Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The liberal gun-rights-haters have even admitted frankly that the only countries that have managed to reduce these mass shootings, are the ones that enact a virtual 100% ban on guns in civilian hands: England, China, Japan, Australia, etc. The fact that crime continues to increase in most of those countries, is carefully not examined by the liberals.BTW, gun control does not mean total confiscation of all guns. That meme is a canard - one echoed by biddable people like you.
And yet, with the evidence before them, they continue to push for more gun laws. It's obvious what their real goal is: Knowing the laws they call for won't work, they want the 100% ban in this country, too.
And even that 100% ban will only work if we also enact a massive police state, where squads of armed police first go door to door confiscating every firearm, and then continue to regularly invade and search every house as time goes on, looking for guns.
Keep this in mind the next time some politician calls for "reasonable gun restrictions" or some other tired talking point. He knows it won't work. But it's the next step he wants on the way to his real goal.
What other reason could he have for continuing to push for more gun laws?
"Sane" require that said laws and policies are demonstrably necessary and effective; you know you cannot provide any sound argument to that effect for any of the restrictions you seek.Q. What reason do I want to see gun controls?The liberal gun-rights-haters have even admitted frankly that the only countries that have managed to reduce these mass shootings, are the ones that enact a virtual 100% ban on guns in civilian hands: England, China, Japan, Australia, etc. The fact that crime continues to increase in most of those countries, is carefully not examined by the liberals.BTW, gun control does not mean total confiscation of all guns. That meme is a canard - one echoed by biddable people like you.
And yet, with the evidence before them, they continue to push for more gun laws. It's obvious what their real goal is: Knowing the laws they call for won't work, they want the 100% ban in this country, too.
And even that 100% ban will only work if we also enact a massive police state, where squads of armed police first go door to door confiscating every firearm, and then continue to regularly invade and search every house as time goes on, looking for guns.
Keep this in mind the next time some politician calls for "reasonable gun restrictions" or some other tired talking point. He knows it won't work. But it's the next step he wants on the way to his real goal.
What other reason could he have for continuing to push for more gun laws?
A. I've seen the results of the insanity, and hope someday a sane gun control policy can be reached by men and women of goodwill.
The end goal should be to follow our Constitution and allow Citizens to arm and protect themselves. The bad guys don't delay raping and killing you and your family so the Police can have time to get there and save you. The Police generally only arrive after the fact. When it comes down to it, They arrive too late with their chalk and body bags. It's only you against the rabid demons.
All Citizens should be prepared to protect themselves and their families. Doing otherwise, is just plain irresponsible. Things are only gonna get worse. Rampant Civil Unrest is coming. The Police don't have the time or resources to be everywhere. You are on your own. That's the harsh reality. It's time to put an end to the Communist/Progressive Anti-2nd Amendment crusade.
Nice Rant, file it under 'Fear and Hate".
BTW, gun control does not mean total confiscation of all guns. That meme is a canard - one echoed by biddable people like you.
Yes, following the Constitution and protecting your family is all about the 'Fear and Hate.' If that's your take, so be it i guess. But all Citizens should arm themselves and protect their loved ones. It's a vital responsibility. The Police can't be everywhere. They most often only arrive after the fact.
[*]The liberal gun-rights-haters have even admitted frankly that the only countries that have managed to reduce these mass shootings, are the ones that enact a virtual 100% ban on guns in civilian hands: England, China, Japan, Australia, etc. The fact that crime continues to increase in most of those countries, is carefully not examined by the liberals.BTW, gun control does not mean total confiscation of all guns. That meme is a canard - one echoed by biddable people like you.
"Sane" require that said laws and policies are demonstrably necessary and effective; you know you cannot provide any sound argument to that effect for any of the restrictions you seek.Q. What reason do I want to see gun controls?And yet, with the evidence before them, they continue to push for more gun laws. It's obvious what their real goal is: Knowing the laws they call for won't work, they want the 100% ban in this country, too.
And even that 100% ban will only work if we also enact a massive police state, where squads of armed police first go door to door confiscating every firearm, and then continue to regularly invade and search every house as time goes on, looking for guns.
Keep this in mind the next time some politician calls for "reasonable gun restrictions" or some other tired talking point. He knows it won't work. But it's the next step he wants on the way to his real goal.
