception either.
and since a child at conception has their own unique DNA distinguishable from anyone else that makes them a person,,
Your looking for ways to rationalize it's not wrong is proof God exists.Science doesn't say it is a person at conception either.
Some transitions are very subtle.I'd love to argue your point about every fossil is a transitional fossil but I doubt long periods of stasis would convince you.
so subtle they dont even happen,,Some transitions are very subtle.
'Person' has no scientific definition so using science is incorrect. Science also can't tell you when someone should be allowed to vote. Or to die.Persons aren't specific human beings? Because a fertilized human egg is literally a specific human being in the earliest stage of its human life cycle.
So subtle they leave no trace in the fossil record.so subtle they dont even happen,,
that means it never happened and youre making shit up,,So subtle they leave no trace in the fossil record.
It affects the legal status of that human life.How does that affect the science of when human life begins?
Thank you for proving me correct.Some transitions are very subtle.
Of course some changes are not subtle and are easily seen in the fossil record. Of course you have to judge the evidence before you to learn the truth and not start with an answer and only accept evidence that supports that answer. It also helps to believe the vast majority of the scientific community is part of a multi-century, global conspiracy to fool you if you want to ignore the evidence.that means it never happened and youre making shit up,,
Persons are distinct human beings. It seems you are struggling with supporting killing people.'Person' has no scientific definition so using science is incorrect. Science also can't tell you when someone should be allowed to vote. Or to die.
