White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report

[Harpy Eagle]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

You mean exactly like what happened with the previous report?

Most likely. Thanks again for showing that Trump is no different at all from Obama.

 

[bripat9643]

Science isn't a popularity contest. Scientific truths are not determined by majority vote. You have just admitted that you don't understand science.

What's ironic about it?

you accusing someone of not understand science.

Kiwiman doesn't understand it, and neither do you.

you are a joke. You get your science from FoxNews and GOP emails. you have never read a scientific article or journal on the subject. you have never downloaded the data sets and did an analysis on them yourself.

all you do is parrot party talking points.

Kiwiman just said that science is where a bunch of so-called "scientists" take a poll and decide which theories are true, and you agreed with him. And you claim you understand science?

 

[bripat9643]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

You mean exactly like what happened with the previous report?

Most likely. Thanks again for showing that Trump is no different at all from Obama.

Then what are you whining about? Did you whine when the previous report came out? Of course you didn't.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What's ironic about it?

you accusing someone of not understand science.

Kiwiman doesn't understand it, and neither do you.

you are a joke. You get your science from FoxNews and GOP emails. you have never read a scientific article or journal on the subject. you have never downloaded the data sets and did an analysis on them yourself.

all you do is parrot party talking points.

Kiwiman just said that science is where a bunch of so-called "scientists" take a poll and decide which theories are true, and you agreed with him. And you claim you understand science?

I agreed with him? Really? Isnt it a little early in the morning to start your lying?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

You mean exactly like what happened with the previous report?

Most likely. Thanks again for showing that Trump is no different at all from Obama.

Then what are you whining about? Did you whine when the previous report came out? Of course you didn't.

You sheep kept telling me Trump was different, that he was a change for the better.

Why do you lie so much?

 

[bripat9643]

What's ironic about it?

you accusing someone of not understand science.

Kiwiman doesn't understand it, and neither do you.

you are a joke. You get your science from FoxNews and GOP emails. you have never read a scientific article or journal on the subject. you have never downloaded the data sets and did an analysis on them yourself.

all you do is parrot party talking points.

Kiwiman just said that science is where a bunch of so-called "scientists" take a poll and decide which theories are true, and you agreed with him. And you claim you understand science?

I agreed with him? Really? Isnt it a little early in the morning to start your lying?

You chimed in on this thread to support his attacks on Trump's panel, didn't you?

 

[bripat9643]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

You mean exactly like what happened with the previous report?

Most likely. Thanks again for showing that Trump is no different at all from Obama.

Then what are you whining about? Did you whine when the previous report came out? Of course you didn't.

You sheep kept telling me Trump was different, that he was a change for the better.

Why do you lie so much?

He is better. For once he's actually allowing some critics of the AGW cult to get their views hear. Yo appear to be angry that anyone else should have any influence in our government.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

you accusing someone of not understand science.

Kiwiman doesn't understand it, and neither do you.

you are a joke. You get your science from FoxNews and GOP emails. you have never read a scientific article or journal on the subject. you have never downloaded the data sets and did an analysis on them yourself.

all you do is parrot party talking points.

Kiwiman just said that science is where a bunch of so-called "scientists" take a poll and decide which theories are true, and you agreed with him. And you claim you understand science?

I agreed with him? Really? Isnt it a little early in the morning to start your lying?

You chimed in on this thread to support his attacks on Trump's panel, didn't you?

Yes I did. I think the panel is a joke. Does not mean I agree with everything he has ever posted.

you are trying wayyyy too hard here. just admit your defeat and move on.

 

[rightwinger]

Gotta love Conservatives

98 percent of climate scientists agree with man made global warming

Trump will rule otherwise

 

[bripat9643]

Kiwiman doesn't understand it, and neither do you.

you are a joke. You get your science from FoxNews and GOP emails. you have never read a scientific article or journal on the subject. you have never downloaded the data sets and did an analysis on them yourself.

all you do is parrot party talking points.

Kiwiman just said that science is where a bunch of so-called "scientists" take a poll and decide which theories are true, and you agreed with him. And you claim you understand science?

I agreed with him? Really? Isnt it a little early in the morning to start your lying?

You chimed in on this thread to support his attacks on Trump's panel, didn't you?

Yes I did. I think the panel is a joke. Does not mean I agree with everything he has ever posted.

you are trying wayyyy too hard here. just admit your defeat and move on.

Why is only the panel that's critical of AGW a joke and not the one that promoted the hocus-pocus?

 

[bripat9643]

Gotta love Conservatives

98 percent of climate scientists agree with man made global warming

Trump will rule otherwise

That's AGW propaganda.

 

[rightwinger]

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

You mean exactly like what happened with the previous report?

Most likely. Thanks again for showing that Trump is no different at all from Obama.

Then what are you whining about? Did you whine when the previous report came out? Of course you didn't.

You sheep kept telling me Trump was different, that he was a change for the better.

Why do you lie so much?

He is better. For once he's actually allowing some critics of the AGW cult to get their views hear. Yo appear to be angry that anyone else should have any influence in our government.

If Trumps “experts” are willing to submit their findings to peer review , I will accept their findings

 

[Harpy Eagle]

you are a joke. You get your science from FoxNews and GOP emails. you have never read a scientific article or journal on the subject. you have never downloaded the data sets and did an analysis on them yourself.

all you do is parrot party talking points.

