Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You prove my point right here. I hope you have better things to do with your life then attack me on a message board.That's not the 'liberal' thing. That's just the fact that you're an idiot.
No, as I stated, that's really not it. Do try to keep up.
Do I call people morons just because they're Republican? Nooooo... I call morons morons.
You prove my point right here. I hope you have better things to do with your life then attack me on a message board.
No, as I stated, that's really not it. Do try to keep up.
Do I call people morons just because they're Republican? Nooooo... I call morons morons.
I honestly think you have a mental condition.. Get some help man
Mmmm-hmmmmm.
Does anyone here from any political persuasion wish to go on the record and state that they think Lovebears is smart?
Mmmm-hmmmmm.
Does anyone here from any political persuasion wish to go on the record and state that they think Lovebears is smart?
Does anyone from any political persuasion want to go on record and state they think Cuyo is smart? How about normal? Would you believe, merely suffering from mild retardation? Come on people, give me something....
You mean like the way anyone receiving public assistance is a welfare cheat and all union workers are lazy, overpaid slobs?
This response will be the basis for the thread "what makes liberals annoying #2" But for now, all I can say is this is not a response to the thread and it is typical of the way Liberals try and turn the discussion away from the real issue into a matter of loaded rhetoric that totally ignores the topic at hand. which will be "What makes liberals annoying #3"
The most infuriating thing to conservatives when arguing with liberals is complexity. Conservatives tend to try to boil everything down to simplicity, the argument always starts when someone says "it's not that simple or clearcut."
You mean like the way anyone receiving public assistance is a welfare cheat and all union workers are lazy, overpaid slobs?
This response will be the basis for the thread "what makes liberals annoying #2" But for now, all I can say is this is not a response to the thread and it is typical of the way Liberals try and turn the discussion away from the real issue into a matter of loaded rhetoric that totally ignores the topic at hand. which will be "What makes liberals annoying #3"
Mr clean's response is precisely why discussing issues with liberals is futile.
Typically, they will as a fallback position, deflect the discussion away from the issue at hand.
Welfare and unions have nothing to do with this thread.
The most infuriating thing to conservatives when arguing with liberals is complexity. Conservatives tend to try to boil everything down to simplicity, the argument always starts when someone says "it's not that simple or clearcut."
Liberalism is expensive because liberals like attorneys and engineers will complicate the process of boiling a pot of water.
Truth is, most things are pretty simple and clear cut.
Liberals live in a world of "what if" and "what about..."
Listening to a liberal answer a direct question is like watching an obsessive compulsive try to decide which color to wear.
).
Very amusing.The most infuriating thing to conservatives when arguing with liberals is complexity. Conservatives tend to try to boil everything down to simplicity, the argument always starts when someone says "it's not that simple or clearcut."
That, and their black-and-white position on every issue.
The most infuriating thing to conservatives when arguing with liberals is complexity. Conservatives tend to try to boil everything down to simplicity, the argument always starts when someone says "it's not that simple or clearcut."
That, and their black-and-white position on every issue.
Hyperpartisans on this board are black and white with every position they have, they support what their team does, don't support what the other team does.
How many Obamabots speak out in favor of a republican position over a democrat position on 1 issue?
How many Bushbots speak out in favor of a democrat position over a republican position on 1 issue?
I'd say that equates to less than 1% of the posts by partisans on this board.
i find it interesting that people who post threads like this are surprised when others respond to them accordingly and don't take them seriously.
I see this over and over. Conservatives are for limited government.
These days, the committment to limited government by conservatives is just so much lip service.
The leadership in no way actually means it.
I give you Homeland Security and the unfinanced Medicare Group D as prime examples.
Stop whining.I see this over and over. Conservatives are for limited government.
WHEN? It never happens. Conservatives are only for limiting ONE thing in government; liberals and Democrats.
I see this over and over. Conservatives are for limited government. Just because we say we don't want government doing things where government is inept, counterproductive, wasteful or whatever, does not mean that we should shut it down totally.
Yes, we do need roads, bridges, highways, jails, schools, aircraft carriers, GPS satellites, standard weights and measures, courts, etc etc. Saying we don't need subsidies for crummy cars badly built and still with astronomical prices does not mean we don't need highways.