What other reason could he have for continuing to push for more gun laws?
A. I've seen the results of the insanity, and hope someday a sane gun control policy can be reached by men and women of goodwill.
Thus nothing you seek is "sane".
And even that 100% ban will only work if we also enact a massive police state, where squads of armed police first go door to door confiscating every firearm, and then continue to regularly invade and search every house as time goes on, looking for guns.
Keep this in mind the next time some politician calls for "reasonable gun restrictions" or some other tired talking point. He knows it won't work. But it's the next step he wants on the way to his real goal.
What other reason could he have for continuing to push for more gun laws?
A. I've seen the results of the insanity, and hope someday a sane gun control policy can be reached by men and women of goodwill.
Thus nothing you seek is "sane".
You are a LIAR. I have presented arguments that may reduce the number of guns in the hands of those who should never be legally capable of owning, possessing or have one or more in their custody or control.
Such arguments include Licensing and Registration and a Flash Notice System. The response is predictable:
- It will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals (only criminals will have guns)
- It violates the 2nd A.
- It is a slippery slope, soon "they" will confiscate all guns in private ownership
- Natural law supersedes gun control laws
- Gun control is a communist goal.
Your response, a lie of omission, is irrelevant to the point, in bold for clarity.I have presented arguments that may reduce the number of guns in the hands of those who should never be legally capable of owning, possessing or have one or more in their custody or control.
He knows there is no sound argument for the necessity of the state having on record the owner of each of the 356,000,000 gun in the US.[
Registration is a no go , PERIOD.
He knows there is no sound argument for the necessity of the state having on record the owner of each of the 356,000,000 gun in the US.[
Registration is a no go , PERIOD.
Such arguments include Licensing and Registration and a Flash Notice System. The response is predictable:
- It will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals (only criminals will have guns)
- It violates the 2nd A.
- It is a slippery slope, soon "they" will confiscate all guns in private ownership
- Natural law supersedes gun control laws
- Gun control is a communist goal.
And even that 100% ban will only work if we also enact a massive police state, where squads of armed police first go door to door confiscating every firearm, and then continue to regularly invade and search every house as time goes on, looking for guns.
Keep this in mind the next time some politician calls for "reasonable gun restrictions" or some other tired talking point. He knows it won't work. But it's the next step he wants on the way to his real goal.
What other reason could he have for continuing to push for more gun laws?
A. I've seen the results of the insanity, and hope someday a sane gun control policy can be reached by men and women of goodwill.
Thus nothing you seek is "sane".
You are a LIAR. I have presented arguments that may reduce the number of guns in the hands of those who should never be legally capable of owning, possessing or have one or more in their custody or control.
Such arguments include Licensing and Registration and a Flash Notice System. The response is predictable:
- It will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals (only criminals will have guns)
- It violates the 2nd A.
- It is a slippery slope, soon "they" will confiscate all guns in private ownership
- Natural law supersedes gun control laws
- Gun control is a communist goal.
Registration is a no go , PERIOD.
Because, as you know, there is no sound argument for the necessity of the state having on record the owner of each of the 356,000,000 guns in the US.Why?
We register cars
We register boats
We register Air craft
Why not guns?
And even that 100% ban will only work if we also enact a massive police state, where squads of armed police first go door to door confiscating every firearm, and then continue to regularly invade and search every house as time goes on, looking for guns.
Keep this in mind the next time some politician calls for "reasonable gun restrictions" or some other tired talking point. He knows it won't work. But it's the next step he wants on the way to his real goal.
What other reason could he have for continuing to push for more gun laws?
A. I've seen the results of the insanity, and hope someday a sane gun control policy can be reached by men and women of goodwill.
Thus nothing you seek is "sane".
You are a LIAR. I have presented arguments that may reduce the number of guns in the hands of those who should never be legally capable of owning, possessing or have one or more in their custody or control.
Such arguments include Licensing and Registration and a Flash Notice System. The response is predictable:
- It will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals (only criminals will have guns)
- It violates the 2nd A.
- It is a slippery slope, soon "they" will confiscate all guns in private ownership
- Natural law supersedes gun control laws
- Gun control is a communist goal.
Registration is a no go , PERIOD.
Why?
