White House hasn't asked FBI to vet Kavanaugh allegations

There is nothing for the FBI to investigate.

Always taking the males side or the conservative side.

There's no fucking sides, there's the TRUTH and there's EVIL. It's that fucking simple. Lying about a sexual assault for political purposes is ABSOLUTELY FUCKING EVIL and needs to be dealt with accordingly.

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

Was she so drunk before she got there that the date or approximate date was wiped from her memory? Was she in such bad shape that she did not know where she was? She claims to have made her own way home so how did she get there if she did not know where she was?
Is it possible that she may not be remembering anything correctly?
Is it possible that she was so drunk she only thinks it was Kavanaugh and his friend? Perhaps she put names to them after the fact.
Perhaps she was so drunk that she misinterpreted what happened as an attempted rape when it was just someone knocking her onto a bed, or someone tickling her.

She never made any allegations when it happened. She kept silent when he was made a judge. The only thing we have is her word and him and the other person saying no. There have been no other allegations. There has been plenty of those saying it is not in his nature or character.

No but he blacked out and so did his buddy. I'm sure they can locate where the party was, probably close to the prep school the elitists teens went to.


She can't even tell which house it allegedly happened at or when it happened......ask other survivors of sexual assault...they remember everything...
 
Just wanted to straighten out some of the wild speculation by some of you kids that the reason the FBI hasn't launched an inquiry is because there is "no evidence". They haven't so much as made a phone call. And so, we will commence a partisan he said/ she said shit-show on Monday which will come down to well you know, the usual NOTHING.

The White House hasn’t asked the FBI to investigate the allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were in high school, a request required for the bureau to take further action, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The FBI’s initial background investigation into Kavanaugh was completed before Christine Blasey Ford came forward with the allegation.

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have said they want the FBI to investigate the allegation. But FBI background investigations are conducted under specific procedures and through requests from government agencies -- which in Kavanaugh’s case would come from the White House, said the two people who asked not to be identified discussing the sensitive matter.

Further investigation by the FBI could be politically volatile, thrusting the bureau into the middle of a tense battle over the future lineup of the Supreme Court. While there appears to be limited evidence for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to work with, the bureau is accustomed to doing professional background investigations, even when the evidence is thin.​

Continued:

Terms of Service Violation

Why am I not surprised they are dragging their feet. I also want to know why he didn't get married till the age of 39, way too many years between the age of 17 and 39. Was he a monk??
dragging their feet? you mean like having this info in July and waiting til the eve of the nomination kinda feet dragging?

She wasn't going to come forward, no witness, no sense to it, till she was outed.
and what bearing does that have on when feinstein showed this "evidence"? none. whatever happened or didn't happen is now being politicized and weaponized, like all else we do anymore.
 
Sorry, no way to investigate this and even if it is true, and it isn't since she can't even keep her story straight, the statute of limitations would have run out about 2 decades ago........
It doesn't have to be about arresting him; the FBI does background checks and I would think with this allegation that they would WANT to update their background checks on Kavanaugh, at least for the record.
It's true if she can't come up with a year or the place so that others who were there could be questioned, there is almost no way to do this, though. Besides, the others who were there could very well have partied through the whole thing and not known it was happening. In her interview with WaPo, Ford stressed that she took pains not to let on she had been attacked, for some reason.

Isn't it amazing that this man who attempted rape WAY back then...has no other examples of improper sexual conduct over the years since? That he somehow turned himself into the choir boy that he now appears to be?
That is one of many reasons that I am not immediately "buying" her story.

So if there were several women like in Trumps case that would make it more believable??
Your only problem with the Trump case is no one accused him of rape. You might be able to canvas a hundred square mile around that school but with no more then a house with an upstairs to go on you would have too many to go with and even if you had a confirmed location what would that prove? It is still a matter of one accuser and two deniers. No date no idea how drunk she was no real idea how drunk the others were. There is nothing but her word over two others.


And even then, it is still just her and those two guys.......she says she didn't tell anyone, not even BFFs from back then at the time, and didn't say anything for over 30 years..... and then it only came out as a "repressed memory" in psychotherapy....... do you remember the hysteria in the 90s about alleged child abuse exposed by psychotherapy that ended up all being false? They made a movie about the worst case with a day care center that destroyed a family....the psychiatrists even had the kids saying that Chuck Norris was involved...
 
