Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think this guy got as much press as any similar white guy shooting:
Washington Navy Yard shooting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I think this guy got as much press as any similar white guy shooting:
Washington Navy Yard shooting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This was at the Navy Yard - that is why the publicity. If a black thug kills three other black thugs, it won't make national news. If a white guy kills two blacks it is a hate crime pasted all over the nation. You are not being real if you don't acknowledge the disparity.
I think this guy got as much press as any similar white guy shooting:
Washington Navy Yard shooting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This was at the Navy Yard - that is why the publicity. If a black thug kills three other black thugs, it won't make national news. If a white guy kills two blacks it is a hate crime pasted all over the nation. You are not being real if you don't acknowledge the disparity.
I think this guy got as much press as any similar white guy shooting:
Washington Navy Yard shooting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This was at the Navy Yard - that is why the publicity. If a black thug kills three other black thugs, it won't make national news. If a white guy kills two blacks it is a hate crime pasted all over the nation. You are not being real if you don't acknowledge the disparity.
Dude, you are really stretching it.
The simple fact is that white men do far more of this kind of shit than other gender ethnicities.
I don't know why, but my guess is that white men just have a genetic predisposition for killing people up close and personal.
One theory regarding the origin of the word 'Aryan' was that it meant something along the lines of 'ones like us we should not kill on sight'.
While it is not likely true, recent centuries would suggest it plausible.
That would be my guess.
However, its not simply mass shooting that get all the media attention. There are MANY cases with a single vic that get insane amounts of coverage. Why is this not reciprocal.
This question is actually a rather interesting one even of you disagree with the purpose of the OP. it represents a schism in our culture when a black man kills another black man and gets virtually no coverage but a 'white man' (as originally reported) killed TM and the media goes bananas. This happens all the time in inner city ghettos. Why is it not newsworthy then?
Why the difference? I think that answering that question would bring some major incite into racial issues within the nation and Americans. It is a rather difficult one to answer though.
Is it because we expect such from blacks and not from whites? Possibly. Does that not reveal a key prejudice thought the nation? Sure does but that might not be true at all. I just don't know why there seems to be a difference. then again, it might simply be a perception that is not real. I doubt that answer though as the murder occurrences is almost flat between whites and blacks but I certainly do not recall as much attention given to black perpetrators as white ones.
Perhaps it is socio economic.
Do you have an example of a single victim white guy shooting that got lots of press? I can't think of one. Only one that comes to mind is the Oscar Pistorius shooting, but that is more because he's slightly famous. This guy getting a lot of press too:
'Shield' Actor Michael Jace Charged With Murder In The Shooting Of His Wife
I think the situation of the killing is important. If it's a bad guy killing a bad guy it doesn't seem so bad. When it is a bad guy killing some innocent person it's more news. You get the news when something happens and many people think that could have been them. If people are getting shot because of gang violence most people don't relate to it.
The purpose of this op is precisely to answer this - why the disparity? The answer is politics; quest for power to force their agenda! It is politically unfavorable to mention blacks in bad light - no matter how truthful, and the reverse for whites. It is all about making the blacks think that liberals are on their side when in fact the only thing liberals care about regarding blacks are their votes!That would be my guess.
However, its not simply mass shooting that get all the media attention. There are MANY cases with a single vic that get insane amounts of coverage. Why is this not reciprocal.
This question is actually a rather interesting one even of you disagree with the purpose of the OP. it represents a schism in our culture when a black man kills another black man and gets virtually no coverage but a 'white man' (as originally reported) killed TM and the media goes bananas. This happens all the time in inner city ghettos. Why is it not newsworthy then?
Why the difference? I think that answering that question would bring some major incite into racial issues within the nation and Americans. It is a rather difficult one to answer though.
Is it because we expect such from blacks and not from whites? Possibly. Does that not reveal a key prejudice thought the nation? Sure does but that might not be true at all. I just don't know why there seems to be a difference. then again, it might simply be a perception that is not real. I doubt that answer though as the murder occurrences is almost flat between whites and blacks but I certainly do not recall as much attention given to black perpetrators as white ones.
Perhaps it is socio economic.
However, its not simply mass shooting that get all the media attention. There are MANY cases with a single vic that get insane amounts of coverage. Why is this not reciprocal.
This question is actually a rather interesting one even of you disagree with the purpose of the OP. it represents a schism in our culture when a black man kills another black man and gets virtually no coverage but a 'white man' (as originally reported) killed TM and the media goes bananas. This happens all the time in inner city ghettos. Why is it not newsworthy then?
