What Was And What Will Be

[Dadoalex]

Past as prologue.


1.I am a believer in the words of the great Yogi, who presciently said “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future'”….but sometimes there are hints in what has been.

But lets begin with the present. It has been established that Biden voters, whatever number there were, and it is surely below 74.2 million, were clueless about the policies that they were voting for. I know this because I have, on numerous occasions, asked them to provide both the Trump policies that they voted against, and Biden policies that they voted for and anticipated.
Of course, they couldn't. Still can't.
A deeply worrisome position for an electorate.



2. For the context of the thread title, recall that whole ‘energy independence’ mantra that impelled elections since the 1960s, 1970s, Trump achieved energy independence, one of the many achievements for which the Democrats felt he needed to be punished.

Joe Biden wiped it out with the stroke of a pen.

“Several unions that eagerly endorsed President Joe Biden during the 2020 presidential election are now learning the hard way what it means to support Democrat policies. During his first day in office, the newly-inaugurated president revoked the construction permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline, thus destroying thousands of jobs.A total of 42,000 jobs were expected to be filled once the pipeline was completed. But not anymore.” ‘Insulting and disappointing’: Unions show signs of voter remorse after Biden reality sinks in

Great news for the oil tyrants in the Middle East, and Iran…and especially Russia, you know, the folks the liars said Trump was in bed with.



3. Now, what else might Biden and the Democrats do for Putin and Russia. Well, remember that Reagan, the greatest President in modern times, was the first President to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world, with the START treaty, while another Republican, Nixon, was the first to stabilize the numbers of the increase in nuclear weapons, that was the SALT treaty.

Of course, Democrats, very different: Here is Hussein offering Putin a quid pro quo.



He cut the defensive weapons we were going to put in Poland. What else was he promising Putin?



What do you suppose Biden’s model will be???



Did any of you consider this history and future when you voted for the Wehrmacht…er, Democrats?

Trump lost.
Want to know why Trump lost?
Look up at that steaming lake of butt squirts you posted.
YOU'RE why Trump lost.

 

[alang1216]

A woman has an abortion and you, knowing all the details, agrees she made the right decision.

I don't follow you, but there's absolutely no medical justification for the abortion of gestationally viable fetuses.

PoliticalChic would never cite any case where abortion is reasonable, moral, ethical, desirable, etc. Can you?

Even a leading group opposing abortion, the National Right to Life Committee, issued a statement saying that its position is "to allow abortion if necessary to prevent the death of the mother."

If you can abort, then you can deliver. Give the baby a chance to live. He (she) can always be adopted if the mother does not want or thinks that she cannot take care of him (her).

But......it's the party of death.

You may be willing to adopt a severely disabled baby, one that may not survive very long, but I don't think I'm up to that task.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Past as prologue.


1.I am a believer in the words of the great Yogi, who presciently said “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future'”….but sometimes there are hints in what has been.

But lets begin with the present. It has been established that Biden voters, whatever number there were, and it is surely below 74.2 million, were clueless about the policies that they were voting for. I know this because I have, on numerous occasions, asked them to provide both the Trump policies that they voted against, and Biden policies that they voted for and anticipated.
Of course, they couldn't. Still can't.
A deeply worrisome position for an electorate.



2. For the context of the thread title, recall that whole ‘energy independence’ mantra that impelled elections since the 1960s, 1970s, Trump achieved energy independence, one of the many achievements for which the Democrats felt he needed to be punished.

Joe Biden wiped it out with the stroke of a pen.

“Several unions that eagerly endorsed President Joe Biden during the 2020 presidential election are now learning the hard way what it means to support Democrat policies. During his first day in office, the newly-inaugurated president revoked the construction permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline, thus destroying thousands of jobs.A total of 42,000 jobs were expected to be filled once the pipeline was completed. But not anymore.” ‘Insulting and disappointing’: Unions show signs of voter remorse after Biden reality sinks in

Great news for the oil tyrants in the Middle East, and Iran…and especially Russia, you know, the folks the liars said Trump was in bed with.



3. Now, what else might Biden and the Democrats do for Putin and Russia. Well, remember that Reagan, the greatest President in modern times, was the first President to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world, with the START treaty, while another Republican, Nixon, was the first to stabilize the numbers of the increase in nuclear weapons, that was the SALT treaty.

Of course, Democrats, very different: Here is Hussein offering Putin a quid pro quo.



He cut the defensive weapons we were going to put in Poland. What else was he promising Putin?



