Dad2three
Gold Member
Are you honestly saying things were just swell from 1945-1980?
Why did we need the "War on Poverty" and the "Great Society" then? Why did we need to start Medicare? Why did Kennedy advocate for a massive income tax cut?
Were the Carter years good in your opinion?
Weird, you don't think an economy where ALL are improving is better than the past 33 years of Renominates where the VAST majority of benefits go to the 1%ers?
War on poverty and great society were GOOD PROGRAMS to assist the most needy, the opposite of Reaganomics!
All those things you list? BENEFITED a LARGE proportion of US society. Reaganomics? Not so much
LBJ had a demand side tax cut. Carter had 9+ million private sector jobs in 4 years to Reagan's 14 million in 8 and yes, Nixon/Fords wage and price controls harmed him, as did OPEC...
ALL you have are false premises, distortions and lies. I'm shocked
If things were so great we would not have needed those massive government programs. That things are worse today means those government programs haven't worked, unless you define success of a government program by the number of people on it.
But since you think Carter was a success and blame Nixon and Ford just shows your partisan bias.
No, actually we NEEDED those things BECAUSE it's called PROGRESS. The exact opposite of what Reaganomics brought US!
Who said Carter was a success? That's like saying Reagan was a success., Yes under Carter there were 9+ million private sector jobs in 4 years to 14 million Reagan had under him in 8. My logic says Reagan cutting taxes for the rich did ZERO for jobs. But boy have the 'job creators' benefited from 30+ years of Reaganomics. The middle class? Not so much...