Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you and the court are too stupid to realize that my Mini 14 is exactly the same as a so called assault rifle and is not bannedNot your choice to make as long as the 2nd amendment is around.
The Supreme Court is letting assault rifle bans stand. Machine guns are highly regulated. We can highly regulate any weapons while having the 2nd.
I would ban high capacity magazines.
For the cops as well?
No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
And they have to go to crime. They have to go in and stop gangs and mass shooters. Defenders don't go to trouble.Cops are only allowed to shoot in self defense or the defense of anotherI would ban high capacity magazines.
For the cops as well?
No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
No trouble comes to them
Same result
But you and the court are too stupid to realize that my Mini 14 is exactly the same as a so called assault rifle and is not bannedThe Supreme Court is letting assault rifle bans stand. Machine guns are highly regulated. We can highly regulate any weapons while having the 2nd.
I would ban high capacity magazines.
For the cops as well?
No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
Good enough for us, good enough for them.
How about this, they get to keep larger magazines for their service pieces, but those get locked up after their shift and their off duty pieces have to meet the same requirements as the rest of us.
Yes a successful defense. Was she defending or trying to kill him?She shot him six times and he drove away dimwit.
Kill him obviously.
Anyone who knows shit about firearms will tell you never shoot to wound.
You didn't kill anyone in your stupidly made up gun defense.
Only because I have an aversion to back shooting.
Yes it being made up had nothing to do with it.
And they have to go to crime. They have to go in and stop gangs and mass shooters. Defenders don't go to trouble.Cops are only allowed to shoot in self defense or the defense of anotherFor the cops as well?
No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
No trouble comes to them
Same result
You find a lot more trouble when looking. And much worse trouble.
Ah so you think defense is killing people. The dumb is strong in you.Yes a successful defense. Was she defending or trying to kill him?She shot him six times and he drove away dimwit.
Kill him obviously.
Anyone who knows shit about firearms will tell you never shoot to wound.
Meh....coming from someone who knows jack shit about firearms i'm not insulted by your ignorance.
Might have more guns than you dipshit.
You want to ban firearms based on cosmetic features, you want to restrict the size of magazines..
What are the last 4 words of the 2nd?
But you and the court are too stupid to realize that my Mini 14 is exactly the same as a so called assault rifle and is not banned
I would ban high capacity magazines.
For the cops as well?
No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
Good enough for us, good enough for them.
How about this, they get to keep larger magazines for their service pieces, but those get locked up after their shift and their off duty pieces have to meet the same requirements as the rest of us.
Sounds fair.
Well then you must have examples of people needing hi cap mags. Let's hear them.And they have to go to crime. They have to go in and stop gangs and mass shooters. Defenders don't go to trouble.Cops are only allowed to shoot in self defense or the defense of anotherNo. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
No trouble comes to them
Same result
You find a lot more trouble when looking. And much worse trouble.
Some pretty bad trouble finds a lot of people but you don't care if they are defenseless
What do you think the word "arms" means as used in the 2nd?You want to ban firearms based on cosmetic features, you want to restrict the size of magazines..
What are the last 4 words of the 2nd?
Many arms are strongly regulated. The 2nd doesn't even mention firearms.
And cops get shot more in states with high ownership. They should rethink their position.I would ban high capacity magazines.
For the cops as well?
No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
Good enough for us, good enough for them.
How about this, they get to keep larger magazines for their service pieces, but those get locked up after their shift and their off duty pieces have to meet the same requirements as the rest of us.
Sounds fair.
LOL, congrats, you have now lost the support of any law enforcement agency out there. Most of them are for full civilian gun rights, and the ones that are not always want exceptions for themselves.
Like I said you need as much ammo as it takes to stop your attackersWell then you must have examples of people needing hi cap mags. Let's hear them.And they have to go to crime. They have to go in and stop gangs and mass shooters. Defenders don't go to trouble.Cops are only allowed to shoot in self defense or the defense of another
No trouble comes to them
Same result
You find a lot more trouble when looking. And much worse trouble.
Some pretty bad trouble finds a lot of people but you don't care if they are defenseless
Arm is a weapon. Could mean a spear. It does not mention firearms. Fact.What do you think the word "arms" means as used in the 2nd?You want to ban firearms based on cosmetic features, you want to restrict the size of magazines..
What are the last 4 words of the 2nd?
Many arms are strongly regulated. The 2nd doesn't even mention firearms.
LinkAnd cops get shot more in states with high ownership. They should rethink their position.For the cops as well?
No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
Good enough for us, good enough for them.
How about this, they get to keep larger magazines for their service pieces, but those get locked up after their shift and their off duty pieces have to meet the same requirements as the rest of us.
Sounds fair.
LOL, congrats, you have now lost the support of any law enforcement agency out there. Most of them are for full civilian gun rights, and the ones that are not always want exceptions for themselves.
Examples.Like I said you need as much ammo as it takes to stop your attackersWell then you must have examples of people needing hi cap mags. Let's hear them.And they have to go to crime. They have to go in and stop gangs and mass shooters. Defenders don't go to trouble.
No trouble comes to them
Same result
You find a lot more trouble when looking. And much worse trouble.
Some pretty bad trouble finds a lot of people but you don't care if they are defenseless
You think that means 1 round I think it means as many as you can have
Arm is a weapon. Could mean a spear. It does not mention firearms. Fact.What do you think the word "arms" means as used in the 2nd?You want to ban firearms based on cosmetic features, you want to restrict the size of magazines..
What are the last 4 words of the 2nd?
Many arms are strongly regulated. The 2nd doesn't even mention firearms.
LinkAnd cops get shot more in states with high ownership. They should rethink their position.No. They have to capture criminals. Completely different than defense.
Good enough for us, good enough for them.
How about this, they get to keep larger magazines for their service pieces, but those get locked up after their shift and their off duty pieces have to meet the same requirements as the rest of us.
Sounds fair.
LOL, congrats, you have now lost the support of any law enforcement agency out there. Most of them are for full civilian gun rights, and the ones that are not always want exceptions for themselves.
And the cops I know are the most pro 2nd people around
Yes a successful defense. Was she defending or trying to kill him?She shot him six times and he drove away dimwit.
Kill him obviously.
Anyone who knows shit about firearms will tell you never shoot to wound.
If defense is killing only about 200 criminals are killed in defense each year. Compare that to over 9000 gun homicides. Maybe we should ban guns.
You seem to be conveniently forgetting the 1.5 million defensive gun uses a year, why do you want a million and a half more victims?
Those are fictional. Funny you would believe that.
Arm is a weapon. Could mean a spear. It does not mention firearms. Fact.What do you think the word "arms" means as used in the 2nd?You want to ban firearms based on cosmetic features, you want to restrict the size of magazines..
What are the last 4 words of the 2nd?
Many arms are strongly regulated. The 2nd doesn't even mention firearms.
A firearm is a weapon and therefore is not excluded by the term
Don't need any because I am not trying to tell other people how much ammo they need you areExamples.Like I said you need as much ammo as it takes to stop your attackersWell then you must have examples of people needing hi cap mags. Let's hear them.No trouble comes to them
Same result
You find a lot more trouble when looking. And much worse trouble.
Some pretty bad trouble finds a lot of people but you don't care if they are defenseless
You think that means 1 round I think it means as many as you can have