What do you suppose Biden’s model will be???



Did any of you consider this history and future when you voted for the Wehrmacht…er, Democrats?

Trump lost.
Want to know why Trump lost?
Look up at that steaming lake of butt squirts you posted.
YOU'RE why Trump lost.

Yet you can't come up with any of his policies you can point to as causing any loss....

.....nor any Biden policies you yearned for.


Seriously, weren't you surprised that, after the doctors made the intermastoid incision, and removed your brain- you were still able to post on the board?

 

[Ringtone]

YOU'RE why Trump lost.

If that's true you should be very concerned about the dwindling mean in the survival IQ of your country. But you're not because you're a fool.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A woman has an abortion and you, knowing all the details, agrees she made the right decision.

I don't follow you, but there's absolutely no medical justification for the abortion of gestationally viable fetuses.

PoliticalChic would never cite any case where abortion is reasonable, moral, ethical, desirable, etc. Can you?

Even a leading group opposing abortion, the National Right to Life Committee, issued a statement saying that its position is "to allow abortion if necessary to prevent the death of the mother."

If you can abort, then you can deliver. Give the baby a chance to live. He (she) can always be adopted if the mother does not want or thinks that she cannot take care of him (her).

But......it's the party of death.

You may be willing to adopt a severely disabled baby, one that may not survive very long, but I don't think I'm up to that task.

I fully understand that empathy, concern for another human being is not within your character......
Perhaps, based on your pecuniary nature, the state could entice you into saving a life by dipping into some of these wasted endowments......


"...the nearly $450 million spent annually on National Public Radio, the Public Broadcasting Network and a number of small regional public radio and TV networks would disappear."
Trump Budget Has Public Broadcasting in a Fight for its Life

Here's another 'donation'...
"...Planned Parenthood receives approximately $500 million a year in taxpayer funds, as a GAO report indicated last year."
How Much of Your Tax Money Does Planned Parenthood Get? A New Report Will Tell You | LifeNews.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

YOU'RE why Trump lost.

If that's true you should be very concerned about the dwindling mean in the survival IQ of your country. But you're not because you're a fool.

See.....now you're gonna get nasty letters from all the fools, demanding not to be associated with that.....individual.

 

[Ava]

your voters cannot either explain any Trump policies they voted against......
....or Biden policies they voted for.

What you mean is that you don't understand how anyone can have values that differ from yours. Your lack of understanding does not reflect on me so much as it does on you. You should try to do better.

Nay, nay......normal people have the value that I have.

Watch:

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda represent 'normal' values????


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,
socialism,
infanticide,
opposition to free speech,
substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,
support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,
accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,
and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And, perhaps you can offer your analysis of which Trump values you reject?

Doubtful he can offer any, Sis, but here is a ton he can celebrate, in what is becoming the Divided States of AmeriKa!.

The Marxist War On Art And America

 

[PoliticalChic]

your voters cannot either explain any Trump policies they voted against......
....or Biden policies they voted for.

What you mean is that you don't understand how anyone can have values that differ from yours. Your lack of understanding does not reflect on me so much as it does on you. You should try to do better.

Nay, nay......normal people have the value that I have.

Watch:

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda represent 'normal' values????


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,
socialism,
infanticide,
opposition to free speech,
substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,
support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,
accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,
and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And, perhaps you can offer your analysis of which Trump values you reject?

Doubtful he can offer any, Sis, but here is a ton he can celebrate, in what is becoming the Divided States of AmeriKa!.

The Marxist War On Art And America

Have you noticed how frequently they now refer to us as 'Nazis'?

Seems a bit of oversensitivity therein.


We're gettin' ready for maybe 15 inches of snow tomorrow.....hope you're doin' better!
(So I shopped up a storm today!)

 

[Ava]

your voters cannot either explain any Trump policies they voted against......
....or Biden policies they voted for.

What you mean is that you don't understand how anyone can have values that differ from yours. Your lack of understanding does not reflect on me so much as it does on you. You should try to do better.

Nay, nay......normal people have the value that I have.

Watch:

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda represent 'normal' values????


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,
socialism,
infanticide,
opposition to free speech,
substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,
support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,
accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,
and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And, perhaps you can offer your analysis of which Trump values you reject?

Doubtful he can offer any, Sis, but here is a ton he can celebrate, in what is becoming the Divided States of AmeriKa!.

The Marxist War On Art And America

Have you noticed how frequently they now refer to us as 'Nazis'?