Why the difference? I think that answering that question would bring some major incite into racial issues within the nation and Americans. It is a rather difficult one to answer though.
Is it because we expect such from blacks and not from whites? Possibly. Does that not reveal a key prejudice thought the nation? Sure does but that might not be true at all. I just don't know why there seems to be a difference. then again, it might simply be a perception that is not real. I doubt that answer though as the murder occurrences is almost flat between whites and blacks but I certainly do not recall as much attention given to black perpetrators as white ones.
Perhaps it is socio economic.
Do you have an example of a single victim white guy shooting that got lots of press? I can't think of one. Only one that comes to mind is the Oscar Pistorius shooting, but that is more because he's slightly famous. This guy getting a lot of press too:
'Shield' Actor Michael Jace Charged With Murder In The Shooting Of His Wife
I think the situation of the killing is important. If it's a bad guy killing a bad guy it doesn't seem so bad. When it is a bad guy killing some innocent person it's more news. You get the news when something happens and many people think that could have been them. If people are getting shot because of gang violence most people don't relate to it.
I find the reference to a 'bad guy killing another bad guy' interesting. I think you are wrong though but close. I don't think it has anything to do with 'bad' guys. I think it might very well have something to do with POOR guy.
A poor guy killing another poor guy is not really news worthy. I would venture to guess that a 'thug' killing a middle class American or the other way around is much more likely to get coverage not only because it is unexpected but the audience that is the target (IMHO middle class Americans actually watch the news whereas the poor are far less likely to) connects to it much better and cares more. Going back to TM, that is a neighborhood that we all can relate to. The ghettos are another animal altogether. An animal that much of the middle class would prefer to ignore.
That would explain much of the disparity in coverage considering the socio economic realities and that the black community sees much of its crime in poor neighborhoods rather than middle class ones. As you related this to white thugs killing other white thugs - no one really reports when a shooting or murder happens in the trailer homes. no one really cares. I think it is a fallacy to assume that both parties are 'thugs' though. There are a LOT of people that are poor and are NOT criminals. The vast majority are not criminals.
As I stated earlier, I have a suspicion that this is more related to socio economics than race.
This was at the Navy Yard - that is why the publicity. If a black thug kills three other black thugs, it won't make national news. If a white guy kills two blacks it is a hate crime pasted all over the nation. You are not being real if you don't acknowledge the disparity.
Dude, you are really stretching it.
The simple fact is that white men do far more of this kind of shit than other gender ethnicities.
I don't know why, but my guess is that white men just have a genetic predisposition for killing people up close and personal.
One theory regarding the origin of the word 'Aryan' was that it meant something along the lines of 'ones like us we should not kill on sight'.
While it is not likely true, recent centuries would suggest it plausible.
Black men are FIVE times (yes FIVE) more likely to murder than whites. They currently represent approximately HALF of all murders while accounting for LESS THAN 20 percent of the population.
So, no, whites are not more likely to do this kind of shit rather than blacks. It is FAR more the opposite. That is simple fact.
FBI ? Table 43
The number of black men murdering actually outnumbers whites when they are a much smaller demographic.
The idea that whites are 'more likely' to do this 'crap' is not supported by any actual fact.
Dude, you are really stretching it.
The simple fact is that white men do far more of this kind of shit than other gender ethnicities.
I don't know why, but my guess is that white men just have a genetic predisposition for killing people up close and personal.
One theory regarding the origin of the word 'Aryan' was that it meant something along the lines of 'ones like us we should not kill on sight'.
While it is not likely true, recent centuries would suggest it plausible.
Black men are FIVE times (yes FIVE) more likely to murder than whites. They currently represent approximately HALF of all murders while accounting for LESS THAN 20 percent of the population.
So, no, whites are not more likely to do this kind of shit rather than blacks. It is FAR more the opposite. That is simple fact.
FBI ? Table 43
The number of black men murdering actually outnumbers whites when they are a much smaller demographic.
The idea that whites are 'more likely' to do this 'crap' is not supported by any actual fact.
Lol, dude, you are only counting the people who get CAUGHT, and you are not counting those who kill legally in the military.
White men have killed far more people on average than any other race-gender in human history and that is simply a FACT.
It's because of the limitless power of the black and hispanic people's monopoly on media, government, and religion.
We should be outraged.
Is this your attempt to deflect?
It is a rather pathetic one to say the least.
Well it's a pretty pathetic thread
Whites kill less then our share of the population...Blacks on the otherhand kill nearly 5 times that. When blacks and whites kill almost the same raw number...Well, something is seriously fucked up.
