frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 46,961
- 10,258
- 2,030
Depends how you define "traitor" I guess.
Generally a traitor is someone who goes against your view of what things should be.
No it's not.
Well that's meaningful.
![eusa_clap :eusa_clap: :eusa_clap:](/styles/smilies/eusa_clap.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends how you define "traitor" I guess.
Generally a traitor is someone who goes against your view of what things should be.
No it's not.
Being a traitor is telling the Russians you'll be more flexible after the election......
Imagine if the scofflaw Cliver Bundy were a black man, the same paranoid wackos now defending him would want him lynched. It's so interesting that a welfare cowboy is defended for breaking the law and now the constitution is about free stuff for moochers. America you grow dumber by the day.
"That Sean Hannity and other far right wing pundits are supporting the regional militiamen and their mooching hero rather than the US government gives you an idea what side theyd be on if they were in Pakistan " 5 Ways Nevada Rancher Militia Resembles Pakistan's Taliban | Informed Comment
.
The closest thing we have to "traitors" are the hardcore partisan ideologues on both ends of the spectrum. They're more interested in "winning" by any means necessary than anything else. They'll lie and spin and deny and divert and distort to avoid the humility and cooperation on which the Constitution so depends. They're narcissists who'd much rather point the finger at the other guy than look in the mirror and clean their own house, regardless of the decay around them.
Traitors? No. Terribly destructive and don't care? Definitely.
Find another fucking hobby.
.
Depends how you define "traitor" I guess.
Generally a traitor is someone who goes against your view of what things should be.
No it's not.
Well that's meaningful.![]()
![]()
.
The closest thing we have to "traitors" are the hardcore partisan ideologues on both ends of the spectrum. They're more interested in "winning" by any means necessary than anything else. They'll lie and spin and deny and divert and distort to avoid the humility and cooperation on which the Constitution so depends. They're narcissists who'd much rather point the finger at the other guy than look in the mirror and clean their own house, regardless of the decay around them.
Traitors? No. Terribly destructive and don't care? Definitely.
Find another fucking hobby.
.
So, you are on the cool side where you do not lean one way or the other? Why don't I believe you?
Everyone has an opinion. If you don't, then what the fuck are you doing coming on a political debate board?
No, there are always assholes like you, who claim to be just...."above it all."
Keep on lying to yourself. Or just stay in the middle. Either way you have successfully convinced yourself of something that is as mythical as the utopia the potheads on the left try to sell.
Now, why don't you dream of the day you will be living in harmony under big beautiful tree with blue wings with the rest of tree hugging hippies.
Being a traitor is telling the Russians you'll be more flexible after the election......
Just that?
Imagine if the scofflaw Cliver Bundy were a black man, the same paranoid wackos now defending him would want him lynched. It's so interesting that a welfare cowboy is defended for breaking the law and now the constitution is about free stuff for moochers. America you grow dumber by the day.
"That Sean Hannity and other far right wing pundits are supporting the regional militiamen and their mooching hero rather than the US government gives you an idea what side theyd be on if they were in Pakistan " 5 Ways Nevada Rancher Militia Resembles Pakistan's Taliban | Informed Comment
Wow just wow. Comparing American Conservatives to the Taliban is right off the Richter scale.
.
The closest thing we have to "traitors" are the hardcore partisan ideologues on both ends of the spectrum. They're more interested in "winning" by any means necessary than anything else. They'll lie and spin and deny and divert and distort to avoid the humility and cooperation on which the Constitution so depends. They're narcissists who'd much rather point the finger at the other guy than look in the mirror and clean their own house, regardless of the decay around them.
Traitors? No. Terribly destructive and don't care? Definitely.
Find another fucking hobby.
.
So, you are on the cool side where you do not lean one way or the other? Why don't I believe you?
Everyone has an opinion. If you don't, then what the fuck are you doing coming on a political debate board?
No, there are always assholes like you, who claim to be just...."above it all."
Keep on lying to yourself. Or just stay in the middle. Either way you have successfully convinced yourself of something that is as mythical as the utopia the potheads on the left try to sell.
Now, why don't you dream of the day you will be living in harmony under big beautiful tree with blue wings with the rest of tree hugging hippies.
Oops, struck a nerve. And I'm glad you bring this up.
