Porter Rockwell
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2018
- 6,088
- 665
- 140
- Banned
- #161
That guy was a white supremacist who appears to have been banned. So if he stole some of your thunder that means you're a white supremacist.Claiming the United States was founded by white people [only] for white people and all that statement implies, doesn't make you a white supremacist in your mind? Or a racist?You called him 'hatemonger' in the screed where you complained about name calling. The self awareness of a deplorable.
I'm only calling his hate what it is. Go to the first time on this thread and show me the justification for him calling me a white supremacist. Now fuck off.
He thinks his racist comments is an unspoken truth whites have been scared to speak because of political correctness. I've seen this before here, it was from a poster named Humone. He made a series of posts claiming that was something that was needed to be said.
Check this out:
THIS IS WHAT NEEDS TO BE SAID PART 2
“When America was founded, it was founded on Christian principles, not as a theocracy, but upon Christian principles. Virtually every early state constitution had some references to things such as only white Christians being able to vote and / or hold public office. In our first immigration statute, federal law limited citizenship to White persons of good character. And, as such, our race became a part of our culture.”
“For example, it was Justice Roger Taney, a Democrat, that wrote the ruling in the Dred Scott v Sanford decision that African-Americans, having been considered inferior at the time the United States Constitution was drafted, were not part of the original community of citizens and, whether free or slave, could not be considered citizens of the United States.”
“Now, let us be totally honest and realistic. Taney was at least partially right. The Preamble to the Constitution reads:”
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
I bolded that fragment of a sentence to show that the Constitution was designed to secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves (the founders) and our Posterity (meaning their children and their offspring - aka the white race.)”
Then there was this in the Constitution:
"Article I, Section. 2
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons"
“3/5th Clause in the Constitution. What is it and why was it put in?
I'm not going to overwhelm you any single post, but here is the bottom line:
The whites who came here originally saw themselves as a separate culture, chosen of God, to establish a New Jerusalem. Building on those principles, America became the greatest nation in the annals of history. If you're going to understand the race issue in America it is imperative that you understand this reality
“Today, we find ourselves in very precarious predicament. The Preamble of the Constitution states, unequivocally, WHO that document pertains to along with the first Naturalization laws saying that in order to become a citizen, one had to be a white person of good character. That is all fact. Then history records that the Dred Scott decision confirming that inspired the Republicans to pass the 14th Amendment... which was done illegally:”
“IF the 14th Amendment was not legally ratified, then the black people who are claiming citizenship are no more "citizens" than migrant worker who slid under the wall from Mexico.”
Rockwell has said the same thing, and like Humone wants to debate this because he believes it's true and that it is not racist.
Quite frankly, I don't care whether you "debate" it or not. BTW, it appears that guy stole some of my thunder.
It's more likely from studying the posts that he is a fellow Georgian who attended or attends the Anglo-Israelite Christian Church. I find their historical material very useful in this discussion.
I don't care what you call me. That is the problem you have. If you want to call me a white supremacist, I fully support your Right to do so. Fact is, I will fight to the death for your Right to say so.
At the same time, when you make allegations, there are consequences. IF (and you and I don't know what the ban was over), but, IF that guy got axed for being a "white supremacist," then I've established my case that it is black people who are getting an unfair advantage. You are what I see as the epitome of what a supremacist is. You live, eat, breathe and sleep this stuff. Man, I was off today and we've spent the entire day arguing over this. But, I am with you until the end on this subject as long as this thread lasts... or the man bans me for giving you the other side of this discussion.