What Was And What Will Be

your voters cannot either explain any Trump policies they voted against......
....or Biden policies they voted for.
What you mean is that you don't understand how anyone can have values that differ from yours. Your lack of understanding does not reflect on me so much as it does on you. You should try to do better.


Nay, nay......normal people have the value that I have.

Watch:

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda represent 'normal' values????


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,
socialism,
infanticide,
opposition to free speech,
substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,
support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,
accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,
and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And, perhaps you can offer your analysis of which Trump values you reject?
Doubtful he can offer any, Sis, but here is a ton he can celebrate, in what is becoming the Divided States of AmeriKa!.

The Marxist War On Art And America



Have you noticed how frequently they now refer to us as 'Nazis'?

Seems a bit of oversensitivity therein.


We're gettin' ready for maybe 15 inches of snow tomorrow.....hope you're doin' better!
(So I shopped up a storm today!)
Maybe if your side wasn't so authoritarian, nationalistic, and racist, it wouldn't be so frequent.
 
I fully understand that empathy, concern for another human being is not within your character......
Maybe I have empathy for both the unborn AND the mothers that have to raise them. In your binary worldview if one side is good the other must be bad. Those of us who live in the real world know things are never that simple.


"... I have empathy for both..."


Kinda like you have 'empathy' for both the dead guy and his killer, huh?


How very 'Democrat' of you.
 
your voters cannot either explain any Trump policies they voted against......
....or Biden policies they voted for.
What you mean is that you don't understand how anyone can have values that differ from yours. Your lack of understanding does not reflect on me so much as it does on you. You should try to do better.


Nay, nay......normal people have the value that I have.

Watch:

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda represent 'normal' values????


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,
socialism,
infanticide,
opposition to free speech,
substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,
support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,
accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,
and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And, perhaps you can offer your analysis of which Trump values you reject?
Doubtful he can offer any, Sis, but here is a ton he can celebrate, in what is becoming the Divided States of AmeriKa!.

The Marxist War On Art And America



Have you noticed how frequently they now refer to us as 'Nazis'?

Seems a bit of oversensitivity therein.


We're gettin' ready for maybe 15 inches of snow tomorrow.....hope you're doin' better!
(So I shopped up a storm today!)
Maybe if your side wasn't so authoritarian, nationalistic, and racist, it wouldn't be so frequent.


The difference between you Democrats and the actual Nazis is hardly 1Ā° different.

Did you know that the Nazis claimed to have used the Democrat Party as its model?

It's a fact


  • 1. Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?

    ā€œā€¦history of laws against miscegenationā€”interracial marriage or procreationā€”in the United States.

    Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help itā€¦ā€ The Race Against Race

    ā€œThe Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.ā€
    Adolph Hitler
    Untitled Document

  • 2. ā€œAt Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



    3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ā€˜undesirablesā€™???
ā€œā€¦Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. ā€œI have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.ā€

Hitlerā€™s viewsā€”which closely parallel Sangerā€™sā€”provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting ā€œimbecilesā€ and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




  • Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his ā€œThe Case for Sterilization.ā€
    (Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)

    German race science stood on American progressiveā€™s shoulders.

  • 4. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.
    In ā€œHitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,ā€ by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democratsā€™ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ā€˜blackā€™ and inserted the word ā€˜Jew.ā€™

ā€œLetā€™s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


  • 5. From the LATimes:
  • ā€œAt a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
    When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes
 
I fully understand that empathy, concern for another human being is not within your character......
Maybe I have empathy for both the unborn AND the mothers that have to raise them. In your binary worldview if one side is good the other must be bad. Those of us who live in the real world know things are never that simple.


"... I have empathy for both..."


Kinda like you have 'empathy' for both the dead guy and his killer, huh?


How very 'Democrat' of you.
I have empathy for both the bomber pilot who drops a bomb and inadvertently kills an innocent child AND for that child. Do you?
 
your voters cannot either explain any Trump policies they voted against......
....or Biden policies they voted for.
What you mean is that you don't understand how anyone can have values that differ from yours. Your lack of understanding does not reflect on me so much as it does on you. You should try to do better.


Nay, nay......normal people have the value that I have.

Watch:

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda represent 'normal' values????


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,
socialism,
infanticide,
opposition to free speech,
substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,
support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,
accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,
and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And, perhaps you can offer your analysis of which Trump values you reject?
Doubtful he can offer any, Sis, but here is a ton he can celebrate, in what is becoming the Divided States of AmeriKa!.