Seems a bit of oversensitivity therein.


We're gettin' ready for maybe 15 inches of snow tomorrow.....hope you're doin' better!
(So I shopped up a storm today!)

Yes, I have, hon. They look in their mirrors and call US what they see! And old Marxist tactic!
Fifteen INCHES!!!! Lord, I am glad you went shopping. I did, too, but it was to see a--umm---friend.

See you, later, logging off! Something good is getting ready to start. xoxoxoxo I'll be thinking of you tomorrow and hope you will be staying toasty. What a beautiful sight to see the snow falling unless of course it is already piled high on the ground when you awaken??

 

[Ringtone]

The Marxist War On Art And America

Excerpt:

The Marxist war on art is the final campaign for Marxism’s domination of America. Make no mistake, they are waging a war. When the last stories of American freedom, progress, and reconciliation are eliminated, the Marxists will have their monopoly on power; not a dictatorship of the proletariat, but a dictatorship onto themselves. And they will wage another war against all of those who they claim have “contaminated” the world.​

 

[gmeyers1944]

This is yet another whack-job conspiracy theory from this poster.

Why do you let these remain in the politics section?

What's with the left's obsession with controlling speech?

Who's controlling speech? It can post as many wacko-job koo-koo conspiracy theories as it wants in the appropriate section of the forum.

When former president Donald Trump cannot even post on Twitter, that is controlling speech!

No it is not. Twitter is not a part of the government so they have every right to control what goes on their platform.

Twitter wants to have it both ways. They want to be protected by Section 230 so they won't be sued. But, when they "control what goes on their platform" they are not a platform. They are a publisher. They, and Facebook, and others don't deserve Section 230 protection.

Wrong. Enforcing the TOS does not make them a publisher.

I just read Twitter's Terms of Service. President Trump did not violate them. Some people deliberately misidentified what he posted as being hateful and calling for violence. He went out of his way on January 6th to tell protesters to go to the Capitol peacefully. He and others have been banned from Twitter for only 1 reason. They are Conservative.

 

[Mustang]

Past as prologue.


1.I am a believer in the words of the great Yogi, who presciently said “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future'”….but sometimes there are hints in what has been.

But lets begin with the present. It has been established that Biden voters, whatever number there were, and it is surely below 74.2 million, were clueless about the policies that they were voting for. I know this because I have, on numerous occasions, asked them to provide both the Trump policies that they voted against, and Biden policies that they voted for and anticipated.
Of course, they couldn't. Still can't.
A deeply worrisome position for an electorate.



2. For the context of the thread title, recall that whole ‘energy independence’ mantra that impelled elections since the 1960s, 1970s, Trump achieved energy independence, one of the many achievements for which the Democrats felt he needed to be punished.

Joe Biden wiped it out with the stroke of a pen.

“Several unions that eagerly endorsed President Joe Biden during the 2020 presidential election are now learning the hard way what it means to support Democrat policies. During his first day in office, the newly-inaugurated president revoked the construction permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline, thus destroying thousands of jobs.A total of 42,000 jobs were expected to be filled once the pipeline was completed. But not anymore.” ‘Insulting and disappointing’: Unions show signs of voter remorse after Biden reality sinks in

Great news for the oil tyrants in the Middle East, and Iran…and especially Russia, you know, the folks the liars said Trump was in bed with.



3. Now, what else might Biden and the Democrats do for Putin and Russia. Well, remember that Reagan, the greatest President in modern times, was the first President to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world, with the START treaty, while another Republican, Nixon, was the first to stabilize the numbers of the increase in nuclear weapons, that was the SALT treaty.

Of course, Democrats, very different: Here is Hussein offering Putin a quid pro quo.



He cut the defensive weapons we were going to put in Poland. What else was he promising Putin?



What do you suppose Biden’s model will be???



Did any of you consider this history and future when you voted for the Wehrmacht…er, Democrats?

Yes, surely Biden's vote was below 74.2 million (which just so happened to be approximately the number of votes that Trump received in case anyone missed the inference).

How can there be so MANY woefully ignorant (and, I have to say it, STUPID) people in this country? HOW?

Carl Sagan introduced the general population to the theory of Occam's Razor in the book (later, a movie) by the title of "Contact." Simply put, the 'rule' states that the simplest of competing explanations should be preferred to explain a phenomenon over more complex explanations. Some people might just call that common sense.

