White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report

[22lcidw]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

So, the government is putting together a panel to dispute what the government already published?

And you big government statist are ok with this?

Would it not have been better for Trump to just not release the report that he is now going to waste money refuting?

What the fuck? you people whine about the government wasting money, yet they cheer this stupid shit...

This is a scam by the New World Order. There may be Climate issues. But not caused by men. All of this is to establish global taxation. For world government purposes and to further take our nation down some more pegs. The taxes will be used to redistribute to other nations that by progressive socialists spouting are not chittholes. We pay a bit already. But the taxes need to be tanked up several times over. And that will affect the peasant. We are lied to over and over. You saw Nancy spout about Obamacare.

 

[kiwiman127]

if trump did a 180 we'd march lock step?

the end is neigh !global warming watermelons faith in their globalist state religion is unshakable .
most are extremely devout and wont listen to you or believe that anyone would fudge any data ,hustle and make shit up for grant money,or use flawed business projection models .

they even demand sate attorney generals lock up "deniers" where is the separation of church and state ?

progressives even tried to do a play somewhere called "kill climate deniers"
promoting violence and hate .....which they're against

I bet you're all for eminent domain....all of a sudden. You gullible goose-steeping Little Trumpsters are so predictable..

 

[Natural Citizen]

I wonder if they're gonna count all them bombs they're dropping all over other people in the world.

 

[BlackFlag]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

Maybe they'll get Alex Jones to sit in on the farce

 

[bripat9643]

All previous government reports were stacked with AGW cult members. Why are you complaining about that now?

Considering, that a very large majority do believe in climate change, based on various tests and studies that are evidence based. It's hard to find many deniers who are scientists.
Even those corporations who are paying deniers, have themselves acknowledged Global Warming.
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Shell Knew Fossil Fuels Created Climate Change Risks Back in 1980s, Internal Documents Show
Holding Major Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable for Nearly 40 Years of Climate Deception and Harm

Science isn't a popularity contest. Scientific truths are not determined by majority vote. You have just admitted that you don't understand science.

What's ironic about it?

you accusing someone of not understand science.

Kiwiman doesn't understand it, and neither do you.

 

[bripat9643]

We all know the previous report was assembled by a gang of partisan hacks from the Obama administration.

I believe the Trump administration has already released that report. Why do you have a problem with another report? You would have us believe that releasing that report was not an exercise in big government, but Trump releasing another is? Why do you only whine about big government when Trump does something that all your leftwing snowflake allies object to.

And this report will be assembled gang of partisan hacks from the Trump administration.

Why release a report just to bring together another committee to dispute the report you just released? Would it not have been better to just not release the first report?

The report may have been released under the Trump administration, but it was assembled under the Obama administration. If Trump had 86ed it, then people like you would be whining about that. No matter what Trump does, you whine about it.

 

[bripat9643]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

From your link: "It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.
And of course Trump is a denier, so there is absolutely no question, what the result of this obvious stacked report will say.
BriPat, you and your shut-in buddy Gomer from the sticks Oddball, would suck this up, because that's just the way you folks are. Goose-steppers.

I'll take a climate denier over a reality denier anytime

Of course you would. If Trump all of a sudden Trump reversed his position on climate change, every single Trumpster, would also do a 180 on their stand of climate change.
Anyway, it doesn't matter much. Being 62% Americans don't think Trump is honest, they won't pay much attention. But with Trump's base? It's what Trump said, is the conclusive conclusion.

Wrong, shit for brains. I was skeptical of AGW before Trump, and I'll remain skeptical after Trump

 

[OKTexas]

All previous government reports were stacked with AGW cult members. Why are you complaining about that now?

Considering, that a very large majority do believe in climate change, based on various tests and studies that are evidence based. It's hard to find many deniers who are scientists.
Even those corporations who are paying deniers, have themselves acknowledged Global Warming.
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Shell Knew Fossil Fuels Created Climate Change Risks Back in 1980s, Internal Documents Show
Holding Major Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable for Nearly 40 Years of Climate Deception and Harm

Science isn't a popularity contest. Scientific truths are not determined by majority vote. You have just admitted that you don't understand science.

What's ironic about it?

you accusing someone of not understand science.

ROFLMFAO, you idiots can't even tell the difference in girls and boys. Science figured that out eons ago.

.

 

[OKTexas]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

From your link: "It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.
And of course Trump is a denier, so there is absolutely no question, what the result of this obvious stacked report will say.
BriPat, you and your shut-in buddy Gomer from the sticks Oddball, would suck this up, because that's just the way you folks are. Goose-steppers.

I'll take a climate denier over a reality denier anytime

Of course you would. If Trump all of a sudden Trump reversed his position on climate change, every single Trumpster, would also do a 180 on their stand of climate change.
Anyway, it doesn't matter much. Being 62% Americans don't think Trump is honest, they won't pay much attention. But with Trump's base? It's what Trump said, is the conclusive conclusion.

It's the epitome of the arrogance of the regressives to think they can control nature. I've said that since al the whore came out with his BS.

.

 

[Coyote]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

From your link: "It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.
And of course Trump is a denier, so there is absolutely no question, what the result of this obvious stacked report will say.
BriPat, you and your shut-in buddy Gomer from the sticks Oddball, would suck this up, because that's just the way you folks are. Goose-steppers.

All previous government reports were stacked with AGW cult members. Why are you complaining about that now?

