Who Am I Supposed To Follow????

C'mon.......you're selling Biden short.




ā€œI think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect,ā€ responded to question about his academic credentials during his first White House bid in 1987. ā€œI went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my class to have a full academic scholarship. In the first year in law school I decided I didnā€™t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom two-thirds in my class, then I decided I wanted to stay, went back to law school and, in fact, ended up in the top half of my class. I won the International Moot Court Competition, I was the ā€˜Outstanding Studentā€™ in the Political Science department at the end of my year. I graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and 165 credits, only needed 123 credits, and Iā€™d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours, if youā€™d like, frankly.ā€

As you can see, Joe Biden has always had the fire in his belly for politics. The only problem with the above response is none of it was true.

Aside from the face that thereā€™s fuzzy math involved in saying you moved from the bottom two-thirds of you class to the top half (thereā€™s a lot of overlap there for both to be true simultaneously), Joe Biden graduated 76th out of 85 people in his law school class. Unless he didnā€™t attend his last year, the only time he was likely near the top half of his class was the first day of his first year.

Moreover, he didnā€™t get an academic scholarship, he received a needs-based scholarship and grants. He only has two undergraduate degrees, not three. And he was only nominated for the ā€œOutstanding Studentā€ award. He didnā€™t win it, and thatā€™s only allegedly because the ā€œcorrectionā€ he issued later was based on his obviously faulty memory of his own life.

The only part of his rant that may be true is the unverified claim that heā€™d won the International Moot Court competition. The New York Times reported back in 1987 that Biden told them ā€œhe had won such a competition, with a partner, in Kingston, Ontario, on Dec. 12, 1967.ā€ How he remembered the exact date while forgetting seemingly everything else about his life remains a mystery.

How did he explain these lies back then? His excuse is one for the books. ā€œI exaggerate when I'm angry,ā€ Biden told the Times. Hilariously, he concluded that statement with, ''but I've never gone around telling people things that aren't true about me.ā€

Joe Biden has always had a strange, tenuous grasp on reality. Heā€™s known for gaffes and goofs. Itā€™s part of his ā€œcharm,ā€ actually. When he was just the Senator from Delaware or a powerless second-fiddle and couldnā€™t do much harm, who cared? Now that there is even the remote possibility he could be the Democratic Partyā€™s nominee for president it is downright terrifying.



His legislative record is from a time when Democrats supported bills that were tough on crime, opposed the legalization of drugs, opposed illegal immigration, were against reparations for slavery, and seemed to not hold the country in so much contempt. Heā€™s going to have to run by denouncing and denying everything heā€™s ever been.

Joe Biden has demonstrated clearly that he has no problem doing that, itā€™s just a question of whether or not the ā€œwokeā€ crowd that demands ā€œpurity of pastā€ is willing to accept it. Joe Biden Is In For A Rude A-WOKEning
What Joe Bidenā€™s (Non-)Apology to Anita Hill Reveals About Him




How about this?


Biden: I never said I oppose frackingā€¦..show the tape!!!!




At 7:20 of the vid:

Bernie: Iā€™m talking about stopping frackingā€¦

Biden: So am I!



I guarantee weā€™re gonna end fossil fuel





Now.....if you've got the time.....Joe's got the lies:

Biden said in the September 12, 2019 debate: "We didn't lock people up in cages. We didn't separate families. We didn't do all of those things, number one. They did"
  • Not true, all those pictures you saw of the cages were taken in 2014 during his time in office.
Joe Biden has repeatedly said he was arrested with Nelson Mandela on the streets of Soweto during a trip to South Africa in the 1970s, when South Africa was under apartheid.
  • There is absolutely no truth to this, as Biden was later forced to confess
Biden said on May 22, 2020 in an interview on The Breakfast Club radio show: ā€œThe NAACP has endorsed me every time I've run.ā€
  • Not true. The NAACP has never endorsed any candidate
On September 3, 2019 in an NPR interview, referring to the Iraq War, "immediately, the moment it started, I came out against the war at that moment."
  • Not true. Biden fully supported the Iraq war and voted for the resolution to go to war
On August 7, 2019 ā€“ Joe Biden claimed that Donald Trump "asserted that immigrants would quote, ā€˜carve you up with a knifeā€™."
  • He never said that about immigrants. He said that MS-13 Gang members were doing that
In a famous video confrontation with a critic, Joe Biden shouted: "I went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my class who had a full academic scholarship. The first year in law school, I decided I didnā€™t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom two-thirds of my class. And then decided I wanted to stay, went back to law school and, in fact, ended up in the top half of my class. I graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school."
  • Every single word, every one of those claims is false.
He was caught cheating in school exams, got caught cheating and plagiarizing in Law School and in his political career their was this huge plagiarism scandal:

One of his greatest lies is that on Charlottesville, President Trump said there were good people on the Nazis/White Nationalists side. He said just the opposite. Here are the actual quotes:
"you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.....Iā€™m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.
Another quote from PresidentTrump's Charlottesville press conference:
ā€œRacism is evil, and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.ā€
Biden continues to repeat this lie. Here is video of a reporter confronting him about it:

Biden has a long history of lying. Here are reports from the 90's by ABC News and CBS News on Biden getting caught lying over and over
I wonder what The Bidens got Corn Pop fir Christmas.
Keeping in mind that they are Charity cheapskates.
 