The conservative view is that the government should be a useful servant of the people's needs. However, you give it too much money, power, authority it becomes the worst sort of master.
This, of course, is total bulshit.
Government is the only defense a citizen has against powerful corporations which have been shown again and again to steal, cheat, and lie to the point of polluting the planet and destroying the world economy. Why? Because the government is ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE.
And the conservatives want to let the unelected corporations run wild....
Gets pretty scary sometimes when you get the full view of the liberal brain.
Government is the only defense a citizen has against powerful corporations?
No, a citizen can simply take his business somewhere else and the corporation loses power as it loses money. Don't like how Mcdonald's gets their meat? Go to Wendy's. Don't like how Wal Mart treats their employees? Go to Meijer.
No, we don't have to be saved by the almighty, all-knowing, all-loving Father Government.
I see this over and over. Conservatives are for limited government.
These days, the committment to limited government by conservatives is just so much lip service.
The leadership in no way actually means it.
I give you Homeland Security and the unfinanced Medicare Group D as prime examples.
Neither of which are agreeable to conservatives.
Bush's ideology was misinterpreted by liberals in stating he governed conservative.
Untrue. On domestic and fiscal policy, Bush 43 was a right leaning populist.
Many of his spending policies were quite liberal.
Where Bush differed from other right leaning moderates was his military and foreign policy. On those issues Bush was indeed conservative.
No..I want the answers to be as direct as the question. In other words I want the answer to cut through the bullshit.This response will be the basis for the thread "what makes liberals annoying #2" But for now, all I can say is this is not a response to the thread and it is typical of the way Liberals try and turn the discussion away from the real issue into a matter of loaded rhetoric that totally ignores the topic at hand. which will be "What makes liberals annoying #3"
Mr clean's response is precisely why discussing issues with liberals is futile.
Typically, they will as a fallback position, deflect the discussion away from the issue at hand.
Welfare and unions have nothing to do with this thread.
But what makes arguing with liberals frustrating is and Mr. Clean just gave a perfect example of it
You are too preoccupied with looking for a direct and rational answer to see that you just received your answer, Mr. spoon! In fact, ou just answered the question!
These days, the committment to limited government by conservatives is just so much lip service.
The leadership in no way actually means it.
I give you Homeland Security and the unfinanced Medicare Group D as prime examples.
Neither of which are agreeable to conservatives.
Bush's ideology was misinterpreted by liberals in stating he governed conservative.
Untrue. On domestic and fiscal policy, Bush 43 was a right leaning populist.
Many of his spending policies were quite liberal.
Where Bush differed from other right leaning moderates was his military and foreign policy. On those issues Bush was indeed conservative.
Nation-building, open borders and ports aren't a conservative defense policy.
Nothing about Bush or any of the republicans in power during his administration, was conservative.
These days, the committment to limited government by conservatives is just so much lip service.
The leadership in no way actually means it.
I give you Homeland Security and the unfinanced Medicare Group D as prime examples.
Neither of which are agreeable to conservatives.
Bush's ideology was misinterpreted by liberals in stating he governed conservative.
Untrue. On domestic and fiscal policy, Bush 43 was a right leaning populist.
Many of his spending policies were quite liberal.
Where Bush differed from other right leaning moderates was his military and foreign policy. On those issues Bush was indeed conservative.
Nation-building, open borders and ports aren't a conservative defense policy.
Nothing about Bush or any of the republicans in power during his administration, was conservative.
Then why do liberals express such vitriol over Bush's presidency?These days, the committment to limited government by conservatives is just so much lip service.
The leadership in no way actually means it.
I give you Homeland Security and the unfinanced Medicare Group D as prime examples.
Neither of which are agreeable to conservatives.
Bush's ideology was misinterpreted by liberals in stating he governed conservative.
Untrue. On domestic and fiscal policy, Bush 43 was a right leaning populist.
Many of his spending policies were quite liberal.
Where Bush differed from other right leaning moderates was his military and foreign policy. On those issues Bush was indeed conservative.
Nation-building, open borders and ports aren't a conservative defense policy.
Nothing about Bush or any of the republicans in power during his administration, was conservative.