We register cars
We register boats
We register Air craft
Why not guns?
"Sane" require that said laws and policies are demonstrably necessary and effective; you know you cannot provide any sound argument to that effect for any of the restrictions you seek.Q. What reason do I want to see gun controls?
A. I've seen the results of the insanity, and hope someday a sane gun control policy can be reached by men and women of goodwill.
Thus nothing you seek is "sane".
You are a LIAR. I have presented arguments that may reduce the number of guns in the hands of those who should never be legally capable of owning, possessing or have one or more in their custody or control.
Such arguments include Licensing and Registration and a Flash Notice System. The response is predictable:
- It will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals (only criminals will have guns)
- It violates the 2nd A.
- It is a slippery slope, soon "they" will confiscate all guns in private ownership
- Natural law supersedes gun control laws
- Gun control is a communist goal.
Registration is a no go , PERIOD.
Why?
We register cars
We register boats
We register Air craft
Why not guns?
Gun Control in Nazi Germany
Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and “Enemies of the State” by Stephen P. Halbrook, Independent Institute, 2014, 364 pp.
There is no shortage of theories or writings related to the rise of the Third Reich and the subsequent Holocaust. Stephen Halbrook’s 2013 book, Gun Control in the Third Reich offers a compelling and important account of the role of gun prohibition in aiding Hitler’s goals of exterminating the Jews and other “enemies of the state.” While much of the early gun prohibition was created with supposedly good intent, Halbrook carefully and meticulously details how a change in political regime facilitated manipulating some well-intentioned gun registration laws and other gun prohibition to be used in inconceivable way
TRANSLATION: I can't refute what you said, but I hate it anyway. So I'll try some of the usual tired talking points and see if I can fool someone somewhere into thinking you were wrong anyway.YOU LOSE - anytime on the internet one needs to default to Hitler or Germany's Policies in the 30's & 40's the post fails.
TRANSLATION: I can't refute what you said, but I hate it anyway. So I'll try some of the usual tired talking points and see if I can fool someone somewhere into thinking you were wrong anyway.YOU LOSE - anytime on the internet one needs to default to Hitler or Germany's Policies in the 30's & 40's the post fails.
Why don't you understand this applies equally as well to people. like yourself, who must lie to make their points?[
YOU LOSE - anytime on the internet one needs to default to Hitler or Germany's Policies in the 30's & 40's the post fails.
This is, of course, a lie, proving the point made just above,As a callous conservatives you don't give a damn about others, it is only your self claimed right that matters to you.
This is, of course, a lie, proving the point made just above,As a callous conservatives you don't give a damn about others, it is only your self claimed right that matters to you.
The end goal should be to follow our Constitution and allow Citizens to arm and protect themselves. The bad guys don't delay raping and killing you and your family so the Police can have time to get there and save you. The Police generally only arrive after the fact. When it comes down to it, They arrive too late with their chalk and body bags. It's only you against the rabid demons.
All Citizens should be prepared to protect themselves and their families. Doing otherwise, is just plain irresponsible. Things are only gonna get worse. Rampant Civil Unrest is coming. The Police don't have the time or resources to be everywhere. You are on your own. That's the harsh reality. It's time to put an end to the Communist/Progressive Anti-2nd Amendment crusade.
Nice Rant, file it under 'Fear and Hate".
BTW, gun control does not mean total confiscation of all guns. That meme is a canard - one echoed by biddable people like you.
Yes, following the Constitution and protecting your family is all about the 'Fear and Hate.' If that's your take, so be it i guess. But all Citizens should arm themselves and protect their loved ones. It's a vital responsibility. The Police can't be everywhere. They most often only arrive after the fact.
"... It's time to put an end to the Communist/Progressive Anti-2nd Amendment crusade"; such a comment deserves to be called a rant, for it is an effort to create hate for other Americans who hold opinions which differ from your own, and fear in those challenged by reality. It is an echo as I stated of a meme and a canard - if you don't know the meaning of these two words all it takes is to Google them, and maybe then you might comprehend reality.
... he dishonesty claims, in defense of his lie, rather than trying to prove his statement is true.The evidence you forget to bring to the post is missing once again....This is, of course, a lie, proving the point made just above,As a callous conservatives you don't give a damn about others, it is only your self claimed right that matters to you.