The white house does not need to tell the FBI to do its job. It is up to the FBI to determine what it will or will not investigate.

In this case there is nothing to investigate. There are no places to examine. She doesn't know where it happened. There is no time frame to use in questioning she doesn't remember when it happened. Not even the year. There are no witnesses to question. She knows of only one witness and he says it never happened. What can the FBI possibly investigate?

The Wall Street Journal is right. This is a politically calculated me too ambush.


And as I keep pointing out, she can't state a specific time and place because she doesn't know what Kavanaugh was doing and when he was doing it...as soon as she states a specific time and place, that gives him a chance to prove he wasn't there......and she can't take that chance.......
 
Um, because she told her therapist there were 4 boys there when it happened and her "witness" has no recollection of whatever the fuck she dreamed up.

Your details are murky there Frank. There were 4 boys IN THE HOUSE at the time. Kavanaugh's witness? He was a self-admitted blackout drunk. He remembers very little of that period of his life (wrote at book about it) and no defense attorney in his right mind would put him on the stand.

She has since stated there were only two.


No defense attorney would put her on the stand.......her story has so many holes they wouldn't be able to trust her on cross examination...
 
Not a Federal Crime. Happened when they were minors. Never crossed state lines. OP is an idiot as the poly was BS.
 
Um, because she told her therapist there were 4 boys there when it happened and her "witness" has no recollection of whatever the fuck she dreamed up.

Your details are murky there Frank. There were 4 boys IN THE HOUSE at the time. Kavanaugh's witness? He was a self-admitted blackout drunk. He remembers very little of that period of his life (wrote at book about it) and no defense attorney in his right mind would put him on the stand.

She has since stated there were only two.


No defense attorney would put her on the stand.......her story has so many holes they wouldn't be able to trust her on cross examination...

I believe the plan is already set that she will not show up on Monday for some contrived reason, and the Democrats will demand another delay until she can attend.

Were I Grassley, I believe my response would be "Go to hell".
 
Um, because she told her therapist there were 4 boys there when it happened and her "witness" has no recollection of whatever the fuck she dreamed up.

Your details are murky there Frank. There were 4 boys IN THE HOUSE at the time. Kavanaugh's witness? He was a self-admitted blackout drunk. He remembers very little of that period of his life (wrote at book about it) and no defense attorney in his right mind would put him on the stand.

She has since stated there were only two.


No defense attorney would put her on the stand.......her story has so many holes they wouldn't be able to trust her on cross examination...

I believe the plan is already set that she will not show up on Monday for some contrived reason, and the Democrats will demand another delay until she can attend.

Were I Grassley, I believe my response would be "Go to hell".


I will take that bet......right now they are scouring the world for another accuser.......but I think she will show up...

The bad part for bill clinton....I just posted an article about the Juanita Broderick rape allegation against him.......you can see the two allegations and which is more credible.....Fords, or Broadericks.....and they keep marching bill clinton out as a democrat hero....
 
Question. Why would the FBI investigate a high school issue from four decades ago? Was it a federal crime then? One more question. You do know Vetting is done by people on your side in an effort to dig up dirt that the opposition might find.
 
Just wanted to straighten out some of the wild speculation by some of you kids that the reason the FBI hasn't launched an inquiry is because there is "no evidence". They haven't so much as made a phone call. And so, we will commence a partisan he said/ she said shit-show on Monday which will come down to well you know, the usual NOTHING.

The White House hasn’t asked the FBI to investigate the allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were in high school, a request required for the bureau to take further action, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The FBI’s initial background investigation into Kavanaugh was completed before Christine Blasey Ford came forward with the allegation.

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have said they want the FBI to investigate the allegation. But FBI background investigations are conducted under specific procedures and through requests from government agencies -- which in Kavanaugh’s case would come from the White House, said the two people who asked not to be identified discussing the sensitive matter.

