White House approves military to use lethal force at southern border

WASHINGTON — The White House has authorized active-duty military troops stationed along the southwest border to use lethal force, if necessary, a significant escalation of the support role they had been tasked with that may run afoul of a 140-year-old law that generally bars the military from operating within U.S. boundaries.

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly signed a memo late Tuesday expanding the mission of the 5,800 troops to include protecting Customs and Border Protection agents. That represents a sharp change in the orders given to troops currently deployed in California, Arizona and Texas, who had been lining the border with concertina wire and providing only logistical support to CBP personnel.

Defense Secretary James Mattis confirmed the new guidelines to reporters on Wednesday but downplayed the level of interaction his troops will have with migrants. He said most troops aren’t carrying weapons and that the military would stay away from civilian law enforcement roles such as arrests, which are forbidden under in the Posse Comitatus Act.

The law prohibits the federal government from using the armed forces in a domestic police role, except in situations specifically authorized by the Constitution or Congress.

Mattis emphasized that he would use his expanded authorities only in response to a specific, detailed request from Secretary of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, and that none has yet been made.

"I now have the authority to do more," Mattis told reporters. "Now we'll see what she asks me."

White House approves military to use lethal force at southern border

Hopefully the activists who have been leading the caravan will not be stupid and reckless enough to make this necessary.
Did you read your own post?

the military would stay away from civilian law enforcement roles such as arrests, which are forbidden under in the Posse Comitatus Act.

The law prohibits the federal government from using the armed forces in a domestic police role, except in situations specifically authorized by the Constitution or Congress.

He said most troops aren’t carrying weapons and that the military would stay away from civilian law enforcement roles such as arrests, which are forbidden under in the Posse Comitatus Act.

The law prohibits the federal government from using the armed forces in a domestic police role, except in situations specifically authorized by the Constitution or Congress.
Exceptions to the act include

Posse Comitatus Act - Wikipedia

which is exactly what our troops will be doing at the border according to the WH memo.
 
It is in reference to enforcing civilian law. Immigration law is definitely civilian. These are asylum seekers which is a legal process allowed by law. They are not invaders. Typical Trump garbage. Typical fascism.

Haha...there you go making a fool of yourself again, pretending the 2% represents the majority.
Look, in the real world only 2% of applicants from the southern shithole are granted asylum...this makes 98 in 100 piece of shit liars just trying to fuck good Americans over. Save your bleeding heart bullshit for all your wetback buddies there Gustavo.
“Do Many People Gain Asylum from Mexico?
Despite its close proximity, only about 300-800 people from Mexico are granted asylum in the U.S. each year. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 667 Mexican nationals who submitted an affirmative U.S. asylum application were granted asylee status in 2015. That number is higher than the norm. For example, only 202 affirmative Mexican asylum cases were approved in 2013.

For grants of asylum in removal proceedings, only 203 out of nearly 9,000 applications in 2015 were eventually approved by immigration judges. That is a grant rate of only 2.3% for Mexican asylum claims.”
We have a Statue of Liberty.

True and our founders gave her very explicit instructions to greet WHITE EUROPEANS...not wetbacks.
lol. our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception.

old worlders simply had all the money.

What part of this is “race neutral”?

C6z4GlmXUAIDOgH.jpg
it is unConstitutional; they had to account for slavery still being in effect.

10USC246 is explicit.
 
I haven't seen Congress pass anything allowing an exception to Posse Comitatus

And since Marshal Law has not been declared...

This is essentially fake news coming out of the friggin White House

The Posse Comitatus act was in reference to US citizens, not foreign invaders.

It is in reference to enforcing civilian law. Immigration law is definitely civilian. These are asylum seekers which is a legal process allowed by law. They are not invaders. Typical Trump garbage. Typical fascism.

Haha...there you go making a fool of yourself again, pretending the 2% represents the majority.
Look, in the real world only 2% of applicants from the southern shithole are granted asylum...this makes 98 in 100 piece of shit liars just trying to fuck good Americans over. Save your bleeding heart bullshit for all your wetback buddies there Gustavo.
“Do Many People Gain Asylum from Mexico?
Despite its close proximity, only about 300-800 people from Mexico are granted asylum in the U.S. each year. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 667 Mexican nationals who submitted an affirmative U.S. asylum application were granted asylee status in 2015. That number is higher than the norm. For example, only 202 affirmative Mexican asylum cases were approved in 2013.

