Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Central Islamist AgencyThat always works out so well when we train and arm people, like bin Laden.They can stay where they came from,stand and fight for their country.Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
Or train them and then send them back to fight for Syria, like the new Polish Foreign Minister has suggested. Makes total sense:
Incoming Foreign Minister: Syrian refugees can fight for homeland
Well yes, but Obama and his Muslim CIA head honcho John Brennan * have already trained and armed the so-called "moderate rebels"....aka the terrorists.
* John Brennan spent time in Saudi Arabia, where he converted to Islam, he also went to Mecca and Medina during Hajj.
Claim: CIA Director John Brennan is a Muslim who converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia.
FALSE
Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
News for ya, several of them probably support ISIS. More news for you, most of those who do here are ALREADY FUCKING HERE!!!Maybe you want them in your back yard? All 10,000+ unvetted, no unvettable, "refugees"? Maybe if we just show them that we love them too, they will stop hating us so much... NOT. I am not saying that they are all terrorists, but do you really want to take the risk that even ONE of them is? Let's use some common sense here. If we can't be sure they are not terrorists looking to come here for evil purposes, we should not let them come. We have a duty to protect ourselves first. If we cannot do that, then nothing else matters. This is not a humanitarian question, it is a matter of national defense.And that matters a damn why? Oh right, it doesn't. Just painting a bull's eye on themselves. If they hate you there's not much reason not to blow those assholes up eh?Texas, Indiana, Michigan, Arkansas, Louisiana and Alabama have announced they will not accept Syrian refugees. That list will grow
Yes, so why take any more of them? Do we need more terrorists?
You run from this, they win.
Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
Only takes one more infiltrator and whoever supported briging them in will have a really uncomfortable time explaining it afterwords. Assuming they get a chance to...
News for you, those ones who attacked France ived next door, and had for some time, the mastermind went to fucking high school there. Now what? Are you planning to remove all Muslims from Canada, Cuba, Mexico so that you feel safe, which you wouldn't be anyway?News for ya, several of them probably support ISIS. More news for you, most of those who do here are ALREADY FUCKING HERE!!!Maybe you want them in your back yard? All 10,000+ unvetted, no unvettable, "refugees"? Maybe if we just show them that we love them too, they will stop hating us so much... NOT. I am not saying that they are all terrorists, but do you really want to take the risk that even ONE of them is? Let's use some common sense here. If we can't be sure they are not terrorists looking to come here for evil purposes, we should not let them come. We have a duty to protect ourselves first. If we cannot do that, then nothing else matters. This is not a humanitarian question, it is a matter of national defense.And that matters a damn why? Oh right, it doesn't. Just painting a bull's eye on themselves. If they hate you there's not much reason not to blow those assholes up eh?
Yes, so why take any more of them? Do we need more terrorists?
You run from this, they win.
It's just so incredibly naïve.
Look at the French, waving the Tricolor, singing La Marseillaise and going on about Liberté, égalité, fraternité etc.
That's all well and good, but I'm sorry NONE of that jazz is going to protect them from another suicide attack.
One way to protect a nation and it's peoples from terrorist attacks is not to allow thousands upon thousands of mainly young males of military age into the nation that not even the government knows who is who.
Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
Only takes one more infiltrator and whoever supported briging them in will have a really uncomfortable time explaining it afterwords. Assuming they get a chance to...
Exactly it's too dangerous, it's just not worth it, which is why none of them should be allowed into our nations.
It's your job to prove he is a Muslim. I read it too. Only one person ever said he converted.Central Islamist AgencyThat always works out so well when we train and arm people, like bin Laden.They can stay where they came from,stand and fight for their country.
Or train them and then send them back to fight for Syria, like the new Polish Foreign Minister has suggested. Makes total sense:
Incoming Foreign Minister: Syrian refugees can fight for homeland
Well yes, but Obama and his Muslim CIA head honcho John Brennan * have already trained and armed the so-called "moderate rebels"....aka the terrorists.
* John Brennan spent time in Saudi Arabia, where he converted to Islam, he also went to Mecca and Medina during Hajj.
Claim: CIA Director John Brennan is a Muslim who converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia.