The Marxist War On Art And America



Have you noticed how frequently they now refer to us as 'Nazis'?

Seems a bit of oversensitivity therein.


We're gettin' ready for maybe 15 inches of snow tomorrow.....hope you're doin' better!
(So I shopped up a storm today!)
Maybe if your side wasn't so authoritarian, nationalistic, and racist, it wouldn't be so frequent.


The difference between you Democrats and the actual Nazis is hardly 1Ā° different.

Did you know that the Nazis claimed to have used the Democrat Party as its model?

It's a fact


  • 1. Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?

    ā€œā€¦history of laws against miscegenationā€”interracial marriage or procreationā€”in the United States.

    Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help itā€¦ā€ The Race Against Race

    ā€œThe Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.ā€
    Adolph Hitler
    Untitled Document

  • 2. ā€œAt Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



    3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ā€˜undesirablesā€™???
ā€œā€¦Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. ā€œI have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.ā€

Hitlerā€™s viewsā€”which closely parallel Sangerā€™sā€”provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting ā€œimbecilesā€ and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




  • Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his ā€œThe Case for Sterilization.ā€
    (Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)

    German race science stood on American progressiveā€™s shoulders.

  • 4. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.
    In ā€œHitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,ā€ by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democratsā€™ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ā€˜blackā€™ and inserted the word ā€˜Jew.ā€™
ā€œLetā€™s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


  • 5. From the LATimes:
  • ā€œAt a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
    When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes
Funny that today, America's Neo-Naziis are closely aligned with the GOP and not the Dems. Maybe you need to update your history and live in the now?
 
I fully understand that empathy, concern for another human being is not within your character......
Maybe I have empathy for both the unborn AND the mothers that have to raise them. In your binary worldview if one side is good the other must be bad. Those of us who live in the real world know things are never that simple.


"... I have empathy for both..."


Kinda like you have 'empathy' for both the dead guy and his killer, huh?


How very 'Democrat' of you.
I have empathy for both the bomber pilot who drops a bomb and inadvertently kills an innocent child AND for that child. Do you?



You should stick to words you can define....although that might leave you mute.

Here's a Democrat wielding the word 'inadvertent.'


In an interview on WTOP, a Washington D.C. radio station, Northam said, ā€œSo in this particular example if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen, the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if thatā€™s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.ā€ The ā€œdiscussionā€ refers to ending the babyā€™s life or not, even though it had been born ā€” another radical step to the left.


Hardly 'inadvertent' for you Democrats/savages.
 
your voters cannot either explain any Trump policies they voted against......
....or Biden policies they voted for.
What you mean is that you don't understand how anyone can have values that differ from yours. Your lack of understanding does not reflect on me so much as it does on you. You should try to do better.


Nay, nay......normal people have the value that I have.

Watch:

Now......which of these parts of the Democrat Party's agenda represent 'normal' values????


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,
socialism,
infanticide,
opposition to free speech,
substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,
support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,
accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,
and anti-Semitismā€¦ the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.


And, perhaps you can offer your analysis of which Trump values you reject?
Doubtful he can offer any, Sis, but here is a ton he can celebrate, in what is becoming the Divided States of AmeriKa!.

The Marxist War On Art And America



Have you noticed how frequently they now refer to us as 'Nazis'?

Seems a bit of oversensitivity therein.


We're gettin' ready for maybe 15 inches of snow tomorrow.....hope you're doin' better!
(So I shopped up a storm today!)
Maybe if your side wasn't so authoritarian, nationalistic, and racist, it wouldn't be so frequent.


The difference between you Democrats and the actual Nazis is hardly 1Ā° different.

Did you know that the Nazis claimed to have used the Democrat Party as its model?

It's a fact


  • 1. Know what else the Nazis learned from the Progressives/Democrats?

    ā€œā€¦history of laws against miscegenationā€”interracial marriage or procreationā€”in the United States.