For grants of asylum in removal proceedings, only 203 out of nearly 9,000 applications in 2015 were eventually approved by immigration judges. That is a grant rate of only 2.3% for Mexican asylum claims.”
We have a Statue of Liberty.

True and our founders gave her very explicit instructions to greet WHITE EUROPEANS...not wetbacks.
Well, that is becauae they were racist pukes like you, in general. They were ignorant of modern science and the modern, informed morality and ethics. While they had at least a shaky excuse, you don't.
 
Wtf are you talking about? So you are saying it is tbe responsibility of the state police and border patrol to stop an invasion by themselves? Is the sole purpose of the US military to fight foreign wars and cannot defend the U.S.

And they are not really there to stop them, they are there to aid border patrol if they become overwhelmed by people and violence. The patrol will stop them. The military will not make any arrests. If our agencies are arresting somebody and it's getting out of hand, our military will be there to help.
The essence of these new rules are that the military will not be required to stand by and watch as our border patrol agents are beaten and killed. The perpetrator will be detained and taken to the BP for arrest.

Mattis explains new roles, authorities at border


On use of force:

While the memo authorizes up to the lethal use of force, Mattis emphasized that the vast majority of forces on the border are not armed and would stay that way. Use of force would be carried out by “unarmed MPs” using shields and batons, he said.

“There is no armed element going in,” Mattis said.

“We are not doing law enforcement. We do not have arrest authority,” Mattis said. “Now the governors could give their [National Guard] troops arrest authority — I don’t think they’ve done that — but there is no arrest authority under Posse Comitatus for the U.S. federal troops. That can be done but it has to be done in accordance with the law.


On detention:

The memo authorizes troops to be used to provide “temporary detention and cursory search,” something they are not allowed to do under Posse Comitatus. Mattis said the use of forces in either role would be minimized to prevent them from crossing that line.

“We do not have arrest authority,” Mattis said. “Detention, I would put it in terms of minutes. In other words, if someone’s beating on a border patrolman and if we were in position to have to do something about it, we could stop them from beating on them and take them over and deliver them to a border patrolman who would then arrest them for it.”

“There’s no violation of Posse Comitatus," Mattis said. "There’s no violation here, at all. We’re not going to arrest, or anything else. To stop someone from beating on someone and turn them over to someone else — this is minutes, not even hours, OK?”
 
WASHINGTON — The White House has authorized active-duty military troops stationed along the southwest border to use lethal force, if necessary, a significant escalation of the support role they had been tasked with that may run afoul of a 140-year-old law that generally bars the military from operating within U.S. boundaries.

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly signed a memo late Tuesday expanding the mission of the 5,800 troops to include protecting Customs and Border Protection agents. That represents a sharp change in the orders given to troops currently deployed in California, Arizona and Texas, who had been lining the border with concertina wire and providing only logistical support to CBP personnel.

Defense Secretary James Mattis confirmed the new guidelines to reporters on Wednesday but downplayed the level of interaction his troops will have with migrants. He said most troops aren’t carrying weapons and that the military would stay away from civilian law enforcement roles such as arrests, which are forbidden under in the Posse Comitatus Act.

The law prohibits the federal government from using the armed forces in a domestic police role, except in situations specifically authorized by the Constitution or Congress.

Mattis emphasized that he would use his expanded authorities only in response to a specific, detailed request from Secretary of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, and that none has yet been made.

"I now have the authority to do more," Mattis told reporters. "Now we'll see what she asks me."

White House approves military to use lethal force at southern border

Hopefully the activists who have been leading the caravan will not be stupid and reckless enough to make this necessary.

They will. My feeling is that someone along the border (a recent deportee) where they are eyeball to eyeball with our troops will throw a rock in hopes of getting a massacre started and hurting American credibility and reputation even more. Of course they will probably be one of the ones who isn't hurt in the clash. This is the inherent danger in publicizing the ROE and having armed troops needlessly down there in the first place.
Keep in mind the President hoped to avoid situations like this by building a smart fence along the border, but the Democrats argued the fence wasn't needed because the US Army could patrol the border and keep illegals out. The present crisis should be seen as a dream scenario by Democrats since this is what they recommended.

