Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
a few years ago I did just that and based on tax rates and percentages at that time it was revenue neutral. It amounted to an increase on the the wealthiest 10% of only 2 or 3% and THE REST OF THE NATION would have had to pay NO income taxes to stay
revenue neutral
You did the math, and proved something that everyone else on the planet has missed? Personally, if I did that, I might think I was wrong, not that everyone else is stupid. Then again, I am not an idiot, so I can see why you might go the other way.
do the math yourself, taxing the richest 10% (this is even after they've hid money) just 2 or 3 % more would be enough to cover the rest of the population's taxes. I am sure its gotten even more divergent...i.e. fewer than top 10% say top 8% could cover the rest with just a 2 or 3% increase.
I did the math, and came to the exact same conclusions every economist and politician since the beginning of time has, it won't work.