    Under the influence of Darwinism, racial science and an associated eugenics movement emerged in the late nineteenth century, grew with the Progressive movement, peaked in the 1920s, and disappeared during World War II. (Its enthusiastic embrace by Hitler did not help itā€¦ā€ The Race Against Race

    ā€œThe Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood.ā€
    Adolph Hitler
    Untitled Document

  • 2. ā€œAt Nuremberg, the Nazis sought to preserve Nordic racial purity by outlawing racial intermarriage with Jews in much the same manner that Democratic anti-miscegenation laws outlawed racial intermarriage with blacks.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats



    3. Guess were Adolph got the idea for sterilization of ā€˜undesirablesā€™???
ā€œā€¦Hitler learned from progressive sterilization laws that had been enacted in America through the influence of activists like Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. ā€œI have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would in all probability be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.ā€

Hitlerā€™s viewsā€”which closely parallel Sangerā€™sā€”provided the basis for the Nazi sterilization laws of 1933 which began by targeting ā€œimbecilesā€ and the mentally retarded, and later expanded to cover Jews, gypsies, and other social undesirables.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats




  • Hitler wrote to the president of the American Eugenics Society to ask for a copy of his ā€œThe Case for Sterilization.ā€
    (Margaret Sanger and Sterilization)

    German race science stood on American progressiveā€™s shoulders.

  • 4. The Nazi Nuremberg Laws were taken nearly wholly from the Jim Crow Laws of the Democrat controlled South.
    In ā€œHitler's American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law ,ā€ by James Whitman, he shows how the Nazis took the Democratsā€™ Jim Crow Laws, simply changed the word ā€˜blackā€™ and inserted the word ā€˜Jew.ā€™
ā€œLetā€™s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.ā€ Dinesh Dā€™Souza: What Hitler Learned from the Democrats


  • 5. From the LATimes:
  • ā€œAt a crucial 1934 planning meeting for the Nuremberg system, the Minister of Justice presented a memorandum on American law. According to a transcript, he led a detailed discussion of miscegenation statutes from all over the United States. Moreover it is clear that the most radical Nazis were the most eager advocates of American practices. Roland Freisler, who would become president of the Nazi People's Court, declared that American jurisprudence "would suit us perfectly."
    When the Nazis wrote the Nuremberg laws, they looked to racist American statutes
Funny that today, America's Neo-Naziis are closely aligned with the GOP and not the Dems. Maybe you need to update your history and live in the now?



"America's Neo-Naziis are closely aligned with the GOP"

This is the current form of the lie.

From Left-leaning USAToday:
"To be fair, President Donald Trump was making a somewhat subtler point. In his colloquy with the press, he was not calling neo-Nazis great folks but arguing that many of the Confederate-statue-loving protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, were not neo-Nazis at all. Somehow, these ā€œfine peopleā€ got mixed in with white supremacists shouting, ā€œJews will not replace us,ā€ and never noticed their compatriots were not fine people, too."
One year after Charlottesville, Trump has normalized racism in America


"You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides... I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name... So you know what, it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people -- and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally -- but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and White nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with helmets and with baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group."

 
Here's a Democrat wielding the word 'inadvertent.'

In an interview on WTOP, a Washington D.C. radio station, Northam said, ā€œSo in this particular example if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen, the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if thatā€™s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.ā€ The ā€œdiscussionā€ refers to ending the babyā€™s life or not, even though it had been born ā€” another radical step to the left.

Hardly 'inadvertent' for you Democrats/savages.
Some friendly advice, when you say "Here's a Democrat wielding the word 'inadvertent'" you should follow it with a quote where the word is actually used. Otherwise someone less charitable than me might think you are a bald faced liar who just makes things up.
 
Funny that today, America's Neo-Naziis are closely aligned with the GOP and not the Dems. Maybe you need to update your history and live in the now?
"America's Neo-Naziis are closely aligned with the GOP"

This is the current form of the lie...
Reality check: Next time you're at a Nazi rally put on your Biden button and see how much support you get.
 
For there to be infanticide there needs to be an infant, not a fetus. Once a child is born they are under protection of the Infants Born Alive Act 2002.

The OP cannot defend the using the term either. Infanticide is illegal in all 50 states.

Frist, a fetus is an unborn human baby (or infant)!

feĀ·tus
/Ėˆfēdəs/

noun
  1. an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.

Second, my observation is neither bound by nor predicated on your acquiescence to the ever-shifting norms and mores (laws) of any given society that disregards the universally objective standard of morality and the attending imperatives of natural law. The unnecessary, premeditated destruction of innocent human life by the hand of any creature is evil.
 
Past as prologue.


1.I am a believer in the words of the great Yogi, who presciently said ā€œ'It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future'ā€ā€¦.but sometimes there are hints in what has been.

