What's the difference?

Kind of like the questionable sources you dick sucked when it came to Kavenaugh?

The ONLY questionable source on Kavenaugh was the White House. Kavenaugh should NEVER have been appointed to the SC, any more than Clarence Thomas should have been appointed. Abuse of women is a disqualifying behaviour.
 
The ONLY questionable source on Kavenaugh was the White House. Kavenaugh should NEVER have been appointed to the SC, any more than Clarence Thomas should have been appointed. Abuse of women is a disqualifying behaviour.
Once the revelations about Schlitz's past came out his nomination would have been withdrawn by any other prez. But he wasn't being nominated for his jurisprudence. He was being nominated for his views on the unitary executive.
 
The ONLY questionable source on Kavenaugh was the White House. Kavenaugh should NEVER have been appointed to the SC, any more than Clarence Thomas should have been appointed. Abuse of women is a disqualifying behaviour.

What abuse?

NOTHING brought up was ever proven, not even corroborated, even the one with the hearing.

You idiots bought it all, but now the same happens to Paul Pelosi and unless you see a video of him taking it up the ass you won't believe any of it, and want to punish anyone that does.

That's called being a fucking hypocrite, bitch.
 
Once the revelations about Schlitz's past came out his nomination would have been withdrawn by any other prez. But he wasn't being nominated for his jurisprudence. He was being nominated for his views on the unitary executive.

Accusations are not proof, and sorry, nothing was even close to proven.

It was a smear attempt, and a pathetic one at that.

Meanwhile we could post a video of Paul Pelosi blowing Hunter biden while Biden does coke and hands $1M to his father and you would ignore it.
 
What abuse?

NOTHING brought up was ever proven, not even corroborated, even the one with the hearing.
C'mon, no need to continue lying about it. He's on the bench now.

 
C'mon, no need to continue lying about it. He's on the bench now.


it was all bullshit, and that's not a lie. The only time you idiots ask for actual proof before believing anything is when it's someone you like.
 
Sure it was. Just like the 26 women who accused the former Adulterer-in-Chief of sexual abuse was bs.:auiqs.jpg:

How many of those were proven?

Meanwhile you got Hunter Biden's laptop out there and nothing has happened to him.
 

Capitol Police cameras caught break-in at Pelosi home, but no one was watching


Inside the command center for the U.S. Capitol Police, a handful of officers were going through their routines early Friday morning, cycling through live feeds from the department’s 1,800 cameras used to monitor the nearby Capitol complex as well as some points beyond, when an officer stopped. On a screen showing a darkened street nearly 3,000 miles away, police lights were flashing outside the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), officials say.

The officer in D.C. quickly pulled up additional camera angles from around Pelosi’s home and began to backtrack, watching recordings from the minutes before San Francisco police arrived. There, on camera, was a man with a hammer, breaking a glass panel and entering the speaker’s home, according to three people familiar with how Capitol Police learned of the break-in and who have been briefed on or viewed the video themselves.

 
LOL, by the people invested in protecting Biden whatever the cost.
More evidence that Trump has been successful in getting you to question the legitimacy of any election or any investigation that doesn't produce the result you want.
 
More evidence that Trump has been successful in getting you to question the legitimacy of any election or any investigation that doesn't produce the result you want.

I still have my doubts about 2020, and they haven't been answered beyond "we re-checked the numbers using the same count you are questioning, and nothing was wrong".
 
I still have my doubts about 2020
Exactly my point. Meanwhile............

Donald Trump’s attorneys saw a direct appeal to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as their best hope of derailing Joe Biden’s win in the 2020 presidential election, according to emails newly disclosed to congressional investigators.

“We want to frame things so that Thomas could be the one to issue some sort of stay or other circuit justice opinion saying Georgia is in legitimate doubt,” Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro wrote in a Dec. 31, 2020, email to Trump’s legal team. Chesebro contended that Thomas would be “our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by Jan. 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/...-to-stop-2020-election-certification-00064592

Emails Show Eastman’s Central Role In Allegedly Fraudulent Lawsuit

Trump attorney John Eastman expected that filing a Big Lie lawsuit seeking to overturn Biden’s win in Georgia might just lead to criminal investigation, new messages show.

The messages, first reported by Politico and revealed via a still-active Dropbox link referenced in a Tuesday night court filing, show what Eastman has furiously been trying to hide: that he appears to have known that information he included in a Georgia federal lawsuit, whose accuracy President Trump swore to, was inaccurate.

Eastman’s apparent decision to file the lawsuit and verification by Trump has been seen as a potentially stunning violation of attorney ethics since portions of the message were first revealed last month by U.S. District Judge David Carter for the Central District of California. But the new messages, made public apparently by accident on Tuesday evening after being provided to the January 6 Committee, make clearer that Eastman and the attorneys around him seem to have understood the complaint’s problems with precision.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckr...-central-role-in-allegedly-fraudulent-lawsuit
 
Exactly my point. Meanwhile............

