Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know less about the SLoT than you do the first, if you remember I made a complete fool of you on the SLoT in another thread.Inflation doesn't violate the FLoT. It honors it.Inflation is pure BULLSHIT violating the FLoT. Some asshole's pontification does not change the FLOT.Inflation explains the otherwise curious cancellation of matter and gravitational energy on cosmological scales, which is consistent with astronomical observations. Stephen Hawking
Is The Inflationary Universe A Scientific Theory? Not Anymore
And it's even worse, they argue, inflation is not even a scientific theory:
“nflationary cosmology, as we currently understand it, cannot be evaluated using the scientific method.”
You on the other hand will fuck the dog shit out of the SLoT.
Hey pinhead, I was ramming your own inflation crap down your throat using your OWN source, not singing its praises!!!Back in May of this year, Edthecynic was singing praises of inflation.
View attachment 214689
And today he calls it pure bullshit.
View attachment 214690
Too funny. Ed's not a very good troll. Funny, but not good.
The net charge of an atom is zero, are atoms something or nothing?The net energy of a closed system is always zero. Don't you know anything?Please show where the law of conservation on energy says anything about the net energy always equals zero.Gravity didn't exist until matter was created from nothing in a closed system. And while matter was being created from nothing in a closed system, the gravity of the closed system cancelled out the force of matter such that the sum of the forces was zero. The net energy of the closed system was and is always zero. So the law of conservation was not violated.
Is an atom something or nothing?
Nothing you post is scientific!!!Militant atheists pretend to worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes.
You are thinking of yourself.You know less about the SLoT than you do the first, if you remember I made a complete fool of you on the SLoT in another thread.Inflation doesn't violate the FLoT. It honors it.Inflation is pure BULLSHIT violating the FLoT. Some asshole's pontification does not change the FLOT.Inflation explains the otherwise curious cancellation of matter and gravitational energy on cosmological scales, which is consistent with astronomical observations. Stephen Hawking
Is The Inflationary Universe A Scientific Theory? Not Anymore
And it's even worse, they argue, inflation is not even a scientific theory:
“nflationary cosmology, as we currently understand it, cannot be evaluated using the scientific method.”
You on the other hand will fuck the dog shit out of the SLoT.
Inflation, which isn't even a valid scientific theory, violates the FLoT ans defies logic.
Is an atom something or nothing???
You mean Stephen Hawking's pinhead crap.Hey pinhead, I was ramming your own inflation crap down your throat using your OWN source, not singing its praises!!!Back in May of this year, Edthecynic was singing praises of inflation.
View attachment 214689
And today he calls it pure bullshit.
View attachment 214690
Too funny. Ed's not a very good troll. Funny, but not good.
What is the mass of an atom and does that mass have a corresponding effect on gravity?The net charge of an atom is zero, are atoms something or nothing?The net energy of a closed system is always zero. Don't you know anything?Please show where the law of conservation on energy says anything about the net energy always equals zero.Gravity didn't exist until matter was created from nothing in a closed system. And while matter was being created from nothing in a closed system, the gravity of the closed system cancelled out the force of matter such that the sum of the forces was zero. The net energy of the closed system was and is always zero. So the law of conservation was not violated.
Is an atom something or nothing?
BULLSHIT!For every matter to energy exchang or energy to matter exchange there is a loss of usable energy.
Different atoms have different masses, but they all have a net positive and negative charge that adds up to ZERO. So is an atom a something or a nothing, loser?What is the mass of an atom and does that mass have a corresponding effect on gravity?The net charge of an atom is zero, are atoms something or nothing?The net energy of a closed system is always zero. Don't you know anything?Please show where the law of conservation on energy says anything about the net energy always equals zero.Gravity didn't exist until matter was created from nothing in a closed system. And while matter was being created from nothing in a closed system, the gravity of the closed system cancelled out the force of matter such that the sum of the forces was zero. The net energy of the closed system was and is always zero. So the law of conservation was not violated.
Is an atom something or nothing?
#winning
Are you telling me you disagree with what I wrote?BULLSHIT!For every matter to energy exchang or energy to matter exchange there is a loss of usable energy.
See I told you you know less than nothing about the SLoT, even after I pointed out the same flaw in another thread, proving you are STUPID rather than ignorant.
Thank you.
Every atom has a mass and in a closed system that mass has a corresponding gravity that results in a net energy to the closed system of zero.Different atoms have different masses, but they all have a net positive and negative charge that adds up to ZERO. So is an atom a something or a nothing, loser?What is the mass of an atom and does that mass have a corresponding effect on gravity?The net charge of an atom is zero, are atoms something or nothing?The net energy of a closed system is always zero. Don't you know anything?Please show where the law of conservation on energy says anything about the net energy always equals zero.Gravity didn't exist until matter was created from nothing in a closed system. And while matter was being created from nothing in a closed system, the gravity of the closed system cancelled out the force of matter such that the sum of the forces was zero. The net energy of the closed system was and is always zero. So the law of conservation was not violated.
Is an atom something or nothing?
#winning
You know less about what Hawking says than you do about Vilinken!Apparently edthepinhead believes he knows more than Stephen Hawking.
I'm telling you the real scientific SLoT disagrees with your made up phony Creationist lie that you are trying to pass off as the SLoT.Are you telling me you disagree with what I wrote?BULLSHIT!For every matter to energy exchang or energy to matter exchange there is a loss of usable energy.
See I told you you know less than nothing about the SLoT, even after I pointed out the same flaw in another thread, proving you are STUPID rather than ignorant.
Thank you.
Hawking says no such thing, but thank you for finally admitting that atoms are nothing.Every atom has a mass and in a closed system that mass has a corresponding gravity that results in a net energy to the closed system of zero.Different atoms have different masses, but they all have a net positive and negative charge that adds up to ZERO. So is an atom a something or a nothing, loser?What is the mass of an atom and does that mass have a corresponding effect on gravity?The net charge of an atom is zero, are atoms something or nothing?The net energy of a closed system is always zero. Don't you know anything?Please show where the law of conservation on energy says anything about the net energy always equals zero.
Is an atom something or nothing?
#winning
Go argue with Hawking.
So then you do not believe usable energy is lost during every exchange? Really?I'm telling you the real scientific SLoT disagrees with your made up phony Creationist lie that you are trying to pass off as the SLoT.Are you telling me you disagree with what I wrote?BULLSHIT!For every matter to energy exchang or energy to matter exchange there is a loss of usable energy.
See I told you you know less than nothing about the SLoT, even after I pointed out the same flaw in another thread, proving you are STUPID rather than ignorant.
Thank you.
If you remember I exposed your lie in another thread when I challenged you to show the math of how you changed the SLoT to eliminate the "EQUAL TO ZERO" part. You couldn't then and you still can't now, all you could do is name drop people for whom you have no understanding.
You don’t understand anything you are talking about. Not one bit.Hawking says no such thing, but thank you for finally admitting that atoms are nothing.Every atom has a mass and in a closed system that mass has a corresponding gravity that results in a net energy to the closed system of zero.Different atoms have different masses, but they all have a net positive and negative charge that adds up to ZERO. So is an atom a something or a nothing, loser?What is the mass of an atom and does that mass have a corresponding effect on gravity?The net charge of an atom is zero, are atoms something or nothing?The net energy of a closed system is always zero. Don't you know anything?
#winning
Go argue with Hawking.
I’m not the one arguing against the leading cosmological model. You are.You know less about what Hawking says than you do about Vilinken!Apparently edthepinhead believes he knows more than Stephen Hawking.