All this said, the Army is there only to support the border patrol agents, so if there is violence it will be between violent migrants and the US border patrol agents and the Army will only step in if the violence is great enough to overwhelm the capabilities of border patrol agents, and if that were to happen, this would properly be called an invasion and it would be proper for the US Army to defend our borders by any means necessary.
 
A simple declaration can be made by Trump which would render the nutless fucks in Congress helpless and shit all over Posse Comitatus.
Should he declare an insurrection...we start killing filthy beaners on his command. I pray for this daily.

He'd have to declare martial law...good luck with that.

Instant impeachment

Negative
The Insurrection Act...look it up.
How cool would it be to see soldiers walking through neighborhoods in Los Angeles, going door to door demanding proof of citizenship?
I dream of that shit.
military-power-grab-300x160.jpg

Just like every other statist you dream of the government talking total charge.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
The Posse Comitatus act was in reference to US citizens, not foreign invaders.

It is in reference to enforcing civilian law. Immigration law is definitely civilian. These are asylum seekers which is a legal process allowed by law. They are not invaders. Typical Trump garbage. Typical fascism.

Haha...there you go making a fool of yourself again, pretending the 2% represents the majority.
Look, in the real world only 2% of applicants from the southern shithole are granted asylum...this makes 98 in 100 piece of shit liars just trying to fuck good Americans over. Save your bleeding heart bullshit for all your wetback buddies there Gustavo.
“Do Many People Gain Asylum from Mexico?
Despite its close proximity, only about 300-800 people from Mexico are granted asylum in the U.S. each year. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 667 Mexican nationals who submitted an affirmative U.S. asylum application were granted asylee status in 2015. That number is higher than the norm. For example, only 202 affirmative Mexican asylum cases were approved in 2013.

For grants of asylum in removal proceedings, only 203 out of nearly 9,000 applications in 2015 were eventually approved by immigration judges. That is a grant rate of only 2.3% for Mexican asylum claims.”
We have a Statue of Liberty.

True and our founders gave her very explicit instructions to greet WHITE EUROPEANS...not wetbacks.
Well, that is becauae they were racist pukes like you, in general. They were ignorant of modern science and the modern, informed morality and ethics. While they had at least a shaky excuse, you don't.

Haha...”modern science, morality and ethics”...that’s funny shit.
Our founders knew exactly what Brown people do to a society...they were some smart muthafuckers...they wanted to keep America safe and productive.
Have you looked at statistical data? Have you looked around the globe at all the Brown shitholes? Our founders had that shit nailed didn’t they?
Facts and truth are a major inconvenience for you huh?
 
A simple declaration can be made by Trump which would render the nutless fucks in Congress helpless and shit all over Posse Comitatus.
Should he declare an insurrection...we start killing filthy beaners on his command. I pray for this daily.

He'd have to declare martial law...good luck with that.

Instant impeachment

Negative
The Insurrection Act...look it up.
How cool would it be to see soldiers walking through neighborhoods in Los Angeles, going door to door demanding proof of citizenship?
I dream of that shit.
military-power-grab-300x160.jpg

Just like every other statist you dream of the government talking total charge.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Nope...just taking charge of the Wetback situation and getting aggressive as fuck with it...eradicating 30 million cockroaches. Piss yourself yet?
 
A simple declaration can be made by Trump which would render the nutless fucks in Congress helpless and shit all over Posse Comitatus.
Should he declare an insurrection...we start killing filthy beaners on his command. I pray for this daily.

He'd have to declare martial law...good luck with that.

Instant impeachment

Negative
The Insurrection Act...look it up.
How cool would it be to see soldiers walking through neighborhoods in Los Angeles, going door to door demanding proof of citizenship?
I dream of that shit.
military-power-grab-300x160.jpg

Just like every other statist you dream of the government talking total charge.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Nope...just taking charge of the Wetback situation and getting aggressive as fuck with it...eradicating 30 million cockroaches. Piss yourself yet?

Nope my little statist I know lots of folks like you that want the government to be all powerful.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Haha...”modern science, morality and ethics”...that’s funny shit.
To an ignorant, angry ,incurious idiot...no doubt, it is. The morons in school always thought it was something worthy of ridicule when other people learned things. We can spot them and you by looking at who is serving us our french fries, or emptying our garbage at the curb.
 