Democrats like Biden don't realize you can't win wars unless you put boots on the ground.
 
This is the very reason we must pity the poor Democrat Party.....they have supporters like this imbecile who cannot keep up with the reversal of the party propaganda.


Now, even Liberals admit that Clinton is a rapist, but this fool is still fighting a war he lost already.


Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm



And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time
Plus there is video out with Joe acting really creepy.
Sneaking up behind gals and smelling their hair.
I sometimes wonder if he learn't that from Corn Pop.
While playing soothing Barry White tunes at Our White House.
Maybe Joe has the ourfits.A couple Nehru jackets.Plenty of leisure suits.
Maybe even a pair of Huggy Bear { Starksy & Hutch } High Pimp shoes.
 
I wonder what The Bidens got Corn Pop fir Christmas.
Keeping in mind that they are Charity cheapskates.
All Leftists....

In his book "Intellectuals," Paul Johnson quotes Pablo Picasso scoffing at the idea that he would give to the needy. "I'm afraid you've got it wrong," Picasso explains, "we are socialists. We don't pretend to be Christians."



Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders donated just over 1% of his total income last year, and Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren donated 5.5% according to her tax information.ā€ UVa Student Asks Beto Why He Gave Less To Charity Than A College Student

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) released 15 years of tax returns on Sunday, showing that she and her husband earned $1.9 million last year and gave $27,000 to charity ā€” or 1.4 percent. Harris reported no charitable giving at all during her first three years as Californiaā€™s attorney general.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and her husband donated $6,600 of their $338,500 income to charity last year, or just under 2 percent
,

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and her husband made $215,000 last year and gave $3,750 to charity, also just under 2 percent.

When Mitt Romney finally relented under pressure and released his tax returns in 2012, they showed that he and his wife had given away $4 million out of the $13.7 million they took in during the previous year, or 29.4 percent.
Romney didnā€™t even deduct $1.8 million of donations that year so that he could live up to his statement that heā€™d always paid an effective tax rate of at least 13 percent. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...85bd448/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f47f35fb184e







Looking at the ten-year total of Bidenā€™s giving, one percent would have been $24,500. One half of one percent would have been $12,250. One quarter of one percent would have been $6,125. And one eighth of one percent would have been $3,062 ā€” just below what Biden actually contributed.

ā€œThe average American household gives about two percent of adjusted gross income,ā€ says Arthur Brooks, the Syracuse University scholar, soon to take over as head of the American Enterprise Institute, who has done extensive research on American giving. ā€œOn average, [Biden] is not giving more than one tenth as much as the average American household, and that is evidence that he doesnā€™t share charitable values with the average American.ā€

Byron York 9/15/08 NR



Although liberal familiesā€™ incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227). http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html



Obama and his wife, Michelle, earned $181,507 to $272,759 each year from 1998-2004.

Their income jumped to $1.6 million in 2005, Obama's first year in the Senate, with the rerelease of his first book, ā€œDreams from My Father.ā€ They made nearly $1 million in 2006, half of it from his second book, ā€œThe Audacity of Hope.ā€

The Obamas' charitable giving also increased with their newfound wealth.

From 1998-2004, they gave between $1,050-$3,400 each year. In 2005, they gave $77,315, including donations to literacy and anti-poverty campaigns and their church. In 2006, they gave $60,307 to charity.



Up until recent years when their income increased sharply from book revenues and a Senate salary, Obama's family donated a relatively minor amount of its earnings to charity. From 2000 through 2004, the senator and his wife never gave more than $3,500 a year in charitable donations -- about 1 percent of their annual earnings.(Sam Stein Huffington Post) Obama Tax Returns: Low On Story Lines And Charity Donations



According to their tax returns, in 2006 and 2007, the Obamas gave 5.8 percent and 6.1 percent of their income to charity. I guess Michelle Obama has to draw the line someplace with all this "giving back" stuff. The Bidens gave 0.15 percent and 0.31 percent of the income to charity.

No wonder Obama doesn't see what the big fuss is over his decision to limit tax deductions for charitable giving. At least that part of Obama's tax plan won't affect his supporters.

Meanwhile, in 1991, 1992 and 1993, George W. Bush had incomes of $179,591, $212,313 and $610,772. His charitable contributions those years were $28,236, $31,914 and $31,292. During his presidency, Bush gave away more than 10 percent of his income each year.

