- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #281
While I have no issue with the concept I bolded, it is not what I was talking about. This is probably less to do with feminism and more with fundamental cultural values that place certain occupations (namely those involved with caring for and educating our young) at a lower level than traditionally male occupations (those involved with the machinery of war or the ritualized combat of male sports). It is interesting.It's not really so difficult to understand the concept of ''from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.'' The philosophy as appealed to social justice warriors for years.
That's basically the philosophy she was promoting. Just not directly.
Of course what she left out of her logic was who exactly within the ''we'' determines need.
The presumably omniscient, benevolent State, I imagine.