Let's see? How could a president who never had an approval rating above 50% for all four years in office and who spent hours every day insulting people and denigrating any number of groups either on twitter or on camera possibly lose an election? How could that happen? Any person with a modicum of common sense would have to say that if a man truly wants affirmation of his leadership, it's probably not a good idea to alienate large swaths of the electorate and that doing so may very well galvanize opposition to you being given another four years to continue to engage in more of the same behavior. But no. Conservatives have concluded that an unpopular president couldn't lose unless he was somehow cheated. It's utter nonsense. I can only state at this point that I hope these people make better decisions in real life.

As for me, it reminds me of something from my past. I joined the Army when I was 20 years old, and I was a good soldier. I even attained "Soldier of the Quarter" when I got to my permanent station. Then something happened. Certain NCOs and officers (but mostly NCOs) started messing with me over little things that were inconsequential. To put it plainly, they were on a power trip, and just enjoyed making soldiers like me jump through hope just for their own amusement. This continued for about two years. Now, I had already decided to only serve one hitch. I had plans to go to school to advance my education (I got a 2 year degree going to school at night while I was on active duty). Here comes the kicker. Right before my ETS, I was approached and was asked to reenlist. Like I said, I'd already decided to leave the service, but let's say I was on the fence instead. The miserable treatment I had to endure would have made the decision a no brainer. My reaction what something like this:

"You screw with me for 2 years plus, and now you want me to reup?"

Well, Trump's reelection hopes were much like the Army's hope that I (and others treated similarly) that we would reenlist.

All across this nation, people were sitting at kitchen tables, in living rooms, and wherever, and asking themselves why it was that Trump would expect them to vote for him again (or for the first time) after almost 4 years of abusive behavior. Not only did these millions of people not want to vote for him, they did not want to endure 4 more years of the same behavior day after day. They'd simply had enough of him.

But for some reason, conservatives can't understand that. It's Occam's Razor. Instead, conservatives want to believe that there was a massive conspiracy that involved probably thousands of people, and it was done without any verifiable evidence, and nobody came forth to spill the beans about it. How likely is that, really? It's probably more likely that you'll win the powerball, and get struck by lightning on the same day.

 

[Ray9]

Past as prologue.


1.I am a believer in the words of the great Yogi, who presciently said “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future'”….but sometimes there are hints in what has been.

But lets begin with the present. It has been established that Biden voters, whatever number there were, and it is surely below 74.2 million, were clueless about the policies that they were voting for. I know this because I have, on numerous occasions, asked them to provide both the Trump policies that they voted against, and Biden policies that they voted for and anticipated.
Of course, they couldn't. Still can't.
A deeply worrisome position for an electorate.



2. For the context of the thread title, recall that whole ‘energy independence’ mantra that impelled elections since the 1960s, 1970s, Trump achieved energy independence, one of the many achievements for which the Democrats felt he needed to be punished.

Joe Biden wiped it out with the stroke of a pen.

“Several unions that eagerly endorsed President Joe Biden during the 2020 presidential election are now learning the hard way what it means to support Democrat policies. During his first day in office, the newly-inaugurated president revoked the construction permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline, thus destroying thousands of jobs.A total of 42,000 jobs were expected to be filled once the pipeline was completed. But not anymore.” ‘Insulting and disappointing’: Unions show signs of voter remorse after Biden reality sinks in

Great news for the oil tyrants in the Middle East, and Iran…and especially Russia, you know, the folks the liars said Trump was in bed with.



3. Now, what else might Biden and the Democrats do for Putin and Russia. Well, remember that Reagan, the greatest President in modern times, was the first President to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world, with the START treaty, while another Republican, Nixon, was the first to stabilize the numbers of the increase in nuclear weapons, that was the SALT treaty.

Of course, Democrats, very different: Here is Hussein offering Putin a quid pro quo.



He cut the defensive weapons we were going to put in Poland. What else was he promising Putin?



What do you suppose Biden’s model will be???



Did any of you consider this history and future when you voted for the Wehrmacht…er, Democrats?

I don't know if this will appear because I keep getting a "Bad Gateway" in the deeper pages of this thread. I congratulate you on your writing. Your research is good. I like to write off the cuff and capture the pulse of the people I want to reach. Your top notch writing seems to elicit similar responses from the opposition. They seem to have a steely resolve in their positions that cannot be penetrated with logic or research.

Don't quit and keep up the good work.

