Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and again no full auto may be purchased in the USA except to law enforcement
That is 100% inaccurate. You have no idea what you're talking about. None. I personally have a friend who bought a fully automatic Uzi with a silencer. 100% legal. I have fired it. I also have an acquaintance who owns a vintage full automatic Tommy Gun (.45 ACP). And though I haven't fired his, I have fired the Tommy Gun.
Both silencers and fully automatic weapons are legal in the U.S. The deal is that only fully automatics that were grandfathered in before the ban of modern automatics.
There is no except for in the 2nd amendment.Could have done the same with a few hand guns. A little practice and you can change out clips faster than it takes t describe the process.The gun experts have been telling us these rifles aren't military and not that dangerous. Now one shooter killed 50 and injured 50 in minutes. Seems the experts don't know shit or blatantly lie. Oh and an armed defender was there, more pro gun BS.
Yet the gun nuts fight a mag limit. If you can reload so fast I assume you have no problem with a limit then? Sorry but people fail reloads all the time too.
The 2nd doesnt say you can own all arms either. A club is an arm.
The only difference between these rifles you lefties like to call "Assault Weapons" and their hunting rifle counter parts is cosmetics. You Liberals are trying to convince everyone that extra plastic on a firearm makes them more dangerous. Its disingenuous and ignorant.Obvious as I referenced the OP's headline for the post. But I would gladly add you if you think a semi-automatic with "scary plastic pieces" is an "assault rifle".I was in the Army and what you are calling an "Army Assault Weapon" is not.
Whose post are you referencing?
Still arguing definitions? He killed 50 and injured 50. What the gun is called really doesn't matter.
50 dead and 50 injured. Hi capacity magazines are the difference. Stop the BS.
50 dead and 50 injured. Hi capacity magazines are the difference. Stop the BS.
He reloaded many many times. He was firing in a very confined area. What was the capacity of his magazines?
The only difference between these rifles you lefties like to call "Assault Weapons" and their hunting rifle counter parts is cosmetics. You Liberals are trying to convince everyone that extra plastic on a firearm makes them more dangerous. Its disingenuous and ignorant.Obvious as I referenced the OP's headline for the post. But I would gladly add you if you think a semi-automatic with "scary plastic pieces" is an "assault rifle".Whose post are you referencing?
Still arguing definitions? He killed 50 and injured 50. What the gun is called really doesn't matter.
50 dead and 50 injured. Hi capacity magazines are the difference. Stop the BS.
No bullshit on my part. You can not deny what I stated. The only thing you Liberals want to ban is extra plastic. It would be hilarious if this whole issue wasn't about infringing on the right of law abiding citizens.
Yep. They are everywhere. I can't stand people who have no idea what they are talking about and spread misinformation.and again no full auto may be purchased in the USA except to law enforcement
That is 100% inaccurate. You have no idea what you're talking about. None. I personally have a friend who bought a fully automatic Uzi with a silencer. 100% legal. I have fired it. I also have an acquaintance who owns a vintage full automatic Tommy Gun (.45 ACP). And though I haven't fired his, I have fired the Tommy Gun.
Both silencers and fully automatic weapons are legal in the U.S. The deal is that only fully automatics that were grandfathered in before the ban of modern automatics.
silencers are completely legal out here
He had to buy guns illegally.That seems like a big jump. You are against stopping terrorists before they kill people?
I don't know how you can. How do you know someone is planning a terrorist attack? How do you find out with no probable cause and no ability to legally obtain warrants?
Nothing you will ever do will stop a person who is determined to commit any crime
FBI thwarts mass shooting at Milwaukee Masonic center
How? They had an informant on the inside most likely. THAT is the exception not the rule unless of course you want the FBI to have a dedicated surveillance team for every citizen
Yeah and how did they know he was going to buy those guns? An informant on the inside?
You are correct but adding that doesn't to matter to the gun grabbers.Actually a typical hunting rifle is far more accurate than any semi auto or full auto assault rifleThe only difference between these rifles you lefties like to call "Assault Weapons" and their hunting rifle counter parts is cosmetics. You Liberals are trying to convince everyone that extra plastic on a firearm makes them more dangerous. Its disingenuous and ignorant.Obvious as I referenced the OP's headline for the post. But I would gladly add you if you think a semi-automatic with "scary plastic pieces" is an "assault rifle".I was in the Army and what you are calling an "Army Assault Weapon" is not.
Whose post are you referencing?
Still arguing definitions? He killed 50 and injured 50. What the gun is called really doesn't matter.
I've been pretty clear I want the mag limit back. That forces the murderer to reload often. That is not just plastic.
50 dead and 50 injured. Hi capacity magazines are the difference. Stop the BS.
He reloaded many many times. He was firing in a very confined area. What was the capacity of his magazines?
You tell me, you just said he reloaded many times so you must know.
Wrong, sure someone with enough money can buy one, but it would not be legal.No normal American owns a military assault rifle legally.This idea of the NRA governing the types of weapons available in gun shops is rank bull shit! Why is it that we're the only industrialized nation in the world which feels the necessity of a ordinary citizen to go armed with a killing machine?
No normal American owns a military assault rifle legally.
If someone has the money, goes thru the red tape, and follows the requirements necessary to house it, they can get one
What good is forcing him to reload more often if there is no one among the population of victims with a weapon who could take that opportunity to fire back?The only difference between these rifles you lefties like to call "Assault Weapons" and their hunting rifle counter parts is cosmetics. You Liberals are trying to convince everyone that extra plastic on a firearm makes them more dangerous. Its disingenuous and ignorant.Obvious as I referenced the OP's headline for the post. But I would gladly add you if you think a semi-automatic with "scary plastic pieces" is an "assault rifle".
Still arguing definitions? He killed 50 and injured 50. What the gun is called really doesn't matter.
50 dead and 50 injured. Hi capacity magazines are the difference. Stop the BS.
No bullshit on my part. You can not deny what I stated. The only thing you Liberals want to ban is extra plastic. It would be hilarious if this whole issue wasn't about infringing on the right of law abiding citizens.
I've been pretty clear I want the mag limit back. That forces the murderer to reload often. That is not just plastic.
As I have said before there is no except for in the Constitution. The government has no right to place limits on the firearms I can own that includes mag sizes. ,,,,, 3,2,1 Nuclear Bombs that's what you were going to say next. right ?The only difference between these rifles you lefties like to call "Assault Weapons" and their hunting rifle counter parts is cosmetics. You Liberals are trying to convince everyone that extra plastic on a firearm makes them more dangerous. Its disingenuous and ignorant.Obvious as I referenced the OP's headline for the post. But I would gladly add you if you think a semi-automatic with "scary plastic pieces" is an "assault rifle".
Still arguing definitions? He killed 50 and injured 50. What the gun is called really doesn't matter.
50 dead and 50 injured. Hi capacity magazines are the difference. Stop the BS.
No bullshit on my part. You can not deny what I stated. The only thing you Liberals want to ban is extra plastic. It would be hilarious if this whole issue wasn't about infringing on the right of law abiding citizens.
I've been pretty clear I want the mag limit back. That forces the murderer to reload often. That is not just plastic.
No rifle any civilian can buy is a military grade weapon
Who in the fuck designated YOU the authority on guns? LMAO.
You probably don't know that the designer of the AR, designed it for the military. And had no intention of it be coming a civilian weapon. According to the designers family.
When the patents expired, the game was on as several gun manufacturers used those patents to build the variety of AR 15s that are out there today.
Now any fucking crazy person can buy a weapon very well suited to kill lots of people. Which was its intent in the first place. Though it was supposed to kill our enemies. Not our fellow citizens.
