Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link to it, asshole.No asshole. I just don't believe what anyone types without a source.So Linky Linkyerson ? Lee is just a lying, incompetent redneck hick ?
You are not special.
You refuse to link to anything, so EVERYTHING you type is especially suspect.
Why yes. Nothing on the chief's statement.
His mother said she recognized her son's voice as the one yelling. I do believe her. I am having a hard time getting past that ...
Are you claiming a dead guy faked the video?So, is it still the non-white white guy's fault?
Not any more, apparently.
MSNBC HOST BLAMES LIMBAUGH, GINGRICH, SANTORUM FOR TRAYVON MARTIN DEATH
Ed Schultz blames Bush for Trayvon Martin's death | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner
Leftists are retarded. No question.
Breitbart.com...
OOPSY is one of those people who thinks if he says something, it's true.Link to it, asshole.No asshole. I just don't believe what anyone types without a source.
You are not special.
You refuse to link to anything, so EVERYTHING you type is especially suspect.
Why yes. Nothing on the chief's statement.
It stands as a lie until you do.
You have zero cred with anyone because of that.
I realize it's politically incorrect and all, but still:
is it possible that Zimmerman isn't guilty of any crime?
I only ask because I believe that, collectively, we know pretty much jack shit about what transpired.
It is certainly possible that he over-reacted. But given how little any of us actually know, it is also possible that there was more to this story than we have seen, and the difference between the way we have gotten the "story" and reality could mean that the neighborhood watch guy is not guilty of anything.
The death of that kid is a tragedy either way. But a tragic outcome is not, alone, proof of guilt.
Or, he had injuries consistent with receiving them from someone who was fighting for his life.Looks like you're right.Good luck getting one from him. I've asked, too.
Mr. Zimmermans claim is that the confrontation was initiated by Trayvon. I am not going into specifics of what led to the violent physical encounter witnessed by residents. All the physical evidence and testimony we have independent of what Mr. Zimmerman provides corroborates this claim to self-defense.
To claim self-defense, someone has to show there was danger of great bodily harm or death.
Zimmerman had injuries consistent with his story,
Bill Lee, Sanford Police Chief
I realize it's politically incorrect and all, but still:
is it possible that Zimmerman isn't guilty of any crime?
I only ask because I believe that, collectively, we know pretty much jack shit about what transpired.
It is certainly possible that he over-reacted. But given how little any of us actually know, it is also possible that there was more to this story than we have seen, and the difference between the way we have gotten the "story" and reality could mean that the neighborhood watch guy is not guilty of anything.
The death of that kid is a tragedy either way. But a tragic outcome is not, alone, proof of guilt.
Yes, it is possible, but the problem is it wasn't investigated. People that are killed deserve better than what the Sanford Police Department gave the Martins.
Better take Ravi's word for it here. She attended classes in Florida where she watched reruns of Marcus Welby M.D. for two consecutive semesters.Or, he had injuries consistent with receiving them from someone who was fighting for his life.Looks like you're right.
Mr. Zimmermans claim is that the confrontation was initiated by Trayvon. I am not going into specifics of what led to the violent physical encounter witnessed by residents. All the physical evidence and testimony we have independent of what Mr. Zimmerman provides corroborates this claim to self-defense.
To claim self-defense, someone has to show there was danger of great bodily harm or death.
Zimmerman had injuries consistent with his story,
Bill Lee, Sanford Police Chief
Link to it, asshole.No asshole. I just don't believe what anyone types without a source.
You are not special.
You refuse to link to anything, so EVERYTHING you type is especially suspect.
Why yes. Nothing on the chief's statement.
It stands as a lie until you do.
You have zero cred with anyone because of that.
Or, he had injuries consistent with receiving them from someone who was fighting for his life.Looks like you're right.
Mr. Zimmermans claim is that the confrontation was initiated by Trayvon. I am not going into specifics of what led to the violent physical encounter witnessed by residents. All the physical evidence and testimony we have independent of what Mr. Zimmerman provides corroborates this claim to self-defense.
To claim self-defense, someone has to show there was danger of great bodily harm or death.
Zimmerman had injuries consistent with his story,
Bill Lee, Sanford Police Chief
Yes, it is possible, but the problem is it wasn't investigated.
Ravi's Nancy Grace Expert Rating Drops
I realize it's politically incorrect and all, but still:
is it possible that Zimmerman isn't guilty of any crime?
I only ask because I believe that, collectively, we know pretty much jack shit about what transpired.
It is certainly possible that he over-reacted. But given how little any of us actually know, it is also possible that there was more to this story than we have seen, and the difference between the way we have gotten the "story" and reality could mean that the neighborhood watch guy is not guilty of anything.
The death of that kid is a tragedy either way. But a tragic outcome is not, alone, proof of guilt.
Yes, it is possible, but the problem is it wasn't investigated. People that are killed deserve better than what the Sanford Police Department gave the Martins.
It was investigated. Some people say poorly, but all sane people agree - it was investigated.
see?
From your link:Link to it, asshole.Why yes. Nothing on the chief's statement.
It stands as a lie until you do.
You have zero cred with anyone because of that.
Link to what ?
I just linked to the miami herald (no bastian of conservatism) quoting the chief that zim had evidence and testimony to support threat great bodily harm or death
That doesn't sound like a police officer relying on the evidence. It's a good thing he stepped down.If someone asks you, Hey do you live here? is it OK for you to jump on them and beat the crap out of somebody? Lee said. Its not.
No one knows, since they dropped the investigation. At this point, the evidence has probably been destroyed.Or, he had injuries consistent with receiving them from someone who was fighting for his life.Mr. Zimmermans claim is that the confrontation was initiated by Trayvon. I am not going into specifics of what led to the violent physical encounter witnessed by residents. All the physical evidence and testimony we have independent of what Mr. Zimmerman provides corroborates this claim to self-defense.
To claim self-defense, someone has to show there was danger of great bodily harm or death.
Zimmerman had injuries consistent with his story,
Bill Lee, Sanford Police Chief
He did not have any defensive injuries and zimmerman no offensive injuries ?
I've never run into him before, so now I know it's just another poster who has no cred.OOPSY is one of those people who thinks if he says something, it's true.Link to it, asshole.Why yes. Nothing on the chief's statement.
It stands as a lie until you do.
You have zero cred with anyone because of that.
Leftists have a remarkable capacity for self-deception. It's because they're stupid and gullible at the same time.
I want to know who it was that was screaming help.
If it was Trayvon, Zimmerman needs to pay for it.
If it is the other way around.... wow, what more evidence do ya need for self defense?
I hope we get to the bottom of it ASAP though.
No interview of Zimmerman at the station the night of the attack and they didn't hold on to his clothing or give him a gunshot residue test. Ravi's right, no investigation took place.
this is too funny, dman is mixing up the oopas....just goes to show you what a knee jerker he really is.I've never run into him before, so now I know it's just another poster who has no cred.OOPSY is one of those people who thinks if he says something, it's true.Link to it, asshole.
It stands as a lie until you do.
You have zero cred with anyone because of that.
Leftists have a remarkable capacity for self-deception. It's because they're stupid and gullible at the same time.
Lots of them here.....