FALSE
They are unable to disprove it, I read the full piece.
What about NASA, Charles Bolden, that NASA's foremost mission is to improve relations with the Muslim world....that's what Obama told him to do.
People are supposed to trust Obama and Co knowing this stuff?
It's not the people, people. it's the mentality, which is already here and way too fucking close for comfort to those like you.Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
Only takes one more infiltrator and whoever supported briging them in will have a really uncomfortable time explaining it afterwords. Assuming they get a chance to...
Exactly it's too dangerous, it's just not worth it, which is why none of them should be allowed into our nations.
Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
Only takes one more infiltrator and whoever supported briging them in will have a really uncomfortable time explaining it afterwords. Assuming they get a chance to...
Well, everyone run for your lives!!!!!Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
Only takes one more infiltrator and whoever supported briging them in will have a really uncomfortable time explaining it afterwords. Assuming they get a chance to...
Exactly it's too dangerous, it's just not worth it, which is why none of them should be allowed into our nations.
Got 2000 already. Even if just 1% are violent that's 20 here now.
News for you, those ones who attacked France ived next door, and had for some time, the mastermind went to fucking high school there. Now what? Are you planning to remove all Muslims from Canada, Cuba, Mexico so that you feel safe, which you wouldn't be anyway?News for ya, several of them probably support ISIS. More news for you, most of those who do here are ALREADY FUCKING HERE!!!Maybe you want them in your back yard? All 10,000+ unvetted, no unvettable, "refugees"? Maybe if we just show them that we love them too, they will stop hating us so much... NOT. I am not saying that they are all terrorists, but do you really want to take the risk that even ONE of them is? Let's use some common sense here. If we can't be sure they are not terrorists looking to come here for evil purposes, we should not let them come. We have a duty to protect ourselves first. If we cannot do that, then nothing else matters. This is not a humanitarian question, it is a matter of national defense.
Yes, so why take any more of them? Do we need more terrorists?
You run from this, they win.
It's just so incredibly naïve.
Look at the French, waving the Tricolor, singing La Marseillaise and going on about Liberté, égalité, fraternité etc.
That's all well and good, but I'm sorry NONE of that jazz is going to protect them from another suicide attack.
One way to protect a nation and it's peoples from terrorist attacks is not to allow thousands upon thousands of mainly young males of military age into the nation that not even the government knows who is who.
So, we should bring more right?News for ya, several of them probably support ISIS. More news for you, most of those who do here are ALREADY FUCKING HERE!!!Maybe you want them in your back yard? All 10,000+ unvetted, no unvettable, "refugees"? Maybe if we just show them that we love them too, they will stop hating us so much... NOT. I am not saying that they are all terrorists, but do you really want to take the risk that even ONE of them is? Let's use some common sense here. If we can't be sure they are not terrorists looking to come here for evil purposes, we should not let them come. We have a duty to protect ourselves first. If we cannot do that, then nothing else matters. This is not a humanitarian question, it is a matter of national defense.And that matters a damn why? Oh right, it doesn't. Just painting a bull's eye on themselves. If they hate you there's not much reason not to blow those assholes up eh?Texas, Indiana, Michigan, Arkansas, Louisiana and Alabama have announced they will not accept Syrian refugees. That list will grow
Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
Only takes one more infiltrator and whoever supported briging them in will have a really uncomfortable time explaining it afterwords. Assuming they get a chance to...
There are criminals, nuts and terrorists amongst us already - most incidents of mass violence in this country are domestic. Refusing to take in refugees who are fleeing for their lives isn't going to make a difference and taking in refugees and monitoring them appropriately - will have no effect on the homeless rates of veterans. It comes down to what we are and want to be as a country.
News for you, those ones who attacked France ived next door, and had for some time, the mastermind went to fucking high school there. Now what? Are you planning to remove all Muslims from Canada, Cuba, Mexico so that you feel safe, which you wouldn't be anyway?News for ya, several of them probably support ISIS. More news for you, most of those who do here are ALREADY FUCKING HERE!!!
Yes, so why take any more of them? Do we need more terrorists?
You run from this, they win.
It's just so incredibly naïve.