Further investigation by the FBI could be politically volatile, thrusting the bureau into the middle of a tense battle over the future lineup of the Supreme Court. While there appears to be limited evidence for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to work with, the bureau is accustomed to doing professional background investigations, even when the evidence is thin.​

Continued:

Terms of Service Violation


Sorry, no way to investigate this and even if it is true, and it isn't since she can't even keep her story straight, the statute of limitations would have run out about 2 decades ago........
It doesn't have to be about arresting him; the FBI does background checks and I would think with this allegation that they would WANT to update their background checks on Kavanaugh, at least for the record.
It's true if she can't come up with a year or the place so that others who were there could be questioned, there is almost no way to do this, though. Besides, the others who were there could very well have partied through the whole thing and not known it was happening. In her interview with WaPo, Ford stressed that she took pains not to let on she had been attacked, for some reason.

Isn't it amazing that this man who attempted rape WAY back then...has no other examples of improper sexual conduct over the years since? That he somehow turned himself into the choir boy that he now appears to be?
That is one of many reasons that I am not immediately "buying" her story.

So if there were several women like in Trumps case that would make it more believable??

Much more believable. But there don't seem to be more.
 
Sorry, no way to investigate this and even if it is true, and it isn't since she can't even keep her story straight, the statute of limitations would have run out about 2 decades ago........
It doesn't have to be about arresting him; the FBI does background checks and I would think with this allegation that they would WANT to update their background checks on Kavanaugh, at least for the record.
It's true if she can't come up with a year or the place so that others who were there could be questioned, there is almost no way to do this, though. Besides, the others who were there could very well have partied through the whole thing and not known it was happening. In her interview with WaPo, Ford stressed that she took pains not to let on she had been attacked, for some reason.

Isn't it amazing that this man who attempted rape WAY back then...has no other examples of improper sexual conduct over the years since? That he somehow turned himself into the choir boy that he now appears to be?
That is one of many reasons that I am not immediately "buying" her story.

So if there were several women like in Trumps case that would make it more believable??

Much more believable. But there don't seem to be more.

You mean like the women who immediately disappear following an election?
 
It doesn't have to be about arresting him; the FBI does background checks and I would think with this allegation that they would WANT to update their background checks on Kavanaugh, at least for the record.
It's true if she can't come up with a year or the place so that others who were there could be questioned, there is almost no way to do this, though. Besides, the others who were there could very well have partied through the whole thing and not known it was happening. In her interview with WaPo, Ford stressed that she took pains not to let on she had been attacked, for some reason.

Isn't it amazing that this man who attempted rape WAY back then...has no other examples of improper sexual conduct over the years since? That he somehow turned himself into the choir boy that he now appears to be?
That is one of many reasons that I am not immediately "buying" her story.

So if there were several women like in Trumps case that would make it more believable??

Much more believable. But there don't seem to be more.

You mean like the women who immediately disappear following an election?

Whatever happened to those women, Billy? LOL
 
Isn't it amazing that this man who attempted rape WAY back then...has no other examples of improper sexual conduct over the years since? That he somehow turned himself into the choir boy that he now appears to be?
That is one of many reasons that I am not immediately "buying" her story.

So if there were several women like in Trumps case that would make it more believable??

Much more believable. But there don't seem to be more.

You mean like the women who immediately disappear following an election?

Whatever happened to those women, Billy? LOL

They cashed the checks they'd been given and went back to their own meaningless horrors of life.
 
I think I recognized a few of them when the Capital Police started tossing disruptive protestors out of the confirmation hearings, Billy!
 
The FBI investigates Federal crimes.

What Federal crime is being alleged?

Is a high school guy feeling up a drunk high school girl a Federal crime now?
 
Would you trust the current FBI to investigate the theft of even a used condom?
The rank and file FBI? Yeah, I would, Henry! I think for the most part they are honorable men and women. The people that I don't trust are the higher ups at the FBI. They've shown themselves to be biased and political...two things that the FBI should never be!
 
Trump just said on TV that "investigation" is NOT the job of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

No, really, he just said that. I know it sounds incredibly stupid, but that is what he said.

He said they wouldn't handle this investigation because it's not their job.

Investigation is the NOT the job of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

And someone said he was capable of reading the constitution.
 
Not a Federal Crime. Happened when they were minors. Never crossed state lines. OP is an idiot as the poly was BS.
There is no crime at all. There never was a crime. The FBI is charged with doing background checks on judicial nominees. They have done six on Kav already.
 

Forum List

Back
Top