Frank... I often have a hard time, understanding how you can assemble some comment to make without doing a little more BASIC thinking first.
A comet might be seen everywhere on the globe as it passes by. That does not make a single person looking up and seeing it a global event. Just because A is included in B does not mean that every part of B is A.
And yet Mann and his little graph is taken from a SINGLE tree in Russia, and suddenly you want us to ascribe global valuation for that. Too funny. The IPCC got over a decade of propaganda from that ONE single little tree.
Prove it
Already done, multiple times. You're long on tough talk, but real short on everything else. The IPCC is now a laughing stock. It has been exposed as nothing more than a purveyor of fraudulent studies, the majority of which we have found out are promulgated by activists and not peer reviewed by anyone save their bankers who wish for more cash.