But lets begin with the present. It has been established that Biden voters, whatever number there were, and it is surely below 74.2 million, were clueless about the policies that they were voting for. I know this because I have, on numerous occasions, asked them to provide both the Trump policies that they voted against, and Biden policies that they voted for and anticipated.
Of course, they couldn't. Still can't.
A deeply worrisome position for an electorate.



2. For the context of the thread title, recall that whole ā€˜energy independenceā€™ mantra that impelled elections since the 1960s, 1970s, Trump achieved energy independence, one of the many achievements for which the Democrats felt he needed to be punished.

Joe Biden wiped it out with the stroke of a pen.

ā€œSeveral unions that eagerly endorsed President Joe Biden during the 2020 presidential election are now learning the hard way what it means to support Democrat policies. During his first day in office, the newly-inaugurated president revoked the construction permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline, thus destroying thousands of jobs.A total of 42,000 jobs were expected to be filled once the pipeline was completed. But not anymore.ā€ ā€˜Insulting and disappointingā€™: Unions show signs of voter remorse after Biden reality sinks in

Great news for the oil tyrants in the Middle East, and Iranā€¦and especially Russia, you know, the folks the liars said Trump was in bed with.



3. Now, what else might Biden and the Democrats do for Putin and Russia. Well, remember that Reagan, the greatest President in modern times, was the first President to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world, with the START treaty, while another Republican, Nixon, was the first to stabilize the numbers of the increase in nuclear weapons, that was the SALT treaty.

Of course, Democrats, very different: Here is Hussein offering Putin a quid pro quo.



He cut the defensive weapons we were going to put in Poland. What else was he promising Putin?



What do you suppose Bidenā€™s model will be???



Did any of you consider this history and future when you voted for the Wehrmachtā€¦er, Democrats?


Trump lost.
Want to know why Trump lost?
Look up at that steaming lake of butt squirts you posted.
YOU'RE why Trump lost.




Yet you can't come up with any of his policies you can point to as causing any loss....

.....nor any Biden policies you yearned for.


Seriously, weren't you surprised that, after the doctors made the intermastoid incision, and removed your brain- you were still able to post on the board?

You know, if you're going to insult someone's intellect it might help your case if...

YOUR POST MADE SENSE!

Which is why YOU are the reason Trump lost.
 
For there to be infanticide there needs to be an infant, not a fetus. Once a child is born they are under protection of the Infants Born Alive Act 2002.

The OP cannot defend the using the term either. Infanticide is illegal in all 50 states.

Frist, a fetus is an unborn human baby (or infant)!

feĀ·tus
/Ėˆfēdəs/

noun
  1. an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.

Second, my observation is neither bound by nor predicated on your acquiescence to the ever-shifting norms and mores (laws) of any given society that disregards the universally objective standard of morality and the attending imperatives of natural law. The unnecessary, premeditated destruction of innocent human life by the hand of any creature is evil.

Infanticide is a form of homicide which occurs if the child is killed after birth and up to a year (I think), even if the birth is due to a botched abortion.

Abortions are legal.
 
Reality check: Next time you're at a Nazi rally put on your Biden button and see how much support you get.
YOU'RE why Trump lost.

If that's true you should be very concerned about the dwindling mean in the survival IQ of your country. But you're not because you're a fool.

No. Darwin will take care of them and you.

You're one of the fools. Darwin's gonna get ya.
 
For there to be infanticide there needs to be an infant, not a fetus. Once a child is born they are under protection of the Infants Born Alive Act 2002.

The OP cannot defend the using the term either. Infanticide is illegal in all 50 states.

Frist, a fetus is an unborn human baby (or infant)!

feĀ·tus
/Ėˆfēdəs/

noun
  1. an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.

Second, my observation is neither bound by nor predicated on your acquiescence to the ever-shifting norms and mores (laws) of any given society that disregards the universally objective standard of morality and the attending imperatives of natural law. The unnecessary, premeditated destruction of innocent human life by the hand of any creature is evil.

Infanticide is a form of homicide which occurs if the child is killed after birth and up to a year (I think), even if the birth is due to a botched abortion.

Abortions are legal.

You're just repeating yourself per your acquiescence to the ever-shifting norms and mores (laws) of any given society that disregards the universally objective standard of morality and the attending imperatives of natural law. I got your reasoning, such as it is, the first time.

I said, relative to the universally objective standard of morality and the attending imperatives of natural law, abortion on demand is homicide.

#Winning
 

Forum List

Back
Top