Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
- Feb 8, 2011
- 110,434
- 39,503
The settlement was part of the severance package dumbass.![]()
ROFL
You're going with that, huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The settlement was part of the severance package dumbass.![]()
It isn't the same thing that Cain did. Cain's harassment was not anything the girls wanted from him or even accepted. Your examples were apples and oranges.
Cain's harassment, huh?
No evidence nor even an accuser, but not only have you adjudged him guilty, you offer lessons from the transgressions..
When you've got partisanship, I suppose there is no room left for rationality.
Aside from pictures, I'd say nothing at all.
Aside from pictures, I'd say nothing at all.
The settlement was part of the severance package dumbass.![]()
ROFL
You're going with that, huh?
Cain Accuser Got a Years Salary in Severance Pay
WASHINGTON The National Restaurant Association gave $35,000 a years salary in severance pay to a female staff member in the late 1990s after an encounter with Herman Cain, its chief executive at the time, made her uncomfortable working there, three people with direct knowledge of the payment said on Tuesday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/u...-a-years-salary-in-severance-pay.html?_r=1&hp
Aside from pictures, I'd say nothing at all.
Aside from pictures, I'd say nothing at all.
As supporter of Sodomites one will go to Hell, the other one who serve in a Church and fights for Christian Values will go to Paradise.
What's the difference between Anthony Weiner and Herman Cain?
Ann Coulter said:To have been accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s is like having been accused of molesting children at preschools in the 1980s or accused of being a witch in Massachusetts in the 1690s.
Right....harassment never happens.More than that...
You do know that people settle out of court all the time to avoid the cost of trials, right?... Even when you're innocent... If you can pay off someone and avoid the lawyers and court costs you're ahead of the game... Companies do it all the time...
Google it...
Plus they didn't make it to court.......it was settled out of court from all the anonymous reporting we have seen so far......unless someone has some solid facts that say otherwise.
Plus....the women most likely just wanted MONEY! That's what the libs want all the time, money for NOTHING!
Interesting. You think God smiles down on sexual harassers.Aside from pictures, I'd say nothing at all.
As supporter of Sodomites one will go to Hell, the other one who serve in a Church and fights for Christian Values will go to Paradise.
You know, I don't like Couter much, but even I am shocked that she would stick up for child molesters.Weiner smeared himself by being as stupid horny pig. He also has a name that is impotent and comical, just like the party he represents. "Look at the little weiner" ..![]()
Cain is being smeared by Politico.
Ann Coulter said:To have been accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s is like having been accused of molesting children at preschools in the 1980s or accused of being a witch in Massachusetts in the 1690s.
Bring some facts please. Not hyperbole, but facts. Names, dates, court records, etc...otherwise you have nothing but a smear job.
lawsuits are not usually settled out of court....unless the party agreeing to pay, is at fault or has no chance in court to win the case.
Look at the michael Jackson settlements or the clinton settlements....
to PRETEND like a person is innocent just because the case got dropped from court via a payoff....is not the same thing as claiming a person is innocent because the law and courts and or jury found them not guilty.
there will always be a "doubt" when a person pays off another person to shut up....in my opinion.
lawsuits are not usually settled out of court....unless the party agreeing to pay, is at fault or has no chance in court to win the case.
Look at the michael Jackson settlements or the clinton settlements....
to PRETEND like a person is innocent just because the case got dropped from court via a payoff....is not the same thing as claiming a person is innocent because the law and courts and or jury found them not guilty.
there will always be a "doubt" when a person pays off another person to shut up....in my opinion.
Good points, and fair minded. We still need full investigation here, and all relevant questions answered. If this is a Politico Smoke and Mirrors thing, they need to be held accountable, when it is all done.
What you have to remember to always keep in mind, my dear friend Ravi, is that to RepubliCON$ and NEO-CON$ in particular, party comes before ANYTHING and EVERYTHING. I get shocked too, how far they take this law, but then I'm reminded of the law and come to my senses.You know, I don't like Couter much, but even I am shocked that she would stick up for child molesters.
Yep, however, the rabid RW supporters will claim that it's made up by the meedya and that they are paying "anonymous" people to smear The Saint Perv Herb Cain.A lawyer for one of the women is expected to make a statement today (Nov. 4th), sometime this afternoon.