For purposes of comparison, in 2005, Barack Obama made $1.7 million -- more than twice President Bush's 2005 income of $735,180 -- but they both gave about the same amount to charity.

That same year, the heartless Halliburton employee Vice President Dick Cheney gave 77 percent of his income to charity. The following year, in 2006, Bush gave more to charity than Obama on an income one-third smaller than Obama's. Maybe when Obama talks about "change" he's referring to his charitable contributions.

Liberals have no intention of actually parting with any of their own wealth or lifting a finger to help the poor. That's for other people to do with what's left of their incomes after the government has taken its increasingly large cut.

" Ann Coulter Are ā€˜hopeā€™ And ā€˜changeā€™ Still Tax-deductible? - Ann Coulter



The convenient clichƩ propagated by many people is that those who truly care about the needy will be supportive of new or expanded government programs. Those who oppose this approach of throwing endlessly increasing sums of money at social programs are commonly labeled as heartless and lacking in compassion. That is not only a false label but it shows a lack of knowledge about American history as well as a lack of understanding about how the incentives created by many large government programs are fundamentally flawed.



Coerced "charity" via government taxation has several corrosive effects:

 
Democrats like Biden don't realize you can't win wars unless you put boots on the ground.
You mean Blankets,helmuts and K-Rations { MTE's } don't much matter.
Liike Biden's word.About as solid as a 4 leaf clover during a Florida Hurricane.
I Take that back.Even a Four leaf clover could weather a hurricane.
But nor if Biden is within a country mile.
Some guys are like that.Just being near them causes instant Bad Luck.
Or Bad Karma.
 
If Sir Thomas Browne { english physician,writer } 1605-1682
In his query was onto something.
" Natura nihil agit frustar { Nature does nothing in vain }
is the only undisputed Axiome in philosophy."
Begging use of a more current axiome.That being a Leftist is
more than a self-evident Lie in the face of humanity but also
the most unchaste example of Pimping-out.

 
So then Biden virtually running as a MODERATE pledging
UNITY isn''t the Biggest Liar in Presidential History.
Name a Potus who lied so cavalierly.
He didn't pledge unity, he wanted to work both sides of the aisle. The sheeple in The Congress are too scared of trump to vote for anything the Democrats put forth, no matter how it will benefit all of the people and the future of their posterity.
 
All Leftists....

In his book "Intellectuals," Paul Johnson quotes Pablo Picasso scoffing at the idea that he would give to the needy. "I'm afraid you've got it wrong," Picasso explains, "we are socialists. We don't pretend to be Christians."



Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders donated just over 1% of his total income last year, and Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren donated 5.5% according to her tax information.ā€ UVa Student Asks Beto Why He Gave Less To Charity Than A College Student

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) released 15 years of tax returns on Sunday, showing that she and her husband earned $1.9 million last year and gave $27,000 to charity ā€” or 1.4 percent. Harris reported no charitable giving at all during her first three years as Californiaā€™s attorney general.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and her husband donated $6,600 of their $338,500 income to charity last year, or just under 2 percent
,

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and her husband made $215,000 last year and gave $3,750 to charity, also just under 2 percent.

When Mitt Romney finally relented under pressure and released his tax returns in 2012, they showed that he and his wife had given away $4 million out of the $13.7 million they took in during the previous year, or 29.4 percent.
Romney didnā€™t even deduct $1.8 million of donations that year so that he could live up to his statement that heā€™d always paid an effective tax rate of at least 13 percent. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...85bd448/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f47f35fb184e







Looking at the ten-year total of Bidenā€™s giving, one percent would have been $24,500. One half of one percent would have been $12,250. One quarter of one percent would have been $6,125. And one eighth of one percent would have been $3,062 ā€” just below what Biden actually contributed.

ā€œThe average American household gives about two percent of adjusted gross income,ā€ says Arthur Brooks, the Syracuse University scholar, soon to take over as head of the American Enterprise Institute, who has done extensive research on American giving. ā€œOn average, [Biden] is not giving more than one tenth as much as the average American household, and that is evidence that he doesnā€™t share charitable values with the average American.ā€

Byron York 9/15/08 NR



Although liberal familiesā€™ incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227). http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html



Obama and his wife, Michelle, earned $181,507 to $272,759 each year from 1998-2004.

Their income jumped to $1.6 million in 2005, Obama's first year in the Senate, with the rerelease of his first book, ā€œDreams from My Father.ā€ They made nearly $1 million in 2006, half of it from his second book, ā€œThe Audacity of Hope.ā€

The Obamas' charitable giving also increased with their newfound wealth.

From 1998-2004, they gave between $1,050-$3,400 each year. In 2005, they gave $77,315, including donations to literacy and anti-poverty campaigns and their church. In 2006, they gave $60,307 to charity.



Up until recent years when their income increased sharply from book revenues and a Senate salary, Obama's family donated a relatively minor amount of its earnings to charity. From 2000 through 2004, the senator and his wife never gave more than $3,500 a year in charitable donations -- about 1 percent of their annual earnings.(Sam Stein Huffington Post) Obama Tax Returns: Low On Story Lines And Charity Donations



According to their tax returns, in 2006 and 2007, the Obamas gave 5.8 percent and 6.1 percent of their income to charity. I guess Michelle Obama has to draw the line someplace with all this "giving back" stuff. The Bidens gave 0.15 percent and 0.31 percent of the income to charity.

No wonder Obama doesn't see what the big fuss is over his decision to limit tax deductions for charitable giving. At least that part of Obama's tax plan won't affect his supporters.

Meanwhile, in 1991, 1992 and 1993, George W. Bush had incomes of $179,591, $212,313 and $610,772. His charitable contributions those years were $28,236, $31,914 and $31,292. During his presidency, Bush gave away more than 10 percent of his income each year.

For purposes of comparison, in 2005, Barack Obama made $1.7 million -- more than twice President Bush's 2005 income of $735,180 -- but they both gave about the same amount to charity.

That same year, the heartless Halliburton employee Vice President Dick Cheney gave 77 percent of his income to charity. The following year, in 2006, Bush gave more to charity than Obama on an income one-third smaller than Obama's. Maybe when Obama talks about "change" he's referring to his charitable contributions.

Liberals have no intention of actually parting with any of their own wealth or lifting a finger to help the poor. That's for other people to do with what's left of their incomes after the government has taken its increasingly large cut.

" Ann Coulter Are ā€˜hopeā€™ And ā€˜changeā€™ Still Tax-deductible? - Ann Coulter



The convenient clichƩ propagated by many people is that those who truly care about the needy will be supportive of new or expanded government programs. Those who oppose this approach of throwing endlessly increasing sums of money at social programs are commonly labeled as heartless and lacking in compassion. That is not only a false label but it shows a lack of knowledge about American history as well as a lack of understanding about how the incentives created by many large government programs are fundamentally flawed.



Coerced "charity" via government taxation has several corrosive effects:


" It would now be technically possible to unify the world,
abolish war and poverty altogether ,if men desired their own
happiness more than the misery of their enemies. "
--
Lord Russell { Portraits From Memory } 1956
Putin BTW was born in ' 53.
 
It appears that Democrat 'principles' are what we call 'situational ethics.'


1. "Matthew Dowd plays the ā€˜dissent is treasonā€™ card over criticism of Joe Biden on Russia and Ukraine




2. Or......this????

View attachment 606339








The truth is, of course, one cannot question whatever the party says at any time........even if it reverses it's orthodoxy 180Ā°s.....




3. Of course Biden and the Democrats are directly responsible for Putin/Ukraine.
Days after his inauguration, Biden banned the Keystone Pipeline, and ended the energy independence that Trump gifted to Americanā€¦.

ā€¦..and at the same time removed any bar to enriching Putinā€¦..removed sanctions and OKā€™s Nord Stream 2

Had both policies not been put in place, weā€™d be able to keep control of the gas station masquerading as a nation, Russia.


Keystone has nothing to do with this. If Nord Stream 2 is so important then why did Trump wait until it was too late to stop it? Germany wanted it as well. It mattered little whether it could be stopped. The majority of the work was done when Trump was President.
 
AND

Back to the Clinton crap.

You do know, don't you my Tiny Minded fool, NO CLINTON HAS HELD ELECTED OFFICE for over a decade.

do try to get over your fantasies about Bill and, REALLY, drop the fixation on Hillary. It's unseemly. Maybe a dildo would help?
Bill Clinton:

Arkansas governor: 1979 - 1981 and 1983 - 1992

US president: 1993 - 2001

That's almost two decades, Math Midget.
 
So then Biden virtually running as a MODERATE pledging
UNITY isn''t the Biggest Liar in Presidential History.
Name a Potus who lied so cavalierly.
He did not lie. UNITY requires 2 to tango. Republicans went all out to undermine Biden at every step.
 
He didn't pledge unity, he wanted to work both sides of the aisle. The sheeple in The Congress are too scared of trump to vote for anything the Democrats put forth, no matter how it will benefit all of the people and the future of their posterity.
Biden used the Word " UNITY " numerous times as candidate.
It could have been part of a Biden Bumper sticker.
Stop yer Leftist infernal Lying.I realize how taxing it must be to stop
something like Lying when it's basically ingrained.
Made Acceptable by Democrats.
The Left Does Not VALUE ... Truth { Dennis Prager }.
 

Forum List

Back
Top