 

[Ringtone]

An individual human life begins at conception when a sperm cell from the father fuses with an egg cell from the mother, to form a new cell, the zygote, the first embryonic stage. The zygote grows and divides into two daughter cells, each of which grows and divides into two grand-daughter cells, and this cell growth/division process continues on, over and over again. The zygote is the start of a biological continuum that automatically grows and develops, passing gradually and sequentially through the stages we call foetus, baby, child, adult, old person and ending eventually in death. The full genetic instructions to guide the development of the continuum, in interaction with its environment, are present in the zygote. Every stage along the continuum is biologically human and each point along the continuum has the full human properties appropriate to that point. - Dr. William Reville, University College Cork, Ireland​

So what don't you understand about that?

Oh, that's right. You subscribe to the pseudoscientific and conspicuously arbitrary meanderings along the biological continuum surmised by the moral retards of expediency.

 

[Ringtone]

Yes, surely Biden's vote was below 74.2 million (which just so happened to be approximately the number of votes that Trump received in case anyone missed the inference).

How can there be so MANY woefully ignorant (and, I have to say it, STUPID) people in this country? HOW?

Carl Sagan introduced the general population to the theory of Occam's Razor in the book (later, a movie) by the title of "Contact." Simply put, the 'rule' states that the simplest of competing explanations should be preferred to explain a phenomenon over more complex explanations. Some people might just call that common sense.

Let's see? How could a president who never had an approval rating above 50% for all four years in office and who spent hours every day insulting people and denigrating any number of groups either on twitter or on camera possibly lose an election? How could that happen? Any person with a modicum of common sense would have to say that if a man truly wants affirmation of his leadership, it's probably not a good idea to alienate large swaths of the electorate and that doing so may very well galvanize opposition to you being given another four years to continue to engage in more of the same behavior. But no. Conservatives have concluded that an unpopular president couldn't lose unless he was somehow cheated. It's utter nonsense. I can only state at this point that I hope these people make better decisions in real life.

As for me, it reminds me of something from my past. I joined the Army when I was 20 years old, and I was a good soldier. I even attained "Soldier of the Quarter" when I got to my permanent station. Then something happened. Certain NCOs and officers (but mostly NCOs) started messing with me over little things that were inconsequential. To put it plainly, they were on a power trip, and just enjoyed making soldiers like me jump through hope just for their own amusement. This continued for about two years. Now, I had already decided to only serve one hitch. I had plans to go to school to advance my education (I got a 2 year degree going to school at night while I was on active duty). Here comes the kicker. Right before my ETS, I was approached and was asked to reenlist. Like I said, I'd already decided to leave the service, but let's say I was on the fence instead. The miserable treatment I had to endure would have made the decision a no brainer. My reaction what something like this:

"You screw with me for 2 years plus, and now you want me to reup?"

Well, Trump's reelection hopes were much like the Army's hope that I (and others treated similarly) that we would reenlist.

All across this nation, people were sitting at kitchen tables, in living rooms, and wherever, and asking themselves why it was that Trump would expect them to vote for him again (or for the first time) after almost 4 years of abusive behavior. Not only did these millions of people not want to vote for him, they did not want to endure 4 more years of the same behavior day after day. They'd simply had enough of him.

But for some reason, conservatives can't understand that. It's Occam's Razor. Instead, conservatives want to believe that there was a massive conspiracy that involved probably thousands of people, and it was done without any verifiable evidence, and nobody came forth to spill the beans about it. How likely is that, really? It's probably more likely that you'll win the powerball, and get struck by lightning on the same day.

And for some reason folks like you can't get your facts straight.

 

[gmeyers1944]

Past as prologue.


1.I am a believer in the words of the great Yogi, who presciently said “'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future'”….but sometimes there are hints in what has been.

But lets begin with the present. It has been established that Biden voters, whatever number there were, and it is surely below 74.2 million, were clueless about the policies that they were voting for. I know this because I have, on numerous occasions, asked them to provide both the Trump policies that they voted against, and Biden policies that they voted for and anticipated.
Of course, they couldn't. Still can't.
A deeply worrisome position for an electorate.



2. For the context of the thread title, recall that whole ‘energy independence’ mantra that impelled elections since the 1960s, 1970s, Trump achieved energy independence, one of the many achievements for which the Democrats felt he needed to be punished.

Joe Biden wiped it out with the stroke of a pen.

