Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Anyone could buy them therefore they were available.That doesn’t make them “widely available” and they weren’t.
Similarly every mass shooting in the US, save one, committed with an "assault rifle" - as you incorrectly use the term - could have been equally perpetrated with a pump-action shotgun.A “gun” need not be an assault rifle to do what you are claiming it is a tool for.
They do NOT lack firepower.You have no power to tell other people what they have to use for self defense weapons and that keeps you up at night doesn't it?
I will not carry a revolver because they are harder to conceal than any other handgun that I own. They lack firepower and reloads take too much time.
The average mass shooting results in less than 1 death?Over 600 incidences of four people (not including the shooter) being shot in one occurrence.
Over 3000 people shot and over 600 dead
No you don't.We do indeed have that power. Do you need examples?
People not purchasing them and them not and them not being available are 2 different things.That was never my claim.
They were not widely available and were not widely used
In fact LE wee using revolvers and shotguns into the 1980s
They were available to anyone who wanted one.That doesn’t make them “widely available” and they weren’t.
The Constitution says otherwise.We do indeed have that power.
Yours is an opinion because you see it only one way and is politically biased, I see both Democrats and Republicans playing the same game just refusing to see their own BS like you fail to do. It is a fact because you confirmed it in your answer.So your admitted opinion is “truth” but my opinion is a lie?
Yea …Republicans…
Of course they doThey do NOT lack firepower.
And the fact that reloads take longer is exactly the point.
Nice side step. You know there are limits in place as to what guns you can ownNo you don't.
The semiautomatic pistol and rifle are considered commonplace weapons and you will never have them banned in this country.
So you can take your dreams of controlling other people and shove it
Save you bogus both sides bullshit. We’ve read your postsYours is an opinion because you see it only one way and is politically biased, I see both Democrats and Republicans playing the same game just refusing to see their own BS like you fail to do. It is a fact because you confirmed it in your answer.
What limit is there on "all bearable arms"?Nice side step. You know there are limits in place as to what guns you can own
Are you having a fever dream? The Constitution does not say thatThe Constitution says otherwise.
"All bearable arms".
No there aren't really.Nice side step. You know there are limits in place as to what guns you can own
Do you deny that there are limits on what guns you can own?What limit is there on "all bearable arms"?
You have read them and you don’t understand, you lied, I told the truth and the reason you lied is because of the bigoted two party system that cannot a.low you your own free thought.Save you bogus both sides bullshit. We’ve read your posts
Are you having a fever dream? The Constitution does not say that
Like I said anyone who can legally own a firearm can own a fully automatic firearm if they want to.Do you deny that there are limits on what guns you can own?
The USSC did - and thus, that's what the Constitution says.Are you having a fever dream? The Constitution does not say that