They were stacked with scientists. Real ones. You denial cultists have trouble with that.

 

[Coyote]

More Americans and most Republicans now believe in climate change - CNNPolitics
About 8 in 10 Americans believe the climate is changing, causing extreme weather. Two thirds of Republicans believe the same thing. A majority of Americans (54%) consider it a "very serious" problem, according to a Monmouth University pollreleased Thursday

 

[bripat9643]

It's about time. Watch the AGW cult go crazy attacking this:

White House committee to reassess climate science conclusions: report​

The Trump administration is planning to create an ad hoc group of federal scientists to reassess and counter the government's conclusions on climate change, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

The National Security Council (NSC) initiative would feature scientists who challenge the seriousness of climate change and the degree to which humans are the cause of climate problems, three unidentified administration officials told the Post.

The Post reported that the plan was discussed by administration officials on Friday in the White House Situation Room.

It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.

The NSC declined to comment to the Post.

At the Friday meeting, deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman said President Trump was upset that the federal government last year released the National Climate Assessment, the Post reported.

The National Climate Assessment warned that climate change could have devastating effects on the economy, health and environment and that current efforts to counter climate change were insufficient.

Trump has been outspoken in doubting the effects of climate change, sometimes calling it a hoax. Following the release of last year's climate assessment, Trump said that he didn't "believe" the report's findings.

“Yeah, I don’t believe it,” Trump said at the time

“I’ve seen it, I’ve read some of it, and it’s fine,” he added.​

From your link: "It is considered a modified version of NSC senior director and climate denier William Happer's plan to create a panel on climate change and national security, according to the newspaper.
And of course Trump is a denier, so there is absolutely no question, what the result of this obvious stacked report will say.
BriPat, you and your shut-in buddy Gomer from the sticks Oddball, would suck this up, because that's just the way you folks are. Goose-steppers.

All previous government reports were stacked with AGW cult members. Why are you complaining about that now?

They were stacked with scientists. Real ones. You denial cultists have trouble with that.

Scientists don't doctor data and they don't make predictions that constantly fail and then claim their theory is valid. These people are charlatans.

 

[Crepitus]

Considering, that a very large majority do believe in climate change, based on various tests and studies that are evidence based. It's hard to find many deniers who are scientists.
Even those corporations who are paying deniers, have themselves acknowledged Global Warming.
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Shell Knew Fossil Fuels Created Climate Change Risks Back in 1980s, Internal Documents Show
Holding Major Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable for Nearly 40 Years of Climate Deception and Harm

The majority of people can believe in Lucky the got-dammend Leprechaun...That doesn't make him real.

And over 30,000 real scientists have signed the Oregon Petition, doofus.

That ridiculous document and its signatures have been debunked many times starting the year it was produced. Which was over 20 years ago now.

 

[Oddball]

That ridiculous document and its signatures have been debunked many times starting the year it was produced. Which was over 20 years ago now.

I'll tell you what has been debunked for years; the totally bullshit "97% of scientists" number that you lying warmers keep tossing around.

In fact, that lie was debunked before the ink was dry on the hard copies that were being shuttled around to Warmer Central.

 

[sealybobo]

Brace yourselves for the weeping and wailing of the warmers!

Anything that gets people to vote. You republicans are fucking with something young people care about. That abortion and gun violence.

Add to that how many non white voters that are out there.

I hope trumps team comes out with horrible legislation that rallies the greenies

Rbg retiring should be enough

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Considering, that a very large majority do believe in climate change, based on various tests and studies that are evidence based. It's hard to find many deniers who are scientists.
Even those corporations who are paying deniers, have themselves acknowledged Global Warming.
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Shell Knew Fossil Fuels Created Climate Change Risks Back in 1980s, Internal Documents Show
Holding Major Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable for Nearly 40 Years of Climate Deception and Harm

Science isn't a popularity contest. Scientific truths are not determined by majority vote. You have just admitted that you don't understand science.

What's ironic about it?

you accusing someone of not understand science.

Kiwiman doesn't understand it, and neither do you.

you are a joke. You get your science from FoxNews and GOP emails. you have never read a scientific article or journal on the subject. you have never downloaded the data sets and did an analysis on them yourself.

all you do is parrot party talking points.

 

[Flash]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

AGW is nothing but bullcrap and has become a major scam of the Left.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

 

[bripat9643]

More Americans and most Republicans now believe in climate change - CNNPolitics
About 8 in 10 Americans believe the climate is changing, causing extreme weather. Two thirds of Republicans believe the same thing. A majority of Americans (54%) consider it a "very serious" problem, according to a Monmouth University pollreleased Thursday

It's ranked 11th in this list of important issues from a 2018 Gallup poll:

1. Healthcare 80
2. The economy 78
3. Immigration 78
4. Way women are treated in U.S. society 74
5. Gun policy 72
6. Taxes 70
7. Foreign affairs 68
8. Way income and wealth are distributed in the U.S. 68
9. The recent confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court 64
10. U.S. trade and tariff policies 61
11. Climate change 53

 

[bripat9643]

It is about time somebody looked objectively at the data.

It would be nice to screen the real data without all the politically motivated false and manipulated crap like we saw under the Obama administration.

But that is not what is happening. The group is not being put together of open-minded people to look objectively at the data, they are people with the answer already decided that are going to write a report to support it.

You mean exactly like what happened with the previous report?