Nope...just taking charge of the Wetback situation and getting aggressive as fuck with it.
No you're not. You're sitting on your fat ass, screaming at a monitor. You're no threat to anyone . You are the vocal minority of racist pukes that has always existed. You just think you are important again now, since you can always find like minded morons on the internet. "Confirmation bias"
 
Haha...”modern science, morality and ethics”...that’s funny shit.
To an ignorant, angry ,incurious idiot...no doubt, it is. The morons in school always thought it was something worthy of ridicule when other people learned things. We can spot them and you by looking at who is serving us our french fries, or emptying our garbage at the curb.

Haha...right.
Meanwhile I’ll hold Thanksgiving on my back deck which sits on the sand of the Pacific Ocean while you’re eating Cheetos and gaming in moms converted garage.
 
If any of the invaders end up injured it won’t be because they weren’t warned. We have been telling them they won’t be allowed to enter the US. If there are injuries it’s on them.
 
We have been telling them they won’t be allowed to enter the US.
Which, of course, is stupid, since we could not possibly know the results or contents of their applications for asylum. That is just stupid people squawking about the scary brown people they were told to fear.
 
We have been telling them they won’t be allowed to enter the US.
Which, of course, is stupid, since we could not possibly know the results or contents of their applications for asylum. That is just stupid people squawking about the scary brown people they were told to fear.


This is not what "asylum" is for.


It's been abused and broken by lefties. Time to shut it down.

Seal the border and reduce immigration to a trickle for the next 50 years.
 
Mattis Says He Has Extra Authority to Use Military on Border

fc5845fb-c196-4ef2-855b-716a14a1bafa.jpg



How the hell are they going to protect Customs and Border Protection personnel, with lethal force if necessary, if they’re not carrying weapons?


So, big deal. Chief of Staff Kelley sends him a letter on behalf of the president.


Mattis was adamant that the military will remain within its legal limits.

"We are not doing law enforcement," he told reporters at the Pentagon. "We do not have arrest authority." He noted that National Guard troops under state control are also involved at the border, and he said the governors of those states could give them arrest authority. He said there are about 2,100 National Guard troops involved.

Mattis said that as of Wednesday there were 5,764 active-duty troops performing support missions along the border in Texas, Arizona and California. The number changes frequently. Just a day earlier, the Pentagon said in a report to Congress that there about 5,900 troop involved; at other times the Pentagon has put the number at 5,800.

More of this @ Mattis Says He Has Extra Authority to Use Military on Border
 
We have been telling them they won’t be allowed to enter the US.
Which, of course, is stupid, since we could not possibly know the results or contents of their applications for asylum. That is just stupid people squawking about the scary brown people they were told to fear.


This is not what "asylum" is for.


It's been abused and broken by lefties. Time to shut it down.

Seal the border and reduce immigration to a trickle for the next 50 years.
let's end our crime, drug, and terror wars to stop creating refugees.
 
They will. My feeling is that someone along the border (a recent deportee) where they are eyeball to eyeball with our troops will throw a rock in hopes of getting a massacre started and hurting American credibility and reputation even more. Of course they will probably be one of the ones who isn't hurt in the clash. This is the inherent danger in publicizing the ROE and having armed troops needlessly down there in the first place.

Let's see.........I'm going to confront the strongest military in the entire world by throwing a rock at one of them to try and create problems........NOT.

Your premise is really stupid. Or haven't you noticed the asymmetrical warfare that self-styled revolutionaries have been using against us now for decades? Nobody fears our military. Other nations do but individuals? No. Especially if what they want is to highlight Americans shooting defenseless people which is what has been authorized by your blob.

These people are gutless. If they had any courage, they would be home fighting in their own country.
That is a childish view but it is what it is.

Democrats are the reason these people are coming here.
No. Jobs are the reason these people are coming here.

You made such a big stink about family separation last time that it made news for over a month, and these invaders know it. They're expecting Democrats to be there again for them and that's why they come here.
Yeah, us liberals are against state-sanctioned kidnapping for no other purpose than to serve as a deterrent. We still have over 10,000 kids in our custody according to reports. Another black eye for our nation courtesy of the blob.

When word gets back that this is no longer the case; that everybody will have to wait outside of our border if they plan on making a phony asylum claim, you'll see how fast these caravans stop. Let's just hope some commie activist judge doesn't interfere with Trump's plan. Because if one is successful, the next caravan will start to form.

