🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

What qualifies Hillary Clinton to be president?

deltex1

Gold Member
Dec 15, 2012
20,614
3,416
295
Near the Alamo
Do not list the usual basic requiements of the constitution...we know those. Do not list her duty titles...we know those. Tell us the decisions she has made, the bills she offered, the legislation she sponsored, her best ideas, critical foreign policy initiatives she successfully managed. I'm excited to learn.
 
She's a democrat and a women. And just like the democrats tried to sooth their conscience over slavery by nominating a black man they will do the same with a woman no matter how unqualified.

She has not had one success in life she can claim as her own.
 
Do not list the usual basic requiements of the constitution...we know those. Do not list her duty titles...we know those. Tell us the decisions she has made, the bills she offered, the legislation she sponsored, her best ideas, critical foreign policy initiatives she successfully managed. I'm excited to learn.
She's got the star power; she knows all the power players in Washington; she's a war hawk; a closet neocon; and she has bigger balls than Bill.

Have Palin debate her and you'll see why!
(What she would do to Palin in a debate, is probably against the law)
 
Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

If she can't manage a marriage - How the hell can she manage a country??
 
Do not list the usual basic requiements of the constitution...we know those. Do not list her duty titles...we know those. Tell us the decisions she has made, the bills she offered, the legislation she sponsored, her best ideas, critical foreign policy initiatives she successfully managed. I'm excited to learn.
She's got the star power; she knows all the power players in Washington; she's a war hawk; a closet neocon; and she has bigger balls than Bill.

Have Palin debate her and you'll see why!
(What she would do to Palin in a debate, is probably against the law)

She is a bitch, I guess that qualifies women on the left.
 
she has none....except being a career politician, oh and she was APPOINTED Sec, of State and she wasn't qualified for that job either... and being the used wife who swallowed her pride for power and stood by her hound dog Billy boy...she doesn't have any more qualifications to be president than the community agitator...

but this seems to be the Democrat base today, they don't need qualifications, they only need to have American idol in them
 
Last edited:
Do not list the usual basic requiements of the constitution...we know those. Do not list her duty titles...we know those. Tell us the decisions she has made, the bills she offered, the legislation she sponsored, her best ideas, critical foreign policy initiatives she successfully managed. I'm excited to learn.
She's got the star power; she knows all the power players in Washington; she's a war hawk; a closet neocon; and she has bigger balls than Bill.

Have Palin debate her and you'll see why!
(What she would do to Palin in a debate, is probably against the law)

She is a bitch, I guess that qualifies women on the left.

Well, to be honest, one thing Hillary "The Wide" Clinton is MORE than capable of - is getting men killed. She seems to excel at that job.
 
she has none....except being a career politician, oh and she APPOINTED Sec, if State and she wasn't qualified for the job either... and being the used wife who swallowed her pride for power and stood by her hound dog Billy boy...she doesn't have any more qualifications to be president than the community agitator...

but this the Democrat base today, they don't need qualifications, they only need to have American idol in them


Absolutely correct! She is being hailed as the "most effective Secretary of State in history" by the left. WHAT!?!?! Name ONE thing she accomplished as SOS. JUST ONE.

Oooops....She DID get those guys killed in Benghazi......OK...Name TWO!!
 
She's a democrat and a women. And just like the democrats tried to sooth their conscience over slavery by nominating a black man they will do the same with a woman no matter how unqualified.

She has not had one success in life she can claim as her own.

This is not about Palin. Shhheeeesh.
 
If she hadn't married Bill Clinton, she would have been a night court public defender somewhere in New England.
 
Damn you guys are worried about her and yes, she will kick your asses. Just like obama did....twice.

Suck it.
 
The Clintons need to retire from political elections and office and try to do a better job of managing their Clinton Foundation. Apparently it has gone awry. We do not need anymore Clintons in our government.

The problem with that, unfortunately, is that the Clintons (not unlike MOST politicians) carry with them this sense of "entitlement". They are the "CLINTONS!!" they SHOULD be in power. They have been ANNOINTED for power.

They are the redneck version of the Kennedy family.

So what if their "donors" are convicted felons? So what if there is murder and mayhem and rape and misogyny associated with the name "Clinton"? Who cares?

And that is the crux of the matter these days when it concerns the left - who cares??

And this is what we have made of OUR country today.

One step closer to ruin.
 
Do not list the usual basic requiements of the constitution...we know those. Do not list her duty titles...we know those. Tell us the decisions she has made, the bills she offered, the legislation she sponsored, her best ideas, critical foreign policy initiatives she successfully managed. I'm excited to learn.

Don't worry about her.


 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
I find it rather heartening that even a well-known moonbat such as Maureen Dowd is onto the Grifters In Chief.

Why is it that America’s roil family always seems better in abstract than in concrete? The closer it gets to running the world once more, the more you are reminded of all the things that bugged you the last time around.

The Clintons’ neediness, their sense of what they are owed in material terms for their public service, their assumption that they’re entitled to everyone’s money.

Are we about to put the “For Rent” sign back on the Lincoln Bedroom?

If Americans are worried about money in politics, there is no larger concern than the Clintons, who are cosseted in a world where rich people endlessly scratch the backs of rich people.

They have a Wile E. Coyote problem; something is always blowing up. Just when the Clintons are supposed to be floating above it all, on a dignified cloud of do-gooding leading into 2016, pop-pop-pop, little explosions go off everywhere, reminding us of the troubling connections and values they drag around.

There’s the continuing grotesque spectacle of Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin. And there’s the sketchy involvement of the Clintons’ most prolific fund-raiser, Terry McAuliffe, and Hillary’s brother Tony Rodham in a venture, GreenTech Automotive; it’s under federal investigation and causing fireworks in Virginia, where McAuliffe is running for governor.

Many Israelis were disgusted to learn that Bill Clinton was originally scheduled to scarf up $500,000 to speak at the Israeli president Shimon Peres’s 90th birthday festivities in June. I guess being good friends with Peres and brokering the accord that won Peres the Nobel Peace Prize were not reasons enough for Bill to celebrate. The Israeli branch of the Jewish National Fund had agreed to donate half a mil to the Clinton foundation. Isn’t the J.N.F. “supposed to plant trees with donor cash?” Haaretz chided before the fund pulled back. “I guess money does grow on trees.”

(snip)

As George Packer wrote in The New Yorker, Bill Clinton earned $17 million last year giving speeches, including one to a Lagos company for $700,000. Hillary gets $200,000 a speech.

Until Harry Truman wrote his memoirs, the ex-president struggled on an Army pension of $112.56 a month. “I could never lend myself to any transaction, however respectable,” he said, “that would commercialize on the prestige and dignity of the office of the presidency.”

So quaint, Packer wrote, observing, “The top of American life has become a very cozy and lucrative place, where the social capital of who you are and who you know brings unimaginable returns.”

The Clintons want to do big worthy things, but they also want to squeeze money from rich people wherever they live on planet Earth, insatiably gobbling up cash for politics and charity and themselves from the same incestuous swirl.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/o...money-money-money-money.html?pagewanted=print
 

Forum List

Back
Top