Yet, whites are the most dangerous within the fable leftist mind? LOL
Dude, you are really stretching it.
The simple fact is that white men do far more of this kind of shit than other gender ethnicities.
I don't know why, but my guess is that white men just have a genetic predisposition for killing people up close and personal.
One theory regarding the origin of the word 'Aryan' was that it meant something along the lines of 'ones like us we should not kill on sight'.
While it is not likely true, recent centuries would suggest it plausible.
Black men are FIVE times (yes FIVE) more likely to murder than whites. They currently represent approximately HALF of all murders while accounting for LESS THAN 20 percent of the population.
So, no, whites are not more likely to do this kind of shit rather than blacks. It is FAR more the opposite. That is simple fact.
FBI ? Table 43
The number of black men murdering actually outnumbers whites when they are a much smaller demographic.
The idea that whites are 'more likely' to do this 'crap' is not supported by any actual fact.
Lol, dude, you are only counting the people who get CAUGHT, and you are not counting those who kill legally in the military.
White men have killed far more people on average than any other race-gender in human history and that is simply a FACT.
Never heard of the "con" party.Pointing out the flaws of black people has been a pretty good strategy for the con party over the last few decades
But I have heard blacks are more violent than whites. We even had a black here on the board telling us that when they hear something that pisses them off, they just simply can't control themselves, they have to get violent because they have no choice. Must be true.
Do you think that that one "Black" represents all of "the Blacks"?
Because the majority of the suburban white audience in general doesn't care about poor black people dying one way or another.Why is it that when a white deranged person kills it is national news, but when there are blacks massacring each other it doesn't get the coverage?
Violent holiday weekend claims at least 10 lives in Chicago - U.S. News
Black men are FIVE times (yes FIVE) more likely to murder than whites. They currently represent approximately HALF of all murders while accounting for LESS THAN 20 percent of the population.
So, no, whites are not more likely to do this kind of shit rather than blacks. It is FAR more the opposite. That is simple fact.
FBI ? Table 43
The number of black men murdering actually outnumbers whites when they are a much smaller demographic.
The idea that whites are 'more likely' to do this 'crap' is not supported by any actual fact.
Lol, dude, you are only counting the people who get CAUGHT, and you are not counting those who kill legally in the military.
White men have killed far more people on average than any other race-gender in human history and that is simply a FACT.
Now you want to count military? Should we count the massacres thought Africa as well? You do know that black people serve in the military as well, right? The rates are actually quite close to the racial makeup of the nation as a whole (with the ratio of blacks to whites being slightly HIGHER). I guess you don't count those blacks though? Just white soldiers are 'genetically wired' killers.
No, you have not posted actual numbers (as I have) because you have nothing but asinine and incorrect statements. Nothing to back up your racist claims. Not that it is very surprising - bigots and racists tend to not care about reality or data. It usually does not support their bigotry. Go on believing that white people have a 'genetic predisposition for killing people' (your exact words) but don't be surprised when you are written off for being a raving racist lunatic.
Because the majority of the suburban white audience in general doesn't care about poor black people dying one way or another.Why is it that when a white deranged person kills it is national news, but when there are blacks massacring each other it doesn't get the coverage?
Violent holiday weekend claims at least 10 lives in Chicago - U.S. News
Black men are FIVE times (yes FIVE) more likely to murder than whites. They currently represent approximately HALF of all murders while accounting for LESS THAN 20 percent of the population.
So, no, whites are not more likely to do this kind of shit rather than blacks. It is FAR more the opposite. That is simple fact.
FBI ? Table 43
The number of black men murdering actually outnumbers whites when they are a much smaller demographic.
The idea that whites are 'more likely' to do this 'crap' is not supported by any actual fact.
Lol, dude, you are only counting the people who get CAUGHT, and you are not counting those who kill legally in the military.
White men have killed far more people on average than any other race-gender in human history and that is simply a FACT.
Really, look up a few men named po-pot and mao.
Is this your attempt to deflect?
It is a rather pathetic one to say the least.
Well it's a pretty pathetic thread
Why's that? Because it points out a standard in journalistic hypocrisy?
Major daily newspapers and electronic media outlets that are left wing biased do not want to acknowledge the fact that every day there is carnage on the streets of every major city across the US being perpetrated by people who are members of PC protected classes.
So when inner city minority people kill each other the main stream media decides that these murders are NOT news.
Truth is truth. Telling it does not make you a racist.