Look at the French, waving the Tricolor, singing La Marseillaise and going on about Liberté, égalité, fraternité etc.
That's all well and good, but I'm sorry NONE of that jazz is going to protect them from another suicide attack.
One way to protect a nation and it's peoples from terrorist attacks is not to allow thousands upon thousands of mainly young males of military age into the nation that not even the government knows who is who.
Yes and two of them arrived in Greece last month, pretending to be refugees....the Greeks have their fingerprints on file from their arrival last month.
So you support allowing even more terrorists in then?
Good, I'm glad we've cleared that one up.
Something I haven't heard explained with all the refugee talk is where they're gonna live. Have about 50,000 homeless veterans in the US as it is. We can't find them a home, but can find homes for 10,000 Syrians? Are we building brand new places or something? What about diseases they're bringing in? These aren't the most sanitary places on Earth so are we putting them into quarantine first at least? What about education, jobs, language training, and cultural assimilation? Are they just getting a handshake and "good luck to you?" This all costs money, takes time, and there are more deserving recipiants for a top-to-bottom handout.
Like our homeless veterans.
It's not a zero-sum issue. Helping on group doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't help the other. Are we that limited?
Only takes one more infiltrator and whoever supported briging them in will have a really uncomfortable time explaining it afterwords. Assuming they get a chance to...
There are criminals, nuts and terrorists amongst us already - most incidents of mass violence in this country are domestic. Refusing to take in refugees who are fleeing for their lives isn't going to make a difference and taking in refugees and monitoring them appropriately - will have no effect on the homeless rates of veterans. It comes down to what we are and want to be as a country.
News for ya, several of them probably support ISIS. More news for you, most of those who do here are ALREADY FUCKING HERE!!!Maybe you want them in your back yard? All 10,000+ unvetted, no unvettable, "refugees"? Maybe if we just show them that we love them too, they will stop hating us so much... NOT. I am not saying that they are all terrorists, but do you really want to take the risk that even ONE of them is? Let's use some common sense here. If we can't be sure they are not terrorists looking to come here for evil purposes, we should not let them come. We have a duty to protect ourselves first. If we cannot do that, then nothing else matters. This is not a humanitarian question, it is a matter of national defense.And that matters a damn why? Oh right, it doesn't. Just painting a bull's eye on themselves. If they hate you there's not much reason not to blow those assholes up eh?
Yes, so why take any more of them? Do we need more terrorists?
You run from this, they win.
It's just so incredibly naïve.
Look at the French, waving the Tricolor, singing La Marseillaise and going on about Liberté, égalité, fraternité etc.
That's all well and good, but I'm sorry NONE of that jazz is going to protect them from another suicide attack.
One way to protect a nation and it's peoples from terrorist attacks is not to allow thousands upon thousands of mainly young males of military age into the nation that not even the government knows who is who.
Dangerous groups throughout our history that generated anti-immigrant rhetoric and actions included Marxists, Anarchists, the "Yellow Peril"...yet here we are.
News for ya, several of them probably support ISIS. More news for you, most of those who do here are ALREADY FUCKING HERE!!!Maybe you want them in your back yard? All 10,000+ unvetted, no unvettable, "refugees"? Maybe if we just show them that we love them too, they will stop hating us so much... NOT. I am not saying that they are all terrorists, but do you really want to take the risk that even ONE of them is? Let's use some common sense here. If we can't be sure they are not terrorists looking to come here for evil purposes, we should not let them come. We have a duty to protect ourselves first. If we cannot do that, then nothing else matters. This is not a humanitarian question, it is a matter of national defense.
Yes, so why take any more of them? Do we need more terrorists?
You run from this, they win.
It's just so incredibly naïve.
Look at the French, waving the Tricolor, singing La Marseillaise and going on about Liberté, égalité, fraternité etc.
That's all well and good, but I'm sorry NONE of that jazz is going to protect them from another suicide attack.
One way to protect a nation and it's peoples from terrorist attacks is not to allow thousands upon thousands of mainly young males of military age into the nation that not even the government knows who is who.
The majority of the refugees are not military age young males: Stretching Facts on Syrian Refugees
