What law(s) would have stopped the Buffalo shooting?

[M14 Shooter]

What part of a cop had a gun right there when it happened and lost don't you understand idiot

When you can tell me why I asked the question, you'll understand the irrelevance of your answer.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

Only if you can carry them!

No if everybody has nukes we would all be safer right gunner.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And under that law the medical health doctor has to deem him a danger to society to trigger it. And they did not.

OK. so you have your answer. Why do you continue arguing this point when you know the answer?

 

[cnm]

Yep...and I can't stop drunk drivers from killing people either. We even tried outlawing all alcohol. How'd that work out.

That's right. There's nothing you can do but lie back and enjoy the killings.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Well mental health professionals sure dropped the ball. If the mental health professionals would of ruled him unstable and a threat the law would of kicked in if they would of judge him in that state.

This is a problem with the law. Wouldn't you say he is crazy?

His killing 10 people and reading his Manifesto....

He is MENTALLY ILL!!!

 

[HandleTheTruth]

When you can tell me why I asked the question, you'll understand the irrelevance of your answer.

When you quit ignoring the fact that a cop was right there with a gun. You asked me how long did it take a cop to be there. ..I said he was right there and you ignore it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Really? How so?

You said:
There is a big difference between a crazed white supremacist with an assault weapon and a "well regulated militia" with muskets
I demonstrated that "Well regulated militia " and "muskets" are irrelevant when discussing the 2nd Amendment.
Thus, your point is meaningless.

 

[cnm]

Why should we care what 'the developed world' thinks of us?

You want its cooperation when convenient to your goals.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No if everybody has nukes we would all be safer right gunner.

No, because I would be one of the few people that could use them. You, on the other hand, would be clueless with a soup spoon!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You need gun laws, then you need decades of cultural change. Anyone who thinks they can create laws, expect results over night and no future incidents, is a retard and has no grip on the subject.

Various English speaking countries are where they are with minimal gun incidents due to decades of gun laws and regulations etc..

The first step in sorting America's gun problem out is ripping up that out of date constitution and drafting a one suitable for the present.

Fuck no. The last thing we want is to be like you sniveling little peasant subjects.

We're better than you.

Now, shut your fucking limey pie hole before we whip your flat asses a third time.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

His killing 10 people and reading his Manifesto....

He is MENATALLY ILL!!!

Menatally?????????????????

 

[Sunsettommy]

You mean fails to work

Yup the State of New York doesn't always succeed in stopping bad people from killing many.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

His killing 10 people and reading his Manifesto....

He is MENATALLY ILL!!!

But the law only kicks in if he is deemed by a professional to be mentally ill. Which they did not.

 

[cnm]

Fuck no. The last thing we want is to be like you sniveling little peasant subjects.

The tree of freedom must be watered with the blood of innocents.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yeah murder laws don't prevent murders either let's scrap them.
Murder laws don't stop murder let's just scrap them. It's going to happen why have laws.

You fail to understand the point.

The laws against murder (A) exist to punish people who commit murder, not prevent people form committing murder.
The vast majority of gun control laws (B) exist to prevent someone why cannot legally own a gun from getting one.
Demonstrating the inefficacy of (B) and then concluding that (B) should be repealed in any way questions the existence of (A).

Thus, your response is nonsense.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Menatally?????????????????

It was a simple typo mistake now corrected.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

Yup the State of New York doesn't always succeed in stopping bad people from killing many.

In this case the doctor fucked up.

Imagine that.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Agreed. The 2nd will have to be repealed or amended to have any useful effect.

Good of you to recognize the gun control laws you seek violate the constitution; in doing so, your demonstrate the validity of and the necessity for the 2nd.

 

[Sunsettommy]

But the law only kicks in if he is deemed by a professional to be mentally ill. Which they did not.

Yes, and they also didn't know he had made a threat to shoot at a school.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

You fail to understand the point.

The laws against murder (A) exist to punish people who commit murder, not prevent people form committing murder.
The vast majority of gun control laws (B) exist to prevent someone why cannot legally own a gun from getting one.
Demonstrating the inefficacy of (B) and then concluding that (B) should be repealed in any way questions the existence of (A).

Thus, your response is nonsense.

You fail to understand the point.

The laws against murder (A) exist to punish people who commit murder, not prevent people form committing murder.
The vast majority of gun control laws (B) exist to prevent someone why cannot legally own a gun from getting one.
Demonstrating the inefficacy of (B) and then concluding that (B) should be repealed in any way questions the existence of (A).

Thus, your response is nonsense.

You failed to get the point of what I was saying.

Laws are not always about prevent a crime but to punish the crime.