“Several unions that eagerly endorsed President Joe Biden during the 2020 presidential election are now learning the hard way what it means to support Democrat policies. During his first day in office, the newly-inaugurated president revoked the construction permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline, thus destroying thousands of jobs.A total of 42,000 jobs were expected to be filled once the pipeline was completed. But not anymore.” ‘Insulting and disappointing’: Unions show signs of voter remorse after Biden reality sinks in

Great news for the oil tyrants in the Middle East, and Iran…and especially Russia, you know, the folks the liars said Trump was in bed with.



3. Now, what else might Biden and the Democrats do for Putin and Russia. Well, remember that Reagan, the greatest President in modern times, was the first President to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world, with the START treaty, while another Republican, Nixon, was the first to stabilize the numbers of the increase in nuclear weapons, that was the SALT treaty.

Of course, Democrats, very different: Here is Hussein offering Putin a quid pro quo.



He cut the defensive weapons we were going to put in Poland. What else was he promising Putin?



What do you suppose Biden’s model will be???



Did any of you consider this history and future when you voted for the Wehrmacht…er, Democrats?

I don't know if this will appear because I keep getting a "Bad Gateway" in the deeper pages of this thread. I congratulate you on your writing. Your research is good. I like to write off the cuff and capture the pulse of the people I want to reach. Your top notch writing seems to elicit similar responses from the opposition. They seem to have a steely resolve in their positions that cannot be penetrated with logic or research.

Don't quit and keep up the good work.

Joe Biden should not be President of the United States! There are several reasons for that.

1) Journalism is dead. The news departments of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and others are not journalists. They are nothing more than the publicity arm of the Democrat Party. President Trump accomplished many laudable goals during his time in office, however, many people who only get their news from the aforementioned sources never heard of them. True journalists report the news even when it points out the accomplishments of people that they don't like.

2) Fraud. Explain to me how people get away with counting votes without the presence of observers? How can there be more votes cast than people who signed in to vote in an area? The Constitution clearly states that rules to be observed in an election are set by the State's Legislature. Many states (like Pennsylvania) changed the rules at the last moment with a ruling from a judge. That's Unconstitutional. How can people get away with that. Did these things happen? The courts that ruled in these cases did not even allow the evidence to be presented. They claimed that those presenting the charges did not have standing, whatever that means. I want to have confidence in elections but there are too many possible areas of fraud.

 

[gmeyers1944]

Democrats who are crying foul against Republicans challenging the election of Joe Biden are the same ones who were challenging the election of Donald Trump in 2016!

 

[Crepitus]

This is yet another whack-job conspiracy theory from this poster.

Why do you let these remain in the politics section?

What's with the left's obsession with controlling speech?

Who's controlling speech? It can post as many wacko-job koo-koo conspiracy theories as it wants in the appropriate section of the forum.

When former president Donald Trump cannot even post on Twitter, that is controlling speech!

No it is not. Twitter is not a part of the government so they have every right to control what goes on their platform.

Twitter wants to have it both ways. They want to be protected by Section 230 so they won't be sued. But, when they "control what goes on their platform" they are not a platform. They are a publisher. They, and Facebook, and others don't deserve Section 230 protection.

Wrong. Enforcing the TOS does not make them a publisher.

I just read Twitter's Terms of Service. President Trump did not violate them. Some people deliberately misidentified what he posted as being hateful and calling for violence. He went out of his way on January 6th to tell protesters to go to the Capitol peacefully. He and others have been banned from Twitter for only 1 reason. They are Conservative.

I'm afraid that's not true.

 

[Ringtone]

I'm afraid that's not true.

What part of his post isn't true?

 

[Crepitus]

This is yet another whack-job conspiracy theory from this poster.

Why do you let these remain in the politics section?

What's with the left's obsession with controlling speech?

Who's controlling speech? It can post as many wacko-job koo-koo conspiracy theories as it wants in the appropriate section of the forum.

When former president Donald Trump cannot even post on Twitter, that is controlling speech!

No it is not. Twitter is not a part of the government so they have every right to control what goes on their platform.

Twitter wants to have it both ways. They want to be protected by Section 230 so they won't be sued. But, when they "control what goes on their platform" they are not a platform. They are a publisher. They, and Facebook, and others don't deserve Section 230 protection.

Wrong. Enforcing the TOS does not make them a publisher.

I just read Twitter's Terms of Service. President Trump did not violate them. Some people deliberately misidentified what he posted as being hateful and calling for violence. He went out of his way on January 6th to tell protesters to go to the Capitol peacefully. He and others have been banned from Twitter for only 1 reason. They are Conservative.

I'm afraid that's not true.

Your post. It's not true. tRump violated their TOS not once but almost daily