Again, that is a narrow and not surprisingly dumb view of what is going on. Now, thanks to the blob, All it is now going to take is some asshole on the Mexican side of the border to hurl a rock and they will get what they want; gruesome pictures of American troops shooting people. And we become a lesser nation in the process.

Not sure who came up with it but the old saying among revolutionaries/protesters/terrorists is that the authorities showing up is not a bad thing; it adds another seat to the negotiation table. Violence forces them to sit in it; one way or the other. As the song goes, "that history book on the shelf...is always repeating itself".
 
WASHINGTON — The White House has authorized active-duty military troops stationed along the southwest border to use lethal force, if necessary, a significant escalation of the support role they had been tasked with that may run afoul of a 140-year-old law that generally bars the military from operating within U.S. boundaries.

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly signed a memo late Tuesday expanding the mission of the 5,800 troops to include protecting Customs and Border Protection agents. That represents a sharp change in the orders given to troops currently deployed in California, Arizona and Texas, who had been lining the border with concertina wire and providing only logistical support to CBP personnel.

Defense Secretary James Mattis confirmed the new guidelines to reporters on Wednesday but downplayed the level of interaction his troops will have with migrants. He said most troops aren’t carrying weapons and that the military would stay away from civilian law enforcement roles such as arrests, which are forbidden under in the Posse Comitatus Act.

The law prohibits the federal government from using the armed forces in a domestic police role, except in situations specifically authorized by the Constitution or Congress.

Mattis emphasized that he would use his expanded authorities only in response to a specific, detailed request from Secretary of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, and that none has yet been made.

"I now have the authority to do more," Mattis told reporters. "Now we'll see what she asks me."

White House approves military to use lethal force at southern border

Hopefully the activists who have been leading the caravan will not be stupid and reckless enough to make this necessary.

They will. My feeling is that someone along the border (a recent deportee) where they are eyeball to eyeball with our troops will throw a rock in hopes of getting a massacre started and hurting American credibility and reputation even more. Of course they will probably be one of the ones who isn't hurt in the clash. This is the inherent danger in publicizing the ROE and having armed troops needlessly down there in the first place.
Keep in mind the President hoped to avoid situations like this by building a smart fence along the border, but the Democrats argued the fence wasn't needed because the US Army could patrol the border and keep illegals out. The present crisis should be seen as a dream scenario by Democrats since this is what they recommended.

All this said, the Army is there only to support the border patrol agents, so if there is violence it will be between violent migrants and the US border patrol agents and the Army will only step in if the violence is great enough to overwhelm the capabilities of border patrol agents, and if that were to happen, this would properly be called an invasion and it would be proper for the US Army to defend our borders by any means necessary.

Invasion of the Hairdressers!!!!
 
No. Jobs are the reason these people are coming here.

No, not jobs--to get into this country anyway they can using any means they can including our laws and Democrats to work against us.

Yeah, us liberals are against state-sanctioned kidnapping for no other purpose than to serve as a deterrent. We still have over 10,000 kids in our custody according to reports. Another black eye for our nation courtesy of the blob.

That's what you consider a black eye? Our government giving these kids temporary homes, feeding them, providing them with clean clothing, and providing medical care when needed?

If that's kidnapping, I'm sure most of them can't wait until the next time they're kidnapped.

What it boils down to is do you want to stop these invaders or do you not? We on the right do, how about you on the left? Because if you say you do, I'd love to hook you up to a polygraph machine to watch it go off the scales.

Again, that is a narrow and not surprisingly dumb view of what is going on. Now, thanks to the blob, All it is now going to take is some asshole on the Mexican side of the border to hurl a rock and they will get what they want; gruesome pictures of American troops shooting people. And we become a lesser nation in the process.

Not sure who came up with it but the old saying among revolutionaries/protesters/terrorists is that the authorities showing up is not a bad thing; it adds another seat to the negotiation table. Violence forces them to sit in it; one way or the other. As the song goes, "that history book on the shelf...is always repeating itself".

If these varmints attack our security forces, I wouldn't blame them for doing whatever it takes to defend themselves including using deadly force. Of course you on the left would welcome such an attack. You never liked our security forces in the first place.
 

Forum List

Back
Top