Donald Trump’s attorneys saw a direct appeal to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as their best hope of derailing Joe Biden’s win in the 2020 presidential election, according to emails newly disclosed to congressional investigators.

“We want to frame things so that Thomas could be the one to issue some sort of stay or other circuit justice opinion saying Georgia is in legitimate doubt,” Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro wrote in a Dec. 31, 2020, email to Trump’s legal team. Chesebro contended that Thomas would be “our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by Jan. 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/...-to-stop-2020-election-certification-00064592

Emails Show Eastman’s Central Role In Allegedly Fraudulent Lawsuit

Trump attorney John Eastman expected that filing a Big Lie lawsuit seeking to overturn Biden’s win in Georgia might just lead to criminal investigation, new messages show.

The messages, first reported by Politico and revealed via a still-active Dropbox link referenced in a Tuesday night court filing, show what Eastman has furiously been trying to hide: that he appears to have known that information he included in a Georgia federal lawsuit, whose accuracy President Trump swore to, was inaccurate.

Eastman’s apparent decision to file the lawsuit and verification by Trump has been seen as a potentially stunning violation of attorney ethics since portions of the message were first revealed last month by U.S. District Judge David Carter for the Central District of California. But the new messages, made public apparently by accident on Tuesday evening after being provided to the January 6 Committee, make clearer that Eastman and the attorneys around him seem to have understood the complaint’s problems with precision.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckr...-central-role-in-allegedly-fraudulent-lawsuit

More opinions from people who wouldn't want to find any fraud even if it happened.
 
What is this? Do lefties really want to compare the attempted assassination of an entire republican baseball team and the wounding of Steve Scalise by a demented Sanders supporter to a sexual encounter gone bad in the Pelosi home? Go for it.
 

Capitol Police cameras caught break-in at Pelosi home, but no one was watching


Inside the command center for the U.S. Capitol Police, a handful of officers were going through their routines early Friday morning, cycling through live feeds from the department’s 1,800 cameras used to monitor the nearby Capitol complex as well as some points beyond, when an officer stopped. On a screen showing a darkened street nearly 3,000 miles away, police lights were flashing outside the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), officials say.

The officer in D.C. quickly pulled up additional camera angles from around Pelosi’s home and began to backtrack, watching recordings from the minutes before San Francisco police arrived. There, on camera, was a man with a hammer, breaking a glass panel and entering the speaker’s home, according to three people familiar with how Capitol Police learned of the break-in and who have been briefed on or viewed the video themselves.

Seems to me, that with Nancy Piglosi out of state, she could of allowed the Capitol Police to keep a watchful eye on her very rich husband, but since he Paul is as queer as a three dollar bill, she just didnt want anyone watching what was going on in her place, but then allow the gay naked hammer time, to murder her husband, and then innocently blame Republicans for actions that could of been prevented(just like she allowed the Capitol Police to open doors for the protestors) and when dead Paul is buried, she Piglosi then became very rich because she inherits all the fortune of dead Paul. This is a story for Hollyweird....
 
In the hours after the Steve Scalise incident liberal internet sites did not immediately create an alternate reality to explain away the shooting. There was no fan fiction about Scalise and his assailant knowing each other. No one on the left gloated about it. There was no desperate need to avoid confronting reality by Dems.

In the case of Pelosi's attack, even after the narrative detailing it, admitted to by DePape was made public, there was a refusal to accept the facts. There were accusations the media was covering up the truth. Anchors on Faux intimated things "didn't add up."

Jokes about an 82 year old man having his skull fractured with a hammer emerged from conservatives like Kari Lake and Donnie J.

How did we get here? Sandy Hook, Pizzagate, election denial, vaccine denial, Charlottesville denial. Immersion in fantasy seems to be a Repub coping mechanism. When facts are inconvenient there's always fiction just a click away. Dangerous fiction. Fiction that rationalizes a coup, a move towards authoritarian governance, even attempted murder.
The MAGA party is all about cruelty now.
 
Here is Nancy Pelosi's response to the shooting of Congressman Scalise:


“This morning, the U.S. Congress suffered a despicable and cowardly attack. My thoughts and prayers are with Whip Steve Scalise and the others wounded, Capitol Police and staff, and their families.

“We are profoundly grateful for the heroism of the Capitol Police, whose bravery under fire undoubtedly saved countless lives. On days like today, there are no Democrats or Republicans, only Americans united in our hopes and prayers for the wounded.”

Here is the entire congressional response to Scalise's return to the chamber:

 
Here is the kind of decency completely lacking in the MAGA party:

 

Forum List

Back
Top