Bruce_T_Laney
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #61
What if the person pulls a knife instead of a gun? what about a baseball bat? is it still armed robbery? do they still get the extra 10 or 25 years you're proposing?The gun in the pocket is not consider armed robbery but if the person pulls it out then yes it is consider armed robbery
You're the one that appears to be struggling to understand the difference, allow me to reiterate the equation for you since you seem to have missed it the first 3 times X crime = X result = X punishment, exception in your world it appears X crime = X result = X punishment or sometimes Y punishment or sometimes Z punishment.So it is you that is having a hard time with understanding the difference between shoplifting and armed robbery
BTW Why are you so angry?
![]()
You are retarded!
Armed robbery can be with any weapon like a bat, knife or gun. The conversation is about the usage of guns, and your smart ass wrote about the gun in the damn pocket and not me.
I stated that if in the pocket then it is consider shoplifting and if used in the robbery then it is armed robbery, and what part of that is too hard to understand for you?
You are equating shoplifting as being the same as armed robbery and not me. You are the one against strict sentencing for those using a firearm in a robbery, and not me.
So should someone get more time if they use a knife in their robbery versus just shoplifting?
Yes, because it is still armed robbery.
The same for a baseball bat?
Yes.
Should someone using a gun get more time?
Yes, and the type of weapon being used should add more time to the sentencing, and you have a problem with this?
Of course you do and I am betting you will blame the victim for being robbed and not the individual doing the crime or will blame society for the crime...