Kiwiman just said that science is where a bunch of so-called "scientists" take a poll and decide which theories are true, and you agreed with him. And you claim you understand science?

I agreed with him? Really? Isnt it a little early in the morning to start your lying?

You chimed in on this thread to support his attacks on Trump's panel, didn't you?

Yes I did. I think the panel is a joke. Does not mean I agree with everything he has ever posted.

you are trying wayyyy too hard here. just admit your defeat and move on.

Why is only the panel that's critical of AGW a joke and not the one that promoted the hocus-pocus?

Where did I say that?

Do you know who put together the last report and what their views were prior to starting on the report?

Do you know anything that is not a talking point from your party masters?

 

[bripat9643]

Kiwiman just said that science is where a bunch of so-called "scientists" take a poll and decide which theories are true, and you agreed with him. And you claim you understand science?

I agreed with him? Really? Isnt it a little early in the morning to start your lying?

You chimed in on this thread to support his attacks on Trump's panel, didn't you?

Yes I did. I think the panel is a joke. Does not mean I agree with everything he has ever posted.

you are trying wayyyy too hard here. just admit your defeat and move on.

Why is only the panel that's critical of AGW a joke and not the one that promoted the hocus-pocus?

Where did I say that?

Do you know who put together the last report and what their views were prior to starting on the report?

Do you know anything that is not a talking point from your party masters?

Did you attack the report issued by the Obama appointed hacks? No, you only attack this one. That's your modus operandi: you attack anything Republicans do, and remain silent about all the sleazy propaganda and double dealing that Demcrats do, and then claim you aren't biased.

Yes, I do know who put the last report together: a bunch of Obama appointed hacks. Everyone Obama appointed was a hack. You couldn't get promoted in the military unless you supported the Obama AGW abracadabra. Obama turned the entire government into one vast leftwing propaganda machine. Not once did you ever criticize it.

 

[22lcidw]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

You mean exactly like what happened with the previous report?

Most likely. Thanks again for showing that Trump is no different at all from Obama.

Then what are you whining about? Did you whine when the previous report came out? Of course you didn't.

You sheep kept telling me Trump was different, that he was a change for the better.

Why do you lie so much?

Ask Paul Ryan and others that are RINOS.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes, I do know who put the last report together: a bunch of Obama appointed hacks. Everyone Obama appointed was a hack. You couldn't get promoted in the military unless you supported the Obama AGW abracadabra. Obama turned the entire government into one vast leftwing propaganda machine. Not once did you ever criticize it.

you are fucking moron that just parrots talking points.

Like Obama had any control over who got promoted in the military. I am sure he knew each and every private that made PFC and every PFC that made LCpl and so forth.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, I do know who put the last report together: a bunch of Obama appointed hacks. Everyone Obama appointed was a hack. You couldn't get promoted in the military unless you supported the Obama AGW abracadabra. Obama turned the entire government into one vast leftwing propaganda machine. Not once did you ever criticize it.

you are fucking moron that just parrots talking points.

Like Obama had any control over who got promoted in the military. I am sure he knew each and every private that made PFC and every PFC that made LCpl and so forth.

You don't believe the President of the United States has control over which generals are promoted in the military?

Talk about fucking stupid.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You don't believe the President of the United States has control over which generals are promoted in the military?

Talk about fucking stupid.

Nope, I do not. And since only one of us actually served, only one of us would have any idea how promotions work in the military.

In the Marines, the first 2 promotions are automatic if you do not get into trouble....how does the POTUS control that?

The next two promotions are based upon a cutting score that is determined by your PFT score, TIS, TIG, rifle range score....how does the POTUS control that?

The rest of the promotions are based upon a randomly chosen board of your peers that meet once a year and looks over the paperwork for all qualified Marines of that grade and chose the best ones as they can determine...how does the POTUS control that?

Explain how the POTUS controls that process for each individual Marine.

 

[iceberg]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

From your link: "It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.
And of course Trump is a denier, so there is absolutely no question, what the result of this obvious stacked report will say.
BriPat, you and your shut-in buddy Gomer from the sticks Oddball, would suck this up, because that's just the way you folks are. Goose-steppers.

All previous government reports were stacked with AGW cult members. Why are you complaining about that now?

Considering, that a very large majority do believe in climate change, based on various tests and studies that are evidence based. It's hard to find many deniers who are scientists.
Even those corporations who are paying deniers, have themselves acknowledged Global Warming.
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Shell Knew Fossil Fuels Created Climate Change Risks Back in 1980s, Internal Documents Show
Holding Major Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable for Nearly 40 Years of Climate Deception and Harm

40 years ago they were saying we were headed for another ice age.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

From your link: "It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.
And of course Trump is a denier, so there is absolutely no question, what the result of this obvious stacked report will say.
BriPat, you and your shut-in buddy Gomer from the sticks Oddball, would suck this up, because that's just the way you folks are. Goose-steppers.

All previous government reports were stacked with AGW cult members. Why are you complaining about that now?

Considering, that a very large majority do believe in climate change, based on various tests and studies that are evidence based. It's hard to find many deniers who are scientists.
Even those corporations who are paying deniers, have themselves acknowledged Global Warming.
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Shell Knew Fossil Fuels Created Climate Change Risks Back in 1980s, Internal Documents Show
Holding Major Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable for Nearly 40 Years of Climate Deception and Harm

40 years ago they were saying we were headed for another ice age.

No they were not. That is just a partisan talking point. You should know better.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1