Another symptom of adherence to a partisan ideology is this kind of binary thought. Either/or, black or white.
I'm not in the middle, I'm just as passionate about any given issue as you. But my opinions don't happen to conveniently, predictably and transparently fall in line with one ideology or another. Nor do I have to play the games of spin, diversion, denial, distortion, hyperbole and outright lies practiced by partisan ideologues.
Further, partisan ideologues are in the minority, they're just louder and therefore more destructive. Put another way: There's a lot more of me than there are of you.
I can understand your anger.
.
Imagine if the scofflaw Cliver Bundy were a black man, the same paranoid wackos now defending him would want him lynched. It's so interesting that a welfare cowboy is defended for breaking the law and now the constitution is about free stuff for moochers. America you grow dumber by the day.
"That Sean Hannity and other far right wing pundits are supporting the regional militiamen and their mooching hero rather than the US government gives you an idea what side theyd be on if they were in Pakistan " 5 Ways Nevada Rancher Militia Resembles Pakistan's Taliban | Informed Comment
Wow just wow. Comparing American Conservatives to the Taliban is right off the Richter scale.
All we want to do is put chains on slaves and chop heads off for not growing their beards.
So, you are on the cool side where you do not lean one way or the other? Why don't I believe you?
Everyone has an opinion. If you don't, then what the fuck are you doing coming on a political debate board?
No, there are always assholes like you, who claim to be just...."above it all."
Keep on lying to yourself. Or just stay in the middle. Either way you have successfully convinced yourself of something that is as mythical as the utopia the potheads on the left try to sell.
Now, why don't you dream of the day you will be living in harmony under big beautiful tree with blue wings with the rest of tree hugging hippies.
Oops, struck a nerve. And I'm glad you bring this up.
Another symptom of adherence to a partisan ideology is this kind of binary thought. Either/or, black or white.
I'm not in the middle, I'm just as passionate about any given issue as you. But my opinions don't happen to conveniently, predictably and transparently fall in line with one ideology or another. Nor do I have to play the games of spin, diversion, denial, distortion, hyperbole and outright lies practiced by partisan ideologues.
Further, partisan ideologues are in the minority, they're just louder and therefore more destructive. Put another way: There's a lot more of me than there are of you.
I can understand your anger.
.
You are not in the middle. Please. Explain.
"Constitutional" Militia?
The Constitutional Militia is under the control of the United States Congress.
The "Militia" that went to Nevada and put women and children in front of them while they were training their sniper rifles and military assault weapons on duly appointed agents of the federal government were terrorists.
Bill Clinton, by Executive Order, transferred top secret missile guidance technology from the Energy Department to the Commerce Department so it could be sold to the Communist Chinese in return for hundreds of thousands in campaign contributions from the Chinese Government into the Clinton campaign.
We now have Communist Chinese nuclear warheads aimed at us as a result of that.
That is treason any way you spin it!
Oops, struck a nerve. And I'm glad you bring this up.
Another symptom of adherence to a partisan ideology is this kind of binary thought. Either/or, black or white.
I'm not in the middle, I'm just as passionate about any given issue as you. But my opinions don't happen to conveniently, predictably and transparently fall in line with one ideology or another. Nor do I have to play the games of spin, diversion, denial, distortion, hyperbole and outright lies practiced by partisan ideologues.
Further, partisan ideologues are in the minority, they're just louder and therefore more destructive. Put another way: There's a lot more of me than there are of you.
I can understand your anger.
.
You are not in the middle. Please. Explain.
I did explain. I can't make it much more clear.
But I'll try to put it another way: I'm off to one side, with most of America, watching the endless dishonest, childish and narcissistic rhetorical slap fights between the far left and the far right, seeing the damage it's causing, and observing the resulting damage.
That's about the best I can explain it for ya.
.
I'm not in the middle, I'm just as passionate about any given issue as you. But my opinions don't happen to conveniently, predictably and transparently fall in line with one ideology or another.
Bill Clinton, by Executive Order, transferred top secret missile guidance technology from the Energy Department to the Commerce Department so it could be sold to the Communist Chinese in return for hundreds of thousands in campaign contributions from the Chinese Government into the Clinton campaign.
We now have Communist Chinese nuclear warheads aimed at us as a result of that.
That is treason any way you spin it!
Bullshit.
Do you actually believe your own bullshit?