Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
And very likely burn yourself to a crisp.
Was that what little Timmy McVeigh used?
Was that what the Tzarnov brothers used?
I’m fact can you point to a mass casualty event where Molotov cocktails were the weapon of choice?
Dope
This has nothing to do with the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the constitution.A well-regulated milita, instead there are a whole bunch of militias.
False. They were not “widely available”500,000 were in circulation of just that one type of semi-automatic. Semi-automatics were also used extensively in WWI and even more in WWII and were widely available to the consumer.
No such thing as an "assault" rifle.A “gun” need not be an assault rifle to do what you are claiming it is a tool for. A revolver or shotgun make fine self defense weapons
The freedom inherent in a free society means people can commit mass murder .Think about, they don't even have a permit. If a crazy gets a gun, you might get shot.
And they do it on such a grand scale when it only takes a trip to the stores and a finger twitchMost understand they will not live out the day. Their goal is not to.
If you remove one way to kill (which you can't anyway) they will use another.
They do not kill because there are guns, they kill because they want to kill.
Link? Do you have something that backs up your claim that people couldnt buy semi automatic rifles post WW2?False. They were not “widely available”
Obviously
And they do it on such a grand scale when it only takes a trip to the stores and a finger twitch
Why you want to make that as easy as possible is beyond understanding
And you stand on the bodies and bathe in the blood of dead children to push your mindless agenda.Bullshit. You ignore tragedy after tragedy in an attempt to fulfill some idiotic fantasy
What you “prefer” is not the issue.No such thing as an "assault" rifle.
And I prefer a Glock over a revolver.
Why are you stuck in the 1800's?
Of course they were.False. They were not “widely available”
Obviously
Adam Lanza murdered his mother and stole her guns.How was it “hard” for Adam Lanza?
Really? It doesn’t sound like you do.I want to address the problem.
Why.
This is not “truth” - it’s your biased opinion.What you “prefer” is not the issue.
Some people might “prefer” a Thompson or a BAR
If self defense is really the reason for having a gun, a double action revolver or a shotgun will do that
That doesn’t make them “widely available” and they weren’t.Of course they were.
The first semiauto rifle for the civilian market was produced on 1906.
Probably more.As opposed to 24 MILLION AR-15s and AK style assault weapons in the last 30 years.
You have no power to tell other people what they have to use for self defense weapons and that keeps you up at night doesn't it?What you “prefer” is not the issue.
Some people might “prefer” a Thompson or a BAR
If self defense is really the reason for having a gun, a double action revolver or a shotgun will do that
That was never my claim.Link? Do you have something that backs up your claim that people couldnt buy semi automatic rifles post WW2?
We do indeed have that power. Do you need examples?You have no power to tell other people what they have to use for self defense weapons and that keeps you up at night doesn't it?
I will not carry a revolver because they are harder to conceal than any other handgun that I own. They lack